logo
Celularity Receives Nasdaq Notice Regarding Form 10-Q

Celularity Receives Nasdaq Notice Regarding Form 10-Q

Globe and Mail2 days ago

FLORHAM PARK, N.J., May 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Celularity Inc. (Nasdaq: CELU) ('Celularity' or the 'Company'), a cellular and regenerative medicine company, today announced that on May 28, 2025, Nasdaq notified the Company that it did not timely file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2025. Based on this latest notice, the Company is not in compliance with Listing Rule 5250 (c)(1), which requires the Company to timely file all required periodic financial reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Notice received from Nasdaq has no immediate effect on the listing or trading of the Company's shares. Nasdaq has provided the Company 60 calendar days to submit a plan to regain compliance. If Nasdaq accepts the Company's plan, then Nasdaq may grant the Company an exception until November 17, 2025, to regain compliance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules.
The Company continues to work diligently to complete its Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2025, after which the Company anticipates maintaining compliance with its SEC reporting obligations.
About Celularity
Celularity Inc. (Nasdaq: CELU) is a regenerative and cellular medicine company developing and commercializing advanced biomaterial products and allogeneic, cryopreserved, placental-derived cell therapies, all derived from the postpartum placenta. Celularity believes that by harnessing the placenta's unique biology and ready availability, it can develop therapeutic solutions that address significant unmet global needs for effective, accessible, and affordable therapies. For more information, visit www.celularity.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release includes 'forward-looking statements' (as defined under Federal securities laws). These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding: (i) our future sales or sales growth; (ii) our expectations for future financial results, including levels of net sales; (iii) our expectations regarding new products including our 510K products; and (iv) future demand for our products. All statements other than statements of historical facts are 'forward-looking statements,' including those relating to future events. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as 'anticipate,' 'believe,' 'can,' 'could,' 'continue,' 'expect,' 'improving,' 'may,' 'observed,' 'potential,' 'promise,' 'should,' and similar expressions (as well as other words or expressions referencing future events, conditions or circumstances). Forward-looking statements are based on Celularity's current expectations and assumptions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks,' and changes in circumstances that may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements, which are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. Many factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements, including those risk factors set forth under the caption 'Risk Factors' in Celularity's annual report on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on May 8, 2025 and May 21, 2025, respectively, and other filings with the SEC. If any of these risks materialize or underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results could differ materially from the results implied by these forward-looking statements. There may be additional risks that Celularity does not presently know, or that Celularity currently believes are immaterial, that could also cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements. In addition, these forward-looking statements reflect Celularity's current expectations, plans, or forecasts of future events and views as of the date of this communication. Subsequent events and developments could cause assessments to change. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing Celularity's views as of any subsequent date, and Celularity undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements contained herein, whether because of any new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Best Technology ETF to Invest $2,000 in Right Now
The Best Technology ETF to Invest $2,000 in Right Now

Globe and Mail

time20 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

The Best Technology ETF to Invest $2,000 in Right Now

Succeeding in the stock market doesn't require one to pick the best individual businesses for their portfolio. Thousands of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) exist that can help automate the investing process, providing exposure to various themes or industries that you might be bullish on. Perhaps no trend has had a greater impact on the economy and markets in the past couple of decades than technology. More recently, this is showing up in the ongoing artificial intelligence (AI) boom. Luckily, investors don't have to look far to bet on this tailwind. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Here's the best tech ETF to buy with $2,000 right now. Betting on technology looks like a lucrative move It seems that technology, the internet, and AI will only become more important. From an investment perspective, it makes sense to want more of your capital in the right place. That's why the Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) is the top technology ETF to invest $2,000 in. It tracks the performance of the largest 100 non-financial companies that trade on the Nasdaq stock exchange. As of this writing, this fund had $324 billion in assets under management, demonstrating its impressive scale. This ETF might have 100 different stocks in it, but the top 10 account for a whopping 49.8% of the total. Unsurprisingly, the " Magnificent Seven" are very important. Investors considering owning the Invesco QQQ Trust must be bullish on various tech-driven trends. Companies in the ETF are benefiting from e-commerce, digital advertising, digital payments, streaming entertainment, electric vehicles, cloud computing, and of course, AI. Stellar performance at a low cost The beauty of owning this ETF is that there is no need to try to pick single stocks that could be the big winners of tomorrow. The Invesco QQQ Trust ensures you'll have exposure to the tech companies that become successful in their respective market niches. Viewed this way, it's a low-maintenance strategy to allocate capital. In the past decade, the Invesco QQQ Trust has generated a total return of 404% (as of May 27). This means a $2,000 investment made in May 2015 would be worth $10,000 today, trouncing the performance of the broader S&P 500 index. Understanding the cost structure is critical. The last thing investors want to do is buy an ETF that charges an arm and a leg for subpar returns. This isn't the case here. Out of a $2,000 investment, just $4 goes to paying the 0.2% expense ratio on an annual basis. You get to keep more of your money. What will the future hold? Investors have heard the saying that past results won't guarantee future returns. This is the right way to think about the Invesco QQQ Trust over the next decade and beyond. While outsize returns are possible, it's best to keep expectations in check. The optimistic view is that technology businesses generally have done well over the long term, due to their disruptive products and services and cultures of innovation. And there's no reason to think this will change. That bodes well for return prospects. But it also pays to have the right mindset. Don't forget that volatility is the name of the game, especially with some of the companies that are included in the Invesco QQQ Trust. Investor sentiment can shift on a dime. That's why it's a good idea to think about the next 10 years and beyond with this investment. Those who are patient may be rewarded. Should you invest $1,000 in Invesco QQQ Trust right now? Before you buy stock in Invesco QQQ Trust, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Invesco QQQ Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025

Is Lucid Group Stock Your Ticket to Becoming a Millionaire?
Is Lucid Group Stock Your Ticket to Becoming a Millionaire?

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Is Lucid Group Stock Your Ticket to Becoming a Millionaire?

Want to become a millionaire? Find the next Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA). Since 2010, Tesla shares have risen in value by nearly 28,000%. An original investment of just $36 would have turned into $1 million over that time period. Few investments in history have been able to provide this much gains over such a short period. Understandably, many investors are wondering what the next big electric car stock will be. From many perspectives, Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) has all the right things going for it to become the next Tesla. But before you jump in, there are a few factors you'll want to understand. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Lucid is following Tesla's growth plan Starting an electric car company from scratch is incredibly difficult. It takes billions of dollars plus sometimes a decade or more to bring a vehicle to market. There's no guarantee that investors are willing to remain that patient for that long. There's also no guarantee that customers will even like the vehicles once they hit the market. Fortunately, Tesla has already proven to the market how an electric vehicle (EV) maker should scale. Tesla first started with high-priced luxury vehicles like the Roadster, Model X, and Model S. These models targeted customers with big spending budgets, allowing the company to produce vehicles with truly impressive performance metrics. This created a reputation for quality even at low volumes. From there, Tesla was able to leverage that reputation and investor trust into lower-priced vehicles that were affordable by the masses. Today, more than 90% of Tesla's vehicles sales come from its budget Model 3 and Model Y models -- a big reason why the company is now worth more than $1 trillion. This is the formula: Create impressive luxury vehicles to establish reputation and scale, and then move into the mass market to produce affordable models for millions of new buyers. So far, Lucid has been following Tesla's paved path for growth, though it still is in the early innings of growth. Right now, the company sells just two luxury models: the Lucid Air and the all new Gravity SUV platform. These vehicles are roughly similar to Tesla's Model S and Model X vehicles. Growth is picking up considerably thanks to the recent introduction of the Gravity SUV. Analysts predict 73% sales growth this year, with another 96% sales growth in 2026. But the real growth will occur when Lucid releases its mass market vehicles. While information has been relatively scarce, the company recently reaffirmed its expectation to launch the first of many midsize, lower-priced models beginning in 2026. Even if it takes until 2027 to start scaling production in a meaningful way, this event would absolutely transform the company's prospects, enabling Lucid to grow sales by heavy double digits for many years to come. Don't forget what it was like for Tesla investors Lucid's long-term growth prospects are exciting. But don't expect shares to go in a straight line higher. Just take a look at Tesla's historical journey. From 2014 to 2019, Tesla's sales grew from $3 billion to more than $20 billion. Yet the share price largely traded sideways, leaving investors with minimal gains. However, if you had held on for another five years, you would have experienced truly seismic gains. Tesla's history proves that high-growth stocks require extreme patience, even during periods of heavy growth. Now trading at 8 times sales, Lucid's valuation will surely gyrate wildly in the coming years. If you believe in its growth journey, this upfront premium will be worth the price of admission. But in any given year, it's hard to know how the market will value that growth. With a market capitalization of just $8 billion, there's clearly huge growth potential for the company, especially compared to Tesla's $1 trillion valuation. There's enough to turn a small investment into millions of dollars. But the road forward will be bumpy, suitable for risk-tolerant, long-term investors only. Should you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group right now? Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025

Can Trump fix the U.S. national debt? Republican senators, many investors and even Elon Musk have doubts
Can Trump fix the U.S. national debt? Republican senators, many investors and even Elon Musk have doubts

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Can Trump fix the U.S. national debt? Republican senators, many investors and even Elon Musk have doubts

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a swearing in ceremony for interim U.S. Attorney General for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro, Wednesday, May 28, 2025, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump faces the challenge of convincing Republican senators, global investors, voters and even Elon Musk that he won't bury the federal government in debt with his multitrillion-dollar tax breaks package. The response so far from financial markets has been skeptical as Trump seems unable to trim deficits as promised. 'All of this rhetoric about cutting trillions of dollars of spending has come to nothing — and the tax bill codifies that,' said Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a right-leaning think tank. 'There is a level of concern about the competence of Congress and this administration and that makes adding a whole bunch of money to the deficit riskier.' The White House has viciously lashed out at anyone who has voiced concern about the debt snowballing under Trump, even though it did exactly that in his first term after his 2017 tax cuts. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt opened her briefing Thursday by saying she wanted 'to debunk some false claims' about his tax cuts. Leavitt said that the 'blatantly wrong claim that the 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill' increases the deficit is based on the Congressional Budget Office and other scorekeepers who use shoddy assumptions and have historically been terrible at forecasting across Democrat and Republican administrations alike.' But Trump himself has suggested that the lack of sufficient spending cuts to offset his tax reductions came out of the need to hold the Republican congressional coalition together. 'We have to get a lot of votes,' Trump said last week. 'We can't be cutting.' That has left the administration betting on the hope that economic growth can do the trick, a belief that few outside of Trump's orbit think is viable. Tech billionaire Musk, who was until recently part of Trump's inner sanctum as the leader of the Department of Government Efficiency, told CBS News: 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.' Federal debt keeps rising The tax and spending cuts that passed the House last month would add more than US$5 trillion to the national debt in the coming decade if all of them are allowed to continue, according to the Committee for a Responsible Financial Budget, a fiscal watchdog group. To make the bill's price tag appear lower, various parts of the legislation are set to expire. This same tactic was used with Trump's 2017 tax cuts and it set up this year's dilemma, in which many of the tax cuts in that earlier package will sunset next year unless Congress renews them. But the debt is a much bigger problem now than it was eight years ago. Investors are demanding the government pay a higher premium to keep borrowing as the total debt has crossed $36.1 trillion. The interest rate on a 10-year Treasury Note is around 4.5 per cent, up dramatically from the roughly 2.5 per cent rate being charged when the 2017 tax cuts became law. The White House Council of Economic Advisers argues that its policies will unleash so much rapid growth that the annual budget deficits will shrink in size relative to the overall economy, putting the U.S. government on a fiscally sustainable path. The council argues the economy would expand over the next four years at an annual average of about 3.2 per cent, instead of the Congressional Budget Office's expected 1.9 per cent, and as many as 7.4 million jobs would be created or saved. Most economists consider the non-partisan CBO to be the foundational standard for assessing policies, though it does not produce cost estimates for actions taken by the executive branch such as Trump's unilateral tariffs. Council chair Stephen Miran told reporters that when the growth being forecast by the White House is coupled with expected revenues from tariffs, the expected budget deficits will fall. The tax cuts will increase the supply of money for investment, the supply of workers and the supply of domestically produced goods — all of which, by Miran's logic, would cause faster growth without creating new inflationary pressures. 'I do want to assure everyone that the deficit is a very significant concern for this administration,' Miran told reporters recently. White House budget director Russell Vought told reporters the idea that the bill is 'in any way harmful to debt and deficits is fundamentally untrue.' Economists doubt Trump's plan can spark enough growth to reduce deficits Most outside economists expect additional debt would keep interest rates higher and slow overall economic growth as the cost of borrowing for homes, cars, businesses and even college educations would increase. 'This just adds to the problem future policymakers are going to face,' said Brendan Duke, a former Biden administration aide now at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank. Duke said that with the tax cuts in the bill set to expire in 2028, lawmakers would be 'dealing with Social Security, Medicare and expiring tax cuts at the same time.' Kent Smetters, faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model, said the growth projections from Trump's economic team are 'a work of fiction.' He said the bill would lead some workers to choose to work fewer hours in order to qualify for Medicaid. 'I don't know of any serious forecaster that has meaningfully raised their growth forecast because of this legislation,' said Harvard University professor Jason Furman, who was the Council of Economic Advisers chair under the Obama administration. 'These are mostly not growth- and competitiveness-oriented tax cuts. And, in fact, the higher long-term interest rates will go the other way and hurt growth.' The White House's inability so far to calm deficit concerns is stirring up political blowback for Trump as the tax and spending cuts approved by the House now move to the Senate. Republican Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky have both expressed concerns about the likely deficit increases, with Johnson saying there are enough senators to stall the bill until deficits are addressed. 'I think we have enough to stop the process until the president gets serious about the spending reduction and reducing the deficit,' Johnson said on CNN. Trump banking on tariff revenues to help The White House is also banking that tariff revenues will help cover the additional deficits, even though recent court rulings cast doubt on the legitimacy of Trump declaring an economic emergency to impose sweeping taxes on imports. When Trump announced his near-universal tariffs in April, he specifically said his policies would generate enough new revenues to start paying down the national debt. His comments dovetailed with remarks by aides, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, that yearly budget deficits could be more than halved. 'It's our turn to prosper and in so doing, use trillions and trillions of dollars to reduce our taxes and pay down our national debt, and it'll all happen very quickly,' Trump said two months ago as he talked up his import taxes and encouraged lawmakers to pass the separate tax and spending cuts. The Trump administration is correct that growth can help reduce deficit pressures, but it's not enough on its own to accomplish the task, according to new research by economists Douglas Elmendorf, Glenn Hubbard and Zachary Liscow. Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale University, said additional 'growth doesn't even get us close to where we need to be.' The government would need $10 trillion of deficit reduction over the next 10 years just to stabilize the debt, Tedeschi said. And even though the White House says the tax cuts would add to growth, most of the cost goes to preserve existing tax breaks, so that's unlikely to boost the economy meaningfully. 'It's treading water,' Tedeschi said. Josh Boak, The Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store