Sunshine Coast Council's $30 million depreciation error causes $20m budget deficit
The Sunshine Coast Council said it uncovered the financial errors in its own internal reporting.
The errors, calculating the depreciation of council assets, amounted to about $30 million and could increase rates.
Consequently, the council's 2025-'26 budget announcement has been pushed back by two weeks.
The revised meeting date is now July 7.
Sunshine Coast Council chief executive officer John Baker said that while external audits by the Queensland Audit Office found no issues, internal reports presented to the council did not fully reflect the long-term cost of asset ownership and renewal.
"The new chief financial officer and I are leading the review with a focus on ensuring the 2025-'26 budget is built on clear, accurate and reliable financial data," he said.
He said the council was putting "robust financial controls" and "reporting mechanisms in place" to prevent this from happening again.
Mayor Rosanna Natoli said independent and internal reviews were being conducted.
"Together we agreed that the right course of action was to bring in external consultants to conduct a thorough and independent review.
"We also agreed that to ensure the accuracy of our financial data we needed to delay the budget and be transparent with our community and the media."
Ms Natoli declined to say who was responsible for the mistake.
"This review is not about blame. It's about strengthening our systems and making sure this doesn't happen again," she said.
"We are committed to transparency. Once the review is complete we will share the outcomes with our community.
"As we finalise the 2025-'26 budget we are focused on financial stability and delivering the services that matter most to our residents.
"We, as a council, are working hard to minimise any impact on rates."
Stan Gallo, a forensic investigator for business and councils at BDO Australia, has extensive experience working with councils but could not talk directly to the Sunshine Coast Council matter.
He said generally councils managed a wide range of assets such as roads, parks, buildings, drainage, and community facilities, each with different life-spans, maintenance needs, and valuation methods.
Mr Gallo said this makes calculating depreciation and accurately forecasting future asset-related expenses more complex than for a business.
"Depreciation is a book entry, so an initial human error may go unnoticed over a period of time if the underlying internal financials are not properly scrutinised and the underlying figures are simply accepted and thereby included in generated reports," he said.
Mr Gallo said it was a positive step to identify and publicly report it.
"They now need to follow through in appropriately responding to it which should include understanding exactly what happened, how it happened, identifying any underlying issues, and determining what — if any — control failures allowed it to happen," Mr Gallo said.
He said for a council to maintain credibility, and its reputation, a detailed external and independent forensic financial review should be undertaken by professionals prepared to ask difficult questions to drive "good governance".
Logan City Council Mayor Jon Raven said depreciation was crippling for councils.
"At this rate we could be in deficit by the end of the financial year," Cr Raven said.
"$1 million [deficit] might sound like a lot of money, but for a council with a billion-dollar budget it's like a family on a combined $100,000 income only having $100 in the bank at the end of the week.
"We didn't end up here because of budget blowouts or project overruns. It's because the cost of things that council buys the most — power, insurance, construction materials and services — has been soaring.
"[It has been] going up by as much as 25 per cent."
The Logan City Council 2025-'26 budget will be adopted on June 25.
"The biggest hit to our bottom line has been depreciation which was $14 million over the forecast budget of $137.5 million for 2024-'25," Mr Raven said.
"Depreciation is crippling local governments.
"We don't benefit from it like businesses do. Councils must adhere to an accounting standard that's not fit for purpose.
"ABS figures show that local government spends significantly more on maintaining depreciating assets than other levels of government.
"We're doing everything we can to find savings and reduce waste, but ultimately rates will need to go up to pay for depreciation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
10 minutes ago
- ABC News
Australia and Vanuatu close to signing Nakamal Agreement worth $500m
Australia and Vanuatu are close to signing an "ambitious" new strategic pact that will see the federal government plough about half a billion dollars into the Pacific island country over the next decade. Vanuatu's Council of Ministers is widely expected to endorse the Nakamal Agreement later today after months of negotiations between the two countries. Foreign Minister Penny Wong, Defence Minister Richard Marles and Pacific Minister Pat Conroy will then join Vanuatu's Prime Minister Jotham Napat and other senior leaders on the island of Tanna tomorrow to give their initial agreement to the pact, ahead of a formal signing next month. Mr Napat's office said in a statement the development and security agreement would "cover a wide range of bilateral issues, including infrastructure planning, economic development, and climate resilience initiatives in light of the devastating December 17 earthquake of 2024". "The partnership between Vanuatu and Australia remains strong, especially as Vanuatu continues its recovery efforts," it said. One Australian government source said Vanuatu had driven "quite a hard bargain", but insisted the pact would boost Vanuatu's development while buttressing Australia's strategic position in the country — which is also being energetically courted by China. Under the pact, Australia is expected to make substantial commitments worth up to $500 million over a decade — or $50 million a year. For example, Australia would provide approximately $120 million to help Vanuatu deliver its plan to build two "large data centres" in both Port Vila and Santo. Australia is also expected to deliver around $100 million in security assistance and budget support worth $55 million, and more than $110 million to help Vanuatu deal with the impacts of climate change. The federal government is also expected to make smaller financial contributions to boosting labour mobility, fostering cultural connections and improving digital connectivity. But several details in the agreement remain under wraps. For example, it is not yet clear whether Australia will offer any concessions to Vanuatu on travel and migration, which is an issue likely to be closely watched by other Pacific nations. Last month Mr Napat declared he would not sign the Nakamal Agreement unless Australia agreed to offer "visa-free" travel to his country, saying the pact had to be "win-win" for both countries. Successive Australian governments have been unwilling to relax visa and travel rules for Pacific nationals, partly due to fears a large proportion would remain in Australia illegally. Relaxing travel restrictions for the Pacific could also be politically contentious. Australian officials have previously raised deep concerns about Vanuatu's contentious "Citizenship By Investment" scheme — sometimes called the Golden Passport program — which critics say has drawn oligarchs and criminals seeking to evade foreign law enforcement. It is not yet clear what commitments Vanuatu has made to Australia on the security front. The Pacific island nations of Tuvalu and Nauru have effectively handed Australia the right to veto security agreements with third nations under sweeping treaties they signed with Canberra in 2023 and 2024 respectively. But Vanuatu has long maintained a fierce commitment to non-alignment — or "friends to all, enemies to none" — and is very unlikely to make a similar commitment to Australia. In 2022, Vanuatu's then-Prime Minister Ishmael Kalsakau signed a contentious security agreement with Ms Wong that labelled Australia as Vanuatu's "principal security partner" and said both countries would "consult" with each other on any "common security interests." But Mr Kalsakau's cabinet rebelled in the wake of that agreement, accusing the prime minister of going above the heads of his ministers and parliament — and the security agreement was never ratified by either Australia or Vanuatu. The statement from Mr Napat's office suggested the Nakamal Agreement will supersede the 2022 security pact. "It is important to note that a security agreement signed in late 2022 between Australia and the former Government of then Prime Minister Ishmael Kalsakau was never approved by COM, let alone parliament!" it said. A spokesperson for the Foreign Minister Penny Wong said discussions on the Nakamal Agreement were "progressing" but "there is still work to do on both sides." "We look forward to continuing our constructive conversations on the ground as we work towards reaching an agreement that delivers shared objectives," they said. "Our visit to Vanuatu highlights the respect, shared values, and cultural and religious connections that are the platform for deepening the partnership between our countries." "As we have shown through our Pacific partnerships, Australia is open to ambitious agreements where they advance the prosperity and security of our region."
ABC News
25 minutes ago
- ABC News
Australia should lead global food security, expert says
The Indo-Pacific is facing significant climate and population pressures, and that presents Australia with an opportunity it must take to become a leader in food security across the region. That's the key message at this year's Crawford conference, the country's largest food security event which continues in Parliament House today. It comes as experts increase calls for urgent, coordinated action, arguing it is one of national security and a foreign policy priority.
ABC News
40 minutes ago
- ABC News
Palestinian Authority says Australia's recognition will encourage other nations to follow
The Palestinian Authority (PA) in the West Bank says it is prepared to yield to demands from countries including Australia to reform its processes and administration, as part of the process to recognise Palestinian statehood. On Monday, the Australian government announced it would shift its policy in the Middle East and recognise a Palestinian state, following similar moves by France, the United Kingdom and Canada. Each of those nations have attached slightly different conditions to their support, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese saying the PA needed to commit to measures such as demilitarisation, financial transparency and to hold elections. "Reform is a Palestinian demand," the PA's foreign minister Varsen Aghabekian told the ABC from her offices in Ramallah. "Yes, there were conditions by various countries on reform — but as a start, it's a Palestinian demand. "We want to become better in terms of how we govern our institutions, how we deal with our money, how we use best practices." The last Palestinian presidential election was in 2005, while the last parliamentary election was the following year. Dr Aghabekian blamed Israeli restrictions for making it too difficult to hold a poll. "Elections are a must, and as Palestinians, we want democratic processes, we want a democratic country whereby we can elect our leaders and we have been denied that democratic process because we are living under abnormal conditions," she said. "We are under occupation and that democratic process cannot include the entirety of occupied Palestine today." She said Palestinians in occupied East Jerusalem were being blocked from taking part, and Gazans also needed to have their say in any ballots. Despite the Albanese government's insistence it is not a major player in the Middle East, the PA foreign minister argued it was influential in global affairs. "Australia is a weighty country, its recognition will make a difference, it will bring others to recognise, hopefully, and it safeguards the two-state solution," she said. "It sends a very clear message that Australia is with international law, it respects international law, it respects the rights of people to self-determination, and it wants to move alongside the Palestinians and the Israelis on the peace track." Dr Aghabekian said she had received a call from her Australian counterpart Penny Wong on Sunday night, local time, informing her an announcement was imminent. But she revealed she woke to the news on Monday morning with surprise, hours after Senator Wong and Prime Minister Albanese revealed the decision in Canberra. While Australia has joined allies in the move, the biggest player in the debate has not, with the United States remaining opposed. "It's not fruitless, it's fruitful," Dr Aghabekian said of the Albanese government's decision to act before the US. "That will create a critical mass of nearly the whole world saying that there's a consensus on this illegal occupation and the need to dismantle this occupation." A White House official said the US President Donald Trump viewed recognising a Palestinian state now as a reward for Hamas after the deadly October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel. Fifty Israeli hostages are still held captive in Gaza, 20 of whom are believed to be alive. It echoes the rhetoric from senior members of the Israeli government, including President Isaac Herzog. "These declarations, by Australia and other countries, are a reward for terror, a prize for the enemies of freedom, liberty, and democracy," he said on Monday. "This is a grave and dangerous mistake, which will not help a single Palestinian and sadly will not bring back a single hostage." Ahead of the announcement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said it was "shameful" countries such as Australia would consider the issue. Dr Aghabekian rejected the sentiment. "It's not a reward for Hamas, it is a reward for the plight of the Palestinian people who have been suffering immensely for seven decades. "And non-recognition is a reward to the extremists in Israel, whether in the government or the settler organisations and their leaders." Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories was ruled illegal by the International Court of Justice last year. News of the Albanese government's decision had quickly spread through the streets of Ramallah, 15 kilometres and a concrete wall away from Jerusalem. "Honestly, it's amazing," Saida Shahout told the ABC. "We've seen something that we've never seen before, which is more countries are siding with us and seeing the injustice that's happening with our country and with the people of Gaza." Her sister Huseina said the move was long overdue. "We're at this point in our lives where why does everything have to [come from] war? " she said. "Why is it always a violent action? Why can't we just come to an agreement? You're a person, I'm a person and we can both sit at the same table and have a meal. "When you cut me, I bleed the same colour you bleed — there should be no difference between the two." West Bank resident Amjad Tamimi welcomed the decision. "I see the Australian advancement together with many other countries — France which was, to be honest, the first initiator in this direction — this is a good thing and will bring peace to the region and stability," he said. "Naturally this talk, the recognition of these states, the Palestinian state, will have an impact on the Palestinian situation in general — the political situation, the economic situation, the social situation." Fellow local Azmi Samah feared symbolism would only go so far, as the Palestinian population was under threat from Israeli forces. "The Palestinians have been here for a long time, we are not waiting to be recognised, they recognise us from the outside, but if we are not given a state, then we have not benefited," he said. "So if the whole world recognises it and we in the reality don't have a state, then we have not benefited from this at all." His comments point to the concerns around issues such as Israeli settlements being built throughout the West Bank — a practice that is illegal under international law, but which the Israeli government approves and encourages. The Albanese Government's push to recognise Palestinian statehood has happened 22 months into the war in Gaza, where local health authorities say more than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed. "What we are experiencing is something incomprehensible, something that we have never experienced in the past," Dr Aghabekian said. "And this recognition brings to the Palestinian people a glimpse of hope, and this is exactly what the Palestinian people would like to feel, especially at this specific moment. The shift in Australian foreign policy also comes days after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced an expansion of his country's military offensive in Gaza. Mr Netanyahu has rejected international condemnation of plans to seize control of Gaza City, displacing hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in the process. He insisted it was the way to end the war with Hamas quickly, and claimed Arab nations — not the PA — could take over civil governance of the strip in the post-Hamas era. "Israel can say whatever it wants, because, frankly, Israel doesn't want to see anybody in the Gaza Strip," Dr Aghabekian said. "But the only entity that can shoulder that responsibility is the Palestinian Authority, and it can be supported by the Arab, Islamic, and the world at large in terms of the assistance, the security assistance, the technical assistance, the funding that is needed."
