Council library takeover challenges blocked
Since 2012, libraries in Suffolk have been managed by independent charity Suffolk Libraries but now the Conservative-run Suffolk County Council is taking over the running of the 45 sites.
It has seen a public dispute between the charity and the authority, with a petition against the move being signed 23,000 times and a protest taking place.
The opposition Green, Liberal Democrat and Independent (GLI) group and the Labour group had lodged separate challenges but the council rejected both.
Call-in challenges can be lodged by councillors against council decisions. A monitoring officer, who is employed by the council in a non-political role, decides whether the challenge can progress.
If allowed, the council's scrutiny committee would debate the issue.
In the case here both challenges were deemed 'not allowed' on all points.
The GLI argument centred around four points:
Whether the contract with Suffolk Libraries could have been extended for a period while the council retendered the contract
If financial costs had been 'properly scoped'
That councillors received the full background information for the decision too late to prepare a response
That the decision should have been subject to a public consultation.
Simon Harley, the group spokesperson for communities, said: "It is disappointing, but not surprising, that the Conservative administration has rejected a more independent scrutiny of this decision, also ignoring the massive petition from the people of Suffolk on legalistic grounds.
"We have no further options available to us to overturn this, but the people of Suffolk will remember this flawed decision and likely regret it for many years to come."
The Labour challenge raised similar points but also suggested the time left until the council takes control on 1 June would be "extremely challenging" and raised concerns that vulnerable people who use library services may see those stopped.
Labour group leader Sandy Martin said: "The Conservative council claim that all the relevant information needed to make a sensible decision was in the reports shown to the meeting.
"But the fact remains that they have never explained in detail how county council employees, on higher salaries, working for a council department that will not have charitable status, can deliver a better library service for less money than Suffolk Libraries have done."
A spokesman for Suffolk County Council said: "The way our cabinet reached the decision to bring Suffolk's libraries back in house has now been thoroughly reviewed.
"This means that any suggestions that the decision was not taken properly have been rejected.
"We will now focus on keeping all 45 libraries open, maintaining current opening hours, bringing libraries staff back to the Suffolk County Council family and continuing our investment in library services."
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
NordVPN is the most popular VPN amongst UK politicians – but they're not getting the best deals
Analysis of the expenses claimed by UK politicians has revealed NordVPN is the most commonly claimed for VPN service. Seeing as NordVPN tops our best VPN list, we're pleased to see UK MPs subscribing to a safe and secure VPN service, but they don't appear to be getting the best VPN deals. No matter the provider, two-year VPN deals always work out cheaper per month than annual or one month subscriptions. Expenses data shows multiple MPs taking out annual plans and therefore not getting the cheapest deals. Furthermore, only nine out of a possible 650 MPs expensed VPN subscriptions, an alarmingly low uptake. VPNs have been a hot topic amongst UK politicians in recent weeks. VPN usage in the country has skyrocketed thanks to people looking to bypass age verification checks implemented as part of the controversial Online Safety Act. NordVPN: our best VPN overall We rate NordVPN as the #1 VPN for most people. It's fast, secure, great for streaming, and can protect up to 10 devices on one plan. Plans start at $2.91 / £2.31 per month ($81.36 / £64.56 up front pre-tax). Until August 12, all subscriptions come with a 4 extra months of protection for free. Premium NordVPN plans come with free Amazon gift cards worth up to $50 / £50. There's also a 30-day money-back guarantee and the two-year deal is the best value for money. 650 MPs sit in the House of Commons, and publicly available data shows nine of them have expensed VPN subscriptions in recent years. NordVPN was the most popular provider, with five MPs expensing plans. Labour MP Jonathan Reynolds, the UK government's current Secretary of State for Business and Trade, is the most high-profile MP to expense a NordVPN subscription. Reynolds claimed £80.68 for a two-year NordVPN plan in April 2024 and is one of the only MPs to take advantage of the better value two-year deal. Fellow Labour MP Alex Sobel claimed £83.99 for a one-year NordVPN plan in December 2023 and made the same claim in December 2024. Labour MP Kate Osamor made four claims labelled "NORDVPN" or "NORD PRODUCTS" between 2020 and 2024. Conservative MP Gareth Davies also claimed for an annual NordVPN subscription, worth £76.99 in December 2023. Conservative colleague Chris Heaton-Harris claimed £120.53 for an annual NordVPN subscription in February 2020 – the most expensive VPN claim out of any MP. There were also a number of claims for unidentified or potentially unsafe VPNs. Labour MP Luke Pollard claimed £9.99 for Secure VPN in March 2023. There are a number of VPN providers with the name "Secure VPN" so it's unclear which one Pollard subscribed to – however none are recommended by Tom's Guide. Pollard also claimed £9.99 back for an expense titled "VPN for Shadow Ministerial visits abroad" once in November 2023 and once in February 2024. We can't say for certain that this was also "Secure VPN" but it's the same price. Former Conservative MP Ben Wallace, who stood down at the 2024 general election, submitted the most VPN-related expenses. Between May 2019 and February 2020 he submitted eight claims, ranging from £10.33 to £11.16. They were titled "VPN access", "VPN service", "VPN usage", and "VPN". We don't know which service Wallace was subscribing to at the time. A claim was submitted almost every month and it would have been far cheaper for Wallace to take out a single one or two-year VPN plan. It appears as though he did eventually do that. In May 2020 he claimed £84.61 for an ExpressVPN subscription and did so again in May 2022, at a cost of £83.97. Another former Conservative MP, Michael Fabricant, submitted two claims worth £116.16 each for "Netshade (Rayner) VPN and Proxy" and "Security software VPN" in July 2022. He claimed £112.62 in July 2019 for "Rayner Netshade Software subscription for UK VPN for iPad." We cover all manner of VPNs here at Tom's Guide, but Netshade is not one we have ever tested or reviewed, so we can't recommend the provider. A quick search suggests it only supports iOS and Mac, has 24 servers, and costs between $2 and $5 per month. This data leaves us wondering how secure MP's tech is and how clued up UK politicians are on cybersecurity practices. We'd like a little more context to this data. Are VPNs provided for MPs and these expenses simply extras? Or is it up to the individual to purchase a VPN for themselves? If the latter is true, nine out 650 protecting their data with a VPN is a worryingly low figure. Although we don't know how many MPs subscribe to a VPN and choose not to claim the cost back. Not everyone needs a VPN, but they can be very useful for those working with sensitive information – MPs would fall into that category. They will deal with important and potentially sensitive data, want to communicate securely, and won't want to become the victim of a data breach. VPNs encrypt your data and protect it from hackers and third-parties. Using one, alongside other cybersecurity tools, can create a robust defence against cyber crime. Research by Proton, the team behind Proton VPN, suggests cybersecurity education may be lacking amongst not just UK politicians, but also those in the EU and US. It found the emails of 443 MPs (68%) had been breached and leaked on the darkweb, along with 284 passwords. The EU parliament had 309 emails breached (44%) and 195 passwords exposed. 3,191 emails (20%) and 2,975 passwords belonging to US political staffers were also discovered on the dark web. Tom's Guide has contacted the House of Commons and the House of Lords, as well as individual MPs, to find out more information on cybersecurity education amongst UK politicians. A UK Parliament spokesperson said: "UK Parliament takes the cyber security of Members of both Houses extremely seriously." "We provide advice, hands on support, and make cyber security software available to Members, to inform them of the risks and how to manage their digital safety, however we do not comment on specific details of our cyber security controls and policies." We therefore can't say for sure if the software made available to politicians includes VPNs. As mentioned earlier, VPNs have become a major talking point in the UK over the last two weeks. The newly introduced Online Safety Act means sites and apps hosting explicit material or content deemed unsafe for children must carry out age verification checks on their users. There is evidence that VPNs can bypass these checks and as a result some have been wondering if the UK government will ban VPNs. The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Peter Kyle, has ruled out a VPN ban but has said he'd look "very closely" at how they're being used in relation to the new law. Kyle has been widely criticised for saying those attempting to bypass age verification checks by using a VPN are "on the side of predators." Many of those opposing the law are doing so because of the cybersecurity risks involved in handing over the sensitive personal data needed to verify age. Cybersecurity experts have called it a "disaster waiting to happen." Prior to the Online Safety Act becoming law, Labour MP Sarah Champion tried to pass an amendment which would give OFCOM power to investigate VPN usage that undermined regulations. In July 2025, she tweeted her frustration over the surge in VPN usage in response to the law. Champion was one of the MPs who expensed a VPN subscription. In October 2024, she claimed £12.36 for Norton VPN, although it's unclear for what purpose. We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Certain households in England face £567 rise in council tax
The areas facing £500 council tax rises have been revealed - with Labour Party Chancellor Rachel Reeves accused of "ultimate stealth tax" after allowing increases of 5 per cent a year. The analysis by the TaxPayers' Alliance reveals that Gateshead faces the largest rise, with typical bills expected to be £567 higher there in 2028/29. With maximum increases imposed, the bill for a Band D home would rise from £2,578 to £3,145. Nottingham (up £563 for Band D and £1,126 for Band H) Rutland (£550 and £1,100) and Bristol (£549 and £1,108) are also namechecked. Taxpayers in Dorset, Hastings, Oxford and Newark and Sherwood will also see increases of more than £500. READ MORE: Major UK bank set to transfer all five million customers to rival READ MORE: HMRC warns UK households to 'declare it' or face fines and prison sentence READ MORE State pensioners 'caught off guard' after becoming 'casualty' of HMRC The highest council tax bills will be in Rutland, where charges will increase from £2,671 this year to £3,221. Elliot Keck, head of campaigns at the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'Council tax is the ultimate stealth tax, given the way in which successive governments have piled on responsibilities to town halls without the resources to pay for them but with the permission to hike bills for residents. 'And this Government clearly intends to continue this trend by allowing years of above-inflation council tax rises, further increasing the crippling tax burden on British families and workers. 'By the end of this Parliament, the grim milestone of the first £3,000 Band D council tax bill will have been reached. 'Labour should impose lower, inflation-linked referendum caps on councils and aim for national solutions to crises such as that around social care.' It comes as Rachel Reeves has 'one hand tied behind her back' as she considers how to balance the books next month in her first budget, according to experts. The IFS said Labour entered office faced with 'unenviable arithmetic'. 'Merely avoiding spending cuts would – if debt is to fall – likely require raising tens of billions of additional revenue by 2028-29,' the report said.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
North Sea giant looks overseas as tax rate hits 111pc
Britain's biggest oil and gas producer is axing investment in the UK and diverting cash to countries including Norway after Labour's windfall taxes left it with an 111pc tax rate. Harbour Energy plans to wind down its North Sea investments and has already announced 250 job losses in Aberdeen, a city once regarded as the oil and gas capital of Europe. On Thursday, a spokesman said the company would consider offering jobs in its overseas operations to suitable workers but most of the Aberdeen staff marked for redundancy would be leaving the company. It came as Harbour report half-year results that made clear the impact of the energy profits levy, or windfall tax, which was initially imposed by the Conservatives and increased under Labour. Harbour made a profit before tax of $1.6bn (£1.2bn) but faced a tax bill of $1.8bn, resulting in a post tax loss of $174m. This was largely down to UK windfall levies plus foreign exchange transactions. The report said: 'The effective tax rate for the six months ending on June 30 2025 was 111pc, compared to 85pc for the same period in 2024.' The company said the increase was 'primarily' down to a deferred tax charge resulting from Labour's decision to extend windfall taxes to 2030. Linda Cook, Harbour's chief executive, said: '[The UK] remains a challenging environment for us... the fiscal regime means investment here just finds itself hard to compete with the opportunities we have in other countries. 'Going forward, we do expect investment to decline in the UK, given the fiscal and regulatory conditions. We will still have some high return opportunities, but overall investment is likely to decline and will be replaced by investment in Norway, Argentina and, over time, Mexico. 'The UK is one of our highest countries for unit operating costs ... and it's one of our highest tax environments as well. So that [UK] production will get replaced over time with production from other countries, and that's a good thing for us overall.' Last week, Donald Trump said Britain was wasting a 'treasure chest' of oil and gas. He wrote on his Truth Social site: 'The taxes are so high, however, that it makes no sense. They have essentially told drillers and oil companies that, 'We don't want you.'' The US president said reopening the North Sea could deliver a 'vast fortune' for the UK and 'far lower energy costs for the people!' Harbour was a primarily UK-focused oil and gas producer but has shifted its focus as successive governments imposed ever-tougher windfall taxes and climate-related drilling restrictions. Last year the company acquired the upstream operations of Germany's Wintershall Dea, giving it production centres in Norway, Argentina, Germany and Mexico. The move tripled output to 475,000 barrels of oil a day compared to the 159,000 seen in the first half of 2024, with reserves also tripled at an estimated 1.3 billion barrels. The company still operates several oil and gas production hubs in UK waters. Investment is focused on two of them, J-Area and Greater Britannia Area, in the central North Sea. However, Ashley Kelty, an analyst at Panmure Liberum investment bank, said Harbour had permanently shifted its focus from the UK to other parts of the world. Harbour also published an 'adjusted profits' figure discounting the impacts of windfall taxes, showing underlying profits of $410m, and announced a $100m share buyback programme alongside a $455m dividend for shareholders. Dan Slater, an analyst at Zeus Capital, said Harbour had shown a strong underlying performance, despite the tax hits. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
