First presenter scared when radio station launched
BBC Radio Shropshire's first presenter has marked the station's 40th birthday, admitting she had "never been so scared" as when launching the station.
Diane Kemp started the first breakfast show at 06:30 BST on 23 April 1985, with the words: "Good morning, welcome along. It's the birth of Radio Shropshire, the BBC's 30th and newest local radio station."
Her first show featured the launch of an appeal to fund a new lifeboat, and interviews with cabinet minister John Gummer and Labour leader Neil Kinnock.
"The excitement of doing it, I think, raised my voice about an octave," Ms Kemp said of the launch.
Speaking to Wednesday's breakfast show about the initial set-up, she said: "We were bowled over by the reaction we got.
"As ever, it's the loyalty of local radio audiences which is always extraordinary, humbling and phenomenal."
The news headlines on the first show included Telford Development Corporation's plan to turn the town into Britain's Silicon Valley, cuts to Shropshire health services and a campaign by Labour MP Tam Dalyell over the 1984 murder of Hilda Murrell.
The launch was marked by a balloon flight from the grounds of Attingham Park at Atcham, and the day's programming continued with Colin Young, who remained at the station until 2020.
Ms Kemp said: "We got a grounding of 'these are the principles and this is the aim of the station', very much, I suspect, how you're still operating it - it's a local station, we exist for reflecting what goes on in the area."
"We got to help fashion it along the principles of what the BBC Local values are."
The presenter later worked on Midlands Today and is now professor of journalism at Birmingham City University.
She said the same ethos of public service journalism had run through all of her jobs: "In the end, it's to make a difference, to amplify voices, to help people hear their own stories."
Four decades on, the broadcaster reflected that the St. George's Day launch had been a career highlight.
"We were launching a radio station, and that felt such an extraordinary privilege.
"We all felt that on the day, and we were trying to do fun things, exciting things, give some of that energy to the programmes - but there's no escaping what an extraordinary privilege it was."
Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
BBC team takes red nose on Comic Relief hill tour
Winners celebrate at Make a Difference awards
BBC Radio Shropshire
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rail challenger to take on Labour's nationalised trains
Private train operator Lumo is plotting a range of new services across Britain in a direct challenge to Labour's nationalised rail network. FirstGroup, which owns the low-cost rail company, is looking to expand operations after already announcing plans to triple Lumo's passenger count to 10m a year with the addition of five new routes. Graham Sutherland, the chief executive, said FirstGroup is now studying population growth and housebuilding plans to determine where is best to introduce new routes. However, he said the company is particularly keen to restore direct services to London from small towns across the UK, while it is also exploring the possibility of launching trains between poorly connected regional centres. He said: 'Obviously it gets harder the further you get through it, but we feel there are other opportunities still to come out over time. 'Anything we are looking at is commercially sensitive. But the basic criteria is do we think there are under-served areas in terms of rail and do we have an opportunity to drive modal shift and get people out of their cars.' It comes after Labour sent out mixed messages on the continuation of private rail services following the launch of its state-backed railway company, Great British Railways (GBR). Privatised 'open-access' operators, which are not paid by the Government to run services and make their money only from passenger fares, are due to remain in private hands, according to the blueprint for GBR. However, Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, wrote to the industry regulator in January advising it to adopt a more rigorous stance on approving open-access applications. GBR is set to be fully operational by next year. Meanwhile, The Telegraph revealed last month that LNER, which is already government-run, is predicted to lose out on £1bn in ticket sales to private operators offering cheaper fares. Mr Sutherland said open access is no threat to the nationalised railway, claiming instead that competition helps to improve standards and attract new customers. Mr Sutherland added that further routes targeted by Lumo were likely to conform to its existing long-distance model. FirstGroup currently operates open-access services along the east coast main line from Kings Cross to Edinburgh and Hull via Lumo and sister brand Hull Trains, which it plans to extend to Glasgow and Sheffield respectively. A further two new routes are guaranteed, one from London Euston to Stirling, in Scotland, and the other from London Paddington to Carmarthen, in south Wales, after FirstGroup bought access rights from Arriva's Grand Union. FirstGroup has also lodged applications with the Office of Rail and Road to run trains from Euston to Rochdale via Manchester and from Paddington to Hereford and Paignton, Devon. Should the company succeed in expanding to all seven routes, its open-access revenue should jump from £106m to around £300m, Mr Sutherland said. FirstGroup's South Western Railway became the first to be seized by Labour last month and will be followed by its remaining Avanti West Coast and Great Western franchises. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Funeral row causes chaos for mourners of Zambia's ex-president
Arranging a funeral can be testing at the best of times - let alone for a former head of state. Amid that intense, initial stage of grief, loved ones must juggle cost, the wishes of the deceased and numerous other factors in order to throw a fitting send-off. Add the clashing desires of a national government and its political opponents into the mix, and things become doubly complicated. Edgar Lungu, who led Zambia from 2015 to 2021, died last Thursday. His death at the age of 68 has shocked Zambians - and there is genuine sense of grief with all radio stations playing gospel music for the man who had remained influential in Zambian politics despite being barred from contesting last year's election. Zambia is officially a Christian country - and most people take their religion and periods of mourning seriously. But a standoff between his family, the government and Lungu's political party, the Patriotic Front (PF), has left mourners confused about how exactly the former president should be honoured. The government announced there would be a state funeral and declared that the official venue for mourning would be a lodge it owns in the capital, Lusaka, but the PF dismissed this plan, directing mourners to its headquarters instead. As for Lungu's family, they have said they are not opposed to a state funeral, but have insisted on choosing who will preside over it, family lawyer Makebi Zulu has told the BBC. Then there is the official book of condolence, in which mourners can pay tributes to Lungu. The government has set up an official book - at the lodge - but the PF has urged people to sign theirs instead - at their headquarters. The government wanted to repatriate his body from South Africa last week - Lungu died there after receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness. However, the PF and Lungu's family intervened, wanting to organise the safe passage of the ex-leader themselves. "The state was saying, 'We are giving him full military honours, therefore we're taking over from here' - as if to say that 'you have no say over what happens,'" Mr Zulu said. Plans for returning Lungu's remains are still unclear, though the family are now engaging with the government on this issue. There has also been confusion over the "official" mourning period when all forms of entertainment like big football matches and concerts are stopped. The government declared a seven-day national mourning period starting last Saturday, even though the PF announced one days earlier. This chaos is, in short, a continuation of the tumultuous relationship between Lungu and his successor, President Hakainde Hichilema. The pair are long-time rivals - in 2017, when Lungu was president, he had Hichilema locked up for over 100 days on treason charges after Hichilema's motorcade allegedly refused to give way for him. It took the intervention of the Commonwealth for Hichilema to be released. Four years later, and after five attempts at the presidency, Hichilema defeated Lungu. Now, the PF and the Lungu family's lawyer are accusing Hichilema's government of being partly responsible for the former president's death. Lungu returned to frontline politics in 2023, frequently accusing Hichilema's government of victimising him and other PF members. Now, after Lungu's death, his party allege that Lungu was banned from leaving the country for years and that if he had been allowed to travel to seek medical treatment sooner, he might still be alive. The government has vehemently denied any responsibility for Lungu's death, with spokesperson Cornelius Mweetwa insisting that the ex-president was never prohibited from travelling. Mr Mweetwa told the BBC that the PF was trying to use Lungu's death as a "springboard" for a "political comeback". It is not the first time conflict has broken out following a Zambian leader's death. In 2021, the family of Kenneth Kaunda, the country's first post-independence president, said he wanted to be laid to rest next to his wife and not at the site designated by the government. Despite this, the government went ahead and buried Kaunda at Embassy Memorial Park in Lusaka. "The High Court ruled that national interest takes precedence over individual or family preferences because there is a designated burial place for former presidents, and there is a designated set of protocol to handle those proceedings that are conducted by the state, not a political party," Mr Mweetwa said. This argument - about the state's rights to a dead president's body - has played out numerous times across Africa. In 2019, Robert Mugabe died almost two years after being unseated as Zimbabwe's president by his former right-hand man, Emmerson Mnangagwa. Mugabe's family refused to allow him to be buried at the national Heroes' Acre, arguing that he had been betrayed by his former colleagues. After a bitter feud, the man who had led Zimbabwe to independence was laid to rest after his state funeral in his home village. But a legal row rumbles on over his burial site, with some still wanting him to be interred at Heroes' Acre, where a mausoleum has now been completed for him. And loved ones rarely won such disputes. The relatives of Angola's José Eduardo dos Santos and various Ghanaian presidents have clashed with the government over post-death arrangements, but all eventually had to yield to the state. In Lungu's case, the government has the constitution - the supreme law of the land - behind it, but the PF has significant clout as the former leader's long-time political home. In an attempt to break the standoff, the government has sent envoys to South Africa to negotiate with Lungu's family, where a private memorial service was held at Pretoria's Sacred Heart Cathedral on Tuesday - organised by the PF. This was attended by his widow and daughter and where it was announced to the congregation that the former president's body would not be flown home on Wednesday as had been expected. So for those in Zambia, there is still no clear direction on how to send off the nation's sixth president. 'My son is a drug addict, please help' - the actor breaking a Zambian taboo An ancient writing system confounding myths about Africa Zambia president orders ministers to stop sleeping in cabinet Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica Africa Daily Focus on Africa
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump vows to 'liberate' Los Angeles as mayor imposes curfew
The mayor of Los Angeles has imposed a night-time curfew for part of downtown as a fifth day of clashes over President Donald Trump's immigration raids erupted in America's second-biggest city. Karen Bass said she was declaring an emergency as businesses were being vandalised and looted. Nearly 200 people were arrested in the city on Tuesday. Trump defended his decision to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to LA, vowing to "liberate" the city and prevent it being "conquered by a foreign enemy". The immigration raids that triggered the protests last Friday are continuing with National Guard troops now protecting border control agents on enforcement operations. Chaotic protests also sprung up on Tuesday night in cities around the country, from Seattle to Chicago: Texas Governor Greg Abbott sent National Guard troops to San Antonio, where immigration rallies are being planned In Atlanta, Georgia, riot police used tear gas on protesters who fired fireworks towards officers at a demonstration attended by hundreds NYPD told the BBC "multiple" arrests were made after some protesters failed to disperse after several thousand marched into lower Manhattan LA's mayor told reporters earlier: "I have declared a local emergency and issued a curfew for downtown Los Angeles to stop the vandalism, to stop the looting." The order affects one-square-mile of LA where the protests have been concentrated and will be in effect beginning on Tuesday night from 20:00 PST (04:00 GMT) until Wednesday morning at 06:00 PST. Live updates from the protests Los Angeles police responding to the protests made 197 arrests on Tuesday, up from 114 on Monday, 40 on Sunday and 27 on Saturday, Bass told Tuesday's press conference. The mayor said 23 businesses had been looted on Monday night, though she did not provide an estimate of financial losses to the city from all the at-times violent disorder. "We reached a tipping point," she said of her decision to impose a curfew. The unrest has been restricted to pockets of the sprawling city. For much of Los Angeles it was a normal Tuesday as tens of thousands of children went to school, commuter traffic choked the streets and tourists strolled Hollywood Boulevard. LA police chief Jim McDonnell said the curfew was "not about silencing voices", but was a necessary measure to save lives and safeguard property. Bass also said Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had provoked the unrest by conducting raids on Latino areas in the city in recent days. "If [the raids are] going to go on for 30 days, and that's what the rumour is, and, if we want to see our city peaceful again, I will call upon the administration one more time to end the raids," she said. On Tuesday, National Guard troops, who were previously guarding federal buildings, began assisting ICE agents with their "daily enforcement operations", a spokesperson for the agency told the BBC. Marines were guarding federal officials and property on Tuesday, Marines Corps General Eric Smith said. They do not have arrest authority. Everything we know about the demonstrations Trump's deportation drive is perfect storm in city of immigrants Could Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? The military deployment to the LA area will cost $134m (£99m), the Pentagon said. Addressing troops at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, Trump described the protests as a "full-blown assault on peace and public order". The Republican president said he plans to use "every asset at our disposal to quell the violence and restore order right away". In televised remarks on Tuesday night, California's Governor Gavin Newsom hit back at Trump's unusual deployment of the military for a domestic law-enforcement matter. "This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our National Guard, at risk," he says. Earlier in the day a federal court denied an emergency request from California to block the use of troops sent to Los Angeles. District Judge Charles Breyer scheduled a hearing on the motion for Thursday.
