logo
Trump is not like other presidents – but can he beat the ‘second term curse' that haunts the White House?

Trump is not like other presidents – but can he beat the ‘second term curse' that haunts the White House?

RNZ News17 hours ago
By Garritt C Van Dyk* of
Donald Trump doesn't quite fit the mould of former presidents, Garritt C Van Dyk writes.
Photo:
AFP / BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI
Analysis
: While he likes to provoke opponents with the possibility of serving a third term, Donald Trump faces a more immediate historical burden that has plagued so many presidents: the "second term curse".
Twenty-one US presidents have served second terms, but none has reached the same level of success they achieved in their first.
Second term performances have ranged from the lacklustre and uninspiring to the disastrous and deadly. Voter dissatisfaction and frustration, presidential fatigue and a lack of sustainable vision for the future are all explanations.
But Trump doesn't quite fit the mould. Only one other president, Grover Cleveland in the late 19th century, has served a second nonconsecutive term, making Trump 2.0 difficult to measure against other second-term leaders.
Trump will certainly be hoping history doesn't repeat Cleveland's second-term curse. Shortly after taking office he imposed 50 percent tariffs, triggering global market volatility that culminated in the "Panic of 1893".
At the time, this was the worst depression in US history: 19 percent unemployment, a run on gold from the US Treasury, a stock market crash and widespread poverty.
More than a century on, Trump's "move fast and break things" approach in a nonconsecutive second term might appeal to voters demanding action above all else. But he risks being drawn into areas he campaigned against.
So far, he has gone from fighting a trade war and a culture war to contemplating a shooting war in the Middle East. His "big beautiful bill"
will add trillions to the national debt
and potentially force poorer voters - including many Republicans - off Medicaid.
Whether his radical approach will defy or conform to the second term curse seems very much an open question.
Photo:
AFP
The two-term limit was enacted by the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution in 1951. Without a maximum term, it was feared, an authoritarian could try to take control for life - like a king (hence the recent "No Kings" protests in the US).
George Washington, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson all declined to serve a third term. Jefferson was suspicious of any president who would try to be re-elected a third time, writing: "Should a President consent to be a candidate for a 3d. [sic] election, I trust he would be rejected on this demonstration of ambitious views."
Demonstrators participate in the nationwide 'Defend Democracy' 50501 National Day of Protest to protest against Project 2025 and the policies of President Donald Trump, in Cincinnati, Ohio, on 4 March, 2025.
Photo:
AFP/ NurPhoto - Jason Whitman
There is a myth that after Franklin Delano Roosevelt broke the de facto limit of two terms set by the early presidents, the ghost of George Washington placed a curse on anyone serving more than four years.
At best, second-term presidencies have been tepid compared to the achievements in the previous four years. After World War II, some two-term presidents (Eisenhower, Reagan and Obama) started out strong but faltered after re-election.
Eisenhower extricated the US from the Korean War in his first term, but faced domestic backlash and race riots in his second. He had to send 500 paratroopers to escort nine Black high school students in Little Rock, Arkansas, to enforce a federal desegregation order.
Reagan made significant tax and spending cuts, and saw the Soviet Union crumble in term one. But the Iran-Contra scandal and watered down tax reform defined term two.
Obama started strongly, introducing health care reform and uniting the Democratic voter base. After re-election, however, the Democrats lost the House, the Senate, a Supreme Court nomination, and faced scandals over the Snowden security leaks and Internal Revenue Service targeting of conservative groups.
Truly disastrous examples of second term presidencies include Abraham Lincoln (assassination), Woodrow Wilson (World War I, failure of the League of Nations, a stroke), Richard Nixon (Watergate, impeachment and resignation), and Bill Clinton (Lewinsky scandal and impeachment).
Former US president Bill Clinton pictured in 2019.
Photo:
AFP or licensors
It may be too early to predict how Trump will feature in this pantheon of less-than-greatness. But his approval ratings recently hit an all-time low as Americans reacted to
the bombing of Iran
and
deployment of troops in Los Angeles
.
A recent YouGov poll showed voters giving negative approval ratings for his handling of inflation, jobs, immigration, national security and foreign policy. While there has been plenty of action, it may be the levels of uncertainty, drastic change and market volatility are more extreme than some bargained for.
An uncooperative Congress or opposition from the judiciary can be obstacles to successful second terms. But Trump has used executive orders, on the grounds of confronting "national emergencies", to bypass normal checks and balances.
As well,
favourable rulings by the Supreme Court
have edged closer to expanding the boundaries of executive power. But they have not yet supported Trump's claim from his first term that "I have an Article 2, where I have the right to do whatever I want as President".
Some supporters say Trump deserves a Nobel Peace Prize. And he was only half joking when he asked if there is room for one more face on Mount Rushmore. But such monumental honours may only amount to speculation unless Trump's radical approach and redefinition of executive power defy the second-term curse.
*
Garritt C Van Dyk is a Senior Lecturer in History, University of Waikato.
This article was first published by
The Conversation
.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NZ-designed Apples Miss Trick By Omitting FernMark Branding In Canada
NZ-designed Apples Miss Trick By Omitting FernMark Branding In Canada

Scoop

time10 hours ago

  • Scoop

NZ-designed Apples Miss Trick By Omitting FernMark Branding In Canada

New Zealand's premium apples have been caught up in a Canadian consumer backlash of United States products. Canadian consumers have actively boycotted US products, since President Donald Trump launched his trade war, along with ongoing calls to make Canada the 51st state of America. T&G Global's premium Envy and Jazz apples exported to Canada were packaged in 2.27 kg (5lb) bags, with prominent 'product of USA' labelling, and were not immune to the consumer backlash. T&G chief operating officer for the apples business Shane Kingston said the brands were grown in more than 11 countries, across both hemispheres. "This also diversifies our geographical spread, and ensures varieties are grown in the right regions and close to markets," he said, adding that sales met expectations. "Currently, around 31 percent of T&G's apple supply is sourced from Aotearoa New Zealand, 37 percent from the Americas, 23 percent from Europe and the United Kingdom, and 9 percent from other markets." Still NZ apples While Envy and Jazz apples sold in Canada were imported from southern hemisphere locations and Washington State, they were designed in New Zealand and were eligible to carry the New Zealand Inc trademark. FernMark brand manager David Downs said the lack of New Zealand branding was a missed opportunity, given that it could be applied to any product designed, grown or made in New Zealand. "That intellectual property was developed here and there is definitely a connection to New Zealand that should be highlighted," said Downs, who was also the chief executive of NZ Story, which - a government agency tasked with helping market New Zealand to the world. "It's actually a great example of New Zealand innovation." Demand for FernMark grows "It's interesting, isn't it, that consumer sentiment can shift pretty quickly," Downs said, referring to the trade dispute in North America. "Someone in Canada suddenly being suspicious of not wanting to buy products from the United States or from another country, because of their perceived activities." He said the FernMark had been independently valued at more than US$290 billlion (NZ$478b), although the licence to use it cost relatively little for qualifying companies. "What the FernMark does is basically visibly allow you to connect your brand with the brand of New Zealand, and that visible connection and association allows you to get that value from the hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of brand value that we have as a country." He said the number of companies using New Zealand's FernMark to promote their products had more than doubled over the past couple of years and featured on products in more than 40 countries. More than 600 companies used the FernMark on some two billion products, with food products one of the biggest users. "Some of those companies are very, very big, with tens of thousands of SKU's [stock items]." Recent research indicated 46 percent of international consumers recognised the FernMark, and 44 percent said they were more likely or a lot more likely to buy a product because it. "More and more in this disrupted world, reputation is what matters," Downs said. "For us, for a relatively small economy like New Zealand, it's important we protect our reputation. "That's not the job of just politicians. It's also the job of exporters and all of us."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store