Musk's X Accuses Britain of Online Safety 'Overreach'
'The Online Safety Act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach,' X said on its Global Government Affairs account. 'A plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression.'
CONCERNS OVER FREE SPEECH, DUPLICATION
X also criticised a new police unit set up to monitor social media and a recently introduced code of conduct for online platforms, calling the measures 'parallel and duplicative.' The company suggested these initiatives could further erode free speech.
Despite its criticism, X said it has begun complying with the law by rolling out age-verification systems in Britain, Ireland and the wider European Union. These include estimating a user's age based on account details, using AI to assess selfies, or requiring the upload of official ID documents.
FINES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE
Under the Online Safety Act, which came into force on Jul 25, UK media regulator Ofcom requires such age checks to be 'technically accurate, robust, reliable and fair.' Companies that fail to comply face fines of up to £18 million (US$24 million) or 10 per cent of global revenue, whichever is higher. Repeat offenders risk being blocked in the UK.
WIDER DEBATE OVER PRIVACY
The UK's move follows similar efforts in France and several US states, where governments have pushed for stricter age verification for pornography sites. Supporters say the rules are necessary to protect minors, but critics warn that such policies could undermine user privacy and heighten the risk of identity theft if sensitive data were compromised.
As users seek workarounds, demand for virtual private networks (VPNs) has surged. According to British media, VPN app Proton reported an 1,800 per cent rise in downloads since last week, with multiple VPN apps topping Apple's UK app store.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
5 minutes ago
- Business Times
Apple says Samsung will supply chips from Texas factory
APPLE said on Wednesday that Samsung Electronics will supply chips from its production plant in Texas for Apple products including iPhones. 'This facility will supply chips that optimise power and performance of Apple products, including iPhone devices,' Apple said in a statement. A Samsung spokesperson declined comment. The statement was made as part of Apple's announcement it would spend an additional US$100 billion in US investments, bringing its total investment commitment to the country to US$600 billion over the next four years. Tesla recently signed a US$16.5 billion deal to source chips from Samsung, with Tesla CEO Elon Musk saying in late July that Samsung's new chip factory in Texas would make Tesla's next-generation AI6 chip. Samsung's chip contract manufacturing business is expected to reduce losses by securing new orders in 2026 to make image sensor chips for iPhone 18s and chips for Tesla, Pak Yuak, analyst at Kiwoom Securities, wrote in a note late last month. REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Major climate-GDP study under review after facing challenge
[WASHINGTON] A blockbuster study published in top science journal Nature last year warned that unchecked climate change could slash global GDP by a staggering 62 per cent by century's end, setting off alarm bells among financial institutions worldwide. But a re-analysis by Stanford University researchers in California, released on Wednesday, challenges that conclusion - finding the projected hit to be about three times smaller and broadly in line with earlier estimates, after excluding an anomalous result tied to Uzbekistan. The saga may culminate in a rare retraction, with Nature telling AFP it will have 'further information to share soon' - a move that would almost certainly be seized upon by climate-change skeptics. Both the original authors - who have acknowledged errors - and the Stanford team hoped the transparency of the review process would bolster, rather than undermine public confidence in science. Climate scientist Maximilian Kotz and co-authors at the renowned Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), published the original research in April 2024, using datasets from 83 countries to assess how changes in temperature and precipitation affect economic growth. Influential paper A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up It became the second most cited climate paper of the year, according to the UK-based Carbon Brief outlet, and informed policy at the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, US federal government and others. AFP was among numerous media outlets to report on it. Yet the eye-popping claim that global GDP would be lowered by 62 per cent by the year 2100 under a high emissions scenario soon drew scrutiny. 'That's why our eyebrows went up because most people think that 20 per cent is a very big number,' scientist and economist Solomon Hsiang, one of the researchers behind the re-analysis, also published in Nature, told AFP. When they tried to replicate the results, Hsiang and his Stanford colleagues spotted serious anomalies in the data surrounding Uzbekistan. Specifically, there was a glaring mismatch in the provincial growth figures cited in the Potsdam paper and the national numbers reported for the same periods by the World Bank. 'When we dropped Uzbekistan, suddenly everything changed. And we were like, 'whoa, that's not supposed to happen,'' Hsiang said. 'We felt like we had to document it in this form because it's been used so widely in policy making.' The authors of the 2024 paper acknowledged methodological flaws, including currency exchange issues, and on Wednesday uploaded a corrected version, which has not yet been peer-reviewed. 'We're waiting for Nature to announce their further decision on what will happen next,' Kotz told AFP. He stressed that while 'there can be methodological issues and debate within the scientific community,' the bigger picture was unchanged: climate change will have substantial economic impacts in the decades ahead. Undeniable climate impact Frances Moore, an associate professor in environmental economics at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved in either the original paper or the re-analysis, agreed. She told AFP the correction did not alter overall policy implications. Projections of an economic slowdown by the year 2100 are 'extremely bad' regardless of the Kotz-led study, she said, and 'greatly exceed the costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to stabilize the climate, many times over.' 'Future work to identify specific mechanisms by which variation in climate affects economic output over the medium and long-term is critical to both better understand these findings and prepare society to respond to coming climate disruption,' she also noted. Asked whether Nature would be retracting the Potsdam paper, Karl Ziemelis, the journal's physical sciences editor, did not answer directly but said an editor's note was added to the paper in November 2024 'as soon as we became aware of an issue' with the data and methodology. 'We are in the final stages of this process and will have further information to share soon,' he told AFP. The episode comes at a delicate time for climate science, under heavy fire from the US government under President Donald Trump's second term, as misinformation about the impacts of human-driven greenhouse gases abounds. Yet even in this environment, Hsiang argued, the episode showed the robust nature of the scientific method. 'One team of scientists checking other scientists' work and finding mistakes, the other team acknowledging it, correcting the record, this is the best version of science.' AFP
CNA
6 hours ago
- CNA
Zelenskiy says Russia appears more open to ceasefire, but warns against deception
KYIV: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Wednesday (August 6) that Russia appeared "more inclined" to agree to a ceasefire, but cautioned that the details of any potential deal would be crucial and that neither Ukraine nor the United States should be misled by Moscow. His remarks followed a meeting in Moscow between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US special envoy Steve Witkoff, which US President Donald Trump described as having delivered 'great progress' – though he offered no specifics. CALL FOR LASTING PEACE "Ukraine will definitely defend its independence. We all need a lasting and reliable peace. Russia must end the war that it itself started," Zelenskiy said in a post on X following a phone call with Trump that included European allies. Trump, who has shown increasing frustration with Putin in recent weeks, has given the Russian president until Friday to advance toward peace or face tougher sanctions. A White House official confirmed that the secondary sanctions Trump had previously warned of – targeting countries that continue doing business with Russia – were still scheduled to take effect on Friday. TARIFFS ON INDIA ADD TO PRESSURE Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday (August 6) imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods over its purchases of Russian oil. The move is widely seen as part of a broader strategy to pressure Moscow by targeting its trade partners. 'The pressure on (Russia) works. But the main thing is that they do not deceive us in the details – neither us nor the US,' Zelenskiy said. While Ukraine has consistently called for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire, Russia, which controls about a fifth of Ukrainian territory, has rejected the proposal and continues to push forward on the eastern front.
