logo
Council slams 'misconceived' PIP cuts that will see thousands lose out

Council slams 'misconceived' PIP cuts that will see thousands lose out

Wales Online6 hours ago

Council slams 'misconceived' PIP cuts that will see thousands lose out
Members said they could have a disproportionate impact on Wales, particularly in deprived areas
Civic Square in Port Talbot
(Image: Lewis Smith )
Neath Port Talbot Council has backed a motion raising concerns and opposition to proposed reforms to the benefits system put forward by the UK Government.
The benefit changes could see the tightening of qualification rules for Personal Independence Payments which the local authority feels could have a "detrimental impact" on the most vulnerable in its communities.

The discussions came at a full council meeting in June of 2025, where members said moves to cut welfare could have a disproportionate impact on Wales, particularly in deprived areas such as Neath Port Talbot, Merthyr Tydfil and Blaenau Gwent.

Speaking at the meeting, the leader of the council Steve Hunt said he would now write to both the Welsh and UK Government to ask that they "reassess the Welfare Reform Act and conduct a comprehensive review of the proposed changes with a focus on understanding their implications on vulnerable populations, especially in Wales."
He said: "Whilst its intention is to streamline welfare offering and address physical consideration, an unintended consequence is the potential for increasing hardship amongst the most disadvantaged members of society.
"These effects may undermine the social safety net essential for ensuring a minimum standard of living, particularly for individuals who are unable to support themselves due to various socio-economic or health-related challenges."
Article continues below
Get daily breaking news updates on your phone by joining our WhatsApp community here . We occasionally treat members to special offers, promotions and ads from us and our partners. See our Privacy Notice
Deputy leader, councillor Alun Llewelyn of Cwmllynfell and Ystalyfera, seconded the motion adding that a re- assessment and review were urgently needed.
He said: "It is clear that this legislation is misconceived.

"As the motion states, the intention may be to streamline welfare, but its unintended consequence will be to plunge hundreds of thousands of people in Wales deeper into poverty, and a re- assessment and review are urgently needed."
Councillor Sonia Reynolds of the Neath Port Talbot Labour group said they had written to the Prime Minister to ask him to reconsider his stance on welfare benefits cuts and look for alternative solutions.
She added that the impact of reductions could be particularly severe in places like Neath Port Talbot, citing figures from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation which suggested 24% of people in Wales currently live in poverty.
Article continues below
The motion was later approved unanimously by members, with an amendment that would also see the authority formally respond to the UK Governments Pathways to Work green paper which is open for consultation until June 30, 2025.
This consultation discusses proposals to reform health and disability benefits and employment support, with a focus on getting more people into work.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Disability benefit claimants to rise by 750,000 despite Starmer reforms
Disability benefit claimants to rise by 750,000 despite Starmer reforms

Telegraph

time40 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Disability benefit claimants to rise by 750,000 despite Starmer reforms

The number of people claiming disability benefits in Britain will jump by 750,000 over the next five years despite Sir Keir Starmer's attempt to reduce the welfare bill, the Government has admitted. An official impact assessment of Labour's benefits reforms found that the total cost of two disability benefits would increase by £8 billion by 2030 as the number of claimants continued to soar. The rate will rise despite a crackdown on the criteria for some benefits by Sir Keir that prompted a rebellion from Labour backbenchers. There are around five million people currently claiming disability benefits in England and Wales, including 3.7 million on PIP (personal independence payment) and a further 1.4 million on disability living allowance (DLA). The Government had warned that figure was set to spiral in the coming years without reform to the benefits system, because of a large increase in claimants with mental health conditions and a rise in fraud. But even with Labour's changes, the number will increase by 750,000 people by 2030, while costs will increase from £23 billion to £31 billion a year. Labour's changes include a new, tougher criteria for PIP, as well as a cut to the sickness-related element of Universal Credit (UC). Ministers estimate that these reforms will save £5 billion a year by the end of this Parliament. Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, previously said there were 1,000 new PIP awards every day, which she described as adding a city the size of Leicester to the welfare books every year. On Wednesday, the Government laid the legislation to enact its welfare reforms, which Ms Kendall said marked 'the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity'. But Labour rebels pointed to the Government's own figures showing that 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, are likely to fall into poverty by 2030 because of the changes. The impact assessment on Wednesday confirmed previously published estimates that changes to PIP entitlement rules could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. The changes to UC are expected to mean an estimated 2.25 million people lose an average of £500 per year. The UC losses are to people claiming an additional rate of the benefit because they have a 'limited capacity to work', which the Government says encourages jobless people not to go back into employment. Ministers argue that 3.9 million households who do not claim the extra allowance will gain an average of £265 each year from an increase to the standard allowance. Rebel MPs have secured a concession from ministers that PIP and UC claimants losing some benefits will be given a 13-week financial support package, up from a planned four-week package. But documents show the Government has ignited fury from Labour MPs without securing an overall reduction in the cost of welfare, while the number of people claiming disability benefits will rise by around 15 per cent. The £8 billion cost increase under the new system is equivalent to around five times the annual revenue that Labour says it will receive from imposing VAT on private schools, and more than the cost of building Britain's two aircraft carriers. The impact assessment said that without reform, the cost of working-age sickness and disability benefits would have increased by £18 billion a year to a total £70 billion. 'The increase alone is more than the entire police budget,' the document said. Ms Kendall told MPs that Britain's social security system was 'at a crossroads' as a result of rising costs since the pandemic. She said: 'Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. 'This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot.' Sir Keir said he was 'determined' to ensure the reforms go through because he feels the welfare system 'doesn't work for anyone'. 'It doesn't work for those that want to get back to work, and it certainly doesn't work for the taxpayer,' the Prime Minister told ITV, adding that 'those that need to be protected should be protected'.

Televise grooming gang inquiry given public interest, Labour peer urges
Televise grooming gang inquiry given public interest, Labour peer urges

South Wales Argus

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Argus

Televise grooming gang inquiry given public interest, Labour peer urges

Broadcaster Baroness Hazarika, who was previously a political adviser to former prime minister Gordon Brown, Baroness Harman and Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, also called for a two-year time limit on the probe, arguing that 'justice delayed is justice denied'. Speaking in Parliament, the Muslim Labour peer again apologised for the crimes carried out by 'wicked, wicked men' and said many in her community felt 'deeply ashamed'. Responding, Home Office minister Lord Hanson of Flint also said he would like to see the inquiry 'speeded up', but this would be subject to discussion with the chairperson, which the Government was looking to swiftly recruit. The full-scale investigation was announced by the Prime Minister following a major review by Baroness Casey into grooming gangs, leading to accusations of a U-turn by Tory critics. Her report, published on Monday, found the ethnicity of perpetrators had been 'shied away from', with data not recorded for two-thirds of offenders. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper claimed officials had dodged the issue of ethnicity among the groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, even though available data showed suspects were disproportionately likely to be Asian men. Labour peer and broadcaster Baroness Hazarika was previously a political adviser to former prime minister Gordon Brown, Baroness Harman and Energy Secretary Ed Miliband (Alamy/PA) Lord Hanson told peers on Wednesday: 'The Government is determined to root out the horrific crimes of grooming gangs and secure justice for victims.' He pointed out all 12 recommendations made by Lady Casey had been accepted by the administration, including the establishment of a national probe. The minister added: 'The inquiry will be time limited, have statutory powers to direct targeted investigations into local areas with the aim of holding institutions to account for current and historic failures in their response to group-based child sexual exploitation.' Lady Hazarika said: 'I welcome this inquiry. And I just wanted to say that, as a Muslim woman, I want to profoundly apologise for what these wicked, wicked men have done to white working class girls. 'Many of us feel deeply ashamed, and let's not call them grooming gangs. These are rape gangs which operated on an industrial level. 'I hope the inquiry will also hear the voices of Muslim girls who were also abused by these animals.' She added: 'The minister talks about a time limit. Could the inquiry be capped at two years because justice delayed is justice denied? 'Given the public interest, can this inquiry be televised? 'And finally, given the incredible work that Baroness Casey has done, can she be appointed the chair? Because in a world of appalling systemic failure, she is the only public figure that many victims trust.' Lord Hanson said: 'She asks about the timescale for the inquiry, Baroness Casey has indicated it would be around three years. I would like to see it speeded up, but we have to discuss that matter with the potential chair of the inquiry. 'And the Government intends to try to recruit the potential chair of the inquiry as a matter of some speed, and we are in the process of doing that now. 'Baroness Casey herself is currently now going to be engaged in a further report, but we will appoint a chair as soon as possible.' He added: 'As to the matter of televising the proceedings, again if she will bear with me, that again will be a matter of discussion with the chair to determine. 'We want to ensure that we take action speedily on this issue.' He pointed out other recommendation made by Lady Casey would be implemented 'in very short order'. These included making it mandatory to collect ethnicity and nationality data of all suspects in child sexual abuse cases, a change in the law so that all adult sex with under-16s was considered rape, and a review of the criminal records of exploitation victims.

Legislation to decriminalise abortion for women clears the Commons
Legislation to decriminalise abortion for women clears the Commons

South Wales Argus

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Argus

Legislation to decriminalise abortion for women clears the Commons

MPs voted 312 to 95, majority 217 to approve the Crime and Policing Bill at third reading on Wednesday. This comes after the Commons backed Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi's amendment, which will remove the threat of 'investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. The issue was treated as a matter of conscience, with MPs given a free vote and the Government remaining neutral. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi (Chris McAndrew/PA) Downing Street said the change to abortion laws must be 'workable and safe', following Tuesday's verdict. MPs voted 379 to 137, majority 242, to back Ms Antoniazzi's amendment. A No 10 spokesman said: 'We'll look at this in detail, considering whether any changes are necessary to make it workable and safe. But, of course, this would not change the intent of the amendment passed.' The spokesman added: 'As with all laws, the Government has a responsibility to ensure it is safe and workable.' The Bill will now undergo further scrutiny in the House of Lords. It will also introduce a two-step verification process for the sale of knives and crossbows purchased online, and greater protections for emergency workers from racial and religious abuse during house calls are also included in the Bill. Speaking during report stage on Tuesday, Ms Antoniazzi said she pushed for the change in the law after cases of women being investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions. The Gower MP said: 'This is the right change at the right time. I implore colleagues who want to protect women and girls and abortion services to vote for new clause one. 'Let's ensure that not a single desperate woman ever again is subject to traumatic, criminal investigation at the worst moments in their lives.' Medics or others who facilitate an abortion after the 24-week time limit could still face prosecution if the change becomes law. Though the Government took a neutral stance on the vote, several Cabinet ministers were among the MPs who backed the amendment. They included Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, Defence Secretary John Healey, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, Environment Secretary Steve Reed, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn, Scotland Secretary Ian Murray, Wales Secretary Jo Stevens and Commons Leader Lucy Powell. Kemi Badenoch and many members of the Conservative front bench voted against it but shadow education secretary Laura Trott voted in favour. Abortion in England and Wales currently remains a criminal offence unless with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks into a pregnancy, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is under 10 weeks pregnant. Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th century law, the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store