Lao, Dupla plead not guilty on graft raps over P4.4-B PPEs, masks purchase
Lao and Dupla entered their not guilty pleas in person before the Sandiganbayan Fifth Division.
Before entering his not guilty plea, Lao informed the anti-graft court that he was waiving his right for the reading of the allegations in the graft charge.
Lao's position was adopted by Dupla.
Lao and Dupla both used to be part of the DBM's Procurement Services unit which purchased alleged overpriced personal protective equipment and surgical masks worth P4.4 billion from Pharmally Pharmaceutical Corporation.
Lao served as the DBM's Undersecretary while Dupla was PS-DBM Administrative Finance Group officer-in-charge director.
Other DBM officials during the time of the P4.4 billion purchase who are also accused in the case include: Warren Liong, Allan Catalan, Dickson Tindugan Panti and Gerelyn Vergara.
Pharmally officials also charged with graft include:
Mohit Chainani Dargani
Linconn Uy Ong
Twinkle Dargani
Huang Tzu Yen
Justine Garado
Krizle Mago
Lin Weixiong
The rest of the respondents in the case have yet to enter their pleas due to pending motions to quash the graft charge, except for Pharmally's Twinkle Dargani, Huang, Garado, Mago and Lin who are all at large. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
2 days ago
- GMA Network
Lao, Dupla plead not guilty on graft raps over P4.4-B PPEs, masks purchase
Former Department of Budget and Management (DBM) officials Christopher Lao and Arnold Dupla pleaded not guilty Thursday on the graft charge involving alleged anomalous purchase of P4.4 billion worth of medical supplies during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lao and Dupla entered their not guilty pleas in person before the Sandiganbayan Fifth Division. Before entering his not guilty plea, Lao informed the anti-graft court that he was waiving his right for the reading of the allegations in the graft charge. Lao's position was adopted by Dupla. Lao and Dupla both used to be part of the DBM's Procurement Services unit which purchased alleged overpriced personal protective equipment and surgical masks worth P4.4 billion from Pharmally Pharmaceutical Corporation. Lao served as the DBM's Undersecretary while Dupla was PS-DBM Administrative Finance Group officer-in-charge director. Other DBM officials during the time of the P4.4 billion purchase who are also accused in the case include: Warren Liong, Allan Catalan, Dickson Tindugan Panti and Gerelyn Vergara. Pharmally officials also charged with graft include: Mohit Chainani Dargani Linconn Uy Ong Twinkle Dargani Huang Tzu Yen Justine Garado Krizle Mago Lin Weixiong The rest of the respondents in the case have yet to enter their pleas due to pending motions to quash the graft charge, except for Pharmally's Twinkle Dargani, Huang, Garado, Mago and Lin who are all at large. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
01-08-2025
- GMA Network
Sandiganbayan asserts jurisdiction in Pharmally case
The Sandiganbayan has issued a Resolution stating that it has jurisdiction over the three counts of graft cases worth over P4 billion involving Phamally and the Procurement Service of the Department of Budget and Management (PS-DBM). In the 43-page Resolution, the anti-graft court said the Malolos Bulacan RTC did not commit grave abuse of discretion in junking the three graft charges which should have been filed before the Sandiganbayan. These graft cases involve P4.16 billion of the following government purchases amid COVID-19 pandemic: P2.877 billion worth of 41,400 Units of BGI Real Time Fluorescen RT-PCR Kits P600 million worth of 8,000 Units of PCR Kit, BGI Real Time Fluorescent Kit P688 million worth of 2,000 Units of A*Star Foundation Kit 2.0 'After a careful review of the records and issues in these cases, this court finds no grave abuse of discretion that can be attributed to the public respondent who issued subject Orders [dismissing the graft charges],' the Sandiganbayan said. 'The issuance by RTC-Malolos of subject Orders did not breach the line of grave abuse of discretion. Rather, it correctly held that RA No. 10660 does not require that damage must be an element of the crime for the Sandiganbayan to take cognizance of the cases,' the Sandiganbayan added. The Department of Budget and Management officials accused in the case include: Christopher Lao Warren Liong Christine Suntay Augusto Ylagan Jasonmer Uayan Webster Laurenana and Paul Jasper Villanueva De Guzman On the other hand, Pharmally officials among the accused include: Twinkle Dargani Mohit Dargani Linconn Uy Ong Justine Garado, Huang Tzu Yen Krizle Grace Ukkong Mago and Lin Weixiong. The Sandiganbayan also said that the Malolos RTC 'correctly held that the amounts involved are not mere incidents of the recital of the material facts of the cases but are illustrative of the gravity of the offense charged against the accused-respondents and of the damage caused to the government.' 'Hence, petitioner's bid to invalidate subject Orders must fail. Wherefore, the Petition for Certiorari filed by the Office of the Special Prosecutor [under the Office of the Ombudsman] is denied. Insofar as the three [graft] Informations are concerned, it is declared that it is the Sandiganbayan which has jurisdiction over the crimes charged,' the Sandiganbayan said. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
11-07-2025
- GMA Network
Ombudsman orders graft charges vs. Briones, Lao over 'pricey' P2.4B laptops
The Office of the Ombudsman has ordered the filing of graft and falsification charges against former Education Secretary Leonor Briones and former Budget Undersecretary Christopher Lao over the P2.4 billion worth of laptops purchased in 2020, which were deemed "pricey" by the Commission on Audit. The laptops, priced at P58,300 each with an outdated Celeron processor, were purchased by the Department of Education for the implementation of distance learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The Ombudsman also recommended the filing of charges against several former DepEd and DBM officials involved in the transaction. 'The new bidding parameters, i.e. lower quantity and higher unit price, were reflected in the bidding documents and was used in the bidding process... These parameters facilitated the overprice and the consequent undue injury and gross disadvantage to the government,' the Ombudsman said. The Ombudsman said that the approved series of requests for extensions to deliver the laptops, requests to change payment terms, and other adjustments to the contract terms and conditions which, taken together, 'betray an unusually deferential treatment and favor towards the Joint Venture consortium.' 'Considering the complexity of the scheme and the individual participation of respondents as contributory to the carrying out and perpetuation of a common design to give unwarranted benefit to the Joint Venture and to cause undue injury to the government, a finding of probable cause for the prosecution of respondents under Section 3(e) of RA 3019 suffices since violation of Section 3 (a) and (g) of RA 3019 are already deemed subsumed therein,' the Ombudsman added. RA 3019 is the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. GMA News Online has reached out to Briones and Lao but they have yet to reply as of posting time. In its annual audit report on the agency for 2021, the Commission on Audit flagged DepEd for purchasing the P2.4 billion worth of laptops through the Procurement Service of the Department of Budget and Management (DBM-PS) when there are cheaper and better options in the market. "Per available documents, the Audit Team could not ascertain the DBM-PS' basis for adopting the unit price of P58,300. Apparently, the supposed number of laptops to be procured of 68,500 units was significantly reduced to 39,583 units which was mainly due to the huge increase of estimated cost P35,046 to P58,300 anchored on the DBM-PS' recommendation, which was duly accepted by the DepEd," COA pointed out. "The price per unit is pricey for an entry-level type of laptop which resulted in significant decrease in the number of units provided to intended users. The huge difference of P23,253 per unit price resulted in a significant decrease by 28,917 laptop computers. Consequently, an estimated 28,917 teachers were deprived of the possible benefits from the supposed provision of these laptops," COA added. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
