Wall Street Slips as Iran-Israel Conflict Sparks Oil Rally and Market Jitters
Investor enthusiasm for stocks waned on Friday as geopolitical tensions resurfaced, driving all three major U.S. indexes into the red. Iran's missile attack on Israel, in response to Israel's earlier strikes on Iranian military and nuclear sites, revived concerns of wider conflict in the Middle East.
The reaction from financial markets was immediate, with most sectors down and oil prices spiking.
Markets had previously been relatively resilient this week. A lower-than-expected inflation reading and in-line jobless claims helped keep the comfort that the Federal Reserve may keep interest rates in status quo in its next meeting. But those gains were erased as investor sentiment turned sharply negative on Friday.
The S&P 500 ended 1.13% lower at 5,976.97, the Nasdaq lost 1.30% to 19,406.83, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.79% to 42,197.79. Ten of the 11 major S&P 500 sectors finished down, led by a 2.06% drop in financial stocks and a 1.5% decline in technology stocks.
Oil markets instantly responded. The price of oil jumped by almost 7 percent on fears that there could be disruptions to Middle Eastern oil supplies, particularly if shipping in the Strait of Hormuz is hindered. Reaction in the U.S. energy sector was less immediate—ExxonMobil gained 2.2%, and Diamondback Energy rose 3.7%.
Airlines, which ordinarily are acutely sensitive to changes in the price of fuel, reversed sharply. Delta Air Lines slid 3.8 percent, United Airlines dropped 4.4 percent, and American Airlines declined 4.9 percent. Defense stocks, however, gained, signaling that people were heading for safer assets in the face of all of the uncertainty. Lockheed Martin, RTX Corporation, and Northrop Grumman were among the biggest gainers, rising by more than 3 percent each.
Tech shares were mixed. Adobe fell 5.3 percent on worries that its adoption of artificial intelligence lags competitors, even as it raised its full-year revenue outlook. Oracle, by contrast, gained 7.7 percent and traded at an all-time high, as demand for its AI-driven services remained strong. Nvidia fell 2.1 percent, while Apple lost 1.4 percent.
Visa and Mastercard, for example, both fell more than 4% after reports that several large U.S. retailers are considering building their own direct payment systems based on cryptocurrency that would bypass traditional card networks.
Even on Friday's sell-off, the losses for the week were muted. The S&P 500 was down 0.4 percent, Nasdaq dropped 0.6 percent, and the Dow fell 1.3 percent. Analysts said recent economic data—such as tepid producer prices and trendless jobless claims—had helped limit the downside.
Investor sentiment was already beginning to turn before the escalation. The University of Michigan's consumer sentiment survey notched its first positive uptick in six months in June, suggesting underlying economic stability. But with risks in the geopolitical landscape rising, volatility may stay elevated in the short run.
Otherwise, trading was brisk, with nearly 18 billion shares changing hands—just below the 20-day average. On the S.&P. 500, decliners outnumbered advancers by more than 6 to 1.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Oil market, long numb to war risk, confronts weekend of worry
The past two years of escalating tensions in the Middle East have taught oil traders to be sanguine about the risk of disruption to oil supplies. The barrage of headlines has revived memories of the political upheavals and prices spikes of the 1970s – and yet even when oil prices have jumped, it inevitably proved short-lived. As Iran and Israel traded volleys of missiles in April last year and again in October, Middle Eastern oil continued to flow to the global market unaffected. Now, the latest assault by Israel is putting oil traders' nonchalance to the test. There's been no impact on supplies so far, but the strikes have shaken a market that for most of this year has been overshadowed by worries about a looming surplus driving down prices, with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its oil producing allies (Opec+) quickly unwinding production cuts and output rising elsewhere from Brazil to Guyana, while US President Donald Trump's trade war threatens demand. Even if many believe that the oil market may ultimately escape unscathed, the widespread uncertainty over how strongly Iran will respond, whether Israel will launch further attacks, and how the US will react is forcing traders to price in a huge range of possible outcomes. With hours left until the end of the trading week, few were brave enough to risk going into the weekend short. Brent futures spiked as much as 13 per cent early on Friday and settled 7 per cent higher at about US$74 a barrel. 'When there's a war on, you're not going to be short anything over the weekend,' said Andreas Laskaratos, chief executive officer of energy trading house AB Commodities. 'Although the fundamentals haven't changed, you can't trade against the headlines over the weekend.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Traders and analysts began to game out scenarios for possible escalation or de-escalation almost as soon as the first Israeli missiles hit Iran in the early hours of Friday morning. Laskaratos says his Europe-based traders were at their desks by about 4.30 am or 5.00 am. Analysts at Goldman Sachs raised their oil price forecasts for the coming months US$2-3 a barrel, but laid out possible scenarios ranging from a surge in prices above US$100 a barrel in the worst-case scenario, to a drop below US$50 next year in their most bearish scenario. 'The potential of further escalation in the Middle East implies that the short-term risks to our price forecast are now skewed to the upside,' the analysts including Daan Struyven wrote. Still, they maintained their call for prices to drop below US$60 by the fourth quarter of this year. A surge of trading in out-of-the money call options showed that many were seeking to hedge against the possibility of a price spike. Among the most traded options were call options that would pay out if prices rise above US$85 a barrel by Jun 25; a measure of the price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) call options relative to the price of put options surged to the highest since March 2022, when the market was rocked by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The most worrying possibility for the oil market is a disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, through which about one-fifth of global oil supply flows. Most analysts reckon that's unlikely. 'It is our understanding that it would be extremely difficult for Iran to close the strait for an extended period given the presence of the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain,' said Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, and a former CIA analyst. Still, even if small, any increase in the chance of disruption is enough to drive prices. 'The possibility that the Strait of Hormuz closes is such a huge binary event, it makes forecasting balances challenging,' consultancy FGE NexantECA wrote in a report. 'Most market participants we have spoken to are not expecting the Strait of Hormuz to be closed; the consequences are just too great.' Other possible scenarios worrying oil traders include the possibility of strikes on Iran's oil infrastructure or the potential for sanctions against Iran to be ramped up if Teheran responds to the strikes by accelerating its nuclear programme. For now at least, most traders are viewing current events through the lens of recent history. 'For the past decade, events like this have been sell-the-rip situations. They didn't escalate. Fears were worse than what actually happened,' Dan Pickering, chief investment officer at Pickering Energy Partners, an energy-focused investment bank in Houston, wrote on X. The strikes may even turn out to be bearish. Trump on Friday called on Iran to make a deal or face 'even more brutal' attacks. If Teheran were to heed his advice, a nuclear deal would likely involve a relaxation of sanctions, potentially lifting Iran's exports. FGE NexantECA said that market participants were 'looking at the recent price action and starting to consider the events as a 'sell' opportunity'. 'However, they acknowledge that taking a short position right now is hard given the risk/expectation of further escalation in tensions in the weeks ahead.' Even if there is a disruption, Opec+ members Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have significant spare capacity that could be brought on to potentially help cool prices. 'It would take a lot of courage for someone to go against it but that said, we can't see this rally being sustained in the long term,' said Laskaratos of AB Commodities. 'We don't believe the fundamentals have changed on supply and demand as things stand.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
US dollar's tepid rebound reinforces questions around haven role
The US dollar's muted rally against major peers after Israel's strikes on Iran reinforced the impression that the greenback's role as a global haven currency is fading. A Bloomberg gauge of the US dollar gained as much as 0.6 per cent at one point on Friday (Jun 13) after Israel's attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities stoked fears of a wider conflict in the Middle East. However, the currency pared much of its advance and closed some 0.2 per cent higher in New York. The modest recovery leaves the greenback just above the three-year low it hit last week after President Donald Trump threatened fresh levies against global trading partners. The US dollar has slid during the past five months as Trump pushed ahead with tariffs, which have raised concerns over the US economic outlook and fuelled speculation that foreigners will shun American assets – the so-called Sell America trade. 'Middle East tensions are a risk to navigate rather than a game changer for the bearish dollar view,' JPMorgan strategists including Meera Chandan and Arindam Sandilya said to clients in a note on Friday. 'We do not expect the dollar impact to be more pronounced or durable than this at this stage.' The day's trading pattern was a far cry from decades past, when international crises would typically fuel gains in the greenback and Treasuries, long considered havens in part because of their liquidity and confidence in the US as a leader in the global economy. The 10-year US Treasury yield rose about five basis points on Friday as surging oil prices stoked inflation worries. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up There are some signs that the gloomy stance towards the US dollar is easing a bit. For example, options traders, while still broadly bearish on the US currency's prospects, have moderated their negative views in recent weeks and are banking on a pause in the greenback's sharp decline. 'The source of shocks to global risk and growth have been more concentrated in the US so far this year,' Goldman Sachs strategists Stuart Jenkins, Kamakshya Trivedi and Teresa Alves said in a report to clients on Friday. 'If that source were to shift more to the rest of the world, the dollar may resume trading with more safe-haven type characteristics.' The US' position as the world's largest oil producer likely helped to buoy the US dollar on Friday as crude futures soared, analysts said. So did the possibility of a squeeze in short positions against the greenback. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index has dropped about 8 per cent this year as Trump's efforts to overhaul global trade chipped away at investor confidence in the US economy. There are also projections that proposed tax legislation will add trillions of dollars to the federal deficit, while America's role in security and political alliances is being called into question as well. 'Dollar sentiment has taken a real hit,' Sonja Marten, DZ Bank's head of FX and monetary policy, told Bloomberg Television on Friday. It would take 'a complete escalation in the Middle East' to extend the US dollar's gains, she said. At cross-border payments firm Corpay, chief market strategist Karl Schamotta said the risk-off tone permeating markets reminded investors that the US dollar's losses this year are more a reflection of long-term growth concerns – and less so of any change in short-term demand for the liquidity of US assets. Before the attack, Wall Street banks were reinforcing their calls on further US dollar weakness. Paul Tudor Jones, the founder of macro hedge fund Tudor Investment, said the US currency may be 10 per cent lower a year from now as he expects to see short-term interest rates cut 'dramatically' in the next year. Hedge funds, asset managers and other speculative traders boosted their bets tied to the US dollar's decline to some US$15.9 billion for the week through Jun 10, up from US$12.2 billion the week prior, according to data by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission released on Friday. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
Diversified S-Reits' operating performance remains resilient amid market uncertainties
[SINGAPORE] Diversified real estate investment trusts (Reits) hold a mixture of assets across multiple sub-sectors such as industrial, retail, office and hospitality, offering investors the prospect of portfolio stability and flexibility. The larger diversified Reits in the Singapore market, or S-Reits, include Straits Times Index (STI) counters such as CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust (CICT), Mapletree Pan Asia Commercial Trust (MPACT) and Frasers Logistics & Commercial Trust (FLCT), as well as Suntec Reit , which is currently on the STI reserve list. Amid trade tensions and geopolitical uncertainties, business updates from these S-Reits for the first quarter ended March highlighted their ability to withstand headwinds. Most showed growth in revenue and net property income (NPI), driven by robust operating performance from existing properties and new acquisitions. Suntec Reit's revenue for Q1 2025 rose 3.4 per cent year on year (yoy) to S$113.5 million, due to stronger operating performance across all properties. Its joint venture income also grew. It reported a distribution per unit of S$0.01563 for the period, up 3.4 per cent yoy. CICT's Q1 2025 revenue was also higher, at S$395.3 million, by 1.1 per cent yoy on a like-for-like basis. Its NPI grew 1.4 per cent over the same period. For the first half of FY2025, FLCT's revenue was S$232.3 million, up 7.5 per cent yoy, while adjusted NPI rose 1.6 per cent to S$161.3 million. The growth was due mainly to full contributions from completed and acquired properties. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up In terms of operating performance, the larger diversified S-Reits have demonstrated resilience. For its retail portfolio, CICT reported strong momentum in rent reversion at 10.4 per cent for Q1 2025. It expects rent reversion to remain positive, although at a more moderate pace, in the next few quarters. The Reit's office portfolio also had positive rent reversion, at 5.4 per cent. Overall portfolio occupancy was stable, at 96.4 per cent as at end-March, with the occupancy standing at 98.8 per cent for retail assets and 94.7 per cent for office properties. The manager of MPACT noted that the trust's Singapore properties continued to buffer overseas headwinds. These assets contributed to higher revenue and NPI on a comparable basis in FY2025 ended March. MPACT also reported positive rent reversion from its local properties during the year, ranging from 2.2 per cent at Mapletree Business City to 16.8 per cent at VivoCity. Similarly, Suntec Reit and OUE Reit achieved positive rent reversions from their Singapore office and retail portfolios as well. Occupancy rates across their portfolios also remained stable. Suntec Reit's Singapore office portfolio had 98.7 per cent committed occupancy, down slightly from 99.4 per cent in the year-ago period. Occupancy for its local retail assets, meanwhile, improved to 98.2 per cent from 95.8 per cent over the same period. OUE Reit saw its office committed occupancy grow 1.7 percentage points quarter on quarter to 96.3 per cent as at end-March, while committed occupancy at Mandarin Gallery climbed to 99.5 per cent. These diversified S-Reits have also been reporting improvements in terms of capital management. Suntec Reit has completed a refinancing of S$730 million due in 2025 and 2026, which would result in interest savings of about S$1.8 million each year. The manager also noted it has pared down debt with proceeds from the divestment of strata office units. Meanwhile, CICT's average cost of debt as at end-March was 3.4 per cent, down 0.2 percentage point from the level in December. OUE Reit has also reported that its proactive capital management in 2024 reduced its weighted average cost of debt to 4.2 per cent a year as at end-March, from 4.7 per cent in December. The Reit managers noted that their portfolios are well-positioned to navigate economic and geopolitical uncertainties. CICT said it remains focused on asset-enhancement initiatives and portfolio-reconstitution efforts. It will continue to monitor the market for opportunities with an eye on Singapore, which offers stability, for inorganic growth. The chief executive officer of Suntec Reit's manager, Chong Kee Hiong, said continual improvement in operating performance highlights the strong fundamentals of the Reit's assets. 'In light of the global macroeconomic uncertainties, we remain focused on strengthening the operating performance of our properties,' he added. The writer is a research analyst at SGX. For more research and information on Singapore's Reit sector, visit for the S-Reits & Property Trusts Chartbook.
