Jon Ossoff Edges Out All But One Republican in New Georgia Senate Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia, a Democrat, fares better than all but one of his Republican rivals heading into the 2026 midterms, when he will have to defend his seat from challengers.
Why It Matters
Republicans hold a slender majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, meaning they must win any and all seats up for grabs if they hope to more effecitvely push through their agenda without needing to rely on reconciliation.
Republicans view Georgia, which narrowly supported President Donald Trump in the 2024 U.S. presidential election, as a major opportunity to make one such gain.
The state has grown increasingly purple over the most recent elections: Senator Marjorie Taylor Green, a Republican, has already seen poor polling that could indicate Republican hardline politics may have limited appeal in what could be an incredibly contentious and tightly run midterm competition.
What To Know
According to polling data from polling and analytics firm Cygnal, Ossoff beats his closest republican rivals with some healthy margins. Only Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia Secretary of State, poses a considerable threat from the Republicans—unless Georgia Governor Brian Kemp decides to join the race.
Raffensperger scored a statistical tie against Ossoff in the polling, and other potential rivals, including Kelly Loeffler, who previously ran against Ossoff and lost despite Trump's backing, fell outside of the margin of error, which Cygnal identified as plus or minus 3.4 percent.
One potential stumbling block for Ossoff is Mike Collins, one of the current representatives from Georgia, who is behind Ossoff by only 2.5 points, putting him within the margin of error but outside of a statistical tie, such as the case of Raffensperger.
While Cygnal did not poll Kemp versus Ossoff, the data showed that Kemp has an overwhelmingly positive net favorability: Kemp has a net favorability of over 25 percent compared to Ossoff's 7.7 percent.
However, Cygnal found that between 11 and 13 percent of respondents were undecided, leaving much room for either side to gain an advantage as the midterms draw closer. Notably, when asked about a generic U.S. Senate ballot and whether the election was held today, would the respondents vote for a republican or Democrat, the republican came out ahead 48 percent to 44 percent.
U.S. Sen. John Ossoff (D-GA) speaks at a campaign rally for Democratic presidential candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris at the Georgia State Convocation Center on July 30, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia.
U.S. Sen. John Ossoff (D-GA) speaks at a campaign rally for Democratic presidential candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris at the Georgia State Convocation Center on July 30, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia.The Cygnal poll surveyed 800 Georgia voters, all of whom voted in the 2024 general election, and was conducted between May 15 and 17 of this year. Interviews were conducted over phone calls and text.
Cygnal works with many Republican campaigns and groups, including the Republican Attorneys General, the Republican Senate Campaign Committee, and several governors, including Kemp and Texas Governor Greg Abbott, according to the firm's website.
The polls also identified inflation in the economy as a potential top concern for voters going into next year's midterms, followed by threats to democracy, illegal immigration and border security, Social Security and Medicare, and government spending and waste.
Half of all respondents said that they found that Georgia was going in the right direction while just over one-third said that the state was on the wrong track.
What People Are Saying
GOP operative Stephen Lawson told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution: "If Brian Kemp runs for the U.S. Senate, Brian Kemp will be the next U.S. Senator from Georgia.
"But if he takes a pass, Republicans should be much more judicious about who the nominee is, given the uncertain political environment and the fact that Jon Ossoff has proven he will be a formidable opponent."
What Happens Next
The midterm elections will take place on November 3, 2026, during which time Ossoff's seat will be up for grabs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
25 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Trump Issues Flurry of Pardons for Former Governor and Others
President Donald Trump on May 28 signed a flurry of presidential pardons and commutations, including for some well-known former politicians. In total, the White House confirmed to The Epoch Times, Trump planned to pardon nine individuals convicted of federal crimes, while commuting the sentences for two others. Those nine include former Connecticut Gov. John Rowland and former New York Rep. Michael Grimm—both Republicans.
CNN
30 minutes ago
- CNN
Tariffs, and Trump's entire economic agenda, were just thrown into chaos
A US federal court's ruling Wednesday against President Donald Trump's authority to levy some of his most sweeping tariffs may have also dealt a serious blow to the president's entire economic agenda. Trump's core economic policy has been his historic tariffs, but the administration has described its aggressive trade actions as just one leg of a three-legged stool. Built on tariffs, spending cuts and tax cuts, Trump's economic agenda relies on all three components to stand strong. But a three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade blocked Trump's global tariffs, which he imposed citing emergency economic powers. Those trade actions include the 'Liberation Day' reciprocal tariffs, 10% universal tariffs and the tariffs aimed at preventing fentanyl from entering the United States. The three-legged economic stool just lost a leg, at least for now. Without trade, Trump's whole economic policy plan could come crashing down. Historic tariffs have persuaded dozens of US trading partners to come to the table to make deals with Trump. In theory, those trade deals could open up foreign markets to more US goods, benefitting US manufacturers and farmers. Revenue from Trump's tariffs, meanwhile, could, at least in part, help pay for Trump and congressional Republicans' massively expensive tax cuts, that could boost economic growth and add certainty to the markets by raising the debt ceiling. Trump's deregulation and spending cuts, particularly via the Department of Government Efficiency, could also reduce the government's costs and negate some of the impact of the tax cuts on the surging federal debt. Because of its fragile construction, Trump's plan to usher in a new economic Golden Age has plenty of naysayers, including most mainstream economists, who argue that the administration lacks the discipline, authority and political support to make it happen. The on-again, off-again trade policy, legal battles over DOGE and intraparty standoffs on the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' serve as evidence. Elon Musk, one of Trump's biggest financial backers who was the public face of Trump's DOGE team, criticized the bill this week, saying the legislation's massive additions to America's debt effectively undermined the cost-cutting group's efforts. Now, with the potential for no tariff component to Trump's agenda, Republican deficit hawks in Congress may not support Trump's tax cuts. Many were already extremely nervous about the bill's nearly $4 trillion price tag – even with around $1 trillion in unpopular cuts to Medicaid. 'Increased revenues from tariffs (approximately $150 billion per year) could have helped offset some of the deficit from the reconciliation package,' Aniket Shah, head of sustainability and transition strategy at Jefferies, wrote in a note to clients Wednesday. With the legal outcome now uncertain, Shah said, Trump and Republicans may be forced to settle for reduced tax cuts or increased spending cuts to advance the House-approved bill through the reconciliation process with the Senate. There are more questions than answers at this point. The Trump administration has appealed the ruling, which may ultimately get overturned. 'It does raise questions about how the administration will respond and how this affects, if at all, the tax package going through Congress,' noted Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist Advisory Services. Even as the appeal makes its way through the legal system – perhaps to the Supreme Court – Wednesday's ruling could undermine Trump's much-sought trade deals with foreign partners. Those deals have been sparsely announced, even with just over a month to go in the three-month pause of Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs.' The administration has announced frameworks of deals with only the UK and China. 'We believe one reason bilateral negotiations had stalled was that US trading partners may have anticipated this outcome,' said Shah. 'Will they now view trade negotiations as a matter to be resolved by the courts, or will they re-engage with the US on trade policy?' The setback for Trump's agenda, however, may be temporary. For businesses, the court's ruling provides little certainty – particularly because of the administration's appeal. 'If anything, the ruling supercharges the uncertainty already facing businesses and consumers, because it's the first hint of a possibility that … tariffs could be eliminated entirely,' said the Yale Budget Lab's Ernie Tedeschi. 'But even if they were, the Administration could try to raise tariffs using other authorities. The potential outcomes just got much more uncertain in both directions — lower or higher tariffs.' The administration may have alternate pathways to imposing its tariffs and avoid legal scrutiny. That could include using Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, which was unaffected by the court's ruling. Trump has levied 25% tariffs on steel, aluminum, autos and auto parts using Section 232 authority. 'It's not over,' said Gary Clyde Hufbauer, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. 'You give a kind of Whac-a-Mole flavor to this whole story.'
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Detroit Mayor Duggan talks Michigan's political and educational systems at Mackinac Policy Conference
For one of the last times as Detroit mayor, Mike Duggan took the stand at the Mackinac Policy Conference Wednesday afternoon. In a speech that could be considered a test run for a campaign rally, Duggan told the crowd he knows how to recognize a bad system. It's why he said he is calling for a change in Michigan politics, and is proposing a $4.5 billion plan to overhaul the state's education system. Duggan gave a stern message about what needs to change to drive the state forward. He says one of the main stumbling blocks is the state of politics in Michigan, which requires a significant turnaround. "I'm not talking about a turnaround from the current governor, who has had a great deal of success with her leadership. I am talking about a turnaround from the political system in the state," Duggan said. Last December, the longtime Democrat announced plans to run as an independent for governor in 2026. During his speech on Wednesday, Duggan used examples of how he and his team turned things around for the city of Detroit, from housing to development. "I decided I am going to campaign by going into everyone's living room and just talk to them about why we have to give up the us vs them politics. We talked about the abandoned houses. We talked about the parks, but mostly what I said is, we have got to change the narrative." The gubernatorial candidate also proposed a strict school accountability system to ensure students have the best opportunities for a prosperous future. "We need to build an educator-driven plan," Duggan said. "We need to have a grading system." "There's got to be consequences if we are going to put 4.5 billion into our schools. The people running the schools need to have some skin in the game," Duggan added. "So here's what I think. First year at your school, if you're failing, you give us an improvement plan. We will help you, too, if you are failing. As a principal, you're our last chance. I will give you more help, but in the third year, if you're still failing, the principal and the team, you're fired." "I said when I stood here 10 years ago, Detroit's turnaround is not as far away as it appears ... I will say this to you, Michigan's turnaround is not as far away as it appears, but we've got to change the political system. "
