
Ryton allotment tenants in horses row
A group of disgruntled allotment tenants have posted recordings online of a fake committee meeting after the chair of real committee told them to tidy up their plots and remove their horses.The Ryton and District Allotment Society tenants in Gateshead claimed in the fake meeting they had ousted the real society's chairwoman and brought in a new committee.Harry Hadfield, who keeps a young pony on his plot, said if chair Christine Rutter "wants us to move she's going to have to give us a stable somewhere".Mrs Rutter said the allotments were supposed to be used for growing plants and could be at risk of closure by the land agent if the rules were not followed.
The breakaway group of tenants posted an audio recording of their meeting to local Facebook groups and claimed "the chair was voted out with a vote of no confidence"."She [Mrs Rutter] can have her allotment but we want her removed as a steward and from running the allotment," said Mr Hadfield."We want things to be normal, the way it has been for years."
An agenda for the fake meeting was posted on the allotment's notice board and reiterated the claim Mrs Rutter and the rest of the committee had been removed from their positions.Another notice regarding an upcoming postal vote organised by the real allotment society was graffitied with the words "void" and "not legal".The real committee has since posted an open letter which explained the other group has not been "elected through the proper channels" and had attempted "a takeover".
The disagreement began on 1 March when the tenants were sent letters instructing them to return their plots to allotment use and giving them one year's notice to remove their horses.Under the allotment rules, 75% of the plots should be used for growing plants and vegetables while 25% can be used for other purposes, such as keeping chickens.But Mrs Rutter said the argument surrounding the enforcement of the rules has led to her becoming the target of abuse and harassment while she visits the allotments.Much of the upset has come about because many of the tenants, some of who have been there for 40 years, have never signed a lease and may have been unaware of the covenants.
Mrs Rutter is now working to make sure all tenants have signed a lease and are following the rules for the land's use. She said the change in stance was prompted when she was contacted by the allotment's land agent who told her the allotments were not being used for their intended purpose.She claimed many of the gardens are being used as businesses and horses are not supposed to be kept on the land, with the exception of two plots which are rented out specifically for that purpose."We have sympathy with the situation but we also, as a society, have to be doing what the rules say," she said.Mrs Rutter said if the land agent inspected the plots the tenants "would probably have to say goodbye to the whole lot".
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
School drag artist performance for 11-year-olds during Pride Month is branded 'morally reprehensible'
A school's drag artist performance for children as young as 11 years old has been branded 'morally reprehensible' by a Conservative MP. The display on June 27, featuring a drag artist, is set to form part of the annual pride event held at Fareham Academy, Hampshire. Described as a 'thriving mixed academy at the heart of our community', the secondary school said that the event offers a 'wonderful opportunity for our community to come together and raise awareness and show support for the LGBTQ + community'. However, Suella Braverman, who previously served as Home Secretary and is the Conservative MP for the local area, urged the institution to rethink their plans, describing it as 'morally reprehensible' that such performance would go ahead. Speaking to The Daily Telegraph about the 'utterly inappropriate' performance, she said: 'Adults are free to enjoy drag, but children should not be exposed to it at school. 'It is highly sexualised, presents a demeaning and distorted image of women and does not fairly represent the LGB community either'. Urging the school to withdraw their invitation to the drag artist, Ms Braveman declared that allowing them to perform was as a 'morally indefensible safeguarding issue' and an 'offensive, sexualised and inappropriate action'. The Tory MP, who said she had received complaints from parents about the planned performance, also feared that it wrongly suggests to children that a man can be a woman with makeup and a dress on. In a statement released on their website, Fareham Academy, who said that this year's event is set to be 'bigger and better than ever before', added that the 'celebrations' are also set to include a bake sale, face painting and a non-uniform day'. The school also said that the event will also be raising funds for local LGBTQ+ charities and members of the community. The statement continued: 'We look forward to seeing our community come together for a day of colour, education and celebration, highlighting diversity, promoting understanding, and showing our pride together'. It comes just days after parents were left furious having discovered that their primary-aged children are being taught about the 300 different flags of pride at school. Leaflets handed out by the charity Swindon and Wiltshire Pride claim there are more flags representing sexuality and gender identity than there are for countries. The information, displayed by the local council on social media, goes into detail about a 'small selection' of 29 varieties. The extensive list includes an 'intersex-inclusive Pride flag', a 'polyamory Pride flag, and even a black and white 'heterosexual flag' for straight people, which it says can include transgender people. Parents of children at the primary schools had raised concerns about the material to the local Labour council but they told The Daily Telegraph that they had been ignored. The information, displayed by the local council on social media, goes into detail about a 'small selection' of 29 varieties. Parents of children at the primary schools had raised concerns about the material to the local Labour council but they told The Daily Telegraph that they had been ignored One mother, a former teacher, said the guide being given out in primary schools was 'really concerning'. 'Obviously the polyamory one, encouraging children to have multiple sex partners, they shouldn't be sexualising children,' she said. Under UK Government guidance, schools should include age-appropriate LGBTQ+ content in their curriculum, rather than being taught as a standalone lesson. LGBTQ+ content should be included in Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) in secondary schools, while primary school pupils should learn about different family structures, including same-sex parents, in an age appropriate manner. More broadly, schools are advised to foster an inclusive environment that promotes the safety, acceptance and wellbeing of all of its students.


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
West is facing ‘moment of peril' after Iran vows retaliation for US strikes
David Lammy has warned the West is facing a 'moment of peril' after Iran vowed to retaliate following US strikes on three nuclear facilities. It comes after Donald Trump's regime conducted airstrikes at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz despite Sir Keir Starmer pushing for de-escalation in the preceding days. Asked how concerned the government is about possible retaliation, the foreign secretary warned: 'This is a moment of peril.' 'There are neighbours in the region very worried about what the IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps] and what the supreme leader might now do. None of us want to see escalation. 'I was crystal clear to the Iranian regime, it would be a huge, catastrophic mistake to fire at US bases in the region at this time. We have forces in the region at this time. It would be a catastrophic mistake', he told BBC Breakfast. But Mr Lammy warned that communication with the Iranian regime is difficult at present because 'the supreme leader is somewhere in Iran in a bunker'. 'Messaging to him cannot be easy, but I would urge them to step back at this point', Mr Lammy added. His comments came after cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds warned that the threat to the UK from Iran is already at a "significant level" and could increase following the US strikes. Over the weekend, the business secretary said "not a week goes by" without an Iranian cyberattack on Britain's critical national infrastructure, adding that it would be "naive" to think the threat will not escalate. After the strikes took place, Sir Keir backed Mr Trump's administration describing Iran's nuclear programme as a 'grave threat to international security'. But on Monday, Mr Lammy refused to defend US attacks on Iran and confirm it was either legal or even 'the right thing to do'. Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, the foreign secretary was asked four times if the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities was legal. 'We were not involved, it is for the Americans to discuss those legal issues," he responded repeatedly. And asked whether it was the 'right thing to do', the foreign secretary replied: "I've said that we weren't involved in the military action." Meanwhile, Sir Keir Starmer - whose previous calls for restraint appear to have been ignored by the US administration – has warned the conflict could escalate beyond the region. 'That's a risk to the region. It's a risk beyond the region, and that's why all our focus has been on de-escalating, getting people back around to negotiate what is a very real threat in relation to the nuclear programme', he said. It came after Iran launched a ballistic missile barrage against Israel in retaliation to the US action, warning that it 'reserves all options' to respond. The foreign ministry in Tehran issued a statement condemning Mr Trump's 'brutal military aggression against Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities'. It added: 'The Islamic Republic of Iran is resolved to defend Iran's territory, sovereignty, security and people by all force and means against the United States' criminal aggression.' The Tehran regime has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, but its uranium enrichment process has gone far beyond what is required for power stations.


Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Former UK Ambassador to Iran says Britain has always wanted 'lasting solution' to Iran's growing Nuclear weapons programme
The former UK Ambassador to Iran says the UK has always wanted a 'lasting solution' to Iran's growing Nuclear weapons programme. It comes after US President Donald Trump sensationally called for regime change, suggesting a new leader could 'Make Iran Great Again'. The President said air strikes by US B-2 bombers on Saturday caused 'monumental damage to all nuclear sites in Iran'. The 'bunker buster' raid from Trump stunned the world and led the United Nations to hold an emergency meeting on Sunday afternoon, where officials said the US crippled Iran's crucial enrichment sites. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has been in power since 1989. Trump and Keir Starmer previously called for Khamenei to return to the negotiating table as soon as possible. Robert Macaire, ambassador to Iran between 2018 and 2021, said the UK has always held the threat of military action against Iran. Speaking on LBC, Mr Macaire said: 'It is absolutely clear that although Britain has been involved for decades now in trying to find solutions to Iran's nuclear programme and the threat it poses and has tried to do that through diplomatic and negotiated means. 'The threat of military action by the US or by Israel of by both, has always been in the background . 'I don't think Britain is in a unique position in wanting to say, when the dust has settled, we would still like to see a lasting, and negotiated, agreed solution that leaves this problem and other issues to do with Iran's threats to the world and for the region in a position that has been firmly locked down in a negotiated way rather than seeing future conflict.' Mr Macaire also warned a regime change in the Middle Eastern nation could lead to 'revolution, chaos and civil war'. He said: 'I spent three and a half years in Iran and met countless people who would be very open in saying they absolutely detested regime. 'But then if you carry on the conversation, most of them say if the alternative is a revolution, chaos and civil war, like we have seen in Syria, Libya and Iraq, that is worse. 'I think that ordinary Iranian people feel that quite strongly, that is quite high in their mind 'The idea of a regime collapse and what could potentially be a civil war would be disastrous for Iran, terrible for the region and for the global economy. 'You could worry that maybe it is not bad for everyone. Israel might feel an Iran in that state was less of a threat, but it doesn't seem that is an objective for the west to be seeking. 'If someone from IRGC or military comes forward and takes over, it is unlikely to be positive in terms of the things we are looking for.' The former ambassador said it was 'brutal' to see what was happening to Iran, which he described as a 'fantastic country with an enormous potential' He added: 'It is a country of 90 million people, it is huge, it is incredibly varied and diverse. The fact it is such a long lasting culture, It has been a country for longer than most makes it very different to other states in the region. 'The Iranian people are incredibly talented, successful, high-achieving people, who are being held back by a ghastly regime and it has just gone on for too long.' Last night Russia warned Donald Trump's attack on Iran's nuclear programme has opened 'Pandora's box'. Moscow's United Nations ambassador Vassily Nebenzia issued an ominous warning at an emergency meeting of the Security Council as he said: 'No one knows what new catastrophes and suffering it will bring.' It comes amid fears Iran will launch terror attacks on the West in revenge and as Iran's foreign minister arrives in Moscow for talks with Vladimir Putin. And he claimed Russia had offered mediation talks to find a peaceful and mutually agreeable solution to Iran's nuclear program, but the US, especially its leaders, are 'clearly not interested in diplomacy today'. 'Unless we stop the escalation,' Nebenzia warned, 'the Middle East will find itself on the verge of a large-scale conflict with unpredictable consequences for the entire international security system, plus the entire world might end up on the verge of a nuclear disaster.' Russian ex-president Dmitriy Medvedev claimed in a post on X/Twitter early on Sunday that the US strikes on three sites in Isfahan, Natanz, and Fordow had backfired and led to the opposite result from what Trump had set out to achieve. Medvedev claimed: 'Enrichment of nuclear material - and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons - will continue.' Medvedev, who has served as President of Russia from 2008 to 2012, further stated that 'Iran's political regime has survived - and in all likelihood, has come out even stronger'. He continued to claim that Iranians are 'rallying around the country's spiritual leadership, including those who were previously indifferent or opposed to it'. His anti-US and pro-Iran social media rant was posted in English and broken down into ten points - gathering more than three million views. There are fears Britain and other allies could face a terror backlash from the regime's supporters. Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds last night warned that Iranian activity in the UK was already substantial, and it was 'naive' to think it won't escalate. Britain's military bases in the region, such as RAF Akrotiri on Cyprus, were on the highest state of alert last night for revenge attacks, including by Iranian swarm drones. Defence Secretary John Healey said: 'The safety of UK personnel and bases is my top priority. Force protection is at its highest level and we deployed additional jets [to Cyprus] this week.' Other experts warned of a 'new era of terrorism' and US Vice President J D Vance said the FBI and law enforcement were on alert for threats on American soil. Sir Keir Starmer and President Trump discussed the need for Iran to return to the negotiating table in a phone call last night, No 10 said. A spokesman said: 'The leaders discussed the situation in the Middle East and reiterated the grave risk posed by Iran's nuclear programme to international security. 'They discussed the actions taken by the United States last night to reduce the threat and agreed that Iran must never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. 'They discussed the need for Iran to return to the negotiating table as soon as possible. They agreed to stay in close contact in the coming days.'