logo
Life in jail, Dhs10 million fine for money laundering in UAE

Life in jail, Dhs10 million fine for money laundering in UAE

Gulf Today27-05-2025
Money laundering crime in the UAE is penalized by life imprisonment, a fine of up to Dhs10 million, and deportation for foreign offenders, according to lawyer and legal consultant Omar Al Awadi who emphasised that the UAE has tightened its measures against such crimes due to their severe impact on the financial and economic systems.
Under Federal Law No. 26 of 2021 on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing, money laundering is treated as a major crime, with stringent penalties for individuals and entities involved.
Al Awadi noted that strict administrative sanctions have been adopted for those who neglect or cooperate in such crimes, including the temporary or permanent closure of involved establishments and the cancellation of commercial licences in some cases.
The money laundering crimes include depositing illicit funds in banks to disguise them as legitimate, purchasing real estate or vehicles using proceeds from criminal activities, transferring funds abroad to conceal their true source, and financing unauthorised or illegal organisations, according to the law.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UAE anti-terror laws 'cover' for crackdown on peaceful dissent, report shows
UAE anti-terror laws 'cover' for crackdown on peaceful dissent, report shows

Middle East Eye

time2 days ago

  • Middle East Eye

UAE anti-terror laws 'cover' for crackdown on peaceful dissent, report shows

The United Arab Emirates' landmark 2014 anti-terror law is being used as a tool of political control rather than a way to protect national security, a new report by Women Journalists Without Chains (WJWC) said. The non-governmental organisation was founded in 2005 by Yemeni Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Tawakkol Karman. In a 48-page report released last week, the findings point to vague legal provisions in the UAE that allow for what the authors have couched as dangerous prosecutorial overreach. Federal Law No. 7 of 2014 represents the UAE's most comprehensive legal instrument addressing terrorism-related offenses. It was created because of a confluence of regional instability and the UAE's own strategic recalibration. There was also the regional rise of the Islamic State, which added to the urgency of the law's development. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Reformists have also long said that the law was designed to halt the rise of a popular brand of political Islam in the early 2010s. But its criminalisation efforts under broad terms such as "offending the state" and "undermining national unity" raise significant human rights concerns, the report said. "Compounding this issue is the law's reference to individuals who 'threaten', 'aim', 'plan', or 'seek' to commit terrorist crimes - formulations so vague that they could encompass expressions of opinion, political advocacy or even the exercise of conscience," the authors said. As a result, Federal Law No. 7 has caused the suppression of civil society engagement and dissent, leading to the detention of journalists, lawyers and academics, and creating a chilling effect across the country, the report explained. Among the most notable cases are individuals who received a decade or longer prison sentences for being part of the so-called 'UAE 94': when 94 activists were prosecuted for allegedly plotting to overthrow the government in the wake of the Arab Spring in 2012-2013. UAE top court upholds life terms for 24 convicted in mass trial Read More » The detainees were largely affiliated with the political reform party al-Islah, whose approach was solely non-violent. But for some of the most high profile dissidents, serving their sentence was not enough - the UAE tried several of them again in 2022-2023 under the vague terms of the 2014 anti-terror law, and extended their sentences, the report showed. Many of the alleged activities in the case that became known as the 'UAE 84' in its second round pre-dated the anti-terror law itself, raising concerns about the retroactive application of criminal law. Human rights lawyer Mohammed al-Roken - after spending a decade in prison - is now serving a life sentence for opposing the act of citizenship revocation by the Emirati government, the report said. Activists Maryam al-Balushi and Amina al-Abdouli were sentenced to an additional three years in prison in 2021 for "publishing information that disturbs public order", after they shared audio recordings with United Nations Special Procedures, in which they described torture and abuse in UAE prisons. "The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that both women were subjected to unfair trials and arbitrary detention. Their cases demonstrate how the law is used to silence prisoners who expose abuse, even while in custody," the report said. And even though they are now working in exile, Mohammed al-Zaabi and Hamad al-Shamsi, who remain advocates for the UAE's political prisoners, have been added to the country's terrorism blacklist. Recommendations But it's not just criticism of the UAE and its ruling family that has landed people in prison. The economist Nasser bin Ghaith has been arrested multiple times for his critical views of regional governments. In 2017 he was sentenced to a decade behind bars on charges including "offending the state" and "communicating with banned groups". Families of political prisoners often face harassment, travel bans and surveillance, and live in fear of acts of retaliation, the report also said. "These cases reflect the systematic use of counterterrorism legislation to dismantle civil society, criminalize peaceful expression and suppress legitimate dissent rather than targeting genuine threats," WJWC noted. Punishments in the UAE for perceived terror offenses also far exceed the international standard, it showed. "Arbitrary deprivation of liberty is prohibited; detention must be time-bound and subject to judicial oversight," the report said, adding that there must be "independent and transparent investigations into all torture allegations, holding perpetrators accountable". But the UAE allows for indefinite detention in "counseling centres" even after a prison sentence is served, without a clear path to contest continued detention. There are also no independent authorities to investigate torture complaints, which are widespread, the report indicated. "The UAE's continued failure to ratify key international treaties, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and its non-compliance with obligations under instruments it has ratified - such as the Convention Against Torture - highlight a profound gap between international human rights commitments and domestic legal practice," the authors wrote. The WJWC also issued a call to "international actors - including UN bodies, human rights organisations and the UAE's Western allies - to exert meaningful diplomatic and policy pressure to encourage reforms". The report argued that because the UAE presents itself as a key global counterterrorism partner, it legitimises its policies to governments abroad, when it is only further asserting authoritarian control. The WJWC urged immediate changes toward detailing the language in the anti-terror law, ensuring transparency in independent judicial proceedings and allowing public access to trials. It called for the repeal of provisions allowing for indefinite detention, and a "guarantee" that any "rehabilitation" programmes are in fact voluntary. The UAE must also assume full engagement with UN human rights bodies and allow for country visits for compliance assessments, the WJWC argued.

Employee wins Dhs200,000 compensation for work-related eye injury in Abu Dhabi
Employee wins Dhs200,000 compensation for work-related eye injury in Abu Dhabi

Gulf Today

time7 days ago

  • Gulf Today

Employee wins Dhs200,000 compensation for work-related eye injury in Abu Dhabi

The Abu Dhabi Family, Civil and Administrative Cases Court has ordered a company to pay an employee Dhs200,000 in compensation for a work-related injury, as well as covering the legal fees and expenses. The case concerns a worker who filed a lawsuit against his employer, requesting Dhs500,000 in material and moral compensation, plus legal interest at a rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing until full payment. He also requested fees, expenses and attorney's fees as a precautionary measure. The worker claimed that he was injured at work when one of the brakes suddenly loosened, causing the new bolts to come loose and leading to a rapid and sudden recoil in his left eye. The Abu Dhabi Penal Court ruled that the company should pay a fine of Dhs25,000. This was appealed and the penalty was reduced to Dhs10,000, a decision that was upheld. The worker sustained physical and psychological injuries as a result of the incident, which resulted in him losing sight in his left eye. According to the medical report, he is now partially sighted. A forensic doctor was appointed to examine him, assess his injuries and the resulting damage, and prepare a detailed medical report outlining the current and anticipated future physical and psychological effects. The Court noted that the documents proved the company's negligence and failure to take safety precautions had caused the victim's injury, and fined it Dhs10,000 after it appealed the initial ruling. As this ruling was upheld by the Abu Dhabi Court of Appeal, the elements of negligence on the part of the company were established and the ruling became final and binding. The Court explained that the report by the appointed forensic doctor concluded that the worker's injuries, namely injury to the left eye resulting in blurred vision and near blindness, were sustained as a result of the accident. The court deemed this to be material damage, amounting to Dhs150,000. The injury also caused him pain and distress, which the court considered to be non-economic damage, estimated at Dhs50,000. Therefore, the court ruled that the company should pay the worker Dhs200,000 in compensation for all damages.

Abu Dhabi establishes labor prosecution to handle worker and domestic cases
Abu Dhabi establishes labor prosecution to handle worker and domestic cases

Filipino Times

time13-08-2025

  • Filipino Times

Abu Dhabi establishes labor prosecution to handle worker and domestic cases

Chairman of Abu Dhabi Judicial Department, His Highness Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Vice President, Deputy Prime Minister and Chairman of the Presidential Court, has issued a resolution creating the Abu Dhabi Labor Prosecution to oversee investigations and claims involving labor and domestic worker cases. The move is part of the judicial department's efforts to expand specialized prosecution units to ensure faster, more efficient proceedings and deliver accurate, fair judgments in key sectors, while safeguarding the rights of all parties in line with transparency and justice standards. The new prosecution office will have jurisdiction over offences under Federal Law No. 33 of 2021 on the regulation of work relations and Federal Law No. 9 of 2022 on domestic workers within Abu Dhabi. It will be led by a public prosecution member with a rank of at least chief prosecutor, supported by additional prosecution members and specialized staff.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store