School drag artist performance for 11-year-olds during Pride Month is branded 'morally reprehensible'
A school's drag artist performance for children as young as 11 years old has been branded 'morally reprehensible' by a Conservative MP.
The display on June 27, featuring a drag artist, is set to form part of the annual pride event held at Fareham Academy, Hampshire.
Described as a 'thriving mixed academy at the heart of our community', the secondary school said that the event offers a 'wonderful opportunity for our community to come together and raise awareness and show support for the LGBTQ + community'.
However, Suella Braverman, who previously served as Home Secretary and is the Conservative MP for the local area, urged the institution to rethink their plans, describing it as 'morally reprehensible' that such performance would go ahead.
Speaking to The Daily Telegraph about the 'utterly inappropriate' performance, she said: 'Adults are free to enjoy drag, but children should not be exposed to it at school.
'It is highly sexualised, presents a demeaning and distorted image of women and does not fairly represent the LGB community either'.
Urging the school to withdraw their invitation to the drag artist, Ms Braveman declared that allowing them to perform was as a 'morally indefensible safeguarding issue' and an 'offensive, sexualised and inappropriate action'.
The Tory MP, who said she had received complaints from parents about the planned performance, also feared that it wrongly suggests to children that a man can be a woman with makeup and a dress on.
In a statement released on their website, Fareham Academy, who said that this year's event is set to be 'bigger and better than ever before', added that the 'celebrations' are also set to include a bake sale, face painting and a non-uniform day'.
The school also said that the event will also be raising funds for local LGBTQ+ charities and members of the community.
The statement continued: 'We look forward to seeing our community come together for a day of colour, education and celebration, highlighting diversity, promoting understanding, and showing our pride together'.
It comes just days after parents were left furious having discovered that their primary-aged children are being taught about the 300 different flags of pride at school.
Leaflets handed out by the charity Swindon and Wiltshire Pride claim there are more flags representing sexuality and gender identity than there are for countries.
The information, displayed by the local council on social media, goes into detail about a 'small selection' of 29 varieties.
The extensive list includes an 'intersex-inclusive Pride flag', a 'polyamory Pride flag, and even a black and white 'heterosexual flag' for straight people, which it says can include transgender people.
Parents of children at the primary schools had raised concerns about the material to the local Labour council but they told The Daily Telegraph that they had been ignored.
The information, displayed by the local council on social media, goes into detail about a 'small selection' of 29 varieties. Parents of children at the primary schools had raised concerns about the material to the local Labour council but they told The Daily Telegraph that they had been ignored
One mother, a former teacher, said the guide being given out in primary schools was 'really concerning'.
'Obviously the polyamory one, encouraging children to have multiple sex partners, they shouldn't be sexualising children,' she said.
Under UK Government guidance, schools should include age-appropriate LGBTQ+ content in their curriculum, rather than being taught as a standalone lesson.
LGBTQ+ content should be included in Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) in secondary schools, while primary school pupils should learn about different family structures, including same-sex parents, in an age appropriate manner.
More broadly, schools are advised to foster an inclusive environment that promotes the safety, acceptance and wellbeing of all of its students.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Reeves calls for Middle East de-escalation amid oil price fears
Rachel Reeves has called for de-escalation of the conflict in the Middle East, warning that rising global oil prices could hit the UK economy as she unveiled Labour's long-awaited industrial strategy. Launching the policy package at an engineering business in Nuneaton alongside Keir Starmer and the business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, Reeves acknowledged the potential impact on companies of the conflict. 'We want de-escalation because it's the right thing for the Middle East, but we also want de-escalation because of the ramifications of conflict in the Middle East for the rest of the world, including the UK,' the chancellor said. 'We have seen increases in oil prices, in recent days, and weeks, which of course, will have an impact on the UK economy,' she added. 'We recognise the challenge that businesses and families faced with energy costs, which is part of the reason why we're doing what we're doing today, but also why, for example, we've extended the warm homes discount to try and take money off people's energy bills.' Reeves also said she understood US concerns about the risk of Iran developing a nuclear capability, saying: '60% enrichment of uranium is not for civil nuclear. And we've long shared those concerns.' As part of the industrial strategy, the government has announced a new scheme aimed at cutting the electricity bills of energy-intensive businesses, to come into force from 2027. Reynolds said the energy plan would bring the UK from being an 'outlier' in Europe on energy prices 'right into the middle of the pack'. Energy-intensive businesses in Britain have long complained that their electricity bills are uncompetitively high. Reynolds and Reeves said the government intended to fund the scheme by spreading the costs of the 'contracts for difference' through which it pays for renewable energy generation out over a longer period and earmarking increased future revenue from the emissions trading scheme from rising carbon prices. 'We are talking about a major shift in competitiveness for the sectors covered by the new British industrial competitiveness scheme: it moves us from being an outlier right into the middle of the pack – cheaper than Italy, Czech Republic, broadly comparable to, say Germany,' Reynolds said. He added: 'There's no increase in bills for anybody else and no implications for tax or borrowing from these policy interventions by the energy department that will create the headroom to allow us to exempt these businesses.' The business secretary also emphasised the cross-Whitehall nature of the industrial strategy, which covers eight sectors the government sees as having potential for significant growth – including advanced manufacturing, financial services and the creative industries. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The government published separate plans for five of the eight sectors on Monday, alongside the industrial strategy, with three more – life sciences, defence and financial services – expected before parliament goes into recess next month. 'This has got real, significant interventions in it that are not only very important in their own right, they do get to the core of what I wanted, what we wanted, which is, you know, this is not the Department for Business and Trade or the Treasury industrial strategy, this is the British government's industrial strategy,' he said. Reynolds also highlighted a new approach on preparing strategic sites for investment, the significant increase in the budget for the taxpayer-backed British Business Bank announced at the recent spending review and more powers for metro mayors to shape economic development.
Spectator
26 minutes ago
- Spectator
Palestine Action banned from protesting outside parliament
After Palestine Action members broke into RAF Brize Norton and graffitied two military planes, the Metropolitan police are taking no chances with them in London. The forced has banned protests planned for today from taking place outside parliament, imposing an exclusion zone around Westminster. Meanwhile police have said that demonstrations by the group cannot begin before noon in central London and must wrap up by 3pm. If activists break these rules, they could face arrest. Crikey! It hasn't completely stumped campaigners, however, with the group moving their protests to Trafalgar Square instead. Announcing the new location on social media, Palestine Action fumed: 'The Metropolitan Police are trying to deter support from Palestine Action by banning the protest from taking place at the House of Parliament. Don't let them win!' A gathering of around 200 people has met in the area, with some kitted out in face coverings and brandishing Palestinian flags. Placards that scream 'Britain, US, Israel are terrorists… Hands off Palestine Action' have been distributed, while volunteers on the ground have handed out 'bust cards' that give legal advice in case of arrest. The protests come ahead of the Home Secretary's written statement – in which she will lay out plans to proscribe Palestine Action, effectively branding them a terrorist organisation The protests come ahead of Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's written statement – in which she will lay out plans to proscribe the group, effectively branding them a terrorist organisation – that is expected to be put before parliament today. The move comes as a security review begins at military bases across the country after the protestors managed to gain access to the RAF unit in Oxfordshire. But while the Home Secretary's plans have garnered praise from across the political spectrum – with former Tory home secretary Suella Braverman among those lauding Labour – the move has also received significant backlash. Amnesty International UK have raged that: 'Terrorism powers should never have been used to aggravate criminal charges against Palestine Action activists and they certainly shouldn't be used to ban them.' Meanwhile left-wingers like independent MP Zarah Sultana and former adviser to Jeremy Corbyn, James Schneider, have taken to social media to slam Cooper's decision, with Schneider writing: 'Every freedom-loving person should oppose the proscription of Palestine Action.' And Irish author Sally Rooney has even waded in, writing in the Guardian today that: From the suffragettes to the gay rights movement to the anti-apartheid struggle, genuine political resistance has always involved intentional law-breaking… Proscribing an entire organisation under the Terrorism Act is not the same thing as prosecuting particular individuals for specific transgressions… If the government proceeds down this path, any ordinary person in the UK could in theory be sent to prison simply for expressing verbal support for non-violent activism. Quite aside from the broader principle, this would represent an alarming curtailment of free speech. Will Cooper bend under pressure and soften her stance on it all? Stay tuned…
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Palestine Action barred from protesting outside parliament
British police have banned a planned protest by Palestine Action outside parliament, citing concerns over the group's activities. The ban aligns with government considerations to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist entity, which would effectively outlaw the group. This decision follows a recent incident where Palestine Action members allegedly infiltrated RAF Brize Norton, damaging aircraft with red paint and crowbars. Palestine Action announced they would relocate their protest to Trafalgar Square, just outside the police exclusion zone. Metropolitan Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said that Palestine Action members are alleged to have caused millions in criminal damage and assaulted a police officer, providing an operational basis for their potential proscription. Police ban Palestine Action from Parliament protest
