How Tariffs Could Impact Advertising Budgets
As generative AI is growing and developing, more people are using it for search and placing trust in the results. According to new research from SEO platform BrightEdge—released in conjunction with its new AI Catalyst tracking platform—almost every AI search engine has seen huge increases in traffic in just the last month. In March alone, xAI's Grok saw an explosion of 266% more users, while 166% more users asked Anthropic's Claude to search for them. More than 500 million people are using ChatGPT at least once a week, and many people are actually using two or three different AI platforms for search weekly. And nearly seven out of 10 consumers are trusting the answers they get from generative AI.
This changes the calculus of SEO for marketers quite a lot, said Jim Yu, BrightEdge founder and CEO.
'There's this notion of am I even visible? Am I even on the list that the AI is suggesting?' Yu said in an interview. 'And then, what is the sentiment that the AI has around my product? Is it positive, is it neutral, is it negative?'
While brands want AI to pull positive information, BrightEdge's research found that only about one in three brand mentions is positive. The vast majority are neutral—straightforward information with no evaluating language, how-to information, or technical specifications. Only 3% of the mentions are negative. Yu said that AI engines are now searching for information to match queries in real time, working to be as fact-based as possible, and striving to inform the user. He described today's AI search engines as 'an uber researcher that goes out and does all this, and comes back with the summary.'
Instead of being concerned with keywords, marketers wanting to do well with AI search need to understand the types of conversations people are having with AI about their brands, Yu said. Knowing what they want to know and the way that they are asking it can help brands understand what kind of information to put out on their websites. A deeper understanding of what different AI engines are looking at can also be helpful, ensuring that the most important information can surface on any platform. But Yu also cautioned that because AI search engines speed through your site, messy code can make for messy results, so it's more important now than ever to ensure the underlying code for your site is clean.
'You've got to have this mindset of optimize once and [know] how you make sure you're winning everywhere,' Yu said.
AI is also revolutionizing how companies do marketing. Home improvement retailer Lowe's has been using it for consumer- and employee-facing platforms that help redesign rooms and answer home repair questions. I talked to CMO Jennifer Wilson about the retailer's strategy, and an excerpt from our conversation is later in this newsletter.
It's spring break season and we'll be taking next week off from Forbes CMO. We'll be back on Wednesday, April 23.
Shipping containers at the Port of Long Beach in California.
FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images
As President Donald Trump's sweeping worldwide tariffs go into effect today, companies are preparing to pay more for products and components that are imported. Some of those costs will be passed on to consumers, but some will be internalized by companies—and many fear it will take a bite out of marketing dollars. A study last month from the Interactive Advertising Bureau found that 94% of advertisers are worried about the impact tariffs will have on ad spending. More than one in five expected an 11% to 20% drop, and 60% anticipate budget cuts of 6% to 10%. Advisory firm Madison and Wall cut its projection for U.S. advertising revenue growth this year to 3.6%, down from 4.5% predicted in December.
The timing of tariffs is especially bad considering TV Upfronts and NewFronts are scheduled to take place in a month. AdAge reports that media sellers are actively talking to buyers, wanting to know more about client budgets and commitments—but the client side of the conversation is silent. 'I have never experienced a phenomenon with such a big thing in the news and so little [communication],' an anonymous buyer told AdAge.
Some marketers are taking a more tactical approach, writes Forbes contributor Kiri Masters. There are some that are cutting down on pay-per-click advertising on Amazon. Others are prioritizing efficiency over growth, planning to maintain visibility during this period rather than build their brands. And still others are analyzing campaigns from the SKU level, concentrating on the items that will generate the most efficient returns.
Ford Motor Company has always had an all-American vibe to its products and story. As tariffs scramble the automotive industry, Ford launched a campaign touting its American manufacturing, called 'From America, For America,' writes Forbes contributor Roger Dooley. The campaign also introduces employee-level discounts on all vehicles through June 2. Ford's video ad got a rave review from President Trump on Truth Social. Dooley points out Ford was able to quickly mobilize this campaign because everyone expected the tariff announcement. While the details were unknown, Ford has always been a U.S. vehicle manufacturer and could play that up in a campaign. (It's worth noting, however, that Ford isn't immune to tariffs. Some of its manufacturing takes place in Canada and Mexico, and some of its parts are imported.)
Shoppers at a grocery store in Washington, D.C.
STEFANI REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images
Economists and analysts have long been saying that higher consumer prices from tariffs will make consumers less likely to buy things. But what if the impact isn't as profound on the consumer level? Forbes senior contributor Pamela Danziger writes about reports that don't necessarily paint a picture of consumer doom. A study from research firm Collage found that consumers are likely to apply the same strategies they used as high inflation gripped prices after the Covid-19 pandemic. More than seven in 10 are already adjusting their behavior, switching to less expensive brands or retailers, buying in bulk and changing their budgets to account for higher prices. However, more changes may be made when tariffs hit home; almost half of respondents believe they're already seeing tariffs reflected in prices.
The National Retail Federation isn't expecting to see many changes to its growth projections, Danziger writes. For 2025, retail growth predictions of 3.6% or better are holding firm, and while NRF economists are expecting slower growth for the near term, the trade group is expecting for normal growth to return in time.
Lowe's CMO Jennifer Wilson.
Lowe's
In the competitive area of home improvement retail, Lowe's has been doubling down on new uses for AI, creating apps for both customers and employees, and automatically targeting campaigns based on the weather. I talked to Lowe's CMO Jennifer Wilson about the retailer's applications of AI.
This conversation has been edited for length, clarity and continuity. A longer version is available here.
Tell me about how AI tools have evolved at Lowe's, starting with Style Your Space.
Wilson: One of the big insights that came through was that customers have a hard time envisioning their space. That was really the impetus for Style Your Space, which allows customers to upload a photo, and then AI is able to detect and then generate different styles based off of that, then serve up personalized product recommendations. That was our first foray into a more consumer-facing AI product.
As we staged for what is now [informational chatbot] Mylow, we first went into a beta test with our associates. We wanted to get feedback with our associates, understanding how helpful was the tool? Where did we need to make tweaks? How did they feel that this was best arming them?
Style Your Space has been out for a while. What kind of a reaction have you gotten?
Our engagement levels continue to grow. We have heard that consumers love that the product that we're serving up they can buy in real time. We've been pleased with some of the early sales results as well.
For us, our primary KPI is engagement. A significant amount of app users who are coming in and finding the tool are spending more time with that product than what we'd anticipated. It's almost the way that consumers interact with Pinterest.
I think that there's this notion of coming into an experience, like Style Your Space, that's a little bit more zen-like than social media. Rather than going down this rabbit hole of reels and getting sucked into what historically would be that social media cycle, we've heard in our research that consumers really want a little bit more of this kind of relaxing space to be able to envision and look at products on their own time. And that tracks as you think about the time that consumers are spending in the tool.
What are the KPIs you're looking at for Mylow?
First and foremost, engagement is really critical for us. The beauty of something like Mylow is that you're helping associates and customers at the same time. You're learning more and more about what is of interest to them so that you can serve up more personalized content in real time to them. And you have these halo effect KPIs, like better SEO value for the site.
What advice would you give to marketers that are trying to figure out how to make AI work for their brand?
My advice would be twofold. One: How is AI in support of your brand ambitions? Are you thinking about what you want your brand to stand for and how AI can help serve that or accelerate that? And then two: How does it impact your customer base? Brand and customer are so deeply connected and the two places that I think about as a CMO of looking at every single day. Will this serve my customer and make their life better? And will this serve our brand and prop it up in the way that we want to be positioned? Look through the lens of how is your brand positioned and what matters most to your customer.
The blockbuster opening of blocky video game-inspired A Minecraft Movie last weekend shattered expectations and showed that it's hip to be square.
$163 million: U.S. gross earnings from opening weekend, making it the year's biggest opening weekend and surpassing that of game-inspired The Super Mario Bros. Movie
88%: Audience review score on Rotten Tomatoes. The critics' score is notably lower, at 48%
'Who the hell saw this coming?': Deadline's reaction to the movie's opening weekend, after projecting it would gross $65 million
Video is vital to growing audience and exposure. Here are seven tips to attract viewers and engagement on your YouTube channel.
No matter what your title is, there are only 24 hours in the day—and ideally you're only spending eight of those working. Stay in control of your schedule with careful time management.
Last weekend, Wayne Gretzky's record for the most career regular season NHL goals was broken by a player who has racked up $60 million in endorsements, licensing and memorabilia throughout his hockey career. Who's the NHL's new all-time top scorer?
A. Marc-Andre Fleury
B. Sidney Crosby
C. Jonathan Quick
D. Alex Ovechkin
See if you got the answer right here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Nvidia stock a massive bargain — or a massive value trap?
AI has transformed demand for computer chips and the most obvious beneficiary of that has been Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA). With a stock market capitalization of $3.4trn, Nvidia might not seem like an obvious bargain. But what if it is really worth that much – or potentially a lot more? I have been keen to add some Nvidia stock to my portfolio, but I do not want to overpay. After all, Nvidia has shot up 1,499% in five years! So, here is what I am doing. For some companies in which I have invested in the past, from Reckitt to Burberry, I have benefited as an investor from a market being mature. Sales of detergent or pricy trenchcoats may grow over time, but they are unlikely to shoot up year after year. That is because those firms operate in mature markets. On top of that, as they are large and long-established, it is hard for them to grow by gaining substantial market share. So, market maturity has helped me as an investor because it has made it easier for me to judge what I think the total size of a market for a product or service may be – and how much of it the company in question looks likely to have in future. Chips, by contrast, are different. Even before AI, this was still a fast-growing industry – and AI has added fuel to that fire. On top of that, Nvidia is something of a rarity. It is already a large company and generated $130bn in revenues last year. But it is not mature – rather, it continues to grow at a breathtaking pace. Its first-quarter revenue was 69% higher than in the same three months of last year. Those factors mean that it is hard to tell what Nvidia is worth. Clearly that is not only my opinion: the fact that Nvidia stock is 47% higher than in April suggests that the wider market is wrestling with the same problem. Could it be a value trap? It is possible. For example, chip demand could fall after the surge of recent years and settle down again at a much lower level. A lower cost rival could eat badly into Nvidia's market share. Trade disputes could see sales volumes fall. With a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 46, just a few things like that going wrong could mean today's Nvidia stock price ends up looking like a value trap. On the other hand, think about those first-quarter growth rates. If Nvidia keeps doing as well, let alone better, its earnings could soar. In that case, the prospective P/E ratio based on today's share price could be low and the current share price a long-term bargain. I see multiple possible drivers for such an increase, such as more widespread adoption of AI and Nvidia launching even more advanced proprietary chip designs. So, I reckon the company could turn out to be either a massive bargain at today's price, or a massive value trap. The price does not offer me enough margin of safety for my comfort if the stock is indeed a value trap. So, I will wait for a more attractive valuation before buying. The post Is Nvidia stock a massive bargain — or a massive value trap? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool C Ruane has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Burberry Group Plc, Nvidia, and Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
We're offloading mental tasks to AI. It could be making us stupid
Koen Van Belle, a test automation engineer who codes for a living, had been using the artificial intelligence large language model Copilot for about six months when one day the internet went down. Forced to return to his traditional means of work using his memory and what he had decades of experience doing, he struggled to remember some of the syntax he coded with. 'I couldn't remember how it works,' Van Belle, who manages a computer programming business in Belgium, told Salon in a video call. 'I became way too reliant on AI … so I had to turn it off and re-learn some skills.' As a manager in his company, Van Belle oversees the work of a handful of interns each year. Because their company has limits on the use of AI, the interns had to curb their use as well, he said. But afterward, the amount and quality of their coding was drastically reduced, Van Belle said. 'They are able to explain to ChatGPT what they want, it generates something and they hope it works,' Van Belle said. 'When they get into the real world and have to build a new project, they will fail.' Since AI models like Copilot and ChatGPT came online in 2022, they have exploded in popularity, with one survey conducted in January estimating that more than half of Americans have used Copilot, ChatGPT, Gemini or Claude. Research examining how these programs affect users is limited because they are so new, but some early studies suggest they are already impacting our brains. 'In some sense, these models are like brain control interfaces or implants — they're that powerful,' said Kanaka Rajan, a computational neuroscientist and founding faculty member at the Kempner Institute for the Study of Natural and Artificial Intelligence at Harvard University. 'In some sense, they're changing the input streams to the networks that live in our brains.' In a February study conducted by researchers from Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon University, groups of people working with data worked more efficiently with the use of generative AI tools like ChatGPT — but used less critical thinking than a comparator group of workers who didn't use these tools. In fact, the more that workers reported trusting AI's ability to perform tasks for them, the more their critical thinking was reduced. Another 2024 study published last year reported that the reduction in critical thinking stemmed from relying on AI to perform a greater proportion of the brain work necessary to perform tasks in a process called cognitive offloading. Cognitive offloading is something we do everyday when we write our shopping list, make an event on the calendar or use a calculator. To reduce our brain's workload, we can 'offload' some of its tasks to technology, which can help us perform more complex tasks. However, it has also been linked in other research to things like having a worse memory. As a review published in March concluded: 'Although laboratory studies have demonstrated that cognitive offloading has benefits for task performance, it is not without costs.' It's handy, for example, to be able to rely on your brain to remember the grocery list in case it gets lost. So how much cognitive offloading is good for us — and how is AI accelerating those costs? This concept is not new: The Greek philosopher Socrates was afraid that the invention of writing would make humans dumber because we wouldn't exercise our memory as much. He famously never wrote anything down, though his student, Plato, did. Some argue Socrates was right and the trend is escalating: with each major technological advancement, we increasingly rely on tools outside of ourselves to perform tasks we once accomplished in-house. Many people may not perform routine calculations in their head anymore due to the invention of the calculator, and most people use a GPS instead of pulling out a physical map or going off physical markers to guide them to their is no doubt these inventions have made us more efficient, but the concern lies in what happens when we stop flexing the parts of the brain that are responsible for these tasks. And over time, some argue we might lose those abilities. There is an old ethos of "use it or lose it" that may apply to cognitive tasks as well. Despite concerns that calculators would destroy our ability to do math, research has generally shown that there is little difference in performance when calculators are used and when they are not. Some have even been critical that the school system still generally spends so much time teaching students foundational techniques like learning the multiplication tables when they can now solve those sorts of problems at the touch of a button, said Matthew Fisher, a researcher at Southern Methodist University. On the other hand, others argue that this part of the curriculum is important because it provides the foundational mathematical building blocks from which students learn other parts of math and science, he explained. As Fisher told Salon in a phone interview: "If we just totally get rid of that mathematical foundation, our intuition for later mathematical study, as well as just for living in the world and understanding basic relationships, is going to be off.' Other studies suggest relying on newer forms of technology does influence our brain activity. Research, for example, has found that students' brains were more active when they handwrote information rather than typing it on a keyboard and when using a pen and paper versus a stylus and a tablet. Research also shows that 'use it or lose it' is somewhat true in the context of the skills we learn. New neurons are produced in the hippocampus, the part of the brain responsible for learning. However, most of these new cells will die off unless the brain puts effort and focus into learning over a period of time. People can certainly learn from artificial intelligence, but the danger lies in forgoing the learning process to simply regurgitate information that it feeds us. In 2008, after about two decades of the public internet, The Atlantic published a cover story asking "Is Google making us stupid?" Since then, and with the emergence of smart phones and social media, research has shown that too much time on the internet can lower our ability to concentrate, make us feel isolated and lower our self-esteem. One 2011 review found that people increasingly turn to the internet for difficult questions and are less able to recall the information that they found on the internet when using it to answer those questions. Instead, participants had an enhanced ability to recall where they found it. 'The internet has become a primary form of external or transactive memory, where information is stored collectively outside ourselves,' the authors concluded. In 2021, Fisher co-authored research that also found people who used internet searches more had an inflated sense of their own knowledge, reporting exaggerated claims about things they read on the internet compared to a control group who learned things without it. He termed this phenomenon the 'Google effect.' 'What we seem to have a hard time doing is differentiating where our internally mastered knowledge stops and where the knowledge we can just look up but feels a lot like our knowledge begins,' Fisher said. Many argue that AI takes this even further and cuts out a critical part of our imaginative process. In an opinion piece for Inside Higher Education, John Warner wrote that overrelying on ChatGPT for written tasks 'risks derailing the important exploration of an idea that happens when we write.' 'This is particularly true in school contexts, when the learning that happens inside the student is far more important than the finished product they produce on a given assignment,' Warner wrote. Much of the energy dedicated to understanding how AI affects our brains has been focused on adolescents because younger generations use these tools more and may also be more vulnerable to changes that occur because their brains are still developing. One 2023 study, for example, found junior high school students who used AI more had less of an ability to adapt to new social situations. Another 2023 paper also found that students who more heavily relied on AI to answer multiple choice questions summarizing a reading excerpt scored lower than those who relied on their memory alone, said study author Qirui Ju, a researcher at Duke University. 'Writing things down is helping you to really understand the material,' Ju told Salon in a phone interview. 'But if you replace that process with AI, even if you write higher quality stuff with less typos and more coherent sentences, it replaces the learning process so that the learning quality is lower.' To get a better idea of what is happening with people's brains when using large language models, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology connected 32-channel electroencephalograms to three groups of college-age students who were all answering the same writing prompts: One group used ChatGPT, another used Google and the third group simply used their own brains. Although the study was small, with just 55 participants, its results suggest large language models could affect our memory, attention and creativity, said Nataliya Kos'myna, the leader of the 'Your Brain on LLM' project, and a research scientist at the MIT Media Lab. After writing the essay, 85% of the group using Google and the group using their brains could recall a quote from their writing, compared to only 20% of those who used large language models, Kos'myna said. Furthermore, 16% of people using AI said they didn't even recognize their essay as their own after completing it, compared to 0% of students in the other group, she added. Overall, there was less brain activity and interconnectivity in the group that used ChatGPT compared to the groups that used Google or their brains only. Specifically, activity in the regions of the brain corresponding to language processing, imagination and creative writing in students using large language models were reduced compared to students in other groups, Kos'myna said. The research team also performed another analysis in which students first used their brains for the tasks before switching to performing the same task with the large language models, and vice versa. Those who used their brains first and then went on to try their hand at the task with the assistance of AI appeared to perform better and had the aforementioned areas of their brains activated. But the same was not true for the group that used AI first and then went on to try it with just their brains, Kos'myna said. 'It looks like the large language models did not necessarily help you and provide any additional interconnectivity in the brain,' Kos'myna told Salon in a video call. 'However, there is potential … that if you actually use your brain and then rework the task when being exposed to the tool, it might be beneficial.' Whether AI hinders or promotes our capacity for learning may depend more on how we use it than whether we use it. In other words, it is not AI that is the problem, but our overreliance on it. Van Belle, in Belgium, now uses large language models to write social media posts for his company because he doesn't feel like that is where his skills are most refined and the process can be very time-consuming otherwise. 'I would like to think that I would be able to make a fairly decent LinkedIn post by myself, but it would take me an extra amount of time,' he said. 'That is time that I don't want to waste on something I don't really care about.' These days, he sees AI as a tool, which it can be — as long as we don't offload too much of our brain power on it. 'We've been on this steady march now for thousands of years and it feels like we are at the culmination of deciding what is left for us to know and for us to do,' Fisher said. 'It raises real questions about how best to balance technology and get the most out of it without sacrificing these essentially human things.'
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
One AI image generator lets you create NSFW art — and it's only A$62 for life
The following content is brought to you by Mashable partners. If you buy a product featured here, we may earn an affiliate commission or other compensation. TL;DR: Create anything, even NSFW art, with a lifetime subscription to Imagiyo for only A$62. Opens in a new window Credit: Imagiyo Imagiyo AI Image Generator: Lifetime Subscription (Standard Plan) AU$62 AU$767 Save AU$705 Get Deal Digital creativity has never been more accessible, yet many of us remember the days when crafting a single image meant wrestling with layers and plugins for hours on end. Now there's a way to generate stunning visuals in seconds, simply by typing a description of what you have in mind. Get an Imagiyo AI Image Generator lifetime subscription for just A$62 (reg. A$767) through 20 July. Imagiyo uses Stable Diffusion AI alongside FLUX AI to turn text prompts into high-quality images ready for commercial use, and there aren't many limits to what you can create. Here's what that means. What do you want to make first? It only takes a brief description to put Imagiyo's advanced algorithms to work, and unlike other image generators, Imagiyo actually lets you really follow your creativity. Craft stunning landscapes, visualize characters from books, or go for something a little more daring. Imagiyo supports NSFW content creation. Just set your prompts to private and let your mind run wild. Imagiyo's commercial-use license means you can take some of the images you generate and incorporate them into client projects, social media campaigns, or personal portfolios without fear of copyright issues. Each month, you receive 500 image-generation credits and can submit up to two prompts at once. Unused credits roll over, so you never lose access to your creative potential. Best of all, Imagiyo delivers your purchased engine updates and feature improvements automatically, ensuring you always work with the latest AI models. You have until 20 July 20 at 11:59 p.m. PT to get an Imagiyo AI Image Generator lifetime subscription for A$62 (reg. A$767). StackSocial prices subject to change.
