logo
Ex-SoftBank Rainmaker Naheta Picked to Head Bakkt's Turnaround Efforts

Ex-SoftBank Rainmaker Naheta Picked to Head Bakkt's Turnaround Efforts

Bloomberg20-03-2025

Akshay Naheta, a former SoftBank Group official who has overseen some of its biggest deals, has joined Bakkt Holdings Inc. as a co-chief executive officer to help turn around the struggling American crypto trading and custody platform.
Naheta will also be part of the company's board and will work with Andy Main, the firm's current CEO, according to a statement from Bakkt Holdings on late Wednesday in the US.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Much Money You Would Have If the U.S. Made These 3 Policy Changes
How Much Money You Would Have If the U.S. Made These 3 Policy Changes

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How Much Money You Would Have If the U.S. Made These 3 Policy Changes

Policy changes at the federal level can impact your personal finances. It can either put thousands of dollars back in your pocket or quietly drain your wallet over time. Here are three policy changes that can have a positive impact on your finances if they become law. For You: Read Next: The most immediate financial relief could come from Senate Bill 381, which proposes capping credit card interest rates at 10%. This change would provide substantial savings for millions of Americans struggling with high-interest debt. 'One policy change that could significantly impact the average American is the pending Senate Bill 381, which proposes a cap on credit card interest rates at 10%,' said Josh Richner, founder and senior advisor at FaithWorks Financial. Discover Next: As of February 2025, the average credit card APR stands at 21.37% and the average credit card debt per American is approximately $6,455, according to TransUnion, one of the three major credit reporting agencies. 'At today's average APR, carrying a $6,455 balance results in roughly $1,380 in interest over a year. If interest were capped at 10%, the annual interest would drop to around $645, saving the average consumer more than $735 a year,' Richner said. For individuals with higher credit card debt, the savings become even more significant. Another proposed policy under Trump Accounts, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' would create a federally-funded savings account with a $1,000 deposit for children born between Jan. 1, 2025 and Jan. 1, 2029. Families could contribute up to $5,000 per year until the child turns 18. 'Assuming a family contributes the maximum $5,000 annually and the account earns an average annual return of 7%, the account could grow to approximately $170,000 by the time the child reaches 18,' Richner added. 'If families make no additional contributions, the initial $1,000 federal seed investment could grow meaningfully over 18 years, depending on the investment's annual return. Assuming the same 7% annual return, the $1,000 could grow to approximately $3,380 by the time the child turns 18.' This nest egg could go toward college, a first home or starting a business, giving the next generation a meaningful financial head start. Monetary policy changes that lower interest rates could deliver big savings across multiple areas of households' financial lives. 'Lower interest rates can have a ripple effect on the entire economy, influencing everything from consumer spending and business investments to the housing market and job creation,' said Aaron Razon, personal finance expert at Couponsnake. 'If borrowing costs decreased even by 1%, households might save thousands of dollars annually in loan and mortgage payments.' More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on How Much Money You Would Have If the U.S. Made These 3 Policy Changes Sign in to access your portfolio

China Urges US to Comply With ‘Hard-Won' Deal After London Talks
China Urges US to Comply With ‘Hard-Won' Deal After London Talks

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China Urges US to Comply With ‘Hard-Won' Deal After London Talks

(Bloomberg) — China cheered a new framework to defuse trade tensions with the US after two days of intense negotiation, calling on both countries to adhere to the agreement and maintain dialogue to stabilize ties. Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire NYC Mayoral Candidates All Agree on Building More Housing. But Where? Senator Calls for Closing Troubled ICE Detention Facility in New Mexico California Pitches Emergency Loans for LA, Local Transit Systems 'As a next step, the two sides should follow the important consensus and requirements reached by the two heads of state on the phone call, further play a good role in the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism,' Vice Premier He Lifeng said, according to a Wednesday statement published by state broadcaster China Central Television. The two sides should 'show the spirit of good faith in abiding by their commitments and jointly safeguard the hard-won results of the dialogue,' he added. The statement offered no details on the specifics of the framework. The agreement comes after two days of high-stakes trade talks in London that concluded Tuesday night. Both sides said they'd agreed on a framework for implementing the Geneva deal that would revive the flow of sensitive goods between the countries. Despite reaching a truce that suspended drastic tariffs last month, the world's two largest economies later accused each other of violating that accord. US officials said China was stalling exports of rare earth magnets crucial for auto and defense sectors, while Beijing protested Washington's move to impose new curbs on chip design software, jet engine parts and student visas. The latest statement represents a step toward de-escalating a tariff war that had led to a slump in bilateral trade. However, it made no reference to rare earth magnets or US export controls, which had both been a focal point of the talks and main source of tension going into negotiations. The US and Chinese delegations will take that proposal back to their respective leaders, China's trade envoy Li Chenggang told reporters after the talks concluded. New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Better Autonomous Driving Stock: Tesla or Uber? The Answer Might Surprise You.
Better Autonomous Driving Stock: Tesla or Uber? The Answer Might Surprise You.

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Better Autonomous Driving Stock: Tesla or Uber? The Answer Might Surprise You.

Tesla has become the poster child for the autonomous driving revolution on Wall Street, thanks to its Cybercab robotaxi. The company is facing a series of headwinds right now and its stock is extremely expensive, which creates downside risk. Uber is approaching autonomous vehicles with a unique strategy that could pay off significantly in the long run. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) is one of the leaders of the electric vehicle (EV) industry, but investors are more focused on its autonomous full self-driving software (FSD), which CEO Elon Musk believes could help it become the most valuable company in the world. But Tesla might be falling behind in the autonomous driving race, at least in terms of commercialization. Uber Technologies (NYSE: UBER) operates the world's biggest ride-hailing network, and it partnered with 18 developers of autonomous vehicles, some of which are already hauling passengers. Can Tesla come out on top over the long term, or is Uber stock the better buy? The answer might surprise you. Musk promised Tesla customers self-driving cars since the early 2010s, but he has yet to deliver one that is approved for unsupervised use on public roads in the U.S. Fortunately for the longtime believers, the wait might be over because he's aiming to get the company's Cybercab robotaxi on the road in Texas and California this year. The Cybercab is a true autonomous vehicle that doesn't come with pedals or even a steering wheel. It runs entirely on Tesla's FSD software, which has been available in beta mode for the last few years in the company's passenger EVs -- strictly in the presence of a human driver, who needs to be ready to take the wheel. Tesla has been releasing safety data for the beta versions of FSD since 2018, and it appears to outperform human drivers by a wide margin. A Tesla passenger EV with self-driving activated crashes once every 7.44 million miles, on average, compared to one crash every 702,000 miles for American drivers who pilot their car manually (across all brands). This data suggests FSD could reduce car accidents by 90% across the country if everybody uses the software, which is why Musk and his team are confident it will be approved for unsupervised use sometime this year. Unsupervised FSD could transform Tesla's economics. The Cybercab will be able to haul passengers and even complete small commercial deliveries around the clock, netting Tesla a consistent revenue stream with high profit margins because there are no human drivers involved. Cathie Wood's Ark Investment Management believes the Cybercab could bring in a whopping $756 billion in annual revenue from autonomous ride-hailing by 2029, assuming FSD receives widespread approval. But there are several unknowns, like whether FSD will actually receive broad approval from regulators or if the Cybercab will be confined to just a few cities. Plus, Tesla has to build an entire ride-hailing network, and there is no telling whether consumers will migrate from other platforms to use it. Uber operates the world's largest ride-hailing network, in addition to a highly successful food delivery service and a commercial freight platform. More than 170 million people use Uber every month, so it has a huge advantage over Tesla, which is starting from scratch. Uber is betting big on autonomous vehicles right now, which could help reduce the enormous cost of its human drivers. At the end of the first quarter of 2025, Uber had 18 partnerships with developers of autonomous technologies, which was up from 14 just six months earlier. One of those partners is Alphabet's Waymo, which is already completing over 250,000 paid autonomous ride-hailing trips every week in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Phoenix, and Austin. According to CEO Dara Khosrowshahi, Uber is facilitating 1.5 million autonomous trips per year (annualized based on its Q1 results). Most of those are attributable to Waymo, which offers its service through its own platform and also through Uber. However, Uber will receive a growing share of that traffic because it's now Waymo's exclusive partner in Austin, and the two companies plan to expand into Atlanta together later this year. Uber could benefit from autonomous vehicles more than almost any other company because the 8.5 million human drivers in its network are its largest cost by a wide margin. During the first quarter, Uber generated $42.8 billion in gross bookings, which represents the total dollar value users spent on the platform. After Uber paid $18.6 billion to its drivers and made $12.9 billion in merchant payouts (to restaurants for customers' food orders, as an example), the company was left with $11.5 billion in revenue for the quarter. Then, after deducting operating costs like marketing, it was left with $1.7 billion in profit on a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) basis. If Uber can eliminate some of its $18.6 billion in quarterly driver costs (a figure that is constantly growing), more of its gross bookings will immediately flow through to revenue and then to its bottom line as profit. Uber could theoretically partner with an infinite number of developers of self-driving vehicles to automate its entire network without committing practically any capital investment itself. And if some of those partners fail, others will likely swoop in to capture market share, which is one of the benefits of operating the world's biggest network. Every player in this space wants access to the most potential customers, and that's what Uber brings to the table. Tesla doesn't have that luxury. It will have to spend an enormous amount of money to manufacture Cybercabs, continue improving its FSD software, build a network, and then achieve scale. There is no guarantee it will succeed, and failure could be an existential threat to the company since its EV sales are currently plummeting worldwide, and other products like the Optimus humanoid robot could be years away from generating meaningful revenue. Plus, Tesla stock trades at an exorbitant valuation right now, which creates a significant downside risk. Its price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is 171, compared to the 30.6 P/E ratio of the Nasdaq-100 index. The Nasdaq-100 is home to all of Tesla's big-tech peers, many of which are growing their earnings while Tesla's earnings are shrinking, so the EV giant's premium valuation is very difficult to justify. Although Tesla is the poster child for the self-driving revolution on Wall Street, I think Uber is in a better position to build a successful autonomous ride-hailing business over the long term. Plus, it's extremely difficult to recommend buying Tesla stock at the current prices because any indication that its autonomous ambitions aren't going to plan could drive a sharp correction. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $369,876!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,243!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $660,341!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Anthony Di Pizio has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Tesla, and Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Autonomous Driving Stock: Tesla or Uber? The Answer Might Surprise You. was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store