Slowing innovation is ruining American politics
IF THERE'S one thing every American agrees on, it's that politics has become vicious. There are plenty of explanations for why that is, from gerrymandering to the partisan sorting that has made both parties increasingly ideologically homogenous. One I'd add – but which often gets overlooked – is the slowdown in US technological progress outside of computing.
Technology is the most important driver of economic growth, and its rapid progress allows political disputes to centre on how best to distribute gains. That's easy. What's hard is when technology stagnates, growth slows and politics become zero-sum. The last few years have seen the promise of new technologies that could help us escape that trap – but the Trump administration is throwing that opportunity away.
The idea that technological progress has slowed might seem counter-intuitive when you consider the smartphone you probably have in your hand right now. But George Mason University economist Tyler Cowen has mustered convincing evidence that that's exactly what's happening in nearly every field other than computing. For example, the Wright Brothers made their first flight in 1903; both the Boeing 747 and the Concorde appeared less than 70 years later. If you had shown either jet to the Wrights, they would have thought they were hallucinating. Fast forward another half century and the differences between the 747 and a modern passenger plane are subtle, while no civilian aircraft approaches the Concorde's speed.
Life expectancy
The problem stretches far beyond aviation. The most basic measure of social well-being is life expectancy. Advances in technology, such as vaccines and antibiotics, constantly increased our life spans during the 20th century. Yet American life expectancy peaked more than a decade ago.
Why is innovation in such a slump? Government is certainly part of the problem. Across many areas (particularly housing), bad policy is crippling growth, as shown by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson in Abundance and Marc Dunkelman in Why Nothing Works.
But there's more to it. Science has, in Cowen's words, plucked the 'low-hanging fruit'. You can only invent penicillin or jet engines once. In drug development, progress has become so difficult that it's governed by 'Eroom's Law' (Moore's Law spelled backwards), which posits that the cost of bringing a new treatment to market doubles every nine years.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Similarly, since the 1970s, innovation has shifted away from material technologies and towards digital ones which are far less constrained by energy requirements and physical limits. Largely unchecked by antitrust laws, dominant technology companies such as Alphabet and Meta Platforms have been able to form durable monopolies and capture the gains from these digital innovations, securing multi-decade positions atop a sector that was once characterised by constant ferment.
Technological advances can make everyone better off. If you're reading this, you have more access to information and medical care than the wealthiest and most powerful people on Earth did when your grandparents were born. These gains make reform easier by creating a surplus, which can be used to compensate interest groups hurt by the changes. When kerosene replaced whale oil for light, it devastated the whaling industry. But the benefits were so large that everyone, even (eventually) the communities that used to be supported by whaling, ended up better off. When that surplus goes away, people end up fighting much harder to avoid losses than they do to secure gains, making it difficult or even impossible to fix broken systems.
Healthcare reform, for example, has stalled at least in part because any change to the system would hurt someone. If healthcare technologies were still leaping ahead as quickly as they were when antibiotics first rolled out, improvements in quality and efficiency would create the slack to compensate those hurt by the reforms.
Recently, however, science and technology have offered the promise of revolution once again. On the energy front, the cost of utility-scale solar cells declined by 88 per cent from 2009 to 2024. Similarly, the price of lithium-ion batteries declined by 97 per cent from 1991 to 2021. This makes new renewable energy cheaper than new fossil fuels – and prices will continue declining. Further in the future, breakthroughs in nuclear fusion pioneered by companies such as Commonwealth Fusion Systems (an MIT spinout) might offer energy abundance of the sort once imagined by 1950s science fiction.
Miracles discarded
There are other examples throughout the sciences. Merck & Co's Keytruda and other immunotherapy drugs have transformed the way we treat cancer. SpaceX has cut the cost to put a satellite in orbit by a factor of 10. And AI may supercharge our ability to innovate, ranging from biological and drug-discovery research to improvements in materials science that may drive advances in the field, including superconductors and quantum computing.
All these potential miracles, however, are being discarded. The administration's new budget proposes a 55 per cent cut to the National Science Foundation (the government's primary arm for research outside medicine) and a 40 per cent cut to the National Institutes of Health (America, and the world's, foremost medical research institution).
These build on massive cuts to universities (most prominently Harvard, where I taught for many years, but others as well) where much of America's most important research happens. Even the flow of scientific talent into the US – long one of the nation's greatest advantages – is reversing, with top AI minds no longer coming here and the EU allocating almost US$600 million to lure away top American researchers.
Science and technology can do amazing things. If we let them, they might even help fix our broken politics. The recent wholesale assault on science isn't just a threat to the American economy or health. It's a threat to the functioning of democracy, and perhaps our best shot at making it work better. BLOOMBERG
The writer teaches leadership at the Yale School of Management and is the author of 'Indispensable: When Leaders Really Matter'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Five nations and EU urge Trump not to impose new airplane tariffs
President Donald Trump has already imposed tariffs of 10 per cent on nearly all airplane and parts imports. PHOTO: REUTERS Five nations and EU urge Trump not to impose new airplane tariffs WASHINGTON - Five nations and the European Union, as well as airlines and aerospace firms worldwide, urged the Trump administration not to impose new national security tariffs on imported commercial planes and parts, documents released on June 10 showed. Airlines and planemakers have been lobbying President Donald Trump to restore the tariff-free regime under the 1979 Civil Aircraft Agreement that has yielded an annual trade surplus of US$75 billion (S$96.5 billion) for the US industry. The documents made public by the US Commerce Department bared concerns over the fallout of possible new tariffs expressed by companies as well as nations such as Canada, China, Japan, Mexico and Switzerland, besides the European Union. 'As reliable trading partners, the European Union and United States should strengthen their trade regarding aircraft and aircraft parts, rather than hinder it by imposing trade restrictions,' the EU wrote. It would consider its options 'to ensure a level playing field', it added. Mr Trump has already imposed tariffs of 10 per cent on nearly all airplane and parts imports. 'No country or region should attempt to support the development of its domestic aircraft manufacturing industry by suppressing foreign competitors,' the Chinese government wrote. Separately, US planemaker Boeing cited a recent trade deal unveiled in May with Britain that ensures tariff-free treatment for airplanes and parts. 'The United States should ensure duty-free treatment for commercial aircraft and their parts in any negotiated trade agreement, similar to its efforts with the United Kingdom,' Boeing told the Commerce Department in a filing. Mexico said in 2024 it exported US$1.45 billion in aircraft parts, just a tenth of the total, to the United States. The EU said it took US exports of aircraft worth roughly US$12 billion, while exporting about US$8 billion of aircraft to the US. In early May, the Commerce Department launched a 'Section 232' national security investigation into imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines and parts that could form the basis for even higher tariffs on such imports. Last week, Delta Air Lines and major trade groups warned of tariffs' impact on ticket prices, aviation safety and supply chains. 'Current US tariffs on aviation are putting domestic production of commercial aircraft at risk,' Airbus Americas CEO Robin Hayes said in a filing. 'It is not realistic or sensible today to create a 100 per cent domestic supply chain in any country.' Boeing said it had been increasing US content in its airplanes over the last decade and its newest airplanes, the 737 MAX 10 and 777X, would have 'more than 88 per cent domestically-sourced content'. The United Auto Workers union, which represents 10,000 aerospace workers, said it supports tariffs and domestic production quotas, adding that US aerospace employment has fallen to 510,000 in 2024 from 850,000 in 1990. 'To safeguard the entire aerospace supply chain across the commercial and defense sectors, comprehensive tariffs and production quotas on several products are needed,' it said. JetBlue Airways opposed new tariffs, however, saying, 'Trade policy should reinforce, not destabilise, the proven systems that keep our aircraft flying safely and affordably.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Hundreds protest outside ICE headquarters in New York City
NYPD Strategic Response Group units arrest protesters as they block an entrance to the Federal building on Broadway in New York. PHOTO: VICTOR J. BLUE/NYTIMES Protesters block an entrance to the Federal building on Broadway after a rally against ICE arrests at Foley Square in New York on June 10. PHOTO: VICTOR J. BLUE/NYTIMES NEW YORK – Hundreds of protesters demonstrated in lower Manhattan on the evening of June 10 against President Donald Trump's escalating immigration crackdown, continuing several days of protests that began more than 3,850km away in Los Angeles. The demonstrators rallied at Foley Square, near a large government building that houses federal immigration offices and the city's main immigration court, which has become a flash point as the Trump administration ramps up the arrest of migrants in courthouses. Shortly after 6pm, hundreds moved into streets that snake through the lower Manhattan neighborhood that is home to federal buildings, marching about 1.5km north toward another immigration court on Varick Street. They raised bright yellow signs that said 'ICE out of NYC' in Spanish and English. A separate group stayed behind and spread out around the Immigration and Customs Enforcement office near Foley Square. The crowd there grew increasingly agitated as night fell, with some chanting 'Nazi scum' and taunting police officers. Dozens of officers in riot gear flanked the protesters in an apparent effort to facilitate traffic, leading to the arrest of a number of demonstrators who were escorted away with their hands bound in zip ties throughout the evening. After 10pm, a dwindling crowd of about 100 protesters clashed with police officers near Foley Square, with some briefly marching downtown toward the entrance of the Brooklyn Bridge. Officers sought to keep people on sidewalks, pushing some demonstrators to the ground as they arrested them and using pepper spray during some of the arrests. Some people shouted and shoved the officers as they were led away in handcuffs. As Mr Trump deployed National Guard troops and Marines to California, New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat who has largely aligned himself with Mr Trump's immigration agenda, said on June 10 that he did not foresee Mr Trump sending the military to the city. 'If there's ever a need to go beyond the manpower that we have, there's other ways you do it before you have to come with the look of a military operation,' Mr Adams said, citing the size and experience of New York City's police force. The rally on June 10 appeared to be larger than protests in New York during the past few days. Those earlier demonstrations were tense, resulting in arrests and small confrontations with law enforcement, but they did not devolve into the visceral scenes of chaos that appeared episodically in Los Angeles. While the protests in Los Angeles were largely peaceful, protesters and federal officers have engaged in violent clashes, with officers shooting flash-bang grenades and rubber bullets at protesters, who have thrown rocks, glass bottles and fireworks at the officers and have burned vehicles. NYPD Strategic Response Group units arrest protesters as they block an entrance to the Federal building in New York on June 10, 2025. PHOTO: VICTOR J. BLUE/NYTIMES In New York, demonstrators coalesced near 26 Federal Plaza, a 41-storey federal building just a few blocks from City Hall with one of the city's three immigration courts. Dozens of migrants showing up for hearings have been detained by federal agents at the courthouse in June, sparking pushback from Democrats and drawing activists to the building. The imposing skyscraper also houses the ICE field office in New York. On June 10, Ms Andrea Montiel, 31, whose parents are Mexican immigrants, said she showed up at the rally on behalf of family and friends who she said were too worried about their immigration status to demonstrate publicly. 'I think we're really here just because we hope we can make a difference and show ICE is not welcome,' she said, adding that New York and Los Angeles were connected by their large Hispanic populations. 'We are one community despite the distance.' After speeches at the rally, which was organised by a coalition of unions and immigration groups, the crowd grew more disorganized as protesters, many of them masked, broke off to march on city streets, chanting 'Abolish ICE' and waving Mexican and Palestinian flags. Ms Eva Stokes, 21, said she marched in support of her father, who is an immigrant from Mexico. 'My father could get deported at any time,' Ms Stokes said with tears filling her eyes. 'He already has been summoned, and, you know, it's a scary process. I don't want to feel like I'm going to lose my dad.' As nightfall approached, one group of about 50 protesters reached Washington Square Park, dancing and clapping by the park's fountain. People protest against recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests in the Columbia Heights neighborhood in Washington on June 10. PHOTO: ERIC LEE/NYTIMES The first day of demonstrations in New York was June 7 , when more than 100 protesters gathered outside 26 Federal Plaza, where they clashed with police officers after the protesters tried to block ICE vehicles carrying detained migrants. Police said 22 people were taken into custody as officers dispersed the crowd. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which oversees ICE, quickly praised the Police Department's response. 'Thankfully, unlike in Los Angeles, the local police department quickly responded to the riots,' DHS said in a statement. On June 9, after Mr Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard members to Los Angeles, demonstrators took over the lobby of Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue in New York, demanding the release of immigrants sent to a notorious maximum-security prison in El Salvador. The Police Department arrested at least 24 protesters during that demonstration. Later in the day, as concerns mounted that the protests in New York could spiral out of control, Mr Adams issued brief remarks alongside police Commissioner Jessica Tisch. The mayor said that he respected the right of New Yorkers to protest peacefully but vowed that 'we will not allow violence and lawlessness'. 'The escalation of protests in Los Angeles over the last couple of days is unacceptable and will not be tolerated in our city,' Mr Adams said. Ms Tisch said that any attack against police officers would 'be met by a swift and decisive response by the NYPD.' The city leaders gave the remarks just as a disjointed group of 200 protesters gathered near 26 Federal Plaza for a 'ICE out of NYC' demonstration on the evening of June 9, leading to seven arrests. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
U.S.-Russian talks to take place in Moscow, Russian envoy says
FILE PHOTO: Russian and U.S. flags are pictured at the United States Mission in Geneva, Switzerland January 10, 2022. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse/File Photo MOSCOW - Talks between the United States and Russia on resolving issues in their bilateral relations will move to Moscow from Istanbul, Russia's new ambassador to Washington told the state TASS news agency. "The recovery of Russian-American relations is still a long way off," Ambassador Alexander Darchiev told TASS, adding that the rapprochement with Moscow was being slowed by the so-called U.S. "deep state" and anti-Russian "hawks" in Congress. "I can confirm that the next negotiations of the delegations will take place in the very near future in Moscow," Darchiev was quoted as saying. The war in Ukraine triggered the biggest confrontation between Moscow and the West since the depths of the Cold War. Senior diplomats in both Moscow and Washington told Reuters in 2024 that they could not recall relations ever being worse. The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump casts the Ukraine conflict as a proxy war between the United States and Russia, and Trump has repeatedly warned of the risk of it escalating into a world war. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.