How to keep your finances on track according to Canadian expert
We're kicking off Financial Fitness Week by looking at how you can evaluate your own financial fitness!
This week marks Financial Fitness Week and CTV Morning Live looks into how to evaluate your financial situation to grow your net worth.
The net worth is defined as the health check for your finances, according to personal finance expert and author Jessica Moorhouse. This includes your assets and liabilities.
Moorhouse says that you want to see your net worth grow every month. This can be done through saving, investing and paying your debts, she adds.
Emergency funds
The most important thing when it comes to finances is making sure you have an emergency fund, Moorhouse said.
'When you think everything is going well, that's when something happens unexpectedly,' she said. 'Your car breaks down, your pet gets sick, you lose your job or your hours are cut. Something is always going to happen.'
The rule of thumb, according to Moorhouse, is to have enough money to cover expenses for three to six months. She notes that most people do not have an emergency fund, citing having other priorities and not being able to save. Therefore, her first suggestion when meeting with new clients is to prioritize having that emergency fund.
How to manage debt
When it comes to debt, Moorhouse says it's usually an emotional topic that comes with shame, embarrassment and anxiety. There is always a way out, she notes. She suggests looking at the interest rates and trying to find the best repayment strategy.
'There are two important ones (strategies), the debt avalanche and the debt snowball. You either want to start paying off aggressively the one with the highest interest rate first, or do you want to tackle the smallest balance,' Moorhouse said.
While the debt avalanche focuses on minimizing interest costs by paying off the debt with the highest interest rate first, the debt snowball focuses on paying off the smallest debts before moving on to the bigger ones, she explains.
Cash flow vs spending
Looking at the cash flow, which is the cash that comes in and the money that goes out, is very important to manage your finances, Moorhouse says.
Though people look at how much they make per month, they don't necessarily look at their spending, she says, while suggesting tracking all expenses.
'It is important because we know that we (might have) spent a little too much on eating out. 'Or what was this expense? I thought I cancelled that subscription. Well, I didn't.' So, now I know cause that's my spending,' she added.
The personal financial expert suggests aligning your spending with your goals and values. For example, if you want to go on a trip, she suggests cutting off on spending on take out coffees or eating at restaurants.
More information is available in Moorhouse's book titled Everything but Money.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
24 minutes ago
- National Post
Adam Pankratz: David Eby's CleanBC initiative a greater hit to economy than Trump's tariffs
Article content Open any book on politics and you will find that, in Canada, the NDP stands for the New Democratic Party. In British Columbia under David Eby, the acronym needs to be updated to — Not Delivering Prosperity. Article content Since Eby and his government took over in 2022, British Columbia has been an economic basket case. The deficit projection for 2025 was revised upwards in March to $10.9 billion — a record — which followed hot on the heels of the 2024 deficit of $9.1 billion — also a record until 2025 stole the deficit crown. The result in April was a downgrade to BC's credit rating from AA to A+. By any measure, the outlook is grim, as total debt for the province is predicted to soar by 70 per cent over the next three years. Article content Article content The ruling NDP and Premier David Eby have been quick to blame economic woes on Donald Trump and his tariff policies. While tariffs are no doubt hurting B.C. — as they are all of Canada — this tactic is already tired. In truth, the damage appears to be mostly self-inflicted, caused by poor budgeting and economic policy driven by ideology rather than actual economics. Article content Article content At the B.C. Chamber of Commerce AGM on June 4th, Ken Peacock, the former Chief Economist at the Business Council of B.C., presented analysis indicating the NDP's CleanBC initiative has actually been a far greater hit to the province's sputtering economy than any tariffs. From 2019-2024 it cost B.C. $29.3 billion in lost GDP and is projected to cost the province a further $109.7 billion between now and 2029. That's David Eby's economic leadership in action: ideology torpedoing economic prosperity for hard working British Columbians. Article content Eby and the NDP will of course point to the fact that they have passed Bill 14 and 15. Bill 15, the Infrastructure Projects Act, is ostensibly a bill to speed up major infrastructure project development, particularly in the resource industry. Eby and the NDP say the bills are 'critically important' to respond to a 'rapidly evolving situation' (read Trump) rather than acknowledge their need as a result of the NDP's actions in creating a provincial economic dud. Bill 15 gives cabinet sweeping powers to override existing regulations for projects in the provincial interest and fast-track them to permitting. It has been met with serious pushback from B.C. Municipalities and from First Nations who claim it ignores their voices and dismisses their rights. Article content Article content While any business which has tried to work in the province's economically critical resource sector may applaud the notion of a government finding ways to stop B.C.'s quagmire of delays and regulatory hell, the bill fails to address the real problem and merely hands unmerited power to a small group of NDP ideologues. This is always the Eby NDP way: power consolidation for decision making. Article content Article content The problem should be obvious to any free-market supporter. Bill 15 does not reignite B.C.'s economy by streamlining regulation for private enterprise; it merely allows cabinet to pick and choose which projects it will decide to ram through any further regulatory oversight. This is ripe for abuse and political interference. It is a pay-to-play system where randomness and arbitrary decisions based on cabinet whims, without clear process, will become the norm. Eby's NDP claim the bill brings investment clarity, in fact, it does anything but. Article content The vague backroom modus operandi of the NDP is, however, consistent in one way. They echo the closed-door decision-making attempts and history of the NDP when deciding how the province's crown land will be used; something essential for investment and resource development. This important process has been shrouded in secrecy on multiple occasions. The latest announcement in this regard covers all of Northwestern B.C. including the mineral-rich Golden Triangle. As a result, nearly a third of British Columbia is now subject to a one year pause on new mining-tenure registrations. This is the exact of opposite of what attracts investment to the province and will send the critical dollars B.C. needs to friendlier investment regions. Article content David Eby's NDP has bankrupted the province and has no plan back for the simple reason that they cannot trust the free market to do its work. They are trapped in an ideologically-driven mindset which does not permit British Columbians to make full use of their own province. This arbitrary and regressive policy must change. Article content
National Post
24 minutes ago
- National Post
Joel Kotkin: Carney's Canada will devolve into feudalism
Article content In this shift towards oligarchy, homeownership and investment profits play a major role. This is particularly true in terms of housing, where the Liberal Party has long championed 'urban containment,' a policy that seeks to limit suburban and exurban development while promoting dense urban growth. The result, notes a new study by demographer Wendell Cox, has been housing prices that, in terms of the relationship between median home prices and household income, are increasingly out of reach for the average Canadian. Article content Immigration, key to Canada's population surge, has contributed to this shortage. While the country's working population swelled by a record 3.7 per cent at the start of this year, housing starts remained essentially flat. At one housing start for every 4.9 people entering the working-age population, 'there is no precedent for a housing supply deficit of this magnitude,' notes National Bank of Canada economist Stéfane Marion. The biggest losers have been people under 40, for whom the homeownership rate has dropped to around 50 per cent, almost 10 per cent less than a decade before. It also helps to have wealthy parents who own a home; children of homeowners are twice as likely to acquire a home as those who do not. Article content If you wish to live in Canada's two great international cities, and are not of aristocratic stock, it's getting tough to get shelter. Four of the six major markets in Canada have a median multiple — a ratio of the median house price by the median gross (before tax) annual household income — of 5.4, considerably higher than the US's 4.8. Vancouver now ranks fourth among all anglophone markets at 11.8, behind Hong Kong, Sydney, and San Jose. Toronto, at 8.4, stands as the second-least affordable market in Canada and ranks 84th out of 95 markets in international affordability, with a severely unaffordable median multiple of 8.4. As late as about 1990, national price-to-income ratios were 'affordable,' at 3.0 or less in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Article content This pattern severely restricts homeownership, which has been declining since 2021. Not surprisingly, rates are lower in both Vancouver and Toronto than in much of the country. Clearly densification, the preferred growth option of the elites, does not help a housing shortage or reduce prices as Patrick Condon of the University of British Columbia has shown. Indeed, now Vancouver is now producing less-than-half the housing units needed to meet demand, one reason for the high prices even in a weak economy. Condon, an eloquent advocate of densification, cites the 'indisputable' evidence that 'upzoning' increases the value of land (by increasing the development value). Article content Concentrations of property and wealth are likely to worsen under the renewed Liberal regime. Planners and climate activists, as in California, a place which almost rivals Toronto and Vancouver in their progressive domination, will likely get even stronger with 'net zero' devotee Carney in charge. Similarly, industries that tend to create high-wage jobs, notably in oil and gas, will find themselves constrained, leaving the big money to financial institutions and those firms who rely on protectionism to shield themselves from both Chinese and American competition. Article content
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Carney to announce Canada's defence spending will hit NATO's target of 2% of GDP this fiscal year, sources say
Prime Minister Mark Carney is set to announce what his government is billing as the largest increase in defence spending since the Second World War, measures that sources say would enable Canada to meet NATO's 2-per-cent military expenditure target this fiscal year, well ahead of any previously announced schedule. Two senior government sources told The Globe and Mail that Mr. Carney will unveil a new security and defence investment plan during a Monday speech at the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs. It will commit the government to rapidly procuring the equipment and technology needed to protect Canada, assert the country's sovereignty and meet its obligations to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the sources said. The Globe is not identifying the sources, as they were not authorized to speak publicly on the matter. For years, NATO member countries have agreed they should spend the equivalent of 2 per cent of gross domestic product on defence. But Canada has been a persistent laggard, spending an estimated 1.45 per cent in 2024, according to a recent NATO report. Canada's existing level of investment has been criticized as insufficient at a time of increasing global threats. Among the critics is U.S. President Donald Trump, who argues his country has devoted too many of its resources to protecting NATO allies. Mr. Carney's coming plan will allow Canada to meet the 2-per-cent target in the 2025-2026 fiscal year ending next March and exceed it in future years, the sources said. This represents a rapid shift in Canada's commitment to defence – already a significant portion of the federal budget – as it moves up the timeline to reach the 2-per-cent target by several years. The spending increase, worth billions of dollars, is set to be announced ahead of the NATO leaders' June 24-25 summit. At The Hague gathering, member countries are expected to raise the Western alliance's military spending target to 3.5 per cent of GDP, plus another amount equivalent to 1.5 per cent for security-related investments. The sources said the new spending will include higher pay for members of the Canadian Armed Forces; new aircraft, armed vehicles and ammunition; new drones and more sensors to monitor the seafloor and the Arctic; repair and maintenance commitments for existing ships, aircraft and other assets; more health care funding for Forces personnel; and funding to boost the Canadian Coast Guard's reach and capabilities. There will also be commitments to increase Canada's defence industry capacity as well as capabilities in artificial intelligence, cyber, quantum and space technologies, the sources said. The expedited effort to meet the NATO 2-per-cent target this fiscal year represents a marked change from as recently as 12 months ago, when then-prime minister Justin Trudeau announced it would take Canada until 2032. He also publicly criticized the target as a 'crass mathematical calculation' that didn't properly account for a country's contributions to NATO. During the recent federal election campaign, Mr. Carney's Liberals pledged to accelerate efforts and reach the 2-per-cent threshold by 2030. The government will provide dollar figures for the announcement on Monday, the sources said. Canadian experts have previously estimated Ottawa would require $15-billion to $20-billion in additional annual military spending to reach the 2-per-cent target. NATO to back 5% spending target in June, Secretary-General says One persistent problem Canada has faced in acquiring new military equipment is a slow and unwieldy procurement process. Mr. Carney's Liberals in the recent election campaign promised to create a stand-alone defence purchasing agency to speed up military equipment procurement, and to prioritize buying Canadian gear and materials whenever possible. It's also expected that the Canadian Coast Guard, currently a civilian operating agency under the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, will be moved under the Department of National Defence. (The move would mirror the U.S. Coast Guard, which is a branch of the U.S. Armed Forces.) The Canadian Coast Guard's annual budget is about $2.5-billion, a small fraction of the Department of National Defence's yearly spending, which exceeds $41-billion. It's not clear whether moving the Coast Guard under the Canadian military would change it from a civilian fleet to a military fleet. The defence spending will also support key capabilities, including the Arctic over-the-horizon radar system investment announced in March, a counter-drone program, joint support ships, long-range precision strike weapons, increased domestic ammunition production and additional armoured vehicles, among other priorities, the sources said. U.S. ambassador to NATO says the military alliance must outspend Russia on defence Monday's new commitment may not be enough for allies, including the United States under Mr. Trump. Over the past two decades, an agreement among NATO countries to reach the 2-per-cent target has evolved from a guideline to the minimum acceptable obligation. Moscow's all-out-assault on Ukraine – the first large-scale land war in Europe since the Second World War – has reignited fears of Russian expansionism and driven many NATO countries to make historic increases in defence spending. NATO's top civilian official, Secretary-General Mark Rutte, said recently he expects leaders of member countries at the coming summit to agree to raise military spending and related security expenditures to 5 per cent of GDP. 'Strong defences send a clear message – no one should ever think of attacking us,' Mr. Rutte said in a speech in Brussels on Wednesday. He told reporters later that 'if we think that we can keep ourselves safe sticking with the 2 per cent, forget it.'
