US approves potential $346 million weapons sale to Nigeria to bolster security
Congress was notified and would need to approve the sale, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a statement. The agency is a division of the Department of Defense body that provides technical assistance and oversees transfers of defense equipment.
The weapons requested by Nigeria include munitions, bombs and rockets.
A resurgence of attacks by Boko Haram, Nigeria's homegrown jihadist group, has shaken Nigeria's northeast. The group took up arms in 2009 to fight Western education and impose its radical version of Islamic law. In recent months, Islamic extremists have repeatedly overrun military outposts, mined roads with bombs and raided civilian communities, raising fears of a possible return to the peak insecurity of the Boko Haram era despite the military's claims of success against them.
The conflict, which has spread into Nigeria's northern neighbors, has claimed about 35,000 civilian lives and displaced more than 2 million people in the country's northeastern region, according to the U.N.
Apart from the insurgency in the northeast, Africa's most populous country also faces serious security challenges in the north-central and northwest regions, where hundreds have been killed and injured in recent months.
'The proposed sale will improve Nigeria's capability to meet current and future threats through operations against terrorist organizations and to counter illicit trafficking in Nigeria and the Gulf of Guinea,' the Pentagon said Wednesday. 'There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.'
In the past 10 years, Nigeria has bought military equipment from the U.S. on several occasions. Most recently, the U.S. approved a $997-million weapons sale in 2022.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
‘What the f--- was that?' My nine hours at Trump's bewildering summit
After travelling 2,000 miles, enduring a three-hour security screening and arguing over seating arrangements with the Russian media, expectations were high for the meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. The early signs were positive – a warm handshake, a ride along in 'The Beast' and the claim by Russia that talks could last 'six or seven hours'. But that feeling came to a screeching halt inside the press tent at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, when a press conference was called just three hours in – and it emerged that the wider bilateral talks had been scrapped. The two leaders appeared on stage for just 12 minutes. There was no ceasefire and they did not take a single question. 'What the f--- was that?' one American journalist exclaimed. 'Is that all?' Indeed, it was. The first surprise of Mr Trump and Putin's post-summit press conference was that the Russian leader was the first to speak. After the two men had taken their place behind their respective podiums, almost the entire room had their eyes fixed on Mr Trump, assuming that the US host would lead the conversation. So when Putin first opened his mouth, you could almost hear the sounds of heads whipping towards the Russian leader. Mr Trump eventually followed suit, and for the first time in his second term, spoke very briefly. Twelve minutes later, it was all over. The press pack, who had flown more than 2,000 miles to the most remote state capital in America in the hopes of witnessing history, were left shouting into the abyss. Colleagues looked around in bewilderment. Almost immediately, chatter between journalists turned from astonishment to frustration, as we realised that the pair had spoken for a twentieth of the painstaking time that it took for us to each be individually screened by the Secret Service that morning. In the few days before the highly-anticipated summit, we had scrambled to secure hire cars and accommodation in Anchorage, which turned out to be as scarce as details of what the two leaders agreed in their talks. Space in Anchorage was precious. With a handful of hotels already bursting with anglers capitalising on the peak salmon season, there was no room at the inn. Some of the Russian delegation were relegated to dorms normally reserved for university students. We also faced accommodation woes. But my colleague, Dom Nicholls, managed to secure us a 26-foot-long Winnebago, affectionately nicknamed the 'Tel Force One', which became an office, recording studio and our sleeping quarters. Some were not so lucky. Angry members of the Russian press pack shared pictures of military camp cots erected on bare hardwood gym floors, prompting taunts about the state of American hospitality. Frustrations were compounded when, upon arriving at the media tents, our Russian counterparts found that their mobile data roaming did not work. In the end, they were able to connect to the special WiFi generously provided by the US Air Force. Security delays prompted outcry from some American journalists who were concerned that Russian reporters would get better seats at the briefing. 'Can we make sure Americans are seated before the Russians?' one disgruntled journalist asked. 'This is America, after all,' another added. The two media camps were being kept apart on separate buses. In the press tent, it was a similar scene. With Russian media lodged on one side, cables hidden under blue and yellow rubber covers acted as a de facto border. A smoking area beside a handful of portable toilets appeared to be exclusively used by chain-smoking Russians. But even they appeared bewildered by the underwhelming press conference, immediately scampering from the press tent via the snack bar to their awaiting bus once it had concluded. After Mr Trump left the venue and the roar of Air Force One receded, we were left wondering how the most consequential diplomatic summit in recent memory could produce so little. Ukraine was shut out of the talks, with no invite for Volodymyr Zelensky, much to the chagrin of his European allies. Given what a non-event the whole thing turned out to be, they may be relieved that they were not required to make the journey.
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Takeaways: Donald Trump fails to reach peace deal with Vladimir Putin
A much-hyped summit between Trump and Putin that saw the U.S. president flex his deal-making skills achieved no major breakthrough in peace negotiations over Russia's war against Ukraine. The talks culminated in a vague statement to the media in which Putin spoke of an "agreement." Trump was then left in the awkward position of declaring "no deal" had been reached. A planned press conference? Called off. The two leaders spoke briefly and answered no questions. "There were many, many points that we agree on," Trump said without elaborating. "A couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there," he added. "So there's no deal until there's a deal." More: 'No deal': Live updates from Trump-Putin Alaska summit Trump said he'd be calling Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and NATO allies on his way home to debrief them on the conversation with his Russian counterpart, who had been isolated by western leaders after invading Ukraine in 2022. As the American president, who'd warned of "severe consequences" if a ceasefire wasn't reached, waved goodbye to press while boarding Air Force One for Washington, Putin taxied down the runway in the distance. Putin invokes 'root causes' of war, jabs Trump foe Biden For a television president who regularly fields questions from reporters, Trump's quick exit after the meeting was abnormal. The two men spoke for a combined 12 minutes - with Putin going first. He praised Trump for convening the meeting, saying relations between the two countries had fallen to their lowest point since the Cold War. But he soon brought up old charges about the "root causes" of the conflict that he's long blamed on NATO enlargement and Ukraine's alignment with the West. And while Putin notably said "the security of Ukraine should be secured" and Russia was "prepared to work on that" he did not say what he had in mind. "I would like to hope that the agreement that we've reached together will help us bring closer that goal and will pave the path towards peace in Ukraine," Putin added, without saying what it entailed. He then warned Ukrainian and European leaders not to "throw a wrench in the works" with "backroom dealings to conduct provocations to torpedo the nascent progress." "I just don't think we heard anything that signaled any sort of shift in Russia's maximal position," David Salvo, a former State Department official who served in Russia. He cast Putin's comments as "grandstanding" and said of security guarantees for Ukraine, "I don't think he's ready to soften his position quite yet." Putin also jabbed at former President Joe Biden and said he agreed with Trump's assertions that the war never would have happened if the Republican had won in 2020. Trump said Putin's comments were "very profound." He described the meeting as "extremely productive" and said the two sides agreed on "many points" without divulging the details. "We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there," Trump said. Trump leaves without a ceasefire agreement Hanging over the summit was a potential ceasefire, which Zelenskyy and European leaders thought could emerge from the talks. But expectations fell quickly as Trump talked up potential "land swaps" that have been rejected by Zelenskyy. Trump sought to lower expectations ahead of the summit and cast the conversation as talks about future talks. Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska told CNN while the summit was happening, "I think the best that we could hope for is that there is a commitment coming out of Putin to a ceasefire with enough contours to it that it is believable that it will be more than just a brief moment to check a box here." The summit ended without any mention of a ceasefire by Putin or Trump, who repeated in an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity after the summit that he believed an agreement was in sight. Trump added: "Now it's up to President Zelenskyy to get it done." He indicated that a prisoner swap between Russia and Ukraine was part of the discussion. Putin teases possible business deals with Trump First, there were joint hockey games. Then, there were films promoting "traditional values." And at their Alaska summit Putin made another enticement: potential economic investments. "It is clear that the U.S. and Russian investment and business cooperation has tremendous potential," Putin said. "Russia and the U.S. can offer each other so much in trade, digital, high tech and in space exploration. We see that arctic cooperation is also very possible." Accompanying Putin at the summit was Kirill Dmitriev, the special envoy for investment and economic cooperation. The Putin adviser met with Witkoff in Washington in April. "He's bringing a lot of business people from Russia. And that's good, I like that, because they want to do business," Trump told reporters on Air Force One on his way to Alaska. "But they're not doing business until we get the war settled." Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick came with Trump. Trump later referred to "tremendous Russian business representatives" at the summit and said "everybody wants to deal with us." In his Hannity interview, Trump indicated that Putin also tried to flatter him by saying the 2020 election he lost to Biden was "rigged" and fanned baseless claims that the outcome was the result of widespread voter fraud. Trump rolls out the red carpet for Putin Putin received a warm reception in Alaska after years of being left out in the cold by western leaders. The summit began with Trump giving Putin an outreached hand, as the Russian leader walked down an intersecting red carpet on the tarmac to greet him. Trump clapped his hands in applause as Putin approached. They shook hands, patted each others' arms and walked together, posing for pictures on a platform with a sign reading "Alaska 2025." In the background: Military planes and personnel and green cloud-covered mountains. A reporter shouted "President Putin, will you stop killing civilians?" while Putin stood next to Trump on the platform. He gestured but didn't say anything. Trump and Putin rode together, without aides, to the summit in Trump's limousine. Gone was the frustration that Trump had expressed throughout the summer over Putin's reluctance to agree on a peace deal. "I've always had a fantastic relationship with President Putin, with Vladimir," Trump said of his Russian counterpart as they shared a stage together in Alaska. Now what? Severe consequences? Secondary Tariffs? Another meeting? The lack of progress at the Trump-Putin summit raised questions about what comes next. Trump said he planned to speak with Zelenskyy and NATO leaders to brief them. He again talked about moderating a three-way meeting with Putin and Zelenskyy. And although he'd warned before the meeting that if Putin wasn't cooperative he would face "severe consequences" and threatened tariff hikes on Russia's top trading partners, for now, he said he was letting China off the hook. "Because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that," Trump told Hannity. "Now I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now, I think the meeting went very well." Trump's next moves will be closely watched to see if he maintains the friendly posture toward Putin that he took at the summit or takes a firmer approach. "By framing it as a positive meeting, in his own mind, it takes the pressure off of himself to make Russia pay a price for continuing the war," former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine John Herbst said. "At least for right now." Trump told reporters before the meeting that he was "not looking to waste a lot of time and a lot of energy and a lot of money" negotiations and wanted to see the war quickly wrapped up. "The wildcard now is whether Trump's actually going to get tough on Russia, or whether it's going to be in sort of endless talks and letting Russia stall for time," said Salvo, managing director for the Alliance for Securing Democracy at the German Marshall Fund.
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Putin floats new nuke deal ahead of Trump summit in Alaska
But in recent weeks, Putin and Trump have both discussed the possibility of a successor deal. Nuclear threats have emanated from Moscow since 2022 when Russia started its war against Ukraine, which is the main topic of the summit. More: Live updates: Russia predicts marathon Trump-Putin Alaska summit Putin suggested the summit could create "the long-term conditions of peace between our countries ... and in the world as a whole, if we reach agreements in the field of strategic (nuclear) offensive arms control," while speaking to senior Kremlin military and civilian officials at an Aug. 14 meeting. Trump told reporters July 25 that New START's looming expiration is "a problem for the world," and expressed a desire to maintain the treaty's deployment limits. The president, who has long sought to reduce the risks of nuclear weapons, tried and failed to launch three-way nuke talks with China and Russia during his first term. A golden 'opportunity' A top arms control negotiations expert told USA TODAY the summit represents a major "opportunity" to rein in a potential arms race before it begins. Paul Dean, a former acting assistant secretary of State who oversaw arms control and led the U.S. delegation to the New START implementation body, emphasized that the treaty's enforcement measures also keep the world a safer place. Dean now leads the non-partisan Nuclear Threat Initiative's Global Nuclear Policy Program. More: 'Heed our warnings': Nobel laureates plea for diplomacy to prevent nuclear war The treaty mandates on-site inspections, data exchanges, and other measures intended to allow each side to maintain an accurate picture of the other's nuclear forces, he explained. "Without (a high) confidence level in the day-to-day picture of what the other side's nuclear forces are, what you really get is the potential for misinterpretation and miscalculation," Dean said. "And when it comes to nuclear weapons, a misinterpretation or a miscalculation can be catastrophic." The U.S. and Russia (and the Soviet Union before it) have maintained a series of such nuclear arms control and verification agreements dating back to the 1972 Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty. "Most people alive right now have never lived in a time during which there were no guardrails on the U.S.-Russia or U.S.-Soviet nuclear deterrence relationship," noted Dean. He argued that "people have forgotten what the risks are," including a potentially costly arms race. The "world that we're living in is more complicated and more dangerous than it's been in quite some time," he said. More: Despite DOGE, Pentagon escapes Donald Trump's budget cuts unscathed The presidents could agree in Anchorage to start the negotiating process for a successor deal to New START, but Dean cautioned that "these are long negotiations and unlikely to be resolved in a matter of weeks or even months." But there is potential for some immediate progress to emerge from the summit, Dean said. "Both sides could take a step back from nuclear threats and raising the nuclear temperature. Both sides could recommit themselves to implementing the New START treaty," he said, and the two sides could agree to respect the deployment limits as negotiations unfold. Contributing: Reuters Davis Winkie's role covering nuclear threats and national security at USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Outrider Foundation and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.
