Trump 'Disappointed' With Putin as Russia Pounds Ukraine
Overnight on Thursday, Moscow launched 539 drone and 11 missile strikes that struck nearly every district of the Ukrainian capital, injuring at least 23 people. Air raid sirens rung out continuously for eight hours, coming to an end at around 5 a.m. local time.
'It was a brutal, sleepless night,' Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky said on X.
Some 478 Russian airstrike 'devices' were damaged or shot down during the attack, according to a statement from the Ukrainian Air Force released on Telegram.
A Ukrainian drone on Friday targeted a power substation near Moscow. Two people were injured in the attack, according to local governor Andrei Vorobyov.
The Russian strikes came hours after President Donald Trump held a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday night. 'I'm very disappointed with the conversation I had today with President Putin, because I don't think he's there… I'm just saying I don't think he's looking to stop, and that's too bad,' the President told reporters early Friday.
The U.S. President is scheduled to hold a call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky today.
Zelensky added in his Friday post on X that the regions of Dnipro, Sumy, Kharkiv, and Chernihiv were also targeted in the overnight attacks. 'All of this is clear evidence that without truly large-scale pressure, Russia will not change its dumb, destructive behavior,' he said.
Russia has in recent weeks stepped up its attacks on Ukrainian cities. Less than a week ago, it launched another record aerial assault on Ukraine.
Zelensky's push for increased Western pressure on Russia was reiterated by his top aide, Andriy Yermak, who said that Putin's goal is to 'keep killing Ukrainians for as long as he's allowed to.'
Poland's Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski has also slammed the overnight Russian attacks, writing on X that Putin is 'mocking' Trump with the continued offensive amid U.S.-led cease-fire efforts. 'Please restore supplies of anti-aircraft ammunition to Ukraine and impose tough new sanctions on the aggressor,' Sikorski said.
Earlier this week, the Trump Administration said it would pause shipments of some military aid to Ukraine, including air defense missiles and precision-guided artillery. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said the pause was needed to evaluate the state of U.S. stockpiles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Valadao supports Trump megabill set to disrupt healthcare for many of his constituents
Already a ripe target for Democrats in the next election, Central Valley Rep. David Valadao put his political future in deeper peril this week by voting in favor of legislation that slashes the Medicaid coverage essential to roughly two-thirds of his Republican dairy farmer from Hanford said that despite his concerns about President Trump's megabill, he voted to support it because of concessions he helped negotiate that will help his district, such as an additional $25 billion for rural hospitals, $1 billion for Western water infrastructure and agricultural preserving tax breaks benefiting the wealthy, the bill passed by narrow Republican majorities in both the House and Senate would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $1.04 trillion over 10 years, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rwanda president unsure if DRC peace deal will hold, warns against ‘tricks'
Rwandan President Paul Kagame has cautiously welcomed a United States-brokered peace deal with the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), while suggesting Kigali will retaliate if provoked. Speaking at a news conference in Kigali on Friday, Kagame said Rwanda remained committed to the agreement but questioned whether Kinshasa would uphold its part of the deal. 'If the side that we are working with plays tricks and takes us back to the problem, then we deal with the problem like we have been dealing with it,' Kagame said. The agreement, backed by the administration of US President Donald Trump, was signed last week and calls for Rwandan troops to withdraw from eastern DRC within 90 days. The region has seen intense fighting this year, with M23 rebels seizing major towns. The United Nations has accused Rwanda of backing the group with thousands of troops – an allegation Kigali denies. While the peace deal is seen as a turning point, analysts do not believe it will quickly end the fighting because M23 – a major belligerent in the conflict – says the agreement does not apply to it. Rwanda insists its military presence in eastern DRC is a response to threats from the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group made up of ethnic Hutu fighters linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Kagame said Kinshasa must act to dismantle the FDLR if the deal is to succeed. 'We are grateful to the Trump administration for its efforts,' he said. 'If it doesn't work, they aren't the ones to blame.' There has been no official response from Kinshasa, which has consistently accused Rwanda of fuelling the conflict. Rwanda-backed M23 is the most prominent armed group in the conflict in eastern DRC, and its major advance early this year left bodies on the streets. With 7 million people displaced in DRC, the UN has called it 'one of the most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth'. M23 has not been involved in the US-mediated efforts, although it has been part of other peace talks. On Thursday, both the Congolese government and M23 representatives agreed that they would return to Qatar for further discussions aimed at ending the conflict. Meanwhile, Washington has proposed a separate investment plan that could allow Western companies to tap into the region's rich deposits of tantalum, copper, and gold – resources that have long fuelled violence in eastern DRC. Kagame's appearance on Friday marked his first public remarks since June 6, prompting speculation during his absence about his health. Dissidents abroad, including former adviser David Himbara, claimed the president was seriously unwell. Kagame dismissed the rumours with a joke. 'Some of my personal health problems might originate from managing you people,' he said, sparking laughter. 'What is the problem? What would people want me to account for? That I am not human?' he added. The president appeared in good health throughout the briefing.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
US judge clears the way for imminent deportation of 8 migrants to South Sudan
By Jody Godoy and Nate Raymond (Reuters) -Eight migrants lost their last-ditch effort to halt their deportation to South Sudan by the Trump administration on Friday, clearing the way for their imminent transfer after a judge in Massachusetts denied their request. Lawyers for the U.S. Justice Department said the men were scheduled to be flown to South Sudan on Friday at 7:00 pm Eastern Time after two courts considered the request on an emergency basis on July 4, when courts are otherwise closed for the Independence Day holiday. Lawyers for the migrants had filed new claims in Washington late Thursday after the U.S. Supreme Court clarified that a judge in Massachusetts could no longer require the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to hold them. U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss in Washington paused the deportation briefly on Friday afternoon, but sent the case back to U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy in Boston. Murphy said the Supreme Court order required him to deny their bid, saying their claims that deportation was being used as a form of punishment were "substantially similar" to the ones he had ruled on previously. The order was the latest round in the fight over the legality of the Trump administration's campaign to deter immigration through high-profile deportations to countries where migrants say they face safety concerns, and which has already gone from lower courts to the Supreme Court twice. Jennie Pasquarella, a lawyer with the Seattle Clemency Project who represents the migrants, called the ruling disappointing. No court will hear their claim that the Trump administration is unconstitutionally using deportation to dangerous countries as a form of punishment, on top of criminal sentences the men have already served, she said. "Both courts' decisions today have denied them their opportunity to have these claims heard and to protect their own lives. That is what is so tragic about where we came out," she said. Pasquarella said the men do not plan to file an appeal. A spokesperson for Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Friday. Department of Justice attorney Hashim Mooppan told Moss during Friday's hearing that court orders halting agreed-upon deportations pose a serious problem for U.S. diplomatic relations and would make foreign countries less likely to accept transfers of migrants in the future. The men have been convicted of various crimes, with four of them convicted of murder, the Department of Homeland Security has said. South Sudan has long been dangerous even for locals. The U.S. State Department advises citizens not to travel there due to violent crime and armed conflict. The United Nations has said the African country's political crisis could reignite a brutal civil war that ended in 2018. The eight men, who their lawyers said are from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Burma, Sudan and Vietnam, argue their deportations to South Sudan would violate the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. "It seems to me almost self-evident that the United States government cannot take human beings and send them to circumstances in which their physical well-being is at risk simply either to punish them or send a signal to others," Moss said during the hearing. But he ultimately found their new claims should be heard by the court in Massachusetts. The Friday effort to prevent the deportations came after months of back and forth between Murphy, the Supreme Court, and the Trump administration. Murphy ruled in May to block the U.S. from immediately moving the men to South Sudan after he found that officials had violated his earlier ruling in a class action lawsuit concerning the due process rights of migrants. That ruling, in April, had blocked the administration from sending migrants to countries where they have no ties without giving them the chance to raise safety concerns. The Supreme Court on June 23 put Murphy's April injunction on hold. But Murphy that same day said the high court ruling did not apply to his May order. Calling Murphy's decision a "lawless act of defiance," the Justice Department the next day urged the Supreme Court to clarify its decision. The nine-member Supreme Court on Thursday, over the dissent of two of its liberal justices, sided with the Trump administration and said its decision serves to reverse Murphy's May order blocking the deportations to South Sudan.
