Angela Rayner battles Rachel Reeves over England tourist tax
The deputy prime minister is pushing for councils to have the ability to tax tourist hotel stays, despite opposition from Chancellor Rachel Reeves, reported The Telegraph.
According to the outlet, Ms Rayner supported the inclusion of the power to charge tourist taxes in the Government's Devolution Bill published earlier this month.
Ms Rayner is responsible for the Government's policy on councils as Secretary of the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG).
Treasury officials, including Ms Reeves, are understood to have opposed the measure due to concerns for the implications on hospitality businesses.
Shadow Chancellor, Mel Stride, told The Telegraph: 'Labour can't help themselves – it's always tax, tax, tax. Whether it's Angela Rayner or Rachel Reeves, the instinct is always the same – more taxes.'
She added that a levy on hotel stays would 'hit hospitality hard.
Inbound tourism is the UK's third-largest service export, with the UK the seventh most visited country in the world in 2023. A record 43 million foreign visits to the UK are expected this year, in addition to domestic travel.
The Labour mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, is among local leaders asking to be allowed to charge more tax to visitors.
Other mayors have echoed his sentiment. Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, said: 'A modest overnight accommodation levy, similar to other international cities, would boost our economy, deliver growth and help cement London's reputation as a global tourism and business destination.'
In June, the mayors of the Liverpool City Region, Greater Manchester, London, the North East, the West Midlands and West Yorkshire signed a joint letter calling for visitor levies across England.
A similar law is already in place in Scotland, passed in 2024, which allows councils to tax overnight accommodation if they wish to do so.
A MHCLG spokesman said: 'There are currently no plans to introduce a tourism tax in England. Places can already choose to introduce a levy on overnight stays through the Accommodation Business Improvement District model.
'We are also already empowering local leaders by removing restrictions and allowing the existing Mayoral Council Tax Precept to be spent on areas that drive local growth, such as transport and adult skills.'
Bath and Cambridge recently urged the government to allow them to introduce tourist taxes, becoming the latest in a string of English destinations seeking similar levies.
In a letter sent to Ms Rayner, the leaders of Bath & North East Somerset Council and Cambridge City Council state that their 'destination' cities are under growing amounts of pressure when it comes to tourism.
The councils are seeking a roundtable with the government to explore ways that they can support sustainable tourism in their cities, including the introduction of 'a modest visitor levy' with revenue that will benefit both residents and visitors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
The options available to Alexander Isak as he trains at former club amid transfer speculation
Newcastle United striker Alexander Isak is training individually at his former club as speculation surrounding his future continues. His former club Real Sociedad confirmed on Thursday he was 'working with his trainers' at their Zubieta facility, with the striker having reportedly told Newcastle he is keen to explore a move away from the club. The Sweden international has been heavily linked with Liverpool and did not not travel with the rest of the Newcastle squad earlier this month for their pre-season tour of Asia. Newcastle have been approached for comment. The decision to train at his old club rather than his current one will heighten speculation that Isak sees his future away from Newcastle. No offer has been submitted by Liverpool as yet to Newcastle, who would almost certainly be looking for a British record transfer fee for the player. Should Newcastle price Isak out of a move or simply refuse to listen to offers, one option Isak and his representatives might consider would be to unilaterally terminate his contract with three years remaining. A European Court of Justice ruling in favour of former Chelsea midfielder Lassana Diarra last year means players can now terminate their deals 'without unnecessary fears', according to the lawyer who led Diarra's case. The ruling appears to have given players greater leeway to terminate a contract without just cause. The court found some of FIFA's transfer rules were contrary to European law because they restricted freedom of movement and were anti-competitive. Jean-Louis Dupont, who led Diarra's challenge and who was also at the centre of the landmark Bosman case which granted players free agency at the end of their contracts, believes last year's ruling lifts the threat of significant sanctions for players who choose to terminate their deals. Dupont, speaking in general rather than specifically about Isak's case, told the PA news agency: 'In its Diarra judgement, the court ruled that players have a right to termination without just cause and that it is for the ex-employer to establish the existence and the quantum of damages, knowing that losing the opportunity to transfer the player is NOT a damage. 'According to the court, such termination cannot entail disciplinary sanctions (when effected in between seasons). 'FIFA has, imperfectly, amended its rules to abide by the court ruling. But the bottom line is that players have the right to terminate without unnecessary fears.' Asked whether he thought players would now be free from the threat of sporting sanctions such as a ban for terminating their deals, Dupont added: 'Yes. If not, the right to terminate, as granted by the court, would just be theoretical. But, apparently, FIFA is still resisting on this point.' Following the ECJ ruling, FIFA opened a global dialogue on its transfer rules and issued amended, interim rules just before Christmas last year. The world players' union FIFPRO immediately pushed back on the amendments, saying they did not 'provide legal certainty' to players. FIFPRO issued guidance to players in May stating that following the ruling, a player's transfer fee or transfer value could no longer be used in the calculation of any compensation due to the club where the player had been contracted, and advised that the compensation paid should be 'limited to the residual value of the contract, with a possible further reduction or increase on the basis of the national law'. A presumption that a player's new club had induced the termination of contract was removed in the amended rules issued by FIFA last December. Now, a player's old club must prove the new club induced the player to break contract.
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Awkward moment Trump leaves Starmer squirming over ‘family farm tax'
Watch as Donald Trump explains how the US ended inheritance tax on farmers whilst sitting next to a silent Sir Keir Starmer on Monday (27 July). During a press conference held as part of the US president's four-day trip to Scotland, the pair were questioned on how important farmers are to a country. While Mr Trump did not comment on the UK 's 'tractor tax' plans, which will make farms valued at £1m or more liable for 20 per cent inheritance tax, he stated that the US had ended its federal levy on farmers. 'There's no estate tax on farmers, so when a parent leaves their farm, because a lot of these farms, they don't make a lot of money, but it's a way of life and they love that way of life.'
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
PM says he ‘particularly' listens to hostages after Palestine backlash
Sir Keir Starmer has said that he 'particularly' listens to hostages after a British-Israeli woman who was held captive by Hamas criticised his pledge to recognise a Palestinian state. The Prime Minister said there is a 'need to do everything we can to alleviate the human catastrophe in Gaza' after Emily Damari accused him of 'moral failure' over the move. Ms Damari said that Sir Keir is 'not standing on the right side of history' and that she was 'deeply saddened' by the decision. As well as Ms Damari's criticism, Wednesday also saw a group of peers warn that the pledge could break international law. Speaking to ITV West Country while on a visit to Swindon on Thursday, the Prime Minister said: 'I particularly listen to the hostages, Emily Damari, who I have spoken to, – I've met her mother a number of times, and they've been through the most awful, awful experience for Emily and for her mother. 'And that's why I've been absolutely clear and steadfast that we must have the remaining hostages released. That's been our position throughout and I absolutely understand the unimaginable horror that Emily went through. 'Alongside that, we do need to do everything we can to alleviate the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, where we are seeing the children and babies starving for want of aid which could be delivered. 'That is why I've said unless things materially change on the ground, we'll have to assess this in September, we will recognise Palestine before the United Nations General Assembly in September.' It comes as some 38 members of the House of Lords, including some of the UK's most eminent lawyers, wrote to Attorney General Lord Hermer. As first reported by the Times newspaper, the peers warned Sir Keir Starmer's pledge to recognise Palestine may breach international law as the territory may not meet the criteria for statehood under the Montevideo Convention, a treaty signed in 1933. Business minister Gareth Thomas described the decision as a 'political judgment' and said ministers 'believe it is' compliant with international law. He told Times Radio 'In the end, recognition of another state is a political judgment and over 140 countries have already recognised Palestine, and we're determined to do so in September if Israel does not end the violence in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and agree to a lasting route towards a two-state solution, and to no annexation in the West Bank.' In their letter to Lord Hermer, the peers said Palestine 'does not meet the international law criteria for recognition of a state, namely, defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states'. There is no certainty over the borders of Palestine, they said, and no single government as Hamas and Fatah are enemies. In their letter, seen by the PA news agency, the peers added: 'You have said that a selective, 'pick and mix' approach to international law will lead to its disintegration, and that the criteria set out in international law should not be manipulated for reasons of political expedience. 'Accordingly, we expect you to demonstrate this commitment by explaining to the public and to the Government that recognition of Palestine would be contrary to the principles governing recognition of states in international law.' Lord Hermer has previously insisted a commitment to international law 'goes absolutely to the heart' of the Government's approach to foreign policy. Sir Keir announced earlier this week that the UK could take the step of recognising Palestine in September ahead of a gathering at the UN. The UK will only refrain from doing so if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months, the Prime Minister said.
