Israel-Iran fallout sparks concerns for Africa's oil producers
The escalating conflict between Israel and Iran has prompted fears about the impact on economies across Africa.
Oil prices have surged following Israel's initial strikes on Iranian targets on Friday and retaliatory attacks by Tehran amid concerns that a broader regional conflict could disrupt oil exports from the Middle East.
Cheta Nwanze, partner at Lagos-based risk advisory company SBM Intelligence, told Semafor that economies across the continent, including oil producers, were likely to be hit hard.
'Higher crude prices will almost certainly translate into increased domestic fuel and transport costs, stoking inflation,' he said, adding that non-oil producing nations face higher energy importation bills that will drain foreign exchange reserves.
A number of African governments have scrapped fuel subsidies in recent years, following pressure from the International Monetary Fund, which means petrol price fluctuations will be felt more sharply.
The military strikes have also prompted diplomatic responses. The African Union expressed 'grave concern' about the attacks, which it said threaten international security. South Africa stressed its fear for 'nuclear safety' after Israel targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, while Nigeria warned the conflict could destabilize the Middle East.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Bloomberg Intelligence: Oil Turns Lower With Iran-Israel Attacks
Watch Alix and Paul LIVE every day on YouTube: Bloomberg Intelligence hosted by Paul Sweeney and Alix Steel Ellen Wald, President of Transversal Consulting, joins to discuss impact of Mideast conflict on commodities. Oil prices fell as the conflict in the Middle East has not disrupted crude production, and Iran has privately expressed willingness to deescalate hostilities with Israel. Phil Orlando, Chief Equity Market Strategist and Head of Client Portfolio Management at Federates Hermes, discusses his outlook for the markets. Global markets calmed down as fears of a wider conflict between Israel and Iran subsided, with stocks rising and oil and gold prices falling. Ned Lazarus, Associate Professor of International Affairs at George Washington University, discusses the latest out of the Mideast. Israel and Iran have exchanged fire for the fourth consecutive day, stoking fears of an all-out war that could drag in other countries in the oil-rich region and force the US into a more hands-on stance. Kate Duffy, Bloomberg News Aviation Reporter, joins to discuss the Paris Air Show and how Airbus has received orders from Saudi Arabian customers valued at up to $17 billion, including 77 freighter and passenger aircraft from AviLease and 50 A350-1000 widebody jets from Riyadh Air.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Senate returns amid concerns about deeper US involvement in the Iran, Israel conflict
Expect the debate about the fighting between Israel and Iran to shift to Capitol Hill in the coming hours. Congress has not been in session since bombs began dropping Thursday night. That changes today with the Senate returning to session. Bipartisan lawmakers have begun demanding answers from the administration about just "how involved" the U.S. is in the strikes and the risks it poses for the nation. Members from both parties have generally been supportive of how President Donald Trump has handled the crisis. But there are concerns about what comes next. Firstly, Trump campaigned on a platform of keeping the U.S. out of foreign entanglements. That pledge enthralled much of the MAGA base. But there is worry that certain direct – and even indirect – support for Israel could upset that coalition. This unfolds as the U.S. sends refueling tankers to Europe to be closer to the region. Secondly, many pro-MAGA voters back Israel. But the question is to what extent that involves the U.S. overseas. Lawmakers have questions, too. Is the U.S. merely supporting Israel? Or is the U.S. more involved? And if that's the case, at what point does Congress step in? The president is the commander in chief. But getting the U.S. involved in a "war" requires congressional approval under the Constitution. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., has already introduced a war powers resolution, forcing debate and a vote by the Senate ahead of the U.S. using any military force against Iran. Moreover, there is concern that U.S. action could spark the risk of domestic terrorism in the U.S. – or strikes against American military and diplomatic assets overseas. There could also be the risk of hitting "soft" targets, such as tourist hotspots, say in Europe. Multiple GOP lawmakers advised Iran and its proxies against taking action over the weekend. However, they all indicated that the U.S. would respond with force to a scenario would almost certainly draw the U.S. more deeply into the conflict if Iran forced a retaliatory strike authorized by Washington. It is said you can't be a little bit pregnant. But you can be a little bit at war. And that's what bipartisan lawmakers are trying to establish now: whether the U.S. could in fact be at war. Even if it's just a little bit.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
A Report From Tel Aviv's Safe Rooms, Supermarkets and Beaches
By and Stacey Shick Save With the conflict between Israel and Iran in its fourth day, we checked in with Bloomberg's Tel Aviv bureau chief Ethan Bronner for a sense of the mood on the streets—and in the safe room at his apartment. Plus: Neither the sender nor the recipient of two-factor authentication codes can be sure who's handled them along the way, food companies are moving too slow to cut methane, and what happens when White House threats are ignored. If this email was forwarded to you, click here to sign up.
