Boy's sentence for killing 80-year-old dog walker to be reviewed
Bhim Sen Kohli called out for help as he was attacked, slapped in the face with a shoe and racially abused in Franklin Park in Braunstone Town, near Leicester, on Sept 1 last year. He died the next day with a spinal cord injury and fractured ribs.
Last month, Mr Justice Turner sentenced a boy aged 15, who had punched and kicked Mr Kohli, to seven years in custody, and a 13-year-old girl, who encouraged the attack by filming parts of it while laughing, to a three-year youth rehabilitation order.
Both children, who cannot be named because of their age, denied their crimes but were convicted by a jury at Leicester Crown Court.
A spokesman for the Attorney General's Office said the case would be reviewed under the unduly lenient sentence scheme.
The spokesman said: 'The Solicitor General, Lucy Rigby KC MP, was appalled by this violent, cowardly attack on an innocent man. She wishes to express her deepest sympathies to Bhim Kohli's friends and family at this difficult time.
'After undertaking a detailed review of the case, the Solicitor General concluded the sentence of the 15-year-old boy could be referred to the Court of Appeal. The court will determine if the sentence is increased or not.'
Mr Kohli's daughter Susan spoke of feeling 'angry and disappointed', adding that she believed the sentences did not 'reflect the severity of the crime they committed'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
10 minutes ago
- The Sun
Theft-hit Tesco store locks beer and wine behind the tills to counter ‘rife' shoplifting
A THEFT-hit Tesco Express has put all beer and wine behind the tills. Shoppers must now request all booze, which is locked away with spirits and cigarettes. 2 The move — thought to be a first for a major chain — was brought in to counter 'rife' shoplifting at the store in Brighton. The city council initially tried to stop it selling any alcohol due to crime. But it relented when told that Tesco would take extra security measures. A cashier said: 'Too many people were stealing. It's bad here.' We told last year how some Tesco branches kept doors locked until staff had checked shoppers outside on CCTV. Figures show 516,971 reported shop thefts last year, around one a minute. But the real total is said to be much higher. Tesco has been invited to comment. 2 How business owners are cracking down on shoplifting
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Minnesota prosecutor seeks to overturn man's 1998 murder conviction after a witness confesses
A Minnesota prosecutor said Tuesday she will seek the release of a man imprisoned 27 years for murder after a key witness has recanted her testimony and told authorities she committed the crime. Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty said she supports the effort by attorneys for Bryan Hooper Sr. who are asking for a judge to vacate his conviction. At a press conference, Moriarty apologized to Hooper's adult daughter, Bri'ana Hooper, saying, 'I understand at the same time, 'sorry' doesn't bring back those 27 years. What we're doing today, though, I hope is the beginning of getting your father out of prison.' Moriarty was not with the office in 1998. Hooper now 54, was convicted by a jury at trial in 1998 of premeditated murder, felony murder while committing burglary and felony murder while committing kidnapping in connection with the death of Ann Prazniak, 77. He received three life sentences with the possibility of release after 30 years. He is in prison in Stillwater. The woman who prosecutors say has confessed is in prison in Georgia for an assault-related crime and will be released in about four years. Moriarty said attorneys will sort through the filing of charges against her after seeing which judge is assigned Hooper's case and trying to get him released as quickly as possible. Moriarty said the woman expects to be charged with murder and 'knows exactly what she's getting into here.' Police found Prazniak's body in April 1998 in a cardboard box wrapped with Christmas lights in a closet in her Minneapolis apartment — her ankles, nose, mouth, wrists and head bound and her body wrapped in garbage bags, blankets and bedding. Her cause of death was ruled asphyxiation, and she died two weeks to a month before police found her body, according to court documents. Moriarty said her office's Conviction Integrity Unit was reviewing Hooper's case when officials learned the state's star trial witness had come forward in late July on her own to recant her testimony against Hooper and to confess to killing Prazniak and concealing her body. Bri'ana Hooper, who has advocated for her father's release, lamented 27 years of missed birthdays, holidays, milestones and lost opportunities. 'But today we don't have to lose," she said. 'We have an opportunity to shed light and use my father's story to shed light on the other people who are sitting behind bars for crimes that they did not commit," she said. Her father has maintained his innocence. Attorneys for the Great North Innocence Project, representing Hooper, filed a petition to vacate his conviction. A judge would have 90 days to make a decision on that, Moriarty said. Project Legal Director Jim Mayer said, 'A strong criminal legal system is not one that insists on its own infallibility. A strong system is one that faces up to and confronts its failures, fixes its mistakes and works to repair the harm that's been caused. We are taking a small step down that road today, but let's acknowledge that we still have a long way to travel.' Jailhouse informants who implicated Hooper also recanted their testimony long ago, Moriarty said. In 2020, a judge granted Hooper's request to vacate two of three first-degree murder charges after he argued he was wrongly convicted and sentenced for three counts of first-degree murder against the same person. ___
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK visa services firm sues ex-boss for £6m over alleged improper use of profits
The company that runs visa services for the UK government is suing its former chief executive for £6m over her alleged improper use of profits earned during a period of record immigration. Cloud Bai-Yun, who once represented the UK on an international ethics and fraud advisory body, is accused by Ecctis of a breach of fiduciary duty, according to court filings. The company claims that she oversaw profit making on a not-for-profit government contract and this money was ultimately used in 2021 to pay her £17.587m for her shares in Ecctis's holding company. Ecctis's claim against Bai-Yun is for £4.63m, plus more than £2m in interest. Bai-Yun said: 'I wholly deny the allegations made against me by the new management of Ecctis and will be defending myself in court.' Ecctis runs the official language tests and qualification recognition services for those applying for certain UK visas or permissions. Under a not-for-profit contract with the Department for Education (DfE), it is claimed that Ecctis was obliged to reinvest any profit earned or to keep a maximum of half of the net gain in reserve. It is alleged that Bai-Yun, who was chief executive from 2014 and a director since 2006, instead improperly approved large dividend payments in 2016 and 2017 to a holding company. Bai-Yun was the sole shareholder of the holding company and in 2021 that money was used to buy her shareholding for £17.587m, it is claimed. The shares were then transferred to an employee-owned trust. Bai-Yun's defence claims there were no restrictions in Ecctis's articles of association on paying dividends and that it was for her as the shareholder to make the decisions on the payments. The legal action by Ecctis follows its repayment to the government of £13.64m after a DfE audit concluded the company had failed to reinvest profits in its services. Bai-Yun, who had moved from being chief executive to chief adviser on the sale of her shares, was asked to resign from the latter role after the 2022 audit. The Guardian revealed details of the scandal in January this year, leading the DfE's most senior civil servant to tell the Common's public accounts committee that officials had undertaken a 'very hard review' of 'serious failings'. The new legal row will be an embarrassment to the DfE, which renewed Ecctis's contract this year with changes that ensured all profits were directly paid to the government. Insiders at the company have voiced concerns that Ecctis continues to hold a monopoly on services they say would be better run directly by the state. Ecctis has seen a huge increase in revenue in recent years owing to historically high levels of immigration, particularly in the post-Brexit period. According to Ecctis's particulars of claim, the payment in 2016 of a £2.16m dividend to the holdings company was questioned at the time by the finance director at the company, Robert Wall. Wall wrote that his understanding was that they were supposed to operate 'as a not-for-profit business', it is claimed. Despite this, the board, with Bai-Yun in attendance, went on to approve a further dividend in 2017 of £2.5m. Ecctis claims the dividends were 'constituted almost entirely of net profit' from the government contracts, leaving it in breach of the agreement with the DfE. The company further alleges: 'In February 2021, funds including the 2017 dividends were passed to the defendant as part of the £17.587m sale price.' Ecctis's claim for £4.6m plus interest in 'remedy' covers only the 2016 and 2017 dividend payments. There is a time limitation on claims. The claim refers, however, to the DfE's audit which found that £16.63m in dividends were paid in total up to 2021 and that this money was ultimately 'put towards the purchase price' of £17.587m paid to Bai-Yun. Ecctis claims Bai-Yun failed in her duty as a director of Ecctis to promote the success of the company and avoid conflicts of interest. In her defence, Bai-Yun claims the price she received for her shares was £17.5m and not £17.587m. She claims there was no contractual restraint on the use of the balance of the net profit once appropriate investments in the services were made. She denies a conflict of interest as she approved the dividends as the shareholder of the holding company, rather than as a director of Ecctis. She claims Wall was mistaken in his understanding of the contract with the DfE. A DfE spokesperson said: 'Our new, strengthened contract, alongside a new leadership team at Ecctis, means the department can continue to work with Ecctis to provide a good service to the public on the recognition of qualifications, which is a requirement under international law.'
