Quad ministers set to meet soon, clear decks for summit India will host
Quad foreign ministers are likely to meet soon in Washington as India gears up to host the summit later this year. It's learnt that discussions are underway to have the meeting of the informal strategic group involving Australia, India, Japan either in late June or early July, depending upon the availability of the ministers.
The meeting of the foreign policy chiefs, if it happens, will lay the ground for the summit that will see US President Donald Trump, Japanese PM Shigeru Ishiba and his Australian counterpart Anthony Albanese travelling to India. With the US keen on hosting it, the meeting will again underscore the Trump administration's unwavering commitment to the group Trump helped revive during his first term - and which has evolved rapidly to work towards a free, open, inclusive, prosperous and resilient Indo-Pacific – in the middle of Washington's efforts to improve trade ties with China.
The Trump administration's diplomatic engagements in fact kicked off with a meeting of the Quad foreign ministers on January 21 this year, a day after the president was sworn in for the second time. Quad has remained ring-fenced from differences that partners have had with the US over trade and tariff issues and, in the case of India, the unease here over some of the claims made by the US about its role in the India-Pakistan military clash last month.
The meeting will also provide an opportunity for external affairs minister S Jaishankar to review India-US cooperation with his counterpart Marco Rubio in a bilateral meeting, including the ongoing efforts for a bilateral trade agreement.
While Russia and China continue to see Quad as an exercise in containment, India believes the grouping's agenda is constructive and practical, focused as it is on infrastructure, debt sustainability, healthcare, critical and emerging technologies, UN reforms, climate change and humanitarian assistance.
And that focus will remain unchanged even as India's ties with China improve considerably.
Counterterrorism is also an important focus area for Quad and a strong condemnation of the Pahalgam terrorist attack can be expected from the meeting. In the past, Quad leaders have condemned the Mumbai and Pathankot terrorist attacks and also called upon all States to uphold international standards on anti-money laundering and combating terror-financing, in line with FATF recommendations.
While the date for the Quad summit has not been finalized yet, it will probably take place within months of the scheduled meeting of Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) leaders in China in late August or early September. PM Narendra Modi has neither accepted nor rejected the invitation for the SCO summit but it's unlikely that the event will not see participation at any level by India as working concurrently with these groups allows it to amplify its strategic autonomy.
In addition to that, India is also hoping to host Russian President Vladimir Putin for the annual summit this year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
A new paradigm in Russia-Ukraine war
On Sunday, Ukraine executed one of the most extraordinary asymmetric operations in modern military history. Using domestically built first-person-view (FPV) drones deployed from deep inside Russian territory, Kyiv launched a coordinated assault against several military airbases as far as eastern Siberia, the border with Mongolia, and the Arctic. Known as Operation Spiderweb, the attacks destroyed or severely damaged as many as 20 strategic aircraft, including nuclear-capable bombers and early-warning planes; Kyiv claims the true toll could reach 41. Only two days later, on Tuesday, the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) struck again – this time detonating underwater explosives and damaging the Kerch Bridge, the critical rail and road artery connecting Russia to occupied Crimea. The combined message from Kyiv could not have been clearer: We may be far smaller and — on paper at least — weaker, but we can strike hard and reach far into Russia. Using drones produced indigenously for less than the cost of an iPhone, Ukraine took out strategic bombers worth upward of $100 million each — many of which are nearly impossible to replace due to sanctions and Russia's degraded industrial base. At a 300,000-to-one return on investment, this is the kind of asymmetric operation that can upend the rules of modern warfare. Just as significant as the material damage is what the attacks revealed: That a small but determined and innovative nation can deploy cheap, scalable, and decentralised tech to challenge a much larger, conventionally superior foe – and even degrade elements of a nuclear superpower's second-strike capacity. The lessons will reverberate globally, from Taipei to Islamabad. Perhaps the biggest impact of Ukraine's battlefield coup may be to challenge the core strategic presumption that has guided Vladimir Putin's thinking for over three years — that time is on his side. Since the invasion began, Putin has bet on outlasting Ukraine — grinding down its defences, draining Western support, and waiting for the political winds in Washington and Europe to shift. That assumption has underpinned his refusal to negotiate seriously. But the success of Ukraine's drone and sabotage operations challenges that theory of victory. It shows that Ukraine is not simply holding the line or surviving a war of attrition; it is shifting the battlefield and expanding the costs of continued war for Russia in ways the Kremlin has not anticipated. That shift matters, especially in the diplomatic context. The timing of the drone campaign — just 24 hours before a direct round of talks between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul — was hardly coincidental. Kyiv's actions were designed to signal that Ukraine is not negotiating from a position of weakness and won't be coerced into a bad deal. Though the Istanbul meeting itself was predictably fruitless — lasting just over an hour and reinforcing the irreconcilability of the two sides' positions— the fact that the Kremlin showed up fresh off such a high-profile embarrassment suggests it may be starting to realise that Ukraine has cards to play and continuing the war carries risks for Russia. This may not be enough to bring Russia to the negotiating table in good faith, but it could make it more open to limited agreements. To be sure, a permanent peace settlement remains as distant as ever. Kyiv continues to push for an unconditional ceasefire that Russia rejects out of hand. In Istanbul, Moscow proposed two equally unacceptable alternatives: Either Kyiv retreats from Russian-claimed territories or accepts limits on its ability to rearm, including a halt to Western military aid. But the right kind of pressure from the US, coordinated with European allies, could now stand a better chance of extracting a first-phase deal — whether that's a 30-day ceasefire, a humanitarian corridor, or a prisoner swap — that could then potentially turn into something bigger and more durable. At the same time, Ukraine's gains increase the tail risks of dangerous escalation. Russia's deterrent posture has been eroded. Putin's red lines – on Nato enlargement, Western weapons use, attacks inside Russia – have been crossed repeatedly without serious consequence. That makes him look weak but also increases the risk that he will feel compelled to escalate the conflict more dramatically to restore his credibility at home and abroad. Russia's immediate response to the recent attacks will be more of the same: heavier indiscriminate bombing of Ukrainian cities and infrastructure. But a darker possibility is that, boxed in and humiliated, Putin might consider a tactical nuclear strike. The threshold for such an extreme step is high — not least because China, Russia's most important global partner, strongly opposes nuclear use. That scenario remains unlikely, but less so than before June 1. And Putin is emboldened by the belief that the West — particularly Donald Trump's US — fears direct military confrontation more than anything. If he assesses that Russia's position in the war is becoming untenable or its conventional deterrence is crumbling, his calculus could change. Ukraine has just reminded the Kremlin — and the world — that it can shape events, not just react to them. This doesn't put it on a path to victory or bring the war to an end. But by showing that it has leverage and that Moscow has more to lose than it thought, Ukraine has altered the strategic equation and opened a narrow window for diplomacy — even if the endgame remains as elusive as ever. The alternative is a deeper and more unpredictable conflict that grows more dangerous the longer it drags on. Ian Bremmer is the founder and board president of Eurasia Group Foundation. The views expressed.
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Joe Biden slams Donald Trump, denies losing mental control, asserts, 'I made the decisions'
Former President Joe Biden firmly rejected claims questioning his control over the presidency, doubling down on his use of an autopen—a mechanical device that replicates a person's signature—to sign pardons, executive orders, and legislation. 'I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' Biden said in a statement, according to Fox News. He further accused President Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans of using these allegations as a distraction from legislative efforts they oppose. Biden said, 'This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations,' Trump orders investigation into Biden's actions President Donald Trump escalated his criticism of Biden by directing his administration to investigate Biden's actions, alleging aides concealed Biden's cognitive decline and casting doubt on the legitimacy of his autopen use. Trump's memo described the situation as 'one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history,' alleging, 'The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts.' Trump appointed Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House counsel David Warrington to lead the inquiry. Autopen use long established and constitutionally valid Despite Trump's accusations, the Justice Department, under both Democratic and Republican administrations, has recognised autopen use for decades. The president's pardon power is absolute and enshrined in the US Constitution. No evidence has been presented showing Biden was unaware of actions signed on his behalf. Congressional Republicans demand answers House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) has intensified the investigation, demanding interviews with five former senior Biden aides. Comer alleges a 'cover-up' regarding Biden's mental state and who was truly in control. 'These five former senior advisors were eyewitnesses to President Biden's condition and operations within the Biden White House,' Comer said. 'They must appear before the House Oversight Committee and provide truthful answers about President Biden's cognitive state and who was calling the shots.' Requested witnesses include White House senior advisers Mike Donilon and Anita Dunn, former Chief of Staff Ron Klain, former Deputy Chief of Staff Bruce Reed, and former counselor Steve Ricchetti. Comer also called for Biden's physician Kevin O'Connor and several former aides to testify. Comer warned that subpoenas would be issued if voluntary cooperation is not granted: 'I think that people will start coming in the next two weeks… we'll release the transcribed interviews, so it'll be very transparent.' Democrats dismiss probe as political theater Democrats have dismissed the GOP investigation as a distraction with no basis in fact. 'Chairman Comer had his big shot in the last Congress to impeach Joe Biden and it was, of course, a spectacular flop,' said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), ranking member of the oversight committee. 'And now he's just living off of a spent dream. It's over. And he should give up the whole thing.' GOP claims focus on final executive actions Republicans have zeroed in on Biden's final executive orders and pardons, suggesting they may be invalid due to his alleged incapacity. Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) said, 'The American people didn't elect a bureaucracy to run the country. I think that the American people deserve to know the truth and they want to know the truth of what happened.' Controversy fueled by book allegations The inquiry has been partly fueled by the book Original Sin by CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson, which alleges that Biden's cognitive state limited his control, saying, 'Five people were running the country, and Joe Biden was at best a senior member of the board.' Biden's family and allies have strongly rejected the book's claims. Naomi Biden, the former president's granddaughter, called it 'political fairy smut for the permanent, professional chattering class.' Target: Family pardons, death row commutations The investigation centres on preemptive pardons Biden issued to five family members—including siblings James Biden, Frank Biden, and Valerie Biden Owens, along with their spouses—and clemency that spared 37 federal inmates from the death penalty. Biden had defended the family pardons, stating they were intended 'to protect them from future politically motivated investigations.' Hunter Biden, the president's son, who had pleaded guilty to tax violations and was convicted on firearms-related charges, was also pardoned by Biden on December 1. In the final hours of his presidency, Joe Biden issued pre-emptive pardons to several key personalities, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, retired General Mark Milley, and members of the House committee that investigated the January 6 Capitol attack. Background: Biden's declining health questions Concerns over Biden's mental acuity arose after a poor debate performance against Trump in the run up to 2024 election, where he appeared confused and misspoke several times. This performance led to his withdrawal from the presidential race and replacement by Kamala Harris, who ultimately lost the general election to Trump. Also Read | Trump and Xi speak amid stalled tariff negotiations: Chinese media
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kremlin Reveals Date Of Putin's Revenge Attack On Kyiv Over Op Spiderweb
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that Russian military will respond to Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb at a time it deems appropriate. His comments came as Russian deputy foreign minister claimed that Russian bombers were not destroyed but damaged by Ukraine's drone blitz on June 1 and that they will be restored soon. Watch for more details.
