logo
Security officers at OKC FAA facility say federal contractor violated court orders

Security officers at OKC FAA facility say federal contractor violated court orders

Yahoo01-04-2025

OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — Security officers protecting a key FAA facility in Oklahoma say they're prepared to strike, accusing their employer, a federal contractor, of defying court orders while continuing to violate their union's collective bargaining agreement.
The officers all work at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center (MMAC) in Oklahoma City.
They say their employer, federal contractor DFW Security Protective Force, has violated their collective bargaining agreement by underpaying officers, forcing them to work with unsafe equipment, and more.
The say DFW Security Protective Force has ignored orders from federal courts telling them to repay officers for missed wages.
The MMAC is the FAA's main national training hub for air traffic controllers.
It's a pretty important place, and protecting it is a job security officers Randy Hampton and Diana Rattler-Bryceland treat with a heavy respect.
'It's a facility that we take pride in,' Rattler-Bryceland said.
'I feel, you know, the responsibility, and I take it seriously over there because if you don't do something, something can happen, and you don't want that to happen,' Hampton said.
Rattler-Brycleand and Hampton are, respectively, President and Vice-president of UGA Local 100, the union representing all 53 security officers at MMAC.
'Everyone on that contract as a security officer holds their job to a high standard,' Rattler-Bryceland said. 'And we don't have to ask for them to do better because they do their best all the time.'
But lately, they say they've had to jump through some hurdles to maintain that standard.
'We have vehicles with over 100,000 miles on them that we're driving that break down,' Hampton said.
'Nothing was held back': Former state forester speaks out after firing
'The brakes go out,' Rattler-Bryceland said. 'We've had employees in these trucks in subzero temps without subzero gear being provided to them, without heaters.'
They say all the problems are tied to the company the federal government contracted to employ all the officers and run the MMAC's security operations.
That company is Fort Worth, Texas-based DFW Security Protective Force.
In 2022, DFW Security signed a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) promising to pay officers certain overtime amounts, give them yearly raises and even pay them on snow days when the facility is closed, among many other things.
But Rattler-Bryceland and Hampton say those ended up being empty promises.
'You can pick over half of the CBA to look at, and they would be violating it,' Rattler-Bryceland said. 'Since 2022, there's an approximately $150,000 in underpayments to the employees.'
The union documented the violations, filing dozens of payroll discrepancy forms with DFW, but nothing changed.
So they took the matter to federal court.
A judge ruled that DFW had violated the union's CBA and underpaid officers, also violating the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Last year, an arbitrator ordered DFW to pay the officers back for all the snow days they went unpaid.
Finalist for vacant Oklahoma Supreme Court seat tied to group that urged voters to create vacancy in the first place
'And that award is in the amount of over $45,000,' Hampton said.
But despite that court ruling, the officers say DFW never paid.
'They ignore everything,' Hampton said. 'They do not respond to anything.'
'No one knows where that money is,' Rattler-Bryceland said.
On Friday, UGA Local 100 filed a new lawsuit asking federal courts to enforce the repayment agreement.
The union has also filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Labor, which is investigating.
'We have talked about doing a strike meeting,' Rattler-Bryceland said. 'We have a pay increase coming April 1st, and the guard force and some management have stated that they are worried that the company is going to ignore that part of the CBA as well.'
She said they hate things have gotten this far.
'We don't want to put that difficulty on the FAA,' Rattler-Bryceland said. 'We don't want to put the FAA at risk.'
In fact, she cannot believe things could have ever possibly gotten this far.
'It raises the question on a daily basis, we ask ourselves, who's going to finally hold this company liable?' Rattler-Bryceland said. 'Who's going to hold their feet to the fire to follow federal regulations? Who's going to?'
News 4 has made multiple attempts to hear from DFW Security, but no one has responded.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More arrests as LA extends curfews and other cities brace for protest, too
More arrests as LA extends curfews and other cities brace for protest, too

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

More arrests as LA extends curfews and other cities brace for protest, too

June 11 (UPI) -- The second night of curfew took place in downtown Los Angeles on Wednesday, as local law enforcement, backed by several thousand members of the National Guard, attempted to restrain violent protests and prevent vandalism. Meanwhile, a group of protesters were in a standoff with law enforcement officers outside a federal courthouse in Santa Ana, about 32 miles south of Los Angeles, in Orange County. Military-style vehicles and National Guards troops blocked a portion of a street in front of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and Courthouse and in front of a federal building a couple blocks away. And protests also are occurring in other major U.S. cities,, including New York, Chicago and Washington, D.C. The downtown Los Angeles curfew will remain in effect between 8 a.m. and 6 a.m., according to the Los Angeles Police Department's Central Division. Ramps onto and off the 101 freeway also will continue to be closed, police said. The curfew zone covers about 1 square mile and affects about 100,000 of Los Angeles' 10 million residents. Limited exceptions include law enforcement, emergency and medical personnel, residents, people traveling to and from work and credentialed news media representatives. The White House confirmed Wednesday that 330 people were taken into custody by federal authorities since immigration sweeps by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement began last week in Los Angeles. Mayor Karen Bass said the number of people arrested from Tuesday night to Wednesday morning was "minor." About 225 were made, including 203 for failure to disperse. One person was arrested after an assault of a police officer with a weapon. "If there are raids that continue, if there are soldiers marching up and down our street, I would imagine that the curfew will continue," the mayor said. During a news conference, Bass said she is trying to set up a call with President Donald Trump for him "to understand the significance of what is happening here." Court case The Trump administration is asking a federal judge to reject California's emergency court order request to limit how federal officials can use Marines and members of the state's National Guard in and around Los Angeles. The Guardsmen "are not performing law enforcement or any other functions," Army Maj. General Niave F. Knell said in a declaration submitted to federal court Wednesday. Justice Department lawyers responded to San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer on Wednesday seeking briefs. The 32-page filing notes that it is entirely within Trump's authority as commander-in-chief, and is not reviewable by the court. Federal law generally bars the military from enforcing domestic laws, but Trump invoked a provision to protect federal property and personnel when there is a "rebellion" or "danger of rebellion." The brief suggests that Gov. Gavin Newsom broke the law by failing to pass on Trump's order to activate the guard. They said he might be "unwilling" to put a stop to the violence. The judge, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton, initially rejected an immediate order and has scheduled a hearing for Thursday. "The federal government is now turning the military against American citizens," Newsom said in a news release Tuesday announcing the lawsuit. "Sending trained warfighters onto the streets is unprecedented and threatens the very core of our democracy. "Donald Trump is behaving like a tyrant, not a President. We ask the court to immediately block these unlawful actions." The attempted order was filed as part of the governor's lawsuit against Trump, Hegseth and the Department of Defense, "charging violations of the U.S. Constitution and the President's Title 10 authority, not only because the takeover occurred without the consent or input of the Governor, as federal law requires, but also because it was unwarranted." According to the lawsuit: "ICE officers took actions that inflamed tensions -- including the arrest and detainment of children, community advocates, and people without criminal history -- and conducted military-style operations that sparked panic in the community." Community members then began protesting to express opposition to "these violent tactics, arrests of innocent people, and the President's heavy-handed immigration agenda." Protests continued for two more days, "and although some violent and illegal incidents were reported -- leading to justified arrests by state and local authorities -- these protests were largely nonviolent and involved citizens exercising their First Amendment right to protest. The protests did not necessitate federal intervention, and local and state law enforcement have been able to control of the situation, as in other recent instances of unrest. Federal response Approximately 2,000 Guardsmen from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team are helping protect ICE Officers, Customs and Border Protection Officers and FBI Special Agents. Another 2,000 have been called up. Army Maj. Gen. Scott M. Sherman, who is overseeing the National Guard, said about 500 of the National Guard troops have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations. National Guard troops have temporarily detained civilians in the Los Angeles protests, but they quickly were turned them over to law enforcement, Sherman said. Attorney General Pam Bondi said the administration "is not scared to go further" in expanding its legal authority to deploy troops in the city. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also has deployed 700 Marines near Los Angeles. Sherman said the Marines are still training outside Los Angeles. "Marines get a two-day set training for civil unrest, very extensive. It's all about civil disturbance and how to control crowds and protection of facilities," Sherman said during a news briefing Wednesday. Hegseth told senators at a hearing Wednesday that Trump's order to federalize the National Guard in California could be applied in other states. "Thankfully, in most of those states, you'd have a governor that recognizes the need for it, supports it and mobilizes it, him or herself," he said. "In California, unfortunately, the governor wants to play politics with it." Trump said in an interview with the New York Post's Pod Force One, said: "I'm able to do things now that I wouldn't have been able to do because the previous president and presidency was so bad that anybody looks good. "As an example, I can be stronger on an attack on Los Angeles," Trump said. "I think bringing in the National Guard four years ago, or eight years ago, would have been more difficult." Newsom on Wednesday said: "President Trump has unnecessarily redirected 4,800 activated guards and Marines to Los Angeles - that's more soldiers than are currently stationed in Iraq and Syria combined." Situation on the streets Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna said his agency is investigating whether there's "conspiracy" or organization behind crimes committed during protests. "There is some evidence we've seen that I don't want to share at this time," Luna said at a Wednesday news conference with Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman. He said authorities are focused on arresting individuals in causing unrest at the protests. Hochman said his office will review additional criminal cases brought by law enforcement in addition to the five he announced Wednesday. Two people were charged with assault on a peace officer after they allegedly drove motorcycles into a line of officers. One officer was hurt and several others were knocked down, Hochman said. "For any individual who is engaged in criminal conduct but did not get immediately arrested, let me provide some bad news for you," Hochman warned. "There is a tremendous amount of video out there through social media, and otherwise. We will know who you are, who engaged in this conduct. We will track you down, we will arrest you, we will prosecute you, and we will punish you. So for people who've already engaged in this, in this illegal activity, we're coming for you." Leticia Rhi Buckley, who lives and works just under a mile from the Los Angeles Federal Building, told CNN that the Trump administration's narrative that Los Angeles is under siege is false. She said the vast majority of what she's witnessed has been peaceful. "I live less than a mile from here. I drive home and about five blocks down, there's nothing. It's like nothing is happening," she said. "Living in downtown for 15 years, it's gotten louder when the Dodgers won the World Series, or when the Lakers won." Bass, the Los Angeles mayor, said "the portrayal is that all of our cities are in chaos. Rioting is happening everywhere, and it is a lie," she said, adding it is not an insurrection as Trump suggests. "Given that I was there on January 6th and saw that insurrection take place, the idea that this, what is happening here is an insurrection is just false and I think it is deliberately false," Bass, appearing with 30 other mayors in the region, said. "I don't think they're confused." Bill Essayli, the U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, said authorities are collecting video, photos and body camera footage to identify anyone who committed acts of violence. ICE agents conducted raids Wednesday morning in Downey, Calif., Councilman Mario Trijulli said. The city of more than 110,000 people located south of Los Angeles. Fearful immigrants Nannies are worried they could be profiled and detained by ICE agents while working, one of them told CNN. "I'm a citizen of the United States, but my color, my skin color, makes me they see me different?" Elsy Melara said. "I'm honestly not afraid to the point myself, but I'm afraid that if they don't believe me, or if they choose not to believe me, what would happen to the kid?" She said she knows two nannies are in ICE detention after they were handcuffed in a public park. LA's garment industry is on edge. Federal agents were seen going into the manufacturer Ambience Apparel in Downtown Los Angeles on Monday. "We're hearing from our membership about a lot of fear and stress. People's mental health is really being impacted," Bo Metz, founder of LA-based manufacturer Bomme Studio, told Vogue Business. "People are afraid to leave their homes. Some people are opting to not go to work and others have no choice. We also need to continue to put food on the table and keep a roof over our heads. Workers are really feeling that pressure right now." More than one-third of the more than 300,000 workers producing clothing and shoes in the U.S. are immigrants, according to an analysis by an immigration reform organization. That includes an estimated 30,000 undocumented.

‘Warning': Uni to pay back 5k staff $8m
‘Warning': Uni to pay back 5k staff $8m

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

‘Warning': Uni to pay back 5k staff $8m

Griffith University has signed a deal committing to repay underpaid staff more than $8m, becoming the sixth university to do so since 2022. Since 2015, the university underpaid 5457 staff across all of its six campuses, including academics, support and fitness workers – one who was underpaid as much as $92,400. It has signed an enforceable undertaking with the Fair Work Ombudsman, meaning it will be required to repay $8.34m including interest and superannuation. It is the sixth university to enter such a deal with Fair Work following The University of Melbourne, which last year agreed to pay back a mammoth $72m after a decade of wage theft. Since 2022, it has been a Fair Work priority to crack down on systemic underpayments in the university sector, with Latrobe University, The University of Sydney, the University of Technology Sydney, the University of Newcastle and Charles Sturt University all signing similar agreements. Fair Work Ombudsman Anna Booth commended Griffith University for self-reporting its breaches and its co-operation with the ombudsman's investigation. 'The matter serves as a warning of the significant long-running problems that can result from an employer failing to have appropriate checks and balances to ensure workplace compliance,' said Ms Booth. 'We expect universities to meet their legal obligations under their own enterprise agreements and underlying awards.' Griffith's failed to pay staff for activities including academic tutorials, subject co-ordination, and proper research assistant rates. Fitness employees were not paid split shift or meal allowances and progression between pay bands had been incorrectly paid. While the underpaid staff were located across all of the university's campuses, the majority were Brisbane-based. The cause of the issue was chalked up to insufficient training and data collection, non-existent payroll and data review processes, a lack of automation, and deficiencies in payroll systems. Under the agreement the university will also establish a new internal body to better consult between management, employees and the education union. 'Improving universities' workplace compliance is a priority for the Fair Work Ombudsman,' Ms Booth said. 'We look forward to working with the leadership teams at universities nationally to assist them to do the sustained, smart work required to ensure full compliance with workplace laws.'

‘Deeply private': Oregon AG challenges potential sale of 23andMe users' personal data
‘Deeply private': Oregon AG challenges potential sale of 23andMe users' personal data

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

‘Deeply private': Oregon AG challenges potential sale of 23andMe users' personal data

PORTLAND, Ore. () — Oregon is among several states taking legal action against a biotechnology company that could sell customer's personal information amid financial woes. Attorney General Dan Rayfield has revealed that Oregon, along with 27 other states, has sued 23andMe in an effort to challenge the potential sale of user data. The California-based genetic testing company in late March, around the same time that co-founder and CEO Anne Wojcicki announced her resignation after nearly 19 years in the role. Grant High School community advocates for new lighting at Grant Bowl athletics field 23andMe is now hoping a buyer will acquire the company — along with the 'sensitive' health and genetic data in its possession. 'This isn't just data — it's your DNA,' Rayfield said in a release. 'It's personal, permanent, and deeply private. People did not submit their personal data to 23andMe thinking their genetic blueprint would later be sold off to the highest bidder. We're standing up in court to make sure Oregonians — and millions of others — keep the right to control their own genetic information.' Following the bankruptcy filing, the attorney general's office issued a consumer alert informing Oregonians that they could withdraw their consent and delete their data from the platform. But the new lawsuit claims a potential could still impact around 15 million customers. The Associated Press has reported 23andMe only recently reached a settlement involving a . In 2023, the company revealed that hackers had stolen the personal information of nearly seven million users — including 5.5 million people who used the DNA Relatives feature and another 1.4 million people who had created family tree profiles. But in a statement to KOIN 6 on Wednesday, 23andMe claimed arguments in the new lawsuit are 'without merit.' A company spokesperson said the potential sale is permitted and the potential buyers are required to adopt its policies. Criminal proceedings in Salem mass stabbing on hold amid suspect's mental evaluation 'Customers will continue to have the same rights and protections in the hands of the winning bidder,' the spokesperson added in an email. 'Both remaining bidders are US companies, have committed to abide by 23andMe privacy policies, and will continue to operate 23andMe as it has always been operated.' The U.S. Bankruptcy Court is slated to hear arguments for the objection of the sale on June 17. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store