You must work harder, new chancellor tells Germans
Germans must work harder and more efficiently in order to fix the stagnating economy, Friedrich Merz, the new chancellor, has said.
People should consider giving up their four-day working weeks and work-life balance to become more 'efficient', the leader of the centre-Right Christian Democrats [CDU] said.
'We must work more, and above all more efficiently, in this country,' he said. 'With a four-day week and work-life balance, we won't be able to maintain this country's prosperity.'
Mr Merz made the remarks ahead of a major speech on Wednesday afternoon, where he is expected to outline his plan to breathe life into the German economy.
It comes after a leading German think tank raised the idea of sacrificing an annual public holiday to support the country's plans for rearmament.
The Ifo Institute said Germans should work more and take less time off, a goal that could be achieved by a reduction in the number of annual public holidays, which varies from state to state.
Mr Merz, 69m was sworn in as chancellor last week, having comfortably won February's general elections on a pro-business platform and a vow to heavily reduce migration levels.
A former BlackRock executive, Mr Merz fears that the German employment system is too generous and too soft, to the point of restricting productivity.
Germany's economy, the largest in Europe, is struggling with a third consecutive year of recession, in addition to a shortage in skilled workers and the decline of its car industry.
About one in three German industries say they are suffering from a serious shortage in skilled workers and are trying to address the shortfall.
Increased competition from China, and disappointing results in the electric car market, have also dented Germany's economic prowess.
While previous governments sought to address the worker shortage by wooing migrants from India, Mr Merz capitalised on anti-immigrant sentiment in Germany to secure his election victory.
He has also introduced reforms that will allow Germany to take on unprecedented amounts of national debt, as part of efforts to massively increase funding for the Bundeswehr, the German army.
The CDU has long argued that poor worker productivity, linked to shorter working weeks, has also contributed to the slump.
Mr Merz says he has already agreed with his coalition partner, the Social Democrats [SPD] to an amendment of the 40-hour working week that will make it easier for Germans to work overtime.
According to the German Economic Institute (IW), the German economy is expected to contract by a further 0.2 per cent this year and slip into a third year of recession.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
Spain could block Gibraltar's removal from EU money laundering list
Spanish conservatives are seeking to stop Gibraltar being removed from an EU list of jurisdictions with lax money laundering and terror financing controls. The centre-Right People's Party (PP) believes keeping the British Overseas Territory on the list is vital to maintaining pressure in negotiations over its future. The populist Vox party will also join an attempt to block Gibraltar's removal because of the party's long-standing support for Spain's sovereignty claim over the Rock, which was ceded by the Spanish king to Britain in 1713. A Vox source told The Telegraph: 'We will, of course, maintain the same position we have consistently held on Gibraltar in every vote. In our view, Gibraltar is a territory unlawfully colonised by the United Kingdom and does not meet the necessary conditions. 'Therefore, we firmly reject any proposal to remove it from the list of territories concerning capital movements.' Inclusion on the EU's 'grey list' comes as a reputational blow and introduces red tape that makes it less appealing to do business with. Gibraltar is on the list with countries including Afghanistan, Burkina Faso, Iran, North Korea and Yemen. The European Commission has proposed removing the Rock, but requires a majority vote in the European Parliament to confirm the decision. Eurocrats failed in a previous attempt to tweak the list, with conservative and socialist politicians forming an unlikely alliance to quash the move. Earlier this year, Right-wing MEPs voted against the changes because of Gibraltar's proposed removal, while their Left-wing counterparts opposed it because of a recommendation to remove the United Arab Emirates. The People's Party urged the Spanish government to intervene to prevent Gibraltar being removed from the EU list in January. It said that the Rock 'continues to be a territory that is too lax with respect to its commitments to combat money laundering and terrorist financing'. The PP also argued that under no circumstances should Gibraltar be removed before a deal was struck between Brussels and the UK on the post-Brexit relationship with the Rock. Its politicians are the second-largest national delegation in the centre-Right European People's Party (EPP) and hold powerful influence over the direction of its voting strategies. 'Sufficiently comprehensive' efforts Commission officials believe that the Spanish opposition could be overcome with a recommendation to add Russia to the list of countries. They have previously said Gibraltar's efforts to counter illicit finance and money laundering are 'sufficiently comprehensive' in order to be removed from the list. The Rock was originally included on the grey list because of concerns over regulations for its gambling industry. It was added in 2023, as negotiations between the UK, Spain and the EU were carried out over the territory's post-Brexit future. The talks have repeatedly stalled over sensitive sovereignty issues, including Madrid's wish for Spanish border police to operate security checks at Gibraltar's airport and seaport. There is strong support for Ukraine among the EU parliament's EPP, and vetoing the changes to the list because of the British overseas territory could become controversial amongst its politicians from other states. 'There is huge support for putting Russia on the list,' Markus Ferber, of the EPP, told the Financial Times. The commission's final list of recommendations is expected to be published next week, after a planned announcement was put on hold at the last minute this week. Moscow was originally listed in 2000 but taken off two years later after fulfilling a number of criteria set to reassure the EU.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Fresh blow for Trump as hiring slows as uncertainty weighs on the economy
Hiring has slowed the latest jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics revealed. The economy added 139,000 jobs in May, less than the monthly average of 144,000 in the year-to-date. It is also a marked retreat from April, which saw 147,000 jobs added. Companies have looked to tighten their payrolls in the face of high tariff bills and economic uncertainty caused by chaotic policy. It is another blow for Trump after the economy contracted in the first quarter of the year and economists are increasingly concerned about the risk of a recession. Despite the slowdown stock futures rose as the numbers beat analysts downbeat expectations.
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
The very important meeting that took place while the world watched the Musk-Trump spectacle
As the inevitable bust-up between a quixotic US President and his wayward billionaire tech guru was erupting into colourful headlines around the world, a tall, grey, spectacled man, very different in character from either, was quietly leaving the White House with his entourage. This was Friedrich Merz, the head of Germany's new government, who had just completed his first visit to the Oval Office as Chancellor. It was a meeting that may prove of more lasting significance for the wider world than the verbal fireworks between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. In the main, the Trump-Merz encounter went well – no doubt to an extent because visiting foreign leaders are learning. As the two sat side by side in the Oval Office, it was hard not to believe that Merz had not spent some preparation time studying the worst (the ambush of Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky) and the best (the smoothly authoritative defence of Canada by Mark Carney) examples of how to handle Donald Trump. Beyond some token flattery, Chancellor Merz began by saying comparatively little, helped along by a US press corps far more interested in domestic politics, including Trump v Musk, than in US-German relations. He piped up a little more on Germany's rising defence spending – eliciting a jocular aside from Trump about how there was a time when a German leader announcing increased military spending would not have been so well received in the US – before touching on the vexed tariff question, with the two jointly accepting that any bilateral discussions would have to be continued in the EU context. When questions turned to Ukraine, however, the first signs of dissent appeared, with Merz waxing almost voluble in 100 per cent support of Ukraine – although it was not immediately apparent whether Trump fully understood this, whether he might have chosen to leave any points of friction for later, or whether he was just in a good mood (which he certainly appeared to be). In all, though, it would appear that Germany, under its new centre-right chancellor, is well on the way to becoming the de facto EU, and maybe European, leader in relations with the United States, with Trump clearly appreciating that Merz was not Angela Merkel – who he initially referred to only as 'her', along with Germany's apparent ambition to become a model defence spender, at 5 per cent of GDP. Merz's facility with the English language, his legal and business background, not to mention his towering 6ft 6 height (3 inches more than Trump), all probably helped too. If the tariff question was set to be a big topic at the lunch and the talks that followed the Oval Office exchanges, however, it looked destined to take second place to Ukraine. This is partly because someone else is the point person for trade talks – the EU's accomplished trade commissioner, Maros Sevcovic. But more because of the urgency that shone out through everything the two leaders had said about Ukraine in their responses to journalists, as well as the sharp differences that what they said – and they said quite a lot – revealed about the thinking on either side of the Atlantic. And what stood out here, for all the surface bonhomie, offered few grounds for optimism. After weeks in which, it had seemed, the Europeans and the US had been making efforts to reconcile their approaches to the Ukraine war, the size of the gap looks almost as wide as ever. Both now profess to want the earliest possible end to the war, which marks a change from the European line a few weeks ago, when the argument from London and Paris was that now was not the time to stop fighting and that Europe's military support for Ukraine had to be boosted, both to replace any retreat by the US and to maintain pressure on Russia. That, however, is almost where the agreement stops. What was said in the Oval Office showed that while Trump wants talks now, he has a deadline in mind for Russia and Ukraine to agree, and has a new sanctions package nearly ready to go. He still sees himself – despite recently calling Russia's President Putin 'crazy' – as the enabler of peace, standing in the middle. Denying that he was friends with Putin – 'I'm no one's friend', he said – he refused to blame Russia alone, and compared Russia and Ukraine to kids fighting in a playground who were not yet ready to be separated, however much damage they were inflicting on each other. The fighting, he accepted, would probably go on for a while yet. Merz, on the other hand, while accepting that the US was the 'key' to any agreement, insisted that he, and Europe, were entirely on Ukraine's side and they were 'looking for more pressure on Russia'. He went so far as to laud Ukraine for 'never' targeting civilians in their attacks – something Russia would contest in the light, most recently, of an attack on a bridge when a train was passing over. And when Trump insisted that his determination to end the war was 'not about the money, well, it's a little bit the money, but it's not the big thing. It's the deaths and decimation' on both sides, Merz spoke only of Ukrainian deaths. While Merz's view is not shared completely across Europe – Hungary, Slovakia and to an extent Italy would align themselves more with Trump – it is the prevailing EU position, and the one forcefully represented by the UK. Any recent hints of movement towards a single Western approach, it would seem, are just that. That Merz gave not the slightest hint of any movement towards Trump's position on the war suggested that the two sides of the Atlantic remain almost as far apart on what should happen next as Russia and Ukraine.
