Germany to cut development aid – DW – 06/30/2025
Germany is ramping up defense spending — while cutting funds for development cooperation. Aid organizations warn of the consequences for millions, amid a world beset by wars and crises.
Germany's draft federal budget for 2025 includes sweeping cuts. The Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) is set to receive just €10.3 billion ($12.1 billion) — nearly a billion less than in 2024. It's the second consecutive year of reductions.
A glance back at 2022 underscores the scale of the decline: at that time, Germany was still spending €13.8 billion ($16.2 billion) on development aid.
Michael Herbst, chair of the umbrella organization VENRO, which represents around 140 development NGOs in Germany, illustrated the human cost of these dramatic cuts amid growing global conflict: "More than 100 million people are displaced. At the same time, more and more donor countries are pulling back." That's why, he argues, Germany needs to ensure stable funding for development cooperation and humanitarian aid. But the opposite is occurring.
Germany's cuts come at a time when US President Donald Trump, early in his second term, has also initiated deep reductions in development aid, reportedlyslashing around 80% of funding.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) agreed at its recent summit on June 25, 2025, that each member state should spend 5% of its economic output on defense annually.
Against this backdrop, the global decline in development aid stands out all the more starkly. The consequences are already becoming clear, especially in the field of humanitarian assistance.
The US has completely withdrawn its support for the UN-administered relief fund. Faced with sweeping international cutbacks, emergency aid coordinator Tom Fletcher says he is being forced to shut down numerous programs for the world's poorest.
Just weeks ago, the UN representative warned that the impact on those in need and suffering from hunger would be devastating. Instead of the originally projected $44 billion, Fletcher now expects just $29 billion to be available for distributing food, water, medicine, shelter, and other essential aid.
According to him, the reduced funding will only enable 114 million people to be reached — down from the 180 million originally targeted.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Due to the sharp reduction in the BMZ budget, Germany's so-called ODA ratio (Official Development Assistance) fell below its self-imposed goal of 0.7% of gross national income in 2024. It had consistently remained above that threshold since 2020.
Humanitarian emergency aid is being slashed by 53% to around €1 billion ($1.2 billion). VENRO chair, Herbst, says the move is short-sighted: "As the world's third-largest economy, Germany can and must take responsibility here. It cannot continue cutting budgets in these areas." However, his push for a reversal was unsuccessful.
As an export-driven nation, Germany depends on strong international ties and global stability. "The German economy benefits from a solid reputation and reliable relationships in countries of the Global South. That helps secure jobs here at home, as well," Herbst points out.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The NGOs Welthungerhilfe and Terre des Hommes give the federal government a poor overall assessment. However, the coalition agreement between the governing center-right Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) describes the cuts to development and humanitarian aid as "appropriate."
In response, the aid organizations counter: "That contradicts the government's own stated goal of ensuring sustainable humanitarian funding — especially at a time when other donor countries are pulling out."
All the same, German Development Minister Reem Alabali Radovan (SPD) affirmed that Germany remains committed to its global responsibilities – "despite painful budgetary constraints on development spending imposed by the coalition agreement."While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
39 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Peace Deal With Rwanda Opens Way To 'New Era', Says DR Congo President
A peace deal between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda aimed at ending decades of conflict in eastern DRC paves the way for "a new era of stability", Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi said Monday. Rich in natural resources, especially lucrative minerals, the vast DRC's east has been plagued by deadly violence that has ravaged the region for three decades. Fighting intensified early this year when the Rwanda-backed M23 armed group seized territory including the key cities of Goma in late January and Bukavu several weeks later. The lightning offensive in the east on Rwanda's border left thousands dead and deepened a humanitarian crisis for hundreds of thousands of displaced people, according to the DRC government and UN. After a series of systematically broken truces and ceasefires in recent years and the failure of several attempts at negotiation between Kinshasa and Kigali, Congolese and Rwandan foreign ministers inked a peace deal in Washington on Friday. A parallel, Doha-led mediation bid between the DRC government and the M23 is also ongoing. A representative from Qatar attended Friday's signature of the agreement, described as a significant milestone towards peace by the African Union and the United Nations. The text "opens the way to a new era of stability, cooperation and prosperity for our nation," Tshisekedi said in a speech broadcast Monday to mark the 65th anniversary of DRC's independence from Belgium. Tshisekedi is due to meet his Rwandan counterpart Paul Kagame in Washington in the coming weeks. The agreement outlines provisions for the "respect for territorial integrity and halting hosilities" in eastern DRC but are still to be implemented. It calls for "a lifting of defensive measures" by Rwanda, or the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers from the DRC. Rwanda has denied directly supporting the M23 but has demanded an end to another armed group which it says threatens the country -- the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), which was established by ethnic Hutus linked to the massacres of Tutsis in the 1994 Rwanda genocide. The agreement calls for the "neutralisation" of the FDLR by Kinshasa. It also includes economic measures but has few details. In April, the Congolese president discussed a mining agreement with Massad Boulos, a Lebanese-American businessman and father-in-law of Trump's daughter Tiffany tapped by the president as a senior advisor on Africa. A "regional economic integration framework" aimed at greater transparency in the supply chains of critical minerals is also foreseen under the deal. Kinshasa will not "sell off any of the DRC's interests," the Congolese government spokesman Patrick Muyaya said on the margins of an economic forum in Osaka, Japan, on Saturday. The DRC is the world's leading producer of cobalt and has deposits of gold and other valuable minerals including coltan, a metallic ore that is vital in making phones and laptops. "This deal is not just a document, it is a promise of peace for the people" affected by the conflict in the eastern DRC, Tshisekedi said. The text -- negotiated through Qatar since before Trump took office -- does not explicitly address territorial gains by the M23 anti-government group. The M23, like the pro-Kinshasa militias it is fighting, has never officially recognised previous ceasefires. The front in eastern DRC has stabilised since February. But conflict continues between M23 fighters and myriad local militias which carry out guerrilla tactics. Corneille Nangaa, coordinator of the political-military Congo River Alliance to which the M23 belongs, dismissed in a statement Monday the Washington agreement as "limited" and accused Kinshasa of "systematically" undermining the Doha mediation process.
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Canada ended its digital tax for Trump. Could others follow? – DW – 06/30/2025
Canada has withdrawn a tax that could have reaped billions in revenue to bring Donald Trump back to the table. It raises the possibility that other taxes targeting big tech could be in the US president's sights next. Canada has cancelled its digital services tax (DST) to entice the United States to return to the negotiating table for a long-awaited trade and defense deal. The tax, which was due to take effect on Monday, would have applied a 3% levy on revenues earned within Canada by companies — from any country — whose services are digitally based and earn more than $20 million CAD (€12.4 million) a year. But the DST was the target on Friday of a now familiar missive from US President Donald Trump on his Truth Social platform. There, he labelled the tax as a "direct and blatant attack" on the US and set the clock ticking on new tariffs for his northern neighbor as he put trade negotiations on ice. While DSTs from Canada and other nations avoid naming specific companies among their targets, there is an inescapable reality that such instruments catch a swathe of American companies in their nets — among them digital behemoths like Meta, Google, Amazon, Airbnb and Uber. Compounding the tax's impact was its retroactive nature, capturing all revenues back to 2022 in a boon that would have yielded more than $2 billion to Canada's finances. Binning the tax on the day it came into effect has potentially avoided Canada feeling the brunt of harsher Trump tariffs and the loss of a trade deal with a major trading partner. At the very least, it's brought the US president back to the negotiating table. Last year Canada bought nearly $350 billion in US products and exported more than $412 billion to the US. "Obviously the revenue from digital services taxes will be much lower than any costs from potential trade conflicts," said Bertin Martens, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based economic think tank Bruegel. "This is the right road to take at this moment for Canada, at least." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Big tech companies make billions in revenue globally and there are few places that haven't been touched by the presence of the dominant US players in e-commerce, digital advertising and social media. But taxation of these businesses largely falls to the country where they are headquartered. For the majors, it's usually in the US, or even low-taxing countries like Ireland or Luxembourg. It's why other countries are turning to DSTs to recoup revenue for operating within their borders. While Canada's DST has been shelved, other countries across the Atlantic have been reaping revenues for years. France, Italy, Spain and the UK have revenue taxes for digital services providers, with criteria requiring a company to meet a minimum level of global revenue, a fraction of which is made within their borders. France, Italy and Spain apply a tax of 3% on those revenues, the UK 2%. France is even looking to increase its rate to 5%. "Big US tech companies that operate in Europe and elsewhere in the world pay very little, if any, taxes in the countries where they operate and collect substantial revenue and profits," Martens told DW. "But nothing of that can be taxed in the country itself, and so, in the absence of an OECD agreement on how to do this, countries have taken this in their own hands." The US has historically taken a dim view towards foreign digital services taxes under the last three administrations — Democrat and Republican — with a view that they amount to import tariffs on services. "It's not just Preisdent Trump, it was President Biden too, it is members of the US Congress in both parties, Republican and Democrat, that agree that DSTs are not appropriate for other countries to adopt," said James Hines, a professor of law and economics at the University of Michigan, US. "A tax that really is designed just to hit hard the American tech companies, which is what DSTs are," Hines said. "I'm sure the Trump administration is very serious about being upset about DSTs, and being willing to retaliate." That leaves open the question of whether other countries will be pressured to drop theirs. "I think the EU could also be persuaded to withdraw these taxes, but the problem is that the EU Commission, as a trade negotiator, has no leverage on member states' taxation policies," said Martens. "It can try to pass the message to member states, but whether they will accept it or not is a different matter." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Biden administration opposed DSTs but worked to broker a global trade deal via the OECD. That agreement was scuttled by Trump upon his return to the White House, leaving the prospect of unilateral DSTs back on the table. Despite American opposition to these agreements, Allison Christians, a tax law professor at McGill University in Canada, said the idea that major tech corporations should only be taxed in their home country is "antiquated." "They're headquartered in the US, yes, but they're capitalized all over the world, and they're collecting data all over the world, and they're making profit all over the world," Christians said. That, she said, makes it harder for local companies to compete with their "highly digitalized" US rivals. Martens agrees that DSTs are a response to the desire for other nations to have a level playing field. "There is this distorted playing field between local companies and foreign — in this case US — companies, in online markets," Martens said. "Local companies obviously pay local taxes in the country where they are established, and US companies can avoid that or circumvent that through preferential tax deals with tax havens like Ireland or Luxembourg, or even through repatriation of lots of their profits to the US. Martens said a global agreement like those brokered by the OECD would be a better way to proceed. But without US support, national-level taxes are likely to remain, at least until they appear again as a trade negotiation tool. "[DSTs] have become tangled up in this Trump administration trade policy debates, and that makes a debate even more complicated," Martens said.
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Business Owner Raided by CBP Agents Says They Refused to Show a Warrant: 'I Feel Like My Rights Were Violated'
A California car wash owner says Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents stormed his business without showing a warrant, part of an escalation in workplace immigration raids. Since President Donald Trump returned to office, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has renewed its aggressive focus on immigration enforcement. A central element of this strategy has been worksite raids, often at small businesses. On June 22, armed CBP officials arrived at Bubble Bath Hand Car Wash in Torrance, California, in unmarked cars, according to the Washington Post. Surveillance footage shows them entering restricted areas and shoving both staff and the owner, Emmanuel Karim Nicola-Cruz, who says his multiple requests to see a warrant were ignored. "They weren't answering any of my questions," Nicola-Cruz told the outlet. "I feel like my rights were 100% violated. I feel absolutely, absolutely betrayed. We have American flags all over the property. We're an American business." One worker was pushed into a gate, and others fled into the car wash tunnel. DHS said the worker was attempting to escape, but denied any misconduct. The shop has since lost business, and its owner, who has not been charged, says his family now fears further retaliation. The incident is one of dozens across the country that immigration advocates say reflect a pattern of rights violations. From Florida construction sites to Nebraska meatpacking plants, ICE raids have increasingly targeted small operations, where owners are less likely to push back. In many cases, workers are arrested while business owners remain untouched. Some raids have involved questionable tactics, including entering private areas without judicial warrants and using so-called "Blackie's warrants," which do not name specific individuals. Though DHS claims the raids aim to disrupt illegal hiring practices, the outcomes suggest a different motive: increasing migrant arrest numbers. Even some business owners who cooperated with immigration checks and used tools like E-Verify have faced surprise raids. Originally published on Latin Times
