Netanyahu's war plan brings Gaza full circle to before Israel's pullout 20 years ago
Two decades on, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu plans to reoccupy Gaza, bringing it back full circle and, if he follows through, dealing a significant blow to hopes for an independent Palestinian state in Gaza and the occupied West Bank.
Equally ominous is the Israeli leader's declared wish to see Palestinians leaving Gaza to settle elsewhere, a vision shared by US President Donald Trump but condemned by Arab states and European powers.
After Gaza was occupied by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war, the 2005 withdrawal from the strip was a realisation of a dream long entertained by Palestinians there: to be rid of Israel's heavy-handed, 38-year rule and have a chance of self-rule that had eluded the strip since the creation of Israel in 1948.
Israel's prime minister at the time, Ariel Sharon, saw the removal of Jewish settlements in Gaza – which was hugely controversial in Israel – as a way of lowering tension and forcing the strip to show itself capable of self-rule.
However, peace has remained elusive during five wars between Israel and Hamas – Gaza's rulers since 2007 – with the latest 22-month offensive by Israel leaving the strip in ruins.
Hamas rule
In 2007, Hamas seized control of Gaza after a brief civil war in which its fighters chased operatives of rival faction Fatah out of the strip. The mainstream Fatah dominates the West Bank-based Palestinian Authority.
With Hamas ruling the strip alone and with an iron grip, the group has since fought five wars against Israel, including the current one. Each of them exacted a heavy price on the territory's civilian residents and its modest infrastructure.
The Hamas takeover also subjected residents to a life of hardship after Israel and Egypt, Gaza's neighbour to the west, closed their borders with the strip. A network of underground tunnels under the Gaza-Egypt border once allowed a wide range of goods to reach the enclave, with Egyptian authorities turning a blind eye until they finally demolished them a decade ago. Israel believes that some continue to exist.
It was a Hamas-led attack against Israel in October 2023 that caused the present war, when the assailants killed about 1,200 people and took hostage another 250, of whom only 50 are believed to be still in captivity.
With the magnitude of the human and material cost in mind, analysts are divided in their verdict on whether the attack was a strategic blunder.
'It was suicide on the part of Hamas,' said Palestinian political scientist and academic, Ayman Al Raqab. 'It is obvious now that there has been no co-ordination between the group's military wing and the political leadership when the attack was being prepared.'
Israeli bombardment
After almost two years of Israeli bombardment, Gaza today lies in ruin, with more than 61,000 Palestinians dead and more than twice that number wounded – with civilians the vast majority in both cases – according to figures from the strip's Health Ministry. The UN views these figures as reliable.
A dire humanitarian crisis has gripped the area, with most of its 2.3 million residents facing hunger – with Israel resisting pressure to allow more food to enter – while many are cramped in about 25 per cent of the enclave's land mass.
The Israeli army said on Wednesday it had approved the framework for a new offensive in Gaza. The announcement comes days after Israel's security cabinet called for the capture of the Palestinian territory's largest city – Gaza city – following 22 months of war.
Some analysts believe Mr Netanyahu's threat to reoccupy Gaza is a bluff designed to force Hamas into capitulation.
'If he could not protect Israel's 1948 borders in October 2023, how will he protect his troops in Gaza?' asked Nazar Nazal, a Palestinian analyst.
'He will not be able to see Hamas flying the white flag. He is merely recycling his failure to appease the extremists in Israel.'
But others see Hamas's insistence on an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a long-term ceasefire as something that may be playing into the hands of Mr Netanyahu and his government.
'Israel benefits from Hamas's rejection of proposals to pause the war and free the hostages. It gives Netanyahu hope for his political survival,' said Tamara Haddad, another Palestinian analyst.
Weakened by Israel's relentless military operations in Gaza, Hamas has now been reduced to fighting for its very survival as a military and political force, according to sources in regular contact with the group's leaders.
Holding 50 Israeli hostages is by far the strongest card in Hamas's hand, a far cry from the days of raining rockets on Israel or making light of its heavy border security and sending hundreds of fighters inside Israel as was the case in October 2023.
The sources said Hamas has already laid bare its weakened state when it suggested to mediators from Egypt and Qatar that it was open to staying out of postwar governance, reconstruction and for its leaders to leave the strip and live abroad in exile.
It has also quietly conveyed to the mediators its readiness to discuss laying down and storing its weapons under international supervision. However, it has publicly stuck to the hardline position of only disarming when a Palestinian state is born.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
36 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Trump says 'not here to negotiate for Ukraine' at Alaska meeting with Putin
US President Donald Trump said he would not negotiate on behalf of Ukraine in his Friday meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and would let Kyiv decide whether to engage in territorial swaps with Russia. Trump said his goal was to get the two sides to start a negotiation, with any territorial swaps to be addressed then. "They'll be discussed, but I've got to let Ukraine make that decision, and I think they'll make a proper decision. But I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine, I'm here to get them at a table," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. Trump's remarks are likely to offer some assurance to Ukraine, which is worried that the US-Russia talks could freeze the conflict at Ukraine's expense. Trump said the Russian offensive in Ukraine was likely aimed at helping to strengthen Putin's hand in any negotiations to end the war. "I think they're trying to negotiate. He's trying to set a stage. In his mind that helps him make a better deal. It actually hurts him, but in his mind that helps him make a better deal if they can continue the killing," he said. The US President said he expected his meeting with Putin to produce results, given the stakes involved and weakness in the Russian economy. "He's a smart guy, been doing it for a long time but so have I ... we get along, there's a good respect level on both sides, and I think, you know, something's going to come of it," he said. Trump said it was a good sign that Putin was bringing business executives with him from Russia, but said no deals could be made until the war was settled. "I like that 'cause they want to do business, but they're not doing business until we get the war settled," he said.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
French MEP questioned by police for praising Palestine 'struggle'
French Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Emma Fourreau was questioned by the Caen judicial police on Wednesday as part of an investigation into "apology for terrorism", French media reported. Fourreau, who is a member of the left-wing La France Insoumise (France Unbowed, LFI) party, is under investigation for her comments welcoming the release of Georges Ibrahim Abdallah, a Lebanese pro-Palestine activist imprisoned for over 40 years in France. "FINALLY! After 41 years in prison, Georges Ibrahim Abdallah will be released on 25 July. He was the oldest political prisoner, and France should be ashamed for keeping him locked up for so long. Long live his struggle, long live Palestine!" she wrote on X on 17 July. The 25-year-old elected official said the investigation was launched by the prosecutor's office after reports of her post were sent via Pharos, the public platform for reporting illegal online content. As per the French criminal code, "apology for terrorism" is defined as "directly inciting acts of terrorism or publicly condoning such acts". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Rights defenders say that France's "apology for terrorism" law is being used to criminalise Palestine solidarity. Since 7 October 2023, French authorities have launched hundreds of investigations against citizens for their remarks about the Israel's war on Gaza, accusing people of promoting terrorism. Those included prominent personalities like French-Palestinian MEP Rima Hassan and French scholar Francois Burgat. "The criminalisation of voices for Palestine does not weaken, nor does our mobilisation: we will not be silenced!" Fourreau wrote on X on 13 August after she was summoned. French scholar acquitted of 'apology for terrorism' charges after Palestine tweets Read More » The police hearing was on a voluntary basis, which meant that she was allowed to leave the premises at any time, and lasted for 90 minutes. "I believe I can be held accountable for my public statements, so I went," she told France 3 television network. However, she said, the investigation was unjustified. "I believe I had nothing to do in this office for 'apology for terrorism' when we have dozens of tweets every day that truly condone the genocide taking place in Gaza," she said. The MEP indicated that it was the "long live his struggle" part of her tweet that was targeted by the proceedings. "This is a bad-faith interpretation of my tweet... when I talk about [Abdallah's] fight, I'm talking about his commitment to Palestine, which is understandable when we're in the midst of a genocide, with shots aimed at journalists and bombs raining down," she said. 'Political police' The MEP was on board the humanitarian ship Handala that recently attempted to break Israel's blockade of Gaza. The ship was intercepted by the Israeli army on 27 July, after which Fourreau was placed under arrest and eventually deported to France on 29 July. Regarding her support for Abdallah, she said: "It's a just fight, anti-imperialist, pro-Palestinian and against the Israeli government. His voice counts in this fight, and I salute his freedom." Abdallah was one of the longest-serving prisoners in France, where most convicts serving life sentences are freed after fewer than 30 years. A former guerrilla with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), he was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1987 for his alleged involvement in the assassinations of US military attache Charles Robert Ray and Israeli diplomat Yacov Barsimantov in Paris in 1982. Lebanese pro-Palestine activist to be freed after 40 years in French jail Read More » Abdallah had been eligible for release since 1999 but his requests to be freed had been repeatedly rejected until the Paris Appeals Court ordered the 74-year-old to be released on 25 July, on the condition that he leaves France and never returns. The United States opposed his release. In France, LFI has openly advocated for Palestine, a long-standing position that has led to the party being labeled antisemitic. After Fourreau's police summon, LFI founder and former presidential candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon denounced on X "the government's grotesque winks to [Israeli Prime Minister] Netanyahu" and accused the presidential majority of reinventing "the political police" in France. LFI leader and MP Mathilde Panot, who was also summoned for questioning by French police in 2024 for an investigation into suspected "apology for terrorism" over her criticism of Israel, has come out in support of Fourreau. "Full support for Emma Fourreau. Criminalising voices for peace and absolutely refusing any sanctions against Netanyahu, a criminal prosecuted by the International Criminal Court and responsible for the genocide in Gaza. [French President] Macron's France brings us shame!" she wrote on X. Fourreau also received support from Anasse Kazib, an activist in the Marxist organisation Revolution Permanente who was also targeted by an investigation for a series of tweets in support of Palestine. "This is France: in the front, we parachute a few supplies to pretend, but in the backroom, we continue to try to silence those who speak out against the genocide," Kazib wrote on X.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Exclusive: ICC arrest warrant applications ready for Israel's Ben Gvir and Smotrich on apartheid charges
Arrest warrant applications against two prominent Israeli ministers on charges of apartheid are ready and with two deputy prosecutors at the International Criminal Court (ICC), Middle East Eye can reveal. If the warrants for National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich are issued, it will be the first time that the crime of apartheid is charged at an international court. ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan had prepared cases against Ben Gvir and Smotrich before he went on leave in May, according to numerous sources in the court with knowledge of the matter. "Those applications for the arrest warrants are completely done," an ICC source told MEE. "The only thing that didn't happen was submitting them to the court," the source said on condition of anonymity. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters MEE can reveal that the deputy prosecutors have the power to submit them to pre-trial judges for examination, but some within the ICC believe the applications will be quietly shelved as the court faces unprecedented external pressure. The newly elected US administration under Donald Trump sanctioned Khan in February, and he went on leave in May amid a UN investigation into sexual misconduct allegations against him, which he has denied. 'If the Ben Gvir and Smotrich applications just disappear, the opportunity to prosecute one of the most blatant examples of apartheid in the world today will likely be lost forever' - ICC source In June, the US further sanctioned four ICC judges. This included two judges who approved Khan's application for arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant and three Hamas leaders last November. MEE revealed earlier this month that Khan has been subjected to a string of threats and warnings by prominent figures, including former British Foreign Secretary David Cameron, as well as close colleagues and family friends briefing against him, and fears for the prosecutor's safety prompted by a Mossad team in The Hague. Khan nevertheless filed applications on 20 May 2024 that culminated in arrest warrants being issued for Netanyahu and Gallant that November. 'There was no more work to do on the applications' MEE understands that despite continued pressure, the prosecutor's team of lawyers continued investigating alleged Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity in the occupied West Bank. But before he could file the applications, Khan went on leave following a failed attempt to suspend him. "Karim was ready," the ICC source told MEE. "There was no more work to do on the applications. They're not being drafted. They weren't being revised. They were done. "All that was left to do was follow court procedures for submitting an application. But Karim didn't have time to do that because everything moved so quickly. And then he stepped aside." Exclusive: How Karim Khan's Israel war crimes probe was derailed by threats, leaks and sex claims Read More » An ICC statement at the time said Khan's deputies would continue his work across all cases, including the Palestine investigation. But whether the Ben Gvir and Smotrich warrant applications were filed would not be public knowledge, since the court ordered in April that any further requests cannot be publicised. Two ICC sources told MEE that the two deputy prosecutors, Nazhat Shameem Khan and Mame Mandiaye Niang, have not filed the applications due to the threat of US sanctions. British-Israeli ICC defence lawyer Nicholas Kaufman told Israel's Kan public broadcaster in June that the US sanctions on four ICC judges were "meant to be designed to encourage the dropping of the arrest warrants for Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Gallant". Kaufman added: "Accordingly, most commentators believe that [sanctioning the judges] is a further warning shot over the bows, if I can put it that way, before the sanctioning of the deputy prosecutors who've now taken over from Karim Khan." When asked by MEE to comment on the status of the Ben Gvir and Smotrich applications, and whether fear of sanctions has delayed their submission, the prosecutor's office said: "The office cannot provide comments on matters related to ongoing investigations and any specific charges that may arise in relation to situations addressed by the office. This approach is essential to protect the integrity of investigations, and to ensure the safety and security of victims, witnesses and all those with whom the office interacts." Khan declined to comment in response to a request from MEE. 'Justice delayed is justice denied' Raji Sourani, a lawyer representing Palestine at the ICC and ICJ, criticised the deputy prosecutors for their delay in applying for the warrants. "For us, they are very late. What are they waiting for? They have everything," he told MEE. "Justice delayed is justice denied." One ICC source said they feared the case would never see the light of day. "There were months and months of intense work that went into them. These are really serious documents documenting really serious crimes. "If the Ben Gvir and Smotrich applications just disappear, the opportunity to prosecute one of the most blatant examples of apartheid in the world today will likely be lost forever." Le Monde publishes new details of campaign against Karim Khan and ICC Read More » On 27 May, The Wall Street Journal reported that the prosecutor had been preparing to seek warrants for Ben Gvir and Smotrich before he went on leave, and that prosecutors had been "weighing" whether the pair committed war crimes related to their role in settlement expansion. But the report did not mention that apartheid was a central charge against both Israeli leaders, as three sources with knowledge of the matter told MEE, nor that the only step left for the prosecutor's office was to submit the applications. Under the Rome Statute, the ICC's founding treaty, apartheid is a crime against humanity. It is defined as "inhumane acts… committed in the context of an institutionalised regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime". Israel has been accused of apartheid by legal scholars and numerous rights groups, including the New York-based Human Rights Watch and Israel's B'Tselem. In July 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the UN's principal judicial body, issued a legal opinion that Israel's occupation of Gaza and the West Bank is illegal. It also concluded that Israel's "near-complete separation" of Palestinians in the West Bank, including by the expansion of settlements, breached its obligations under international law to prevent, prohibit and eradicate all racial segregation and apartheid. On 10 June, the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway sanctioned Smotrich and Ben Gvir over "their repeated incitement of violence against Palestinian communities". MEE contacted the Israeli government for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication. 'They will destroy you' Last month, an MEE investigation revealed that on 1 May, ICC defence lawyer Kaufman told Khan he had spoken to Netanyahu's legal advisor and was "authorised" to make Khan a proposal that would allow him to "climb down the tree". He told Khan to apply to the court to reclassify the warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant as "confidential", according to a note of the meeting lodged on file at the ICC and seen by MEE. This, it was suggested, would allow Israel to access the details of the allegations, which it could not do at the time, and challenge them in private, without the outcome being made public. But Kaufman warned that if it emerged the prosecutor was applying for more arrest warrants related to the West Bank or if the warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant were not withdrawn, then "all options would be off the table". According to the note, Kaufman told Khan: "They will destroy you and they will destroy the court." Netanyahu's office did not respond to requests for comment at the time. In response to questions from MEE, Kaufman denied threatening Khan. He denied having been authorised to make any proposals on behalf of the Israeli government and said he had shared his personal views with Khan on the Palestine situation. Two weeks after the meeting, Khan stepped down on indefinite leave following the publication by The Wall Street Journal of new sexual assault allegations against him, which he denied. There is no suggestion of any connection between the Kaufman-Khan meeting and the publication of the allegations. MEE also revealed in June that on 23 April 2024, as Khan was preparing to apply for warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, then-British Foreign Secretary David Cameron threatened in a phone call with the prosecutor that the UK would defund and withdraw from the ICC if the court issued the warrants. The phone call was also reported earlier this month by French newspaper Le Monde. The British foreign office and Khan both declined to comment in response to the report, while Cameron did not respond to multiple requests by MEE for comment. Khan faced more pressure from other sources. In a virtual meeting with ICC officials in May 2024, US Republican Senator Lindsey Graham threatened sanctions against them if Khan applied for the warrants. Now, the ICC finds itself in a precarious position. Many fear the institution itself could be the target of sanctions, a move which would paralyse the court's operations. In a further threat to the court last month, US State Department legal adviser Reed Rubinstein warned that "all options remain on the table" unless all arrest warrants and the investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes are dropped. Whether the ICC will issue warrants for Ben Gvir and Smotrich in these circumstances remains to be seen.
