A financial blueprint can help investors weather volatility while saving for retirement
Listen and subscribe to Decoding Retirement on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcasts.
When it comes to saving and investing for retirement, especially during times of volatility, there's no need to complicate it. In fact, you should make saving as easy to implement as possible, according to Brian Walsh, the head of advice and planning at SoFi.
The best way to save and invest your money is to have a financial blueprint, or a structured framework that guides your investment decisions based on your specific goals, time horizons, and risk tolerance.
Like an architectural blueprint for a house, a financial blueprint provides the foundational plan that helps you build your financial future with purpose rather than reacting emotionally to market changes.
A blueprint allows you to "always make sure that you're investing based on your goal" and plan for "when you're going to use your money," Walsh, who is also known as "Dr. Money," said in a recent episode of the Decoding Retirement podcast (see video above or listen below).
This embedded content is not available in your region.
One of the best financial blueprints to use is what Walsh calls the three-bucket investment approach, where you invest based on your time horizons.
For money you need in the short term (less than three years), "Money should not be invested [in stocks]. Period," Walsh said. "Think money market funds, short-term bonds, high-yield savings."
This conservative approach for short-term funds recognizes that market volatility could devastate money you need soon, so preservation of capital takes absolute priority over growth potential.
The second bucket is for intermediate funding needs of three to 10 years. For that, you want "a mix of stocks and bonds," Walsh said. "That's long enough where you can actually deal with volatility."
This balanced approach gives you enough time to weather market downturns while still providing growth potential. The intermediate timeframe allows you to take calculated risks without jeopardizing near-term financial goals.
Read more: Here's what to do with your retirement savings in a market sell-off
For the third bucket, dealing with long-term (10+ years) funding needs, Walsh advised investing in "mostly equities."
With this extended timeline, you can afford to weather multiple market cycles and capitalize on the historically superior returns of stocks compared to other asset classes. The decade-plus horizon means short-term volatility becomes merely a blip in your overall investment journey, allowing you to focus on maximizing growth rather than minimizing fluctuations.
'We start with that framework,' Walsh said, noting that 'you always need to make sure that you're investing based on your goal.'
In the podcast, Walsh also emphasized the importance of understanding the difference between your emotional comfort with risk — your risk tolerance — and your financial ability to absorb losses — your risk capacity — when making investment decisions.
'Risk tolerance is one thing,' he said. 'Risk capacity is a completely different thing.'
Young investors should be able to tolerate risk, but having the ability to withstand the market's ups and downs is also very important. One has to be 'totally on board with some volatility and some risk,' Walsh said.
But having a framework in place can help investors resist three key investment biases that can affect decision making, especially during volatile periods.
Walsh discussed loss aversion, a concept introduced by Daniel Kahneman, a Nobel laureate in Economic Sciences, and psychologist Amos Tversky that posits that people tend to feel the pain of losses about twice as strongly as they feel the pleasure of equivalent gains.
Another bias is confirmation bias, which leads people to seek out information that supports the story they already believe — whether it's accurate or not, Walsh said.
And people often experience hindsight bias, where they believe they should have seen something coming, even if it was truly unpredictable.
For example, after COVID hit, some might think, 'I should've sold my investments right after the first case in China. I could've made a lot of money,' Walsh said, even though that would've been nearly impossible to foresee at the time. He noted that after unpredictable events, people "feel like they should have known."
The challenge, Walsh said, is recognizing those biases and figuring out how to manage them, whether it's by slowing down and reflecting more critically or by using tools like automation and technology to help make more objective choices.
Each Tuesday, retirement expert and financial educator Robert Powell gives you the tools to plan for your future on Decoding Retirement. You can find more episodes on our video hub or watch on your preferred streaming service.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content
OTTAWA — Some of the world's biggest streaming companies will argue in court on Monday that they shouldn't have to make CRTC-ordered financial contributions to Canadian content and news. The companies are fighting an order from the federal broadcast regulator that says they must pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenues to funds devoted to producing Canadian content, including local TV news. The case, which consolidates several appeals by streamers, will be heard by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Apple, Amazon and Spotify are fighting the CRTC's 2024 order. Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents such companies as Netflix and Paramount, is challenging a section of the CRTC's order requiring them to contribute to local news. In December, the court put a pause on the payments — estimated to be at least $1.25 million annually per company. Amazon, Apple and Spotify had argued that if they made the payments and then won the appeal and overturned the CRTC order, they wouldn't be able to recover the money. In court documents, the streamers put forward a long list of arguments on why they shouldn't have to pay, including technical points regarding the CRTC's powers under the Broadcasting Act. Spotify argued that the contribution requirement amounts to a tax, which the CRTC doesn't have the authority to impose. The music streamer also took issue with the CRTC requiring the payments without first deciding how it will define Canadian content. Amazon argued the federal cabinet specified the CRTC's requirements have to be "equitable." It said the contribution requirement is "inequitable because it applies only to foreign online undertakings and only to such undertakings with more than $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues." Apple also said the regulator "acted prematurely" and argued the CRTC didn't consider whether the order was "equitable." It pointed out Apple is required to contribute five per cent, while radio stations must only pay 0.5 per cent — and streamers don't have the same access to the funds into which they pay. The CRTC imposes different rules on Canadian content contributions from traditional media players. It requires large English-language broadcasters to contribute 30 per cent of revenues to Canadian programming. Motion Picture Association—Canada is only challenging one aspect of the CRTC's order — the part requiring companies to contribute 1.5 per cent of revenues to a fund for local news on independent TV stations. It said in court documents that none of the streamers "has any connection to news production" and argued the CRTC doesn't have the authority to require them to fund news. "What the CRTC did, erroneously, is purport to justify the … contribution simply on the basis that local news is important and local news operations provided by independent television stations are short of money," it said. "That is a reason why news should be funded by someone, but is devoid of any analysis, legal or factual, as to why it is equitable for foreign online undertakings to fund Canadian news production." In its response, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters said the CRTC has wide authority under the Broadcasting Act. It argued streamers have contributed to the funding crisis facing local news. "While the industry was once dominated by traditional television and radio services, those services are now in decline, as Canadians increasingly turn to online streaming services," the broadcasters said. "For decades, traditional broadcasting undertakings have supported the production of Canadian content through a complex array of CRTC-directed measures … By contrast, online undertakings have not been required to provide any financial support to the Canadian broadcasting system, despite operating here for well over a decade." A submission from the federal government in defence of the CRTC argued the regulator was within its rights to order the payments. "The orders challenged in these proceedings … are a valid exercise of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's regulatory powers. These orders seek to remedy the inequity that has resulted from the ascendance of online streaming giants like the Appellants," the office of the attorney general said. "Online undertakings have greatly profited from their access to Canadian audiences, without any corresponding obligation to make meaningful contributions supporting Canadian programming and creators — an obligation that has long been imposed on traditional domestic broadcasters." The government said that if the streamers get their way, that would preserve "an inequitable circumstance in which domestic broadcasters — operating in an industry under economic strain — shoulder a disproportionate regulatory burden." "This result would be plainly out of step with the policy aims of Parliament" and cabinet, it added. The court hearing comes as trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada have cast a shadow over the CRTC's attempts to regulate online streamers. The regulator launched a suite of proceedings and hearings as part of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act, legislation that in 2023 updated the Broadcasting Act to set up the CRTC to regulate streaming companies. In January, as U.S. President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term, groups representing U.S. businesses and big tech companies warned the CRTC that its efforts to modernize Canadian content rules could worsen trade relations and lead to retaliation. Then, as the CRTC launched its hearing on modernizing the definition of Canadian content in May, Netflix, Paramount and Apple cancelled their individual appearances. While the companies didn't provide a reason, the move came shortly after Trump threatened to impose a tariff of up to 100 per cent on movies made outside the United States. Foreign streamers have long pointed to their existing spending in Canada in response to calls to bring them into the regulated system. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025. Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI): A Bull Case Theory
We came across a bullish thesis on SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) on Value Degen's Substack. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on SOFI. SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI)'s share was trading at $13.67 as of 2nd June. SOFI's trailing and forward P/E were 30.93 and 41.49 respectively according to Yahoo Finance. An individual using a laptop to access the fintech platform to manage their finances. SoFi (SOFI) is a fully digital neo-bank aiming to disrupt traditional banking through technology, with no physical branches and a broad suite of financial products. Its growth strategy centers on expanding its user base and increasing customer product adoption. SoFi has made significant progress, growing accounts from 8.7 million to 10.9 million in just two quarters, though annual growth has slowed to 34% from 52% as its base expands. CEO Anthony Noto envisions reaching 50 million users in five years, but the focus is increasingly on deepening customer engagement. Product growth—now over 15 million—is a key but hard-to-verify metric, and while GAAP net income has been positive for six consecutive quarters, consistent growth in profitability remains elusive. The company expects stronger earnings beginning in 2025, with $320–$350 million in net income and a substantial increase to $650–$950 million projected in 2026. Trading at ~45x 2025 earnings but only 15–30x 2026 estimates, SoFi appears expensive today but potentially cheap relative to forward growth. Revenue is expanding at 20–33% annually, and SoFi trades at just 3.77x sales, versus the 6–8x typical of high-growth, sticky-tech peers. If the multiple expands alongside revenue growth, shares could double by 2027. Risks include legacy banks finally innovating and concerns over SoFi's personal loan portfolio, though most loans are resold, and tangible book value continues to rise. With forward-looking profitability, strong growth, and a potential valuation rerating, SOFI presents a compelling entry point today ahead of its 2026 inflection. Previously, we have covered SOFI in May 2025 wherein we summarized a on Substack. SoFi showed strong Q1 2025 growth with 33% revenue increase and improving profits, driven by expanding membership and financial services. Despite weak stock response, its solid fundamentals and conservative valuation pointed to potential stock price doubling by 2026. SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 17 hedge fund portfolios held SOFI at the end of the first quarter which was 14 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of SOFI as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. This article was originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Better Fintech Stock: SoFi Technologies vs. Robinhood Markets
SoFi Technologies' earnings growth is accelerating as it benefits from its expanding slate of personal finance solutions. Shares of Robinhood Markets have hit a new all-time high thanks to its strong growth outlook and improved financial position. 10 stocks we like better than SoFi Technologies › Digital bank SoFi Technologies (NASDAQ: SOFI) and online brokerage Robinhood Markets (NASDAQ: HOOD) both leverage their innovative platforms to disrupt the traditional financial services sector. Their strong growth rates have translated into impressive returns: Shares of SoFi are up 95% in the past year, while Robinhood stock has climbed by a remarkable 246%. After such large gains, some investors may wonder if they can keep their rallies going. Let's consider which of these fintech leaders is a better buy for your portfolio today. SoFi Technologies has transformed from a student and personal loans specialist into a comprehensive financial services platform. Its digital-first, one-stop shop approach resonates with consumers. Today, it serves 10.9 million members, nearly twice as many as it served just two years ago. In the first quarter -- in what CEO Anthony Noto described as a "tremendous start to 2025" -- SoFi's adjusted net revenue surged 33% year over year while adjusted earnings per share (EPS) climbed 200% to $0.06. The bank's success reflects its ongoing diversification beyond lending products into more fee-based services, as its members are increasingly utilizing more of its banking accounts, credit cards, investing options, and other financial products. SoFi is now positioned for more consistently profitable growth and high-quality cash flows. Management expects the positive trends to continue: It's targeting full-year adjusted EPS of $0.27 to $0.28 -- nearly double the $0.15 result in 2024. This outlook highlights a key advantage of SoFi over Robinhood Markets, which faces greater earnings uncertainty, as its business is still tied to transaction volumes and shifting financial market conditions. Investors who are confident in SoFi's ability to execute its growth strategy and capture more market share from legacy banks have compelling reasons to buy and hold the stock for the long term. As robust as SoFi's operating and financial results have been, Robinhood's recent momentum has been even stronger. In the first quarter, net revenue increased 50% while EPS more than doubled to $0.37 from $0.17 in the prior-year period. The company that redefined retail investing with its pioneering commission-free trading model is capitalizing on its 25.8 million funded accounts, where users are trading more actively and directing more of their total assets to the platform. Much of the growth story stems from the cryptocurrency market boom. Crypto now represents 43% of the platform's total transaction volume and contributes 27% of total revenue. Still, Robinhood Markets is also diversifying its product and service offerings with professional-level trading tools, banking solutions, wealth management options, and the premium Robinhood Gold subscription, all of which are increasing the company's customer wallet share. Wall Street has cheered Robinhood's traction, sending the stock up 94% year-to-date to a high that surpassed the pandemic-era peak it set in 2021. Robinhood aims to replicate its U.S. success as it expands globally. It plans to launch service in the Asia Pacific region, and is bolstering its presence in the digital asset space through its recent acquisition of crypto exchange Bitstamp. Those international ambitions, compared to SoFi's more domestically focused operations, could support greater long-term top- and bottom-line growth, which would help justify the stock's premium valuation. Notably, both Robinhood and Sofi are trading at forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios near 50, suggesting the market's optimism about their potential is fairly equal. Investors who take the view that Robinhood is just getting started on its path toward a dominant position in the online brokerage space should consider making the stock a part of a diversified portfolio. Choosing which of these is the better fintech stock to buy now isn't easy. I'm bullish on both and predict each will deliver positive returns over the next year. If I were forced to pick just one to buy, though, I'd give the edge to SoFi Technologies, which appears to offer a compelling buy-the-dip opportunity with shares still down about 27% from their 52-week high. In my view, SoFi stands to benefit more from a resilient macroeconomic backdrop, fueling lending demand and earnings growth in the coming quarters, which would provide catalysts for the stock to rally higher. Meanwhile, Robinhood must contend with the lofty expectations baked into its stock price following its recent surge. The market's hopes for it could prove difficult to meet, potentially setting the stage for renewed stock price volatility ahead. Before you buy stock in SoFi Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and SoFi Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Dan Victor has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Fintech Stock: SoFi Technologies vs. Robinhood Markets was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data