National Development Plan shows the Government is about to bet big on capital expenditure
infrastructure and capital projects by 2030
, and another €175 billion in the five years after that, the
Coalition
is betting heavily that it can achieve a step-change in addressing the infrastructure deficit that has developed in recent years.
If that deficit is the biggest problem facing the State – and the Coalition say constantly this is so – then the Government is planning to solve the problem by throwing a ton of money at it.
Tuesday's announcement
adds more than €30 billion to previous plans, promising a surge of investment, especially in the areas of water, energy infrastructure and housing. A further €175 billion is due to be spent by 2035, though much of that will fall to the next government to make those final decisions.
[
National Development Plan: €275bn to be spent over next 10 years, with housing receiving biggest boost
Opens in new window
]
Spending money – or promising to spend it – is in itself no guarantee of success. Past performance is evidence enough of that.
READ MORE
As
Tánaiste Simon Harris
acknowledged, the real test will be the Government's capacity to deliver the projects within something like the timescale envisaged. 'Our watchword,' said Harris, 'must be delivery … We have to say to [Government] agencies, 'get on with it'.'
But experience suggests this is easier said than done. However, the ability to ensure that Government and its agencies deliver those projects expeditiously now becomes a critical issue for this Coalition.
It has mortgaged its future on transforming the State's infrastructure, especially housing. But those housing units are visible and countable: if the Government fails to deliver 50-60,000 a year, there will be nowhere to hide.
Do Sinn Féin need to change tack after slump in the polls?
Listen |
38:36
In private,
Taoiseach Micheál Martin
has reportedly expressed impatience with the system's failure to move more quickly in response to decisions of its elected leaders. But there is nobody in Irish politics with deeper or broader experience of the system than Martin. Success or failure of the Government – and perhaps his legacy as Taoiseach – depends on his ability to get the machine to produce results. It is a formidable task.
It is complicated by factors outside the Government's control. Chief among them is the uncertain international environment. The European Union and United States stand on the brink of a trade war that has potentially serious consequences for our economy and those corporation tax revenues which will bankroll much of the planned building spree.
Launching their summer economic statement, barely an hour after the National Development Plan announcement, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe and Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers admitted that their budget plans would have to be rewritten if US president Donald Trump's 30 per cent tariffs – or anything like that – take effect.
The two men promised a budget package of €9.4 billion in October – a number that means sharp reductions to the recent growth in current spending budgets (but growth all the same). But then they immediately said that number may change if the conditions change. Here's the budget, they said – for now, anyway. This is the world we live in.
Martin, Harris, Donohoe and Chambers were united and unambiguous on one thing: if budgets come under pressure, they will trim current spending growth to safeguard capital budgets.
The principle is a laudable one: taking short-term pain for long-term gain. But what if that short-term pain comes in the shape of severely constrained spending on welfare, pensions, public services and increased taxes?
In recent budgets, the Government was able to cut taxes, increase spending, save money and still run surpluses. That happy era is coming to an end. Tougher choices will soon be unavoidable. With them comes tougher politics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
32 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Relief for the industry or a blow to public health: Mixed reaction to delayed health warnings on alcohol
There was a mixed reaction to the Government confirming it would delay putting health warnings on alcohol products, from 'breathing space for a sector under pressure' to 'a blow for public health in Ireland'. At Cabinet on Tuesday, ministers heard that the introduction of health warnings on alcohol labels was being delayed by two years after concerns were raised about the impact of their implementation in the current global trading environment. It comes against the backdrop of fears for Irish business from US trade tariffs propagated by President Donald Trump, with Fine Gael ministers in particular such as Paschal Donohoe and Peter Burke raising concerns in recent months. Part of the landmark Public Health Alcohol Bill, which has seen the introduction of minimum unit pricing and advertising curbs, the measure will now proceed next year as planned but at a 'more appropriate time', Cabinet heard. Ibec organisation Drinks Ireland welcomed the move and said it provided 'much-needed relief' for drinks producers in this country. 'Our members are currently contending with major trade uncertainty, new tariffs on product entering our most important export market, the US, and threats of further tariff escalation,' it said. 'In these uncertain times, companies must be as competitive as possible to survive in international markets. This means tackling regulatory burden and reducing costs for producers.' It claimed that commentary that the now-deferred changes would not impact exports, as the labelling requirement would only have applied here, was 'misguided and disingenuous'. 'The introduction of supplementary requirements uniquely for the Irish market would have placed additional pressure on all companies operating here, and this would of course be more pronounced for SMEs,' it added. The move was also welcomed by the Irish Whiskey Association, which called it a 'reprieve' as some members would have seen packaging and labelling costs increase by over 35%. Meanwhile, Alcohol Action Ireland said it was disappointed by the Government's decision and said the measure was aimed at informing consumers about the health risks that come with alcohol consumption. 'It's not just that the government is allowing its own groundbreaking legislation to be undermined by the very industry it is designed to regulate,' its CEO Sheila Gilheany said. This delay will have real-life consequences that will be felt by ordinary Irish people every day. Labels are crucial to efforts to reduce incidences of cancer, liver disease, and foetal alcohol spectrum disorder in Ireland and indeed to change the conversation about this product which is heavily marketed as risk-free and essential to everyday living.' Ms Gilheany added that the step-by-step approach to implementing aspects of the Public Health Alcohol Bill has been slow and allowed a space where misinformation has flourished. She also criticised the failure to date to introduce stricter curbs for advertising allowed by the law, which would restrict the content of such adverts to 'facts, stripping out the industry myths which are used to recklessly promote alcohol consumption'.
Irish Times
32 minutes ago
- Irish Times
‘It's important to keep it sustainable': Burke defends plans to cut VAT for hospitality sector
Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment Peter Burke has defended plans to cut VAT for the hospitality sector. The planned decrease would see VAT fall to 9 per cent at a cost cost to the exchequer of €545 million. 'The tourism sector is a very important part of the economy. At this point in time, over 200,000 people are employed in it. It's a €9 billion sector. And it's so important to try and keep that sector sustainable,' he told RTÉ's Today show. 'We've seen over the last number of years a very significant number of independent small food outlets and coffee shops come under pressure, many restaurants closing their doors. But this is a jobs measure to sustain the employment in that sector,' he said. .' READ MORE 'I've been in coffee shops and indeed restaurants where I've seen their margins diminish and some making a very significant loss that they weren't the prior year, considering in many cases their trade and turnover has sustained.' The Minister said the best value for money would be to sustain jobs. The Restaurant Assoication of Ireland's new president, Sean Collender, told the Today showthe VAT reduction would be an important step to support the industry. He outlined the challenges faced by it including rising costs such as labour, energy, and other operating expenses. He also spoke of the need for a broader framework and support from the Government to help the hospitality industry remain viable, beyond just the VAT reduction. This includes addressing issues like the risk-reward ratio for opening businesses and the high failure rate in the industry, he said. Mr Collender also spoke about the difficulty in guaranteeing price stability or reductions for customers, even with the VAT reduction. He said this is due to the significant cost pressures the industry is facing because of rising costs, especially for property/rent and on the ability of hospitality businesses to provide a good standard of living for their employees.
Irish Times
32 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Will the Government's big projects survive the next downturn?
The Government's updated National Development Plan (NDP) proposes to spend a vast sum of money on capital infrastructure. But beyond three 'mega projects' there is little detail and the vagueness of the document has led to some skepticism. In part one of today's Inside Politics podcast, Pat Leahy joins Hugh Linehan to discuss the NDP and whether the Government's promise to prioritise infrastructure could survive a major economic shock - the kind created by heavy US tariffs, for example, They then look at the Summer Economic Statement, also revealed this week, which shows there will not be much wriggle room in this year's Budget. In part two, back to the NDP and what it says about the Government's plan for the development of transportation infrastructure. Dublin's proposed MetroLink is one of the three mega projects identified, but there is €20 billion earmarked for other unidentified projects. Where should it go? How much will be spent on new roads, and what are the implications for carbon emissions? And what about public transport projects outside Dublin? Professor Brian Caulfield talks to Hugh and Pat. READ MORE Brian Caulfield is a Professor in Transportation in the Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering at Trinity College Dublin.
