The VAT betrayal: How South Africa's political charlatans sold out the people
Image: Tumi Pakkies/ Independent Newspapers
WHEN the African National Congress (ANC) announced plans to increase Value-Added Tax (VAT) in 2025, it struck a dagger into the heart of every struggling South African. VAT — a tax that punishes the poor for simply surviving — was once again being weaponised to protect the rich and punish the working class.
Today, the so-called "leaders" of South Africa's political parties stand exposed, naked before the nation, stripped of their empty rhetoric and false promises. The VAT saga has laid bare their treachery, their hypocrisy, and their unforgivable betrayal of the very people they swore to serve.
The Real Impact of VAT on the Poor
Let's be clear: VAT is not just another tax. It is a tax on survival. When government raises VAT, it increases the price of bread, milk, school shoes, and bus fare — essentials that millions of South Africans already struggle to afford. VAT doesn't ask if you are rich or poor. It strikes hardest at the empty pockets of the working class, pensioners, and the unemployed.
In a country where over 18 million people depend on social grants, unemployment has soared to over 32%, more than 55% of citizens live below the poverty line, a VAT increase is economic violence. And yet, knowing all this, the ANC still proposed a VAT increase of up to 3% in internal discussions — a brutal attack on the most vulnerable.
Only a massive public outcry and the ANC's weakened position in Parliament — thanks largely to the rise of the MK Party — forced them to reduce the immediate increase to 0.5%.
If Not for MK, VAT Would Have Increased Without a Fight
Had the ANC still held its old majority, the VAT increase would have sailed through Parliament unchallenged. Let the nation remember this: It was the entry of the MK Party into Parliament that weakened the ANC's iron grip.
It was the voice of the masses, echoed by MK MPs, that forced this government to at least slow down its assault on the poor.But even then, the betrayal was only beginning.
The Fiscal Framework Farce
When the Fiscal Framework, the blueprint for government spending, including the VAT increase, came before Parliament, the ANC desperately needed allies.
They found them among parties that had loudly campaigned against the ANC, sworn never to work with the ANC, and claimed to stand for the people.
Yet when the moment of truth arrived, ActionSA, BOSA (Build One South Africa), Rise Mzansi, Gayton Mackenzie's Patriotic Alliance, and others stood not with the people. but with the ANC.
In a narrow vote, the Fiscal Framework was adopted, giving life to the VAT increase. These so-called opposition parties handed the ANC a knife and pointed it at the neck of the poor.
ActionSA, a party that had thundered against ANC corruption and mismanagement, voted for the ANC's Fiscal Framework.
BOSA, led by the so-called "new hope" Mmusi Maimane, voted with the ANC.
Rise Mzansi, the party that brands itself as the future, voted for a future with higher VAT and deeper poverty. Gayton Mackenzie, who styles himself as a man of the people, handed the ANC the majority it needed.
The Great Lie: "The Fiscal Framework Had Nothing to Do with VAT"
When caught, these parties scrambled to spin a narrative so ridiculous it insults the intelligence of every South African. They claimed: "We voted for the Fiscal Framework, but it had nothing to do with VAT.
"Lies. Blatant, shameless lies. The Fiscal Framework explicitly includes the assumptions and parameters for government revenue — including the VAT increase.
It is the foundational document that dictates taxes, spending, and borrowing. Without the Fiscal Framework being adopted, the VAT increase had no legislative path forward.
Today, the Western Cape High Court confirmed what any honest politician already knew: The Fiscal Framework contained the VAT increase. The court set aside the adoption of the Framework and suspended the VAT hike, exposing the lies told to the people. The spin has failed. The betrayal stands naked before us.
The Reality Voters Must Never Forget
South Africans must remember this treachery. Remember that these parties made public pledges and broke them when it mattered most. Remember that in the corridors of Parliament, when faced with a choice between standing with the people or kneeling before the ANC, they chose to kneel.
They are not opposition parties. They are political charlatans. They are the ANC's convenient enablers, eager for scraps from the table of power.
The tragedy of South Africa is not just a corrupt ruling party. It is an entire political class — old and new — that talks revolution during elections but practices betrayal in Parliament.
A Systemic Betrayal
This is not a once-off event. It is a symptom of a deeper sickness: A political elite more interested in self-preservation than public service.
A culture of spin doctors, legal loopholes, and manufactured consent. An economy managed for the rich, subsidised by the poor.
And VAT is just the beginning. Behind every act of betrayal today lurks the threat of more taxes on the working class, more protection for monopolies and billionaires, and more lies dressed up as governance.
MK Party: A Different Road
In this sea of betrayal, the MK Party has stood firm. From the outset, MK MPs opposed the Fiscal Framework, exposed the hidden VAT increase, and demanded that the burden of fixing the economy be placed where it belongs: on the backs of the wealthy, not the poor.
Tax the billionaires. Tax the monopolies. Nationalise key industries. Use the wealth of the country for its people, not for its elite.
That is the road to freedom. Not endless VAT hikes. Not squeezing pensioners and single mothers to please global markets and local oligarchs.
The Final Verdict: Voters Must Choose
South Africa is at a crossroads. The mask has slipped. The lies have been exposed. In the next election — and every election to come — South Africans must remember who voted for higher VAT.
They must remember who lied to them. And they must punish every political party and every political opportunist who chose betrayal over bravery. Never again must we vote for cowards in nice suits.
Never again must we trust smooth talkers who sell us out behind closed doors. Never again must we allow political charlatans to dictate the destiny of our children. The VAT saga is a warning. Let us heed it.
DAILY NEWS
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
27 minutes ago
- The South African
Ramaphosa: National Convention to tackle South Africa's realities openly
President Cyril Ramaphosa delivered the keynote address at the first sitting of the National Convention on Friday at the University of South Africa's (Unisa) main campus in Pretoria. He described the convention as a platform to confront South Africa's realities openly and constructively. Over a thousand delegates from government, civil society, business, and communities gathered for the two-day citizen-led debate. They aim to discuss practical ways to improve the lives of South Africans. In his speech, Ramaphosa said: 'Today marks the first sitting of the National Convention of the National Dialogue, a space where we confront our realities openly, respectfully, and constructively. Furthermore, this is not a partisan platform. This is a national platform.' He added that the dialogue will help define a social compact outlining the roles and responsibilities of citizens, government, business, labour, traditional leaders, religious bodies, civil society, activist groups, and civic organisations. Ramaphosa emphasised that South Africans will define the outcome of the Dialogue. He said: 'Our task is to prepare for the thousands of public dialogues that will happen in communities across the country over the next six to eight months. Importantly, this National Dialogue must be about citizens taking responsibility for their future. Through the dialogues, people must be able to address the challenges where they live, work, or study.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

The Star
43 minutes ago
- The Star
Ramaphosa unaware of SANDF chief's controversial Iran visit
Mayibongwe Maqhina | Published 5 hours ago The Presidency on Thursday night said President Cyril Ramaphosa was unaware of the 'ill-advised' visit by South African National Defence Force (SANDF) Chief Rudzani Maphwanywa to Iran. Addressing the media, Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said Ramaphosa did not sanction Maphwanya's visit. He stated that it was Defence Minister Angie Motshekga, not Ramaphosa, who approved Maphwanya's travel. 'As much as the president is the appointing authority and the commander-in-chief, he does not get involved in supervising the general's travel. That process sits with the minister. So the president did not know.' Maphwanya was quoted by Iranian media as pledging 'common goals' with Iran and said his trip carried 'a political message'. Magwenya said there was a concern about Maphwanya's trip. 'At this period of heightened geopolitical tensions as well as conflict in the Middle East, one can say the visit was ill advised and more so the expectation is that the general should have been a lot more circumspect with the comments he makes, which delve into the area of foreign policy that only the president, as well as the Department of International Relations, are responsible for.' Maphwanya's trip took place amid tensions between South Africa and the US President Donald Trump imposed 30% tariffs on South African goods, which were implemented this month. Magwenya said South Africa was in a process of resetting diplomatic and political relations with the United States, as well as balancing the trade relationship in a mutually beneficial manner between the two countries. 'Of resolving the relationship or resolving issues around the relationship with the US, you then have senior government or military officials in statements that will further inflame the situation. It is not helpful at all,' he said. Both the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) and the Defence have distanced themselves from Maphwanya's remarks, citing that Ramaphosa and DIRCO were custodians of foreign policy. Magwenya said Ramaphosa will meet Maphwanya within the next week regarding his 'ill-advised' trip. 'I can't say when that meeting will happen, but there will be an engagement between the president and the general. So it's still early to say what the outcome of that engagement will be.' He would not comment on the possible consequence, if there was to be any, for the defence's chief amid calls by the DA for him to be hauled before a court martial. 'It is also difficult to speak to. One must consider what constitutes the grave nature of charges or accusations that would require a court-martial ,' Magwenya said. Deputy Defence Minister Bantu Holomisa told Newzroom Afrika that he was unaware of the visit. 'I don't know what the purpose of his visit was. It is only the minister who will be in the know. If he did not ask for permission to leave from the minister, then he will have to swim in his stew,' he said. Holomisa also said such visits outside the country were authorised by Motshekga. 'The last word has been said by the Presidency, and the Presidency is the custodian of our foreign policy. There is nothing one can contest on that, but what we should be waiting for is either to hear the minister herself addressing this issue or alternatively wait for General Maphwanya to come back and tell the nation how he went there, what was the purpose.' He said since the matter was in the open, Maphwanya should be allowed to respond openly and be transparent about it. Holomisa added that it was too early to say what would happen to Maphwanya. 'If he went abroad without permission from the president or the minister, he will have to face the music and explain on what basis he had to utter such words, which are creating controversy,' he said. [email protected]

The Star
43 minutes ago
- The Star
Mbeki and Ramaphosa's relationship remains 'comradely cordial'
Mayibongwe Maqhina | Published 5 hours ago The relationship between President Cyril Ramaphosa and former president Thabo Mbeki remained 'comradely cordial' despite the latter's ongoing criticisms of both the president and his administration . This is according to Ramaphosa's spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, when he was responding to questions from the media on Thursday during a briefing on the president's upcoming public programme and other issues. 'Look for President Ramaphosa, the relationship with the former president is one that is cordial, or rather call it comradely cordial as well as professional,' Magwenya said. Mbeki will not attend the convention scheduled to take place at Unisa in Pretoria from Friday to Saturday. This comes after several foundations withdrew from the Preparatory Task Team for the National Dialogue and announced their non-attendance at the convention over issues of budget and the government's control of the initiative they deem is being rushed and ought to be driven by citizens. Magwenya would not be drawn into commenting on Ramaphosa's position in terms of Mbeki, who has not been shy to criticise Ramaphosa and the government. 'With observations around what the former president is attempting to do, the president will not venture into that. We'll leave that to your good self and others who observe developments as they occur in the political space,' he said. Magwenya said Ramaphosa was by far the most publicly criticised and attacked president by a former president, which was a slight departure from the unwritten rule in terms of the courtesy that a former president grants to a sitting president. 'The president also recognises and accepts that he is not above criticism, and that we live in a democracy where there's free speech and people are welcome to openly criticise him. That's not something that he loses sleep over from many issues that he has to worry about.' He said it would have been great to have Mbeki at the convention. 'If he is not there, he is not there. T he reality is that the show will go on and South Africans will continue with the dialogue process, and hopefully at some point, not only the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, but also other foundations, will find it among themselves to participate in the process.' Magwenya was asked whether DA leader and Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen was still part of the Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) after his party announced that it would not be part of the National Dialogue. 'I don't know if he has been participating or not, but I think, to be honest with you, it's neither. T he IMC has made significant progress in getting us to this point regarding the national convention ,' he said. Magwenya also said the IMC has done a stellar job in ensuring that the costs for the national convention were reduced, securing a lot of sponsorship for the convention, and ensuring that there was no extra pressure that was placed on the fiscus. 'So the IMC has been operating quite well. If Minister Steenhuisen has not participated, I don't think that has created any gaps in the IMC. Maybe, some of his colleagues may have missed him, but I don't think IMC as such would have suffered consequences.' Ramaphosa will on Friday lead the government delegation and officially open the first national convention that will be held until Saturday at Unisa in Pretoria. The convention will bring together about 1,000 delegates representing the diversity of the South African nation. [email protected]