Sweden's EQT receives over $10bln for its new Asia fund
EQT launched the fundraising of its ninth regional private equity fund - BPEA Private Equity Fund IX, managed by EQT Private Capital Asia - last August, with a target of $12.5 billion and an upper limit or hard cap of $14.5 billion.
"BPEA IX was activated during the period and is expected to reach its $12.5 billion target fund size during the summer," CEO and Managing Partner Christian Sinding said in EQT's first-quarter announcement.
Fundraising is expected to conclude in the second half of the year, EQT said in the announcement.
The average time required to close a fund was 24 months, according to Bain & Company.
If successful, the fund would be its largest in Asia so far, and could become the region's largest ever if it surpasses its hard cap.
The region's biggest private equity fund was KKR's fourth Asia-Pacific focussed fund that raised $15 billion in 2021.
Private equity funds typically begin investing after their first close, once they have secured an initial round of investor commitments.
The first-close of the EQT fund in April will come against the backdrop of a challenging global macroeconomic and geopolitical environment triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and policy orders.
Asia-focused private equity and venture capital fundraising dropped 29% on-year to hit a 12-year low of $63.79 billion in 2024 amid trade tensions between the U.S and China, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence.
"As we look ahead, exit activity will slow down, but periods of disruption often bring compelling investment opportunities," Sinding said, adding that EQT's portfolio had limited direct exposure to tariffs.
(Reporting by Kanjyik Ghosh and Bipasha Dey in Bengaluru and Yantoultra Ngui in Singapore; Editing by Christian Schmollinger, Sherry Jacob-Phillips and Tomasz Janowski)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
5 hours ago
- Al Etihad
US trade advisor says Trump tariff rates unlikely to change
3 Aug 2025 20:22 WASHINGTON (AFP) New US tariff rates are "pretty much set" with little immediate room for negotiation, Donald Trump's trade advisor said in remarks aired who has wielded tariffs as a tool of American economic might, has set tariff rates for dozens of economies, including the European Union, at between 10 and 41 percent, come August 7, his new hard deadline for the a pre-taped interview broadcast Sunday on CBS's "Face the Nation," US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said "the coming days" are not likely to see changes in the tariff rates."A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country," Greer said."These tariff rates are pretty much set."Undoubtedly, some trade ministers "want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States," he "we're seeing truly the contours of the president's tariff plan right now with these rates."Last Thursday, the former real estate developer announced hiked tariff rates on dozens of US trade will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. Meanwhile, White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said that while talks are expected to continue over the next week with some US trade partners, he concurred with Greer's tariffs assessment in that the bulk of the rates "are more or less locked in."
Crypto Insight
5 hours ago
- Crypto Insight
China's crypto liquidation plans reveal its grand strategy
Opinion by: Joshua Chu, co-chair of the Hong Kong Web3 Association Last week's announcement of Hong Kong's LEAP Digital Assets Policy Statement 2.0 was made with much anticipation and fanfare. The government of Hong Kong promised a comprehensive regulatory framework that will unify licensing and 'expand the suite of tokenised products.' Yet beneath the hype and visible maneuvers lies a far more consequential move: Beijing's (the world's second largest holder of crypto) announcement of its intention to liquidate confiscated virtual currencies through Hong Kong's licensed exchanges. These events, while seemingly separate, are actually components of a carefully orchestrated strategy by China, designed to position Hong Kong as the dominant virtual asset hub and China's strategic market operator. A strategy of convergence: Hong Kong is poised to become the region's virtual asset hub. Still, it will also serve as the linchpin of China's global ambitions: a crypto hedge, a market price vehicle and a forward command post for PRC-crypto-liquidity. Regulatory foundations On the surface, Hong Kong's LEAP policy appears to be all the headlines. A proper understanding of strategy, however, demands looking beyond the surface. The true power of these policy decisions lies in the liquidity injection that China's crypto-liquidation decision will invariably create. This instrument will simultaneously grant Hong Kong unprecedented influence over global virtual asset markets. The foundation of Hong Kong's regulatory framework can be traced back to 2022 with the passage of the Amendment of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (AMLO), which, after the Securities and Futures Commission had the opportunity to gain sufficient experience under the previous opt-in regime, formally brought virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs) under their remit via the AMLO mandatory licensing regime. This critical move secured alignment with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards and became the first cornerstone legislation for virtual assets. The next critical legislation that came about was the Stablecoin Ordinance, set to commence on Aug. 1, 2025, establishing a dedicated licensing regime for fiat-referenced stablecoin issuers. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) oversees this regime, mandating one-to-one reserves, robust redemption mechanisms and rigorous risk controls. In June 2025, introducing the LEAP Digital Assets Policy Statement 2.0 further developed Hong Kong's framework. LEAP unifies licensing, expands the suite of tokenized products and advances use cases of cross-sector collaboration and talent development. Going beyond FATF-directed regulatory tinkering, LEAP aspires to be the architecture that will 'scale Hong Kong to new heights of global digital asset leadership' and signal Hong Kong's readiness to embrace the future of digital assets. Laws and regulations alone cannot, however, command markets. It is liquidity that will decide the day. China's decision to channel confiscated digital assets through Hong Kong's licensed VATP will strategically inject real, tangible liquidity into the ecosystem. This is no longer an FATF compliance checklist exercise — it is a strategic lever. Through enabling controlled liquidation, Hong Kong stands to become a market price vehicle capable of rapidly modulating supply and demand, another key driving factor of virtual asset value. Liquidity as a weapon Liquidity is the lifeblood of any market. Without liquidity, even the most sophisticated market will falter. Just look at the London Stock Exchange. Under China's grand strategy, unlike the United States, which holds a vast Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and is placed under a rigid 'hold-only' policy, liquidity injected into Hong Kong's exchanges will actively convert seized assets into market liquidity. This setup will grant Hong Kong — and by extension China — the ability to influence price, stabilize markets and respond to geopolitical pressures as it sees fit. Just as control of the rare earth metals gave China all the cards in the latest rounds of trade negotiation with the US, so too will control over crypto liquidity, effectively controlling the value of the US's newly minted crypto reserve. This is a subtle, yet profound, shift in the balance of power. The ability of a single nation to control liquidity flows is to control market narratives and outcomes. Implications and countermeasures This grand strategy fundamentally alters the balance of power within the cryptosphere. Hong Kong will have a decisive advantage in absorbing institutional capital and deepening market liquidity, leveraging its unique position as the conduit for the PRC's crypto liquidation moves. At the same time, by scaling 'Hong Kong to new heights of global digital asset leadership,' China will have a powerful geopolitical tool in its hands, able to control global cryptocurrency valuations through calculated market liquidity management. Meanwhile, the US will face a strategic dilemma: Should it continue with a passive crypto stockpile with limited or no market influence? Or should the US consider new mechanisms to counterbalance Hong Kong's growing control over crypto liquidity? Understanding the dynamic in this interplay is important for market participants, lawyers, risk practitioners and lawmakers. After all, compliance frameworks must be adjusted to address increased scrutiny and risks associated with liquidity-driven market movements. In contrast, risk management strategies anticipating volatility stemming from strategic liquidity flows and a keen understanding of how liquidity control will shape the market narratives and outcomes are key. The key to the Web3 markets is therefore liquidity and information. While Hong Kong's LEAP policy garners all the media attention, the true chess move lies in China's crypto liquidation and injection policy. This injection will turn Hong Kong into a dynamic market price vehicle, capable of wielding liquidity as a weapon that few jurisdictions can match. Contrast this with the US, which is constrained by a rigid 'hold-only' reserve policy, and it lacks the flexibility to influence market liquidity or respond effectively to price volatility. Singapore, which, despite a mature regulatory framework, faces limitations in market scale, and Dubai, though ambitious, struggles with fragmented regulatory remits and high operational costs that hinder rapid scaling. Hong Kong 'holds all the cards.' Only this time, China is also making all the liquidity cards. As such, the city's unique combination of mature regulatory framework, direct access to the world's second-largest crypto holdings and the ability to deploy such liquidity strategically at their discretion grants it an unparalleled high ground in the Web3 ecosystem. Hong Kong can modulate global crypto prices in real time, attract institutional capital and foster innovation within a stable, investor-friendly environment. Liquidity is the ultimate leverage in this contest, and Hong Kong holds the switch. Understanding this layered strategy is essential for those who seek to navigate the rapidly evolving digital asset landscape with clarity and foresight. Those who fail will find themselves outmaneuvered. Opinion by: Joshua Chu, co-chair of the Hong Kong Web3 Association. Source:
Khaleej Times
8 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
India to maintain Russian oil imports despite Trump threats, government sources say
India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of penalties, two Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday, not wishing to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. On top of a new 25% tariff on India's exports to the U.S., Trump indicated in a Truth Social post last month that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday, Trump told reporters he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. But the sources said there would be no immediate changes. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." Justifying India's oil purchases from Russia, a second source said India's imports of Russian grades had helped avoid a global surge in oil prices, which have remained subdued despite Western curbs on the Russian oil sector. Unlike Iranian and Venezuelan oil, Russian crude is not subject to direct sanctions, and India is buying it below the current price cap fixed by the European Union, the source said. The New York Times also quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials on Saturday as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy. Indian government authorities did not respond to Reuters' request for official comment on its oil purchasing intentions. However, during a regular press briefing on Friday, foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India has a "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia. "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," he said. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. India's top supplier Trump, who has made ending Russia's war in Ukraine a priority of his administration since returning to office this year, has expressed growing impatience with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks. He has threatened 100% tariffs on U.S. imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the leading supplier to India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, accounting for about 35% of its overall supplies. India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. But while the Indian government may not be deterred by Trump's threats, sources told Reuters this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022 - when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow - due to lower Russian exports and steady demand. Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp , Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters. Nayara Energy - a refinery majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major Rosneft, and major buyer of Russian oil - was recently sanctioned by the EU. Nayara's chief executive resigned following the sanctions, and three vessels laden with oil products from Nayara Energy have yet to discharge their cargoes, hindered by the new EU sanctions, Reuters reported last week.
