logo
Meet the last female Afghan ambassador as she leads the resistance against the Taliban

Meet the last female Afghan ambassador as she leads the resistance against the Taliban

Independent19-04-2025
Manizha Bakhtari is on a mission to show that resisting the Taliban doesn't mean 'wanting a war' again in her home country. As the last serving female ambassador from Afghanistan anywhere in the world, she is at the forefront of efforts to deny the Islamist group the international recognition it badly craves.
The UN still refuses to recognise the legitimacy of the Taliban regime in Kabul, in place since Nato forces withdrew from the country and the last democratically-elected government collapsed in August 2021. Individual countries are following the UN's lead, but many now host Afghan diplomatic missions led by Taliban appointees, often out of practicality rather than ideology.
Austria, where Bakhtari leads the Afghan embassy, has held firm. And from there, Bakhtari is trying to spread the message across Europe that it would be a mistake to recognise or deal with a Taliban regime that fosters extremism and denies women many of the most fundamental rights.
Her story has started gaining attention, and is now the subject of an 80-minute documentary entitled The Last Ambassador that received a standing ovation at last month's Copenhagen International Documentary Film Festival. It follows her journey from first being appointed as envoy to Austria from the previous Ashraf Ghani-led administration to her present status as head of a mission disowned by Kabul. It also shows her activities running secret classes for Afghan girls banned by the Taliban from attending school.
In an interview with The Independent at a conference on Afghanistan's future hosted by Madrid earlier this year, Bakhtari explains what resistance means for her.
'Resisting the Taliban doesn't mean that I want war in Afghanistan,' she says. 'That is how many politicians treat us in this world, believe me – they see [the word] resistance and they're like 'you are warlords and you want another war in your country'. It is very painful, you know, because resistance does not mean to take arms again. It means to stand against injustice.'
The Taliban has done its best to get rid of critical voices from the previous administration, and like in many countries it issued a diktat firing Bakhtari shortly after capturing Kabul. But Austria still recognises her accreditation, and so she continues to represent the interests of Afghan nationals in the country.
'I am not taking orders from them – Taliban men,' she says. 'My legitimacy is not coming from the Taliban approval. Whatever they say, whatever their rule, it is their problem. Not mine. I don't have to accept their words because they have not been recognised within and outside of Afghanistan. They do not even have legitimacy among our own people.'
Over the past four years Taliban representatives have steadily taken over more and more missions around the world, with Norway the latest European nation to accept an appointee from the group last month. India held out until the tenure of the last Afghan ambassador reached its time limit, and then quietly ushered in an official agreeable to the Taliban in late 2023. And the Afghan embassy in the UK was closed in September 2024, at the request of the British government, after the Taliban sacked all its staff.
Asked whether it is inevitable that foreign governments will be forced to deal with the Taliban as Afghanistan's de facto rulers, Bakhtari is adamant. 'Let's forget the fact that the Taliban have been a terrorist group and put it aside, because right now the international community wants everyone to forget this,' she says,
'What about their policies today? Not 20 years back – let's concentrate on the past four years – forgetting their suicide attacks and atrocities. What have the Taliban done for the prosperity and welfare of Afghans? Jobs? Respected basic human rights? Forget about girls' education for a second. What about boys' education? What are our boys studying?' the ambassador asks.
'They do not have proper education or educated teachers. The Taliban has long altered the curriculum and is teaching regressive subjects to millions of Afghan boys who earlier studied under working Afghan women. So yeah, I am not taking orders from them who are yet to be recognised by even one authority,' she says.
Though Bakhtari is the only female Afghan ambassador still standing, she is not alone as a woman working through diplomatic channels for the interests of the old Afghan republic. At the Herat Security Dialogue in Madrid, The Independent also met Nigara Mirdad, deputy head of mission at the now shut-down embassy of Afghanistan in Poland.
Mirdad was in hospital in September last year with her 11-year-old daughter, who has diabetes and needed insulin, when the ambassador informed her that their Warsaw mission was being closed. She says she tried to fight back but in vain, and without any funds coming in from Kabul, she appealed to the diplomatic missions in Canada, Germany and the UK to help her pay for gas in the bitter sub-zero Polish winter.
She recalls how it felt when she watched TV coverage of the Taliban sweeping Kabul in 2021. 'I didn't eat for days and the tears wouldn't stop rolling down my face,' she says.
Both Mirdad and Bakhtari knew what was coming for Afghan women under Taliban rule – the same horror they endured as young women in their early 20s.
In 1996 when she was just 12 years old, Mirdad recalls, Taliban militants entered the Panjshir valley and her neighbourhood prepared to fight. 'People said girls and women should be killed and thrown in the rivers to prevent the Taliban from touching them and the Afghan men should go and fight the Taliban. And from that time, it stayed in my mind – if the Taliban comes closer, me and the women of my family will be killed and thrown in the river,' she says.
Like Bakhtari, she has received threats from the Taliban in recent years. 'I received many messages from the Taliban supporters and even the spokesperson of the Taliban's interior affairs ministry after they came to power. He said: 'Okay, you wait when we take the all the embassies in Europe, we will see you',' she says.
Bakhtari says women like them are seen by the Taliban as a 'threat to their control'. 'They hate women. [They] fear that educated and empowered women will confront them and the structures of oppression they have built. With education, with empowerment and with the ruling society, women will question them,' she says.
She says women cannot afford to give up their country, or the idea that things can change. 'We cannot afford to lose hope,' she says. 'That is the only thing keeping millions in Afghanistan alive.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Macron hits out at ‘abject' Netanyahu claim of rise in antisemitism in France
Macron hits out at ‘abject' Netanyahu claim of rise in antisemitism in France

The Guardian

time11 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Macron hits out at ‘abject' Netanyahu claim of rise in antisemitism in France

Emmanuel Macron has hit out at Benjamin Netanyahu for his 'abject' and 'erroneous' remarks after Israel's prime minister claimed that antisemitism had 'surged' in France after the country's decision to recognise a Palestinian state in September. In a statement released late on Tuesday, the office of the French president pushed back against Netanyahu's claim. 'The analysis suggesting that France's decision to recognise the state of Palestine in September is behind the rise in antisemitic violence in France is erroneous, abject, and will not go unanswered,' it said. 'The current period calls for seriousness and responsibility, not generalisation and manipulation.' Relations between the two leaders have been strained since July, when Macron announced that France would become the first major western power to recognise a Palestinian state at next month's UN general assembly, in the hope of bringing peace to the region. At the time, Netanyahu, who is wanted by the international criminal court over allegations of war crimes in Gaza, criticised the decision, saying that France 'rewards terror'. He added: 'A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel – not to live in peace beside it.' The move means France will join the group of UN members – at least 145 out of 193 – that now recognise or plan to recognise a Palestinian state, according to a tally by the news agency Agence France-Presse. In a letter sent to Macron earlier this week, Netanyahu accused the French president of not doing enough to confront the alarming rise of antisemitism in France. 'Your call for a Palestinian state pour fuels on this antisemitism fire,' Netanyahu wrote. A similar letter, with almost identical wording, was reportedly also sent to Australia's prime minister earlier this week. Responding to the allegations, Macron's office said that France 'protects and will always protect its Jewish citizens' and that, since 2017, the president had systematically required the government to 'take the strongest possible action against the perpetrators of antisemitic acts'. According to the latest figures from France's interior ministry, 504 antisemitic acts were reported across the country between January and May this year, suggesting a 24% decrease from the previous year. The numbers, however, remain high, double the number of reported incidents from the same time period in 2013. Members of France's Jewish community, one of the largest in the world, have repeatedly warned that antisemitic acts have increased since Israel launched its war in Gaza in response to the attack by Hamas on 7 October 2023. Most recently, the felling of an olive tree planted in memory of a young French Jewish man tortured to death in 2006 prompted outrage, with Macron vowing to punish an act of 'antisemitic hatred'. Tensions between Israel and its traditional allies have been mounting in recent weeks after Macron's promise to recognise a Palestinian state – a move that elicited similar signals from Britain, Canada and Australia. This week, after sending Australia's prime minister a letter accusing him of fuelling antisemitism with his decision to recognise a Palestinian state, Netanyahu doubled down on his criticism of Anthony Albanese on Tuesday, saying he was a 'weak politician who had betrayed Israel'. Albanese brushed off the claims. 'I don't take these things personally,' he told reporters on Wednesday. 'I treat leaders of other countries with respect. I engage with them in a diplomatic way.' Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion Hours after his office had sparred with Netanyahu, Macron highlighted plans to co-chair a conference on a two-state solution with Saudi Arabia in New York in September. Macron made the announcement as he criticised Israel's plans for a 'military offensive in Gaza', writing on social media that it 'can only lead to disaster for both peoples and risks plunging the entire region into a cycle of permanent war'. Global pressure has been mounting on Israel to address the situation in Gaza, where at least 62,000 people have been killed and a complete blockade on aid entering the Palestinian territory has led to widespread conditions of starvation. In July, two of Israel's most respected human rights organisations, B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights, said Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, and said the country's western allies had a legal and moral duty to stop it. The accusation echoes earlier positions taken by global human rights organisations such as Médecins Sans Frontières and Amnesty International. Israel denies is it carrying out a genocide, and says the war in Gaza is one of self-defence in response to the cross-border attacks by Hamas on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people, mostly civilians, were killed.

Donald Trump is becoming the greatest unifier of Europe since the end of the cold war
Donald Trump is becoming the greatest unifier of Europe since the end of the cold war

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Donald Trump is becoming the greatest unifier of Europe since the end of the cold war

Seven is a biblical number, a number dear to ancient Rome, and the number of Cristiano Ronaldo's lucky jersey. Perhaps it is also now going to be the answer to Henry Kissinger's (probably apocryphal) question: what number do I call when I want to talk to Europe? Maybe the answer is seven, like the number of leaders sitting at the table in Washington on Monday alongside Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy. It's difficult to say at this stage whether anything good will come from the impromptu White House summit, but European leaders showing up as a group in support of Ukraine was a first. This seven-member format – Nato, the European Commission, France, Germany, the UK, Italy and Finland – truly spoke with one voice. They did so on a crisis, Ukraine, over which they have sometimes been bitterly divided throughout the past three and a half years (remember Emmanuel Macron's early concern not to 'humiliate' Vladimir Putin?). Yet Ukraine is also the dossier over which European leaders have converged and yielded the greatest impact during the same timeframe: from the 18 sanctions packages the EU has imposed on Russia and the opening of EU accession negotiations for Ukraine, to the supply of weapons to Kyiv. In Washington, we saw a rare and unprecedented yet admirably balanced European ensemble: countries from northern and southern Europe, large and small, two nuclear powers and permanent members of the UN security council, the two institutions headquartered in Brussels but often appearing to inhabit two different planets; and the UK, perfectly in tune with European positions, despite having withdrawn from its core political entity. For those like myself who have followed the chimera that is European foreign and security policy for years, it was almost an epiphany to witness these seven leaders, each speaking for two minutes, repeating the exact same message. To be sure, they had nuances as varied as their English-language accents. Macron and his German counterpart, Friedrich Merz, insisted on a ceasefire, while Italy's Giorgia Meloni claimed ownership of the proposal for possible military protection of Ukraine modelled on Nato's article 5. Yet everyone agreed on the need for iron-clad security guarantees for Kyiv, keeping the transatlantic front united and the imperative of a just and lasting peace. As always, it took a crisis to jolt Europeans out of their inertia. The immediate one began last Friday with the shameful summit in Alaska between Trump and Putin. Trump alarmingly reneged on threats and ultimatums to Russia and instead rolled out the red carpet for the Russian dictator, for reasons we may never fully understand. It continued over the weekend with the real risk that Zelenskyy could once again be the victim of an Oval Office ambush. Paradoxically, we must thank Trump's vanity, disloyalty, his disdain for liberal and democratic ideals, his cynicism, for giving Europeans the urgent signal they needed to dash to the table in Washington. Trump may be destroying what remains of the west; but together with Putin he is unwittingly proving himself to be Europe's 'other', that is, the external force that is shaping its collective identity, and thus the greatest unifier of Europe since the end of the cold war. The key question, of course, is where all this shuttle diplomacy leaves Ukraine. For good and bad, a momentum is building towards a concrete peace framework – albeit without a ceasefire, in a clear nod to Russia's demands. The contours of this deal would involve territorial concessions in the four regions of eastern Ukraine illegally annexed by Russia in 2022. These were ominously displayed in the Monday meeting by Trump himself on a custom-made board map. The more Ukraine and the Europeans converge on the inevitability of land concessions, the more they emphasise the need for the US to provide 'security guarantees', in effect a collective defence assurance, backed by military assistance, akin to Nato's mutual defence pledge. In the now typical Trumpian transatlantic fashion, Europe would have to pay for these. All of this, as well as longstanding Russian demands for a future new security architecture in Europe, would be the object of the much-touted direct trilateral summit between Trump, Zelenskyy and Putin. Finland's president, Alexander Stubb, one of the summit seven, has a maxim about how Europe works which he likes to repeat: 'First there's a crisis, then there's chaos. And in the end, you arrive at a suboptimal solution.' One must hope that this time Stubb is wrong: the formulas being discussed now are born out of a tragedy and may well be suboptimal. But the stakes have rarely been higher: the consequences for all of Europe if these talks are followed by chaos could be devastating. Fabrizio Tassinari is executive director of the School of Transnational Governance at the European University Institute in Florence

Ukraine security talks are ‘road to nowhere' says Lavrov as Nato chiefs meet
Ukraine security talks are ‘road to nowhere' says Lavrov as Nato chiefs meet

The Independent

time38 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Ukraine security talks are ‘road to nowhere' says Lavrov as Nato chiefs meet

Nato defense chiefs held a 'candid discussion' on Wednesday about what security guarantees they could offer Ukraine – as Russia warned that any talks without its participation were a 'road to nowhere'. Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of Nato's Military Committee, said 32 defense chiefs from across the alliance held a video conference amid a diplomatic push to end the fighting. He said there was a 'great, candid discussion' in the call. 'We are united, and that unity was truly tangible today, as always,' he said. Assurances that it won't be invaded again in the future are one of the keys for getting Ukraine to sign up for a peace deal with Russia. It wants Western help for its military, including weapons and training, to shore up its defenses, and Western officials are scrambling to figure out what commitments they might offer. But Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov dismissed efforts to work on security arrangements in Ukraine without Moscow's involvement. 'We cannot agree with the fact that it is now proposed to resolve collective security issues without the Russian Federation. This will not work,' he said. He also criticised the role of European leaders who met Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on Monday. Lavrov said Russia was in favour of 'truly reliable' guarantees for Ukraine and suggested these could be modelled on a draft accord that was discussed between the warring parties in Istanbul in 2022, in the early weeks of the war. At the time, Kyiv rejected that proposal on the grounds that Moscow would have held effective veto power over any military response to come to its aid. 'I am sure that in the West and above all in the United States they understand perfectly well that seriously discussing security issues without the Russian Federation is a utopia, it's a road to nowhere,' Lavrov said. He accused the European leaders who met Trump and Zelenskiy of carrying out 'a fairly aggressive escalation of the situation, rather clumsy and, in general, unethical attempts to change the position of the Trump administration and the president of the United States personally... We did not hear any constructive ideas from the Europeans there.' Trump said on Monday the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war there. He subsequently said he had ruled out putting US troops on the ground to do so, but Britain said it is readying its own troops to take part in a European 'peace assurance' force. Russia has repeatedly said that it would not accept Nato troops in Ukraine. French president Emmanuel Macron has proposed a trilateral summit in Geneva. Putin's ability to travel abroad is limited because he is wanted by the International Criminal Court in The Hague on a warrant dating back to March 2023, but Switzerland intends to ask the ICC to exempt it from sanctions in order to allow Putin in for a summit. Meanwhile, attacks on civilian areas in Sumy and Odesa overnight into Wednesday injured 15 people, including a family with three small children, Ukrainian authorities said. Russian strikes also targeted ports and fuel and energy infrastructure. Poland 's defence minister accused Russia of again provoking Nato countries after an official said an object that landed in a cornfield may have been a Russian drone. 'Once again, we are dealing with a provocation by the Russian Federation, with a Russian drone,' Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz said. 'We are dealing in a crucial moment, when discussions about peace are underway.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store