
Shahid Afridi, former Pakistan captain dead? Video goes viral, what's the truth
Pakistan's legendary cricketer Shahid Afridi has passed away. Actually, a video that has surfaced on social media has shaken the cricket world. It is being claimed that former Pakistan captain Shahid Afridi has passed away. Afridi was in the news till a few days ago due to his anti-India statements.
In a viral video, it is being told that former Pakistan team captain Shahid Afridi has passed away. He was buried in Karachi, while many officials including the chairman of Vision Group also claimed to have expressed condolences.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
9 hours ago
- Economic Times
Salman Khan makes big reveal about his IPL team ownership plans
Synopsis Salman Khan recently revealed that he was offered an Indian Premier League (IPL) team during the tournament's launch in 2008 but turned it down, saying he has no regrets and is 'too old' for it now. While other Bollywood stars like Shah Rukh Khan, Juhi Chawla, and Preity Zinta have invested in franchises, Salman joked he would rather start leagues for childhood games such as gilli-danda and marbles. On the work front, he is shooting Battle of Galwan, a physically demanding film based on the 2020 India-China conflict, set for release in January 2026. Salman Khan Jokes About Skipping IPL Ownership, Shares Unusual League Ideas Bollywood superstar Salman Khan recently addressed long-standing curiosity about his absence from the list of celebrity Indian Premier League (IPL) team owners. Speaking at an event in Mumbai, the 59-year-old actor said he had been approached to buy a franchise during the league's inception in 2008 but chose not to move forward. In his trademark humorous style, Salman remarked that he now considers himself 'too old' for such an investment. He clarified that he has no regrets about the decision, adding that he is content with how things turned out. Over the years, several prominent actors have bought into IPL teams. Shah Rukh Khan and Juhi Chawla co-own Kolkata Knight Riders, while Preity Zinta is a co-owner of Punjab Kings. Despite his close association with many of these stars, Salman said he has no plans to join the ownership ranks. While discussing the topic, Salman also amused fans by suggesting he would be more interested in creating leagues based on childhood games such as marbles, gilli-danda, hide and seek, and cops and robbers. He joked about even launching a 'doctor-doctor' league, drawing laughter from the has often expressed his admiration for cricket and players like MS Dhoni, whom he calls his favourite. However, he seems more inclined toward fun, unconventional formats rather than professional team the work front, Salman was last seen in Sikandar alongside Rashmika Mandanna. He is now immersed in filming Battle of Galwan, a project inspired by the 2020 India-China Galwan Valley conflict. Directed by Apoorva Lakhia, the film involves demanding action sequences and challenging shoots in Ladakh's high-altitude terrain and cold actor told PTI that the role has been physically taxing, requiring more intense and prolonged training compared to his previous films. He revealed that around 20 days of the shoot will be in Ladakh, followed by over a week in freezing water conditions. The film is scheduled for a January 2026 release, breaking from his usual Eid premiere Battle of Galwan, Salman will return to television soon to host Bigg Boss 19. He also confirmed that a sequel to his 2015 hit Bajrangi Bhaijaan is in development, further adding to his already packed schedule.


News18
10 hours ago
- News18
Gavaskar Slams ECB's Decision: 'Drawn Series Showed How Silly This Idea Was...'
Last Updated: Sunil Gavaskar criticised replacing the Pataudi Trophy with the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy for the India-England Test series, questioning the logic and execution. Former India captain Sunil Gavaskar has once again stirred debate over the decision to replace the historic Pataudi Trophy with the newly introduced 'Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy' for the India–England Test series. The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB), facing widespread criticism from fans and experts for sidelining the original trophy, opted to present the 'Pataudi Medal' to the winning captain instead. However, Gavaskar has now questioned both the logic behind the move and the execution of the presentation. Writing in his column for Sportstar after the conclusion of the five-Test series, which ended in a 2-2 draw, Gavaskar noted that no member of the Pataudi family was present for the medal presentation. He argued that the idea itself was flawed. 'Nobody from the Pataudi family was there either, for the Pataudi medal, which was to be presented to the winning team's captain. The drawn series showed how silly this idea was of trying to make up to the Pataudis by retiring the trophy named after them," Gavaskar wrote. 'Every time the series is drawn, the medal can't be presented, can it? Wouldn't it be better, therefore, to have the medal for the Man of the Series than give it to the winning team's captain? And what if the captain himself has had an ordinary series and had little impact on the result?" he added. Gavaskar also criticised the absence of the two cricketing legends after whom the new trophy was named — Sachin Tendulkar and James Anderson. He pointed out that both were in England at the time yet were not part of the ceremony. 'This was the first-ever series named after Sachin Tendulkar and Jimmy Anderson, two of cricket's greatest legends. One would have expected both to be present to give the trophy to the two captains, especially since the series ended in a draw." 'To the best of one's knowledge, both were in England at the time. So, were they simply not invited? Or was this similar to what happened in Australia earlier this year, when only Allan Border was asked to present the Border-Gavaskar Trophy because Australia had won the series? Since this England series was drawn, perhaps neither was asked to attend the presentation," he concluded. In the series itself, India claimed victories in the second and fifth Tests, while England won the first and third. The fourth Test ended in a draw. Shubman Gill of India and Harry Brook of England were named joint Players of the Series for their standout performances. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Indian Express
10 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘The enduring memory will always be Mohammed Siraj's yorker': Sunil Gavaskar on his moment of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy
The recently concluded Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy ended in a 2-2 draw between India and England, with Indian players topping both the batting and bowling charts. Captain Shubman Gill was the highest run-scorer with 754 runs, while pacer Mohammed Siraj took the most wickets (23), including a five-wicket haul in the final innings at The Oval. Siraj sealed India's six-run victory by dismissing England's Gus Atkinson on the final day, a yorker that Sunil Gavaskar called his 'enduring memory' from the series. 'There will be several moments to cherish from the series: Gill's batting — very rarely do you get to see batting as pure as this — and his captaincy, Stokes' superhuman efforts with both bat and ball, the Indian fast bowlers' marathon spells, Joe Root's classy centuries, Rishabh Pant batting as only he can, as also Harry Brook and both also chirping as only they can. But the enduring memory will always be Mohammed Siraj's yorker that flattened the off-stump of Gus Atkinson to give India a win to level the series. After the disappointing last season in Test cricket, this would no doubt be the happiest moment in recent times for Indian cricket lovers. Thank you, Shubman, and your boys,' Gavaskar wrote in his column for Sportstar. The series, previously named the Pataudi Trophy after former captains Iftikhar Ali Khan and Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi, was renamed to honour James Anderson and Sachin Tendulkar. Earlier this year, when Australia had won the Border-Gavaskar Trophy 3-1, Gavaskar was not present at the Dias to hand over the trophy with former Australian captain Alan Border doing the honours alone. The plan by Cricket Australia was that Allan Border would present the trophy if Australia won and Sunil Gavaskar would if India retained it. Gavaskar, who had shared his disappointment at that time, also talked about how he wanted Tendulkar and Anderson to present the trophy to the two captains, Shubman Gill and Ben Stokes after the 2-2 draw and how he sees a similarity in this incident with the Border-Gavaskar Trophy presentation. 'This was the first-ever series named after Sachin Tendulkar and Jimmy Anderson, two of cricket's greatest legends. One would have expected both to be present to give the trophy to the two captains, especially since the series ended in a draw. To the best of one's knowledge, both were in England at the time. So, were they simply not invited? Or was this similar to what happened in Australia earlier this year, when only Allan Border was asked to present the Border-Gavaskar Trophy because Australia had won the series? Since this England series was drawn, perhaps neither was asked to attend the presentation,' Gavaskar wrote further. Post the renaming of the series, BCCI and ECB had announced that the Pataudi Medal of Excellence will be awarded to the winning captain of the series. With the series being drawn, it was decided to give the medal to both the captains. Gavaskar was of the view that the Pataudi medal could be given to the Man of the Series instead of the winning captain. 'Mostly around the world, administrators are brought in to ensure profits and are quite good at it, but they may not have much knowledge about the history of the sport they are presiding over. So, these little gestures are not in their scheme of things. Nobody from the Pataudi family was there either, for the Pataudi medal, which was to be presented to the winning team's captain. The drawn series showed how silly this idea was of trying to make up to the Pataudis by retiring the trophy named after them. Every time the series is drawn, the medal can't be presented, can it? Wouldn't it be better, therefore, to have the medal for the Man of the Series than give it to the winning team's captain? And what if the captain himself has had an ordinary series and had little impact on the result?' Gavaskar wrote.