
Natural disaster victims would get six months of mortgage relief under Senate bill
The Mortgage Relief for Disaster Survivors Act would apply to homeowners with federally backed loans in areas declared disasters since Jan. 1 without accumulating interest or penalties during the six-month period. Borrowers could apply for additional six-month extensions.
"Earlier this year, we watched as families in Los Angeles were devastated by wildfires, and to date, many homeowners are still struggling to rebuild from this disaster," said Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who is co-sponsoring the bill.
"As natural disasters become more frequent due to climate change, it is critical that we pave a path to stability for homeowners in times of crisis," he added.
Parts of Schiff's former congressional district in Southern California were devoured in January when the Eaton Fire tore through Altadena, destroying nearly 6,000 homes and killing at least 19 people.
His co-sponsor is Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., whose state was ravaged by the 2021 Marshall Fire, which damaged or destroyed some 1,200 homes in Boulder County.
"Coloradans know all too well how difficult it is to pick up the pieces and move forward after catastrophic wildfires," Bennet said. "When mounting financial and emotional costs of recovery weigh on families, they should be able to take time to put their lives back together and rebuild their homes."
House members who represent Altadena, Pacific Palisades and Malibu in California introduced a companion bill this year that would provide 180 days of mortgage relief without penalties or late fees. The pause would apply only to federally backed loans.
Nonfederal lenders are not required to offer payment reprieves to homeowners in disaster zones. But after the Palisades and Eaton fires, more than 400 lenders agreed to a 90-day pause without reporting the missed payments to credit agencies.
Eaton Fire survivor Freddy Sayegh said he took advantage of the program after heavy smoke damage prevented him from returning to his Altadena home. He has since moved his family seven times and incurred thousands of dollars of unforeseen costs for food, clothing and other immediate needs.
Some of the costs were covered by insurance, but much of the money came out of his pocket while he awaits compensation.
He dipped into his savings when the 90 days were over and paid his delinquent mortgage in a lump sum, fearing he would incur fees or be forced to refinance.
"It actually placed a lot of pressure to come up with three months all at once," he said. "There's a lot of people who don't have three months of savings."
In Texas, where cataclysmic flooding that began July 2 caused an estimated $240 million in damage, officials announced a 90-day foreclosure moratorium that prohibits mortgage companies from initiating or completing foreclosures in Kerr County, the area hardest hit by the disaster.
According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, delinquencies nearly doubled nationally in March compared with the same time last year, up 21% from 12%.
In California, wildfire-related delinquencies peaked in March at 4,100 and fell to 2,240 in June, according to the data tracking company ICE Mortgage Technology.
The trend follows a pattern seen after other natural disasters, in which delinquencies spike in the months immediately following catastrophes and gradually level out over the next 18 to 24 months, said Andy Walden, head of mortgage and housing market research at Intercontinental Exchange, the parent company of ICE Mortgage Technology.
"It takes time for many homeowners to untangle finances while dealing with the emotional and logistical aftermath of losing their homes," he said. "From navigating insurance claims to working with FEMA, borrowers often need time to stabilize. Foreclosure moratoriums introduced after major disasters often give families the breathing room they need to recover."
Former Altadena resident Keni "Arts" Davis stared down at a 10-year mortgage when his home of nearly four decades was destroyed. He has moved six times since then, finally landing close to the neighborhood he loved so much.
Much of his recovery journey included negotiating with his insurance company to pay off his mortgage, rather than borrowing or seeking an extension.
"It might have meant financial ruin," he said.
He intends to rebuild by cobbling together the money through savings and microloans that are sometimes just $500. He said that the mortgage relief bills sound good on paper but that their timing leaves something to be desired.
"My grandmother would have said it's a day late and a dollar short," he said. "We're all just depending on any help we can get to make it one day to the next."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
Braun will wait to call special session on pro-GOP redistricting
Gov. Mike Braun says he won't call a special session until Statehouse leaders decide if they want to move forward with redrawing Indiana's congressional maps to benefit Republicans. The big picture: Indiana is one of several Republican-controlled states considering mid-cycle redistricting at the behest of the Trump administration. Vice President JD Vance visited with Braun and legislative leaders last week and Braun confirmed to reporters that redistricting was "the main topic." What they're saying: "The legislative leaders are checking with their caucuses to see if they're interested," Braun told reporters Tuesday. "I think it's going to be a methodical process and I think each leader is going to take his time on getting to that point where they say what they want to do." Between the lines: Braun can't force lawmakers to act. He can call the special session, but lawmakers can gavel in and out without taking action if they don't have the appetite to change the state's maps. There isn't much to gain in Indiana — Republicans could likely pick up one seat at best. The intrigue: Braun says it'll also depend on whether maps are redrawn in Texas, where House Democrats have fled the state, stalling redistricting attempts in the state that kicked off the nationwide fight. Reality check: Democrats in Indiana won't follow in the footsteps of their Texas peers. Being in the superminority, Indiana Democrats don't have the numbers to break the quorum; Republicans could come into a special session and pass new maps without a single Democrat being present. "Maybe that's something that voters will keep in mind when they decide who they're going to support in the upcoming elections," State Rep. Matt Pierce, D-Bloomington, said to reporters during a recent press conference. For now, Pierce said, Democrats will make the public aware of what's going on in hopes that public pushback will stop an effort to gerrymander Indiana's congressional maps.


Axios
41 minutes ago
- Axios
Indiana GOP mum on redistricting after VP visit
Gov. Mike Braun didn't say whether he'd call lawmakers in for a special session to draw new congressional maps after Vice President JD Vance's visit to Indiana yesterday. Why it matters: If Democrat-controlled states retaliate against Texas' redistricting plan, national Republicans will be looking at other GOP-controlled states, like Indiana, to pick up another seat or two. Driving the news: Vance met with Braun, House Speaker Todd Huston and Senate President Pro Tem Rodric Bray for about an hour at the Statehouse. What they're saying: Braun told reporters the meeting was "pretty good" and said, "we listened." Vance did not take questions from reporters when he walked by. The intrigue: Bray and Huston released statements afterward, but neither mentioned redistricting. "We had a meaningful discussion, heard the vice president's perspective on a number of topics, and will continue conversations as we work to advance Indiana and deliver results for Hoosiers," Huston said. "I appreciated the opportunity to hear from the Vice President on a variety of issues, which we will continue to talk through in the days ahead," Bray said. The other side: U.S. Reps. André Carson and Frank Mrvan — Indiana's two Democratic congressmen — joined protestors at the Statehouse to criticize the redistricting effort.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California GOP lawmaker faces taunts and jeers over Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' at town halls
GOP Rep. Doug LaMalfa drew taunts and jeers at two raucous town hall meetings Monday over his support for President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' LaMalfa, whose district spans much of the state's northern interior, is the latest Republican to face harsh in-person criticism, as members of the party attempt to sell Trump's sweeping agenda back home during Congress' August break from Washington. Last week, Nebraska Rep. Mike Flood – who also heeded the guidance of the NRCC, the House GOP's campaign arm, to focus the district work period on the president's massive domestic policy bill – met a largely hostile crowd as he was pressed on a range of issues, including the agenda bill that Trump signed into law July 4. LaMalfa calmly address audience members throughout both town halls, even as some attendees cursed at him and railed against his support of the president, shouting 'Liar!' While the morning crowd in Chico had been much louder, the audience in Red Bluff later in the evening was at times just as vocal, especially when LaMalfa expressed skepticism about the role of carbon dioxide in climate change. At both town halls, LaMalfa was pressed over how Trump's agenda, which includes historic cuts to federal support for the social safety net, would affect rural hospitals, particularly those in his district. Other attendees asked questions about transparency around the so-called Jeffrey Epstein files. At the morning event, LaMalfa called it a 'bad look' to have Epstein-related information continue to be 'suppressed.' Still other attendees warned the president's tariffs would harm farmers in California and attacked the congressman's credibility. 'If you're not here to either announce your resignation, why aren't you here to apologize to the farmers of the north state because of your support for the Trump tariffs?' one audience members said at the Chico town hall. 'I'm not gonna do either. Thanks,' LaMalfa replied. 'Do you actually want to talk about something productive?' LaMalfa defended Trump's tariffs, insisting that the United States had been taken advantage of and that the tariffs were being used to negotiate better deals for American farmers. 'And you know, is it the ideal, perfect way to go? No, I hope these tariffs can end soon,' he said Monday evening. 'I want to believe at some point we'lll end up with very low or zero tariffs with all these countries.' LaMalfa also addressed Texas' redistricting effort, warning it is going to start 'a grass fire all across the country.' His comments come as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has urged lawmakers to draw a new map to put before voters in a November special election. The map, as CNN previously reported, could flip five of Republicans' nine seats in the state if voters approve it in a ballot initiative and could potentially target LaMalfa's seat. For his part, LaMalfa said he didn't support either redistricting push. 'It's really ugly and no matter which side of the aisle you're on, it doesn't look good. It doesn't give you more faith in the political process if legislators draw the lines merely to have an outcome for a partisan win,' the congressman said.