Skokie swears in first new mayor in 26 years, new Village Board
Mayor Ann Tennes was the first official to be sworn in, and received a standing ovation from Skokie residents after she commented on what it means to be Skokie's mayor.
Incumbent Trustees Keith Robinson and Alison Pure Slovin were sworn in for their second term on the village board, and new trustees Kimani Levy, Lissa Levy, Jim Iverson and Gail Schechter took the oath for the first time. Village Clerk Minal Desai was also sworn in at Monday's Village Board meeting.
'Thank you to everyone who entrusted all of us to guide our community,' Tennes said. 'As (it) has been said in the last few minutes, whether you voted for one of us, all of us, or some of us, we will represent you.'
Tennes paid homage to past female mayors in the northern suburbs, including Jacqueline Gorell (Skokie), Lorraine H. Morton (Evanston), Joan Barr (Evanston), Madeleine Grant (Lincolnwood), Nancy Firfer (Glenview), and Sheila H. Schultz (Wheeling). 'I stand on their shoulders this evening,' she said.
'I believe that we will see that the best decision we make will often include components of our differing thoughts and opinions on the issues we face. And I also believe, and I know, that we are all stronger and better together,' Tennes said.
The new village board represents a mix of more traditionally-minded officials and reformers who felt empowered to run for office after the village implemented election reform initiated by residents through a petition.
As part of that election reform, an amended election code created term limits, staggered terms for trustees (with some running every two years) and four geographic districts from which trustees were to be elected. In line with that last item, the Skokie Village Board now contains four district trustees and two at-large trustees who represent the entire village. Election reform also created non-partisan elections, meaning that party affiliation wasn't on the ballot for Skokie voters.
Skokie voters also recently approved ranked-choice voting for its municipal elections, though that voting system appears to be facing roadblocks to implementation in Cook County.
Robinson, who received the most votes for re-election in his race, thanked voters. 'Your confidence humbles me and I do not take it lightly,' he said.
'This election felt very different. While we're no longer managing the global crisis of COVID-19, like we did before, we are undeniably in another epidemic: a national crisis of hate, division and misinformation.'
'What grounded me was the joy of connecting, meeting new people, walking through new neighborhoods and listening — I'm talking real deep listening — from parents concerned about their LGBTQIA+ children's future, to families unsure about where they will live next. To folks who are worried about something as basic, but as real as the rat and garbage problem,' Robinson said.
'To my new colleagues on the board, congratulations. We've got work to do. And if I can offer some unsolicited old head advice — check your privileges and your bias at the door. This seat is not about your personal agenda, it's about our shared future. Ask questions. Be willing to learn and recognize the brilliance of this village and the value of the commissioners who work tirelessly behind the scenes.'
Schechter said she accepted her seat on the board with humility, honor and gratitude. 'My philosophy of responsible democratic governance over my 40 years of community service that I developed is this: trust your people.'
'The underpinning of democracy is that no one is entitled to lead a government by divine right, inheritance, military might or wealth,' Schechter said. 'With electoral reform in Skokie, a campaign that I am proud to have chaired, now no political party has that kind of privilege either.'
'Today, you seat the first village board in decades that was elected based on our individual merits, vision and values. You have the right to expect a board that is accountable to you, as Alison said, that listens to you and that is not only welcoming, but invites you to sit at the governing table and contribute meaningfully to improving everyone's life,' she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
mRNA mayhem
Good morning!🙋🏼♀️ I'm Nicole Fallert. BRB, checking out Instagram's new features. RFK Jr. is canceling mRNA vaccine development Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. revealed his agency will be cutting funding to mRNA development, the vaccine technology used in the two most common COVID-19 vaccines licensed in the U.S. What we're talking about: Messenger RNA works by instructing the body's immune system to recognize the virus and creating fighting antibodies to attack it. These vaccines contain only a fraction of the virus, so unlike some vaccines, they can't give people the disease they're trying to prevent or trigger allergies. Fort Stewart shooting is latest US military base attack in recent years An Army sergeant shot and wounded five fellow soldiers Wednesday at the Fort Stewart military base in Georgia, the latest in a growing number of violent, and sometimes deadly, incidents at U.S. military bases over the years. Officials did not provide further details on what led to the incident, but Army Brig. Gen. John Lubas said the suspect, Quornelius Radford, 28, used a personal handgun, not a military firearm. Fellow soldiers responded swiftly, tackling him to the ground. Other military bases have also experienced mass shootings in recent years. More news to know now What's the weather today? Check your local forecast here. Trump's tariffs take effect Thursday President Donald Trump's higher tariff rates of 10% to 50% on dozens of trading partners kicked in Thursday, testing his strategy for shrinking U.S. trade deficits without massive disruptions to global supply chains, higher inflation and stiff retaliation from trading partners. U.S. Customs and Border Protection began collecting the higher tariffs at 12:01 a.m. ET after weeks of suspense over Trump's final tariff rates and frantic negotiations with major trading partners that sought to lower them. Meanwhile, costs from Trump's tariff war are mounting for a wide swath of companies, including bellwethers Caterpillar, Marriott, Molson Coors and Yum Brands. USA TODAY breaks down the tariffs. Texas Democrats evacuate amid bomb threat Some of the Texas Democrats who fled their state to try to block Republicans' redistricting efforts were evacuated from an Illinois hotel where they were staying over a bomb threat. Texas House Rep. John Bucy III, one of the Democrats at the hotel, told USA TODAY that many legislators were still asleep when the alarm went off in the morning and that the group gathered outside. He said it took about two hours before everything was cleared up and they were allowed to safely reenter. Today's talkers Why are people tossing sex toys onto the court at WNBA games? The latest toss of a sex toy came during Tuesday night's game between the Indiana Fever and the Los Angeles Sparks at Arena in L.A. With two minutes remaining in the second quarter, the neon green toy landed on the court in the lane near Fever forward Sophie Cunningham, who earlier in the week went on social media to plead with fans not to throw things on the floor and posted another reaction after the game. Sparks guard Kelsey Plum took it upon herself to get rid of it by kicking it into the stands. It's the third such incident in the past two weeks where a sex toy was thrown on the court of a WNBA game — and the league is issuing warnings and ejecting fans. Photo of the day: Meet Plesionectes longicollum Paleontology researchers in Europe have identified Plesionectes longicollum, a new species of ancient marine reptile that existed nearly 183 million years ago. What did the newly discovered Jurassic sea monster eat? Nicole Fallert is a newsletter writer at USA TODAY, sign up for the email here. Want to send Nicole a note? Shoot her an email at NFallert@
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
History Can Teach Modern Activists About Coalition Building
In an era of doomscrolling and political anxiety, collective action and grassroots political organizing remain a powerful antidote to despair and disempowerment, and a force for change and progress. That has helped spur opponents of President Donald Trump to take to the streets. Protests throughout the spring and summer have demonstrated significant (and even international) opposition to the Trump Administration's agenda, particularly its attempts to consolidate power and undermine key institutions and services. And many marginalized populations (including migrants, the poor, people of color, women, and LGBTQIA+ folks) have been disproportionately impacted. Yet, commentators also have noted that, like many protests during Trump's first presidency, participants at protests such as the "No Kings" protest were overwhelmingly white (and older). This is problematic because history suggests that collective action is far more durable and effective when it transcends racial, class, age, and gender boundaries. From the Mississippi Freedom Movement to various Rainbow Coalitions, collaboration and coalition-building across social positions—despite the challenges and potential for tension—attract participants with a wider toolkit of resources, opportunities, and tactics. Multiracial and cross-class coalitions may be underemphasized in the historical record, but they existed and had a profound impact in the 1960s. In Chicago, for example, white working-class migrants from the South, known as the Young Patriots Organization, worked closely with the Illinois Black Panther Party and the Puerto Rican Young Lords Organization to fight against racism and poverty through protests and community programs. Drawing on the blueprint from Black and Latino community organizing, the Young Patriots successfully involved previously disenfranchised poor whites in their activism. The group developed free health clinics that treated thousands of people in the Uptown neighborhood, which was then known as 'hillbilly haven.' The Young Patriots' work demonstrated the power of organizing across social boundaries to create new, more powerful blocs that could bolster communities. Yet, cultivating such coalitions often presented difficult challenges. No group epitomized this better than the Mississippi Freedom Movement during the southern civil rights push. This effort emerged from the activism on college campuses that produced the creation of groups such as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), which was formed in 1960 and was known for organizing sit-ins and the Freedom Summer voter outreach project in 1964. Though Black college students founded SNCC and largely led the group, their organizing enabled them to recruit over 1000 Northern white college students to the cause. In 1964, the group turned its focus to Mississippi, where, despite the apparent dismantling of overt racial restrictions thanks to the newly passed federal Civil Rights Act, state and local laws empowered white officials to erect barriers to voter registration. Further, whites used the threat of racist violence, tacitly approved by elites, to stifle efforts to empower the Black population. SNCC allied with other national Civil Rights organizations to form the Council of Federated Organizations (COFO). COFO's voter registration efforts catalyzed the Mississippi Freedom Movement and helped build the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP). Working-class African Americans from Mississippi led the MFDP. The party advocated for political representation of Blacks in Mississippi and challenged the white supremacist 'Dixiecrat' politics of the state Democratic Party. Between 1961 and 1966, the coalition of SNCC and the MFDP pamphleteered and organized both on northern college campuses and in impoverished Southern communities. It mobilized and brought into the movement two disparate populations: working-class and poor Southern Black people, as well as white middle- and upper-class Northern college student activists recruited through SNCC. Each group brought unique and robust experiences and tactics. The leaders of SNCC and the MFDP recognized that holding together such a diverse coalition required intentional steps to communicate the stakes of their efforts in language that would resonate with the interests and moral ideology of both groups. The MFDP focused on outreach to working-class and poor Black people in the South by emphasizing how Black political rights directly shaped their quality of life and mattered for the advancement of their interests. The group's pamphlets didn't present the gaining of political rights as a moral good in and of itself, but rather as a means to obtain greater security, resources, and influence. One pamphlet, 'The Congressional Challenge,' argued plainly, 'Congress does not do the things we want because we do not have anyone in Congress to speak for us.' Simultaneously, SNCC helped northern white students understand Black political rights as a matter of moral injustice. Many whites were aware of a lack of Black voter participation in the South but often lacked a deeper understanding of its causes and consequences. The pamphlets the group distributed on Northern college campuses covered the historical and legal aspects of this problem. It explained racial inequality by emphasizing the racism of southern white elites and the rank moral injustice of violence and discrimination. In 1964, the MFDP challenged the all-white Mississippi delegation to the Democratic National Convention, and while it failed to gain seats for its own delegation, the group helped transform the Democratic agenda by cultivating support for Black political rights from liberal Democrats and alienating segregationists. This push and pull reshaped the Democratic voting base and helped force the party to advocate for additional civil rights legislation. These efforts also shone a national spotlight on how the Democratic Party in the South disenfranchised Black people from the political process. In doing so, it permanently shifted the racial politics in the U.S. Yet, despite its major success, MFDP's efforts to coordinate actions between groups with vastly different approaches and interests posed a significant challenge for organizers and participants. Disagreements between white and Black participants about tactics and goals fractured the coalition and eventually SNCC itself. In contrast to other, more mainstream Civil Rights organizations, SNCC leaders began to emphasize Black separatism, which alienated white participants. In 1966, the group banned white members altogether, which undermined its stability, collaborative potential, and impact in the following years. The work of the MFDP and the Young Patriots shows the promises and perils of diverse coalitions as opponents of the Trump Administration look to effectuate change. Their history offers a blueprint for how a good communications strategy, and intentional collaborative outreach can enable the construction of such broad coalitions. Yet, this history also reveals how coalitions between groups with disparate world views and social positions can be as fragile as they are powerful. My own research suggests that too often today, progressive organizers are highly educated whites who fail to build bridges with diverse communities and activists of color. Instead, they frequently direct the burgeoning movement around their assumptions and habits—without cultivating and supporting the people most impacted by the Trump Administration. Even in ostensibly multiracial coalitions, this approach leads to burnout and disengagement for activists of color. This blind spot threatens to torpedo activists' success. But the nuanced collaboration and communications strategy employed by groups like the MFDP and the Young Patriots offers a solution, one that could dramatically increase the chances of achieving activists' goals. Adopting such tactics won't guarantee success or unity. But they offer a far better possibility than many of the methods being employed today. Michael L. Rosino is assistant professor of sociology at Molloy University, studying racial politics, democracy, and media. His most recent book, Democracy is Awkward, is available from the University of North Carolina Press.' Made by History takes readers beyond the headlines with articles written and edited by professional historians. Learn more about Made by History at TIME here. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors.
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
RFK Jr. defunds mRNA vaccine research. His anti-vax policies will kill people.
It's ridiculous that Kennedy is in this position following a lifetime of gargling conspiratorial and dangerous health nonsense, but his actions are now deadly serious. In his ongoing crusade to make America sicker and dumber, Health and Human Services Secretary (I bristle every time I type that title) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has axed about $500 million in vital mRNA vaccine research funding. It's the latest salvo in Kennedy's war against science, and it's about as predictably stupid as any of the Neanderthal-brained things he has done since President Donald Trump foisted him on the American public. (My apologies to any Neanderthals offended by the comparison.) You might recall being fortunate beyond measure to receive mRNA vaccine shots during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Nobel Prize-winning vaccine development saved millions of lives globally and was hailed by Trump himself as a 'medical miracle.' 'This may be the most dangerous public health judgment that I've seen' Messenger RNA, or mRNA, vaccines are far more nimble and easier to produce and alter than traditional vaccines, so continued development is seen as crucial ‒ not just for future pandemics but for everything from responding to bioterrorism attacks to cancer prevention. Michael Osterholm, head of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, told NPR this when asked about Kennedy's mRNA funding decision: 'This may be the most dangerous public health judgment that I've seen in my 50 years in this business. ... It is baseless, and we will pay a tremendous price in terms of illnesses and deaths.' Every day RFK Jr. is in charge is a bad day for science In a New York Times report, University of Pennsylvania immunologist Scott Hensley, who has been researching an mRNA flu vaccine, said: 'This is a bad day for science.' That can be said about every day as long as we have a wholly unqualified anti-vaccine nutter like Kennedy in charge of America's health. And remember, as with all things RFK Jr., his 'concerns' and 'fears' about mRNA vaccines are wholly unfounded and not supported by science. They are safe and have been studied for decades. It's ridiculous that Kennedy is in this position following a lifetime of gargling conspiratorial and dangerous health nonsense, but his actions are now deadly serious, and they're often cloaked by the daily insanity spun up by Trump himself, from tariffs to migrant cruelty to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Out go the smart people, in come the vaccine skeptics In June, Kennedy fired all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and replaced them with people he handpicked (that's a red flag if I've ever seen one), including several vaccine skeptics. Now they're reexamining your children's vaccine schedule and echoing baseless fears heard in anti-vax circles for years. Kennedy is also reportedly considering getting rid of all members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which gives guidance to doctors and health insurers on preventive medicine. Dr. Thomas Lew, an assistant clinical professor of medicine at the Stanford University School of Medicine and frequent contributor for USA TODAY Opinion, told CBS News: "This will greatly damage all the work we've done in preventative care, making people sicker, and driving up costs and premiums. To put it mildly, this is extremely concerning ‒ and doing the opposite of making America healthy.' Kennedy is so bad for health that he's being sued by major medical groups Kennedy has removed the COVID-19 vaccine from the recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women, prompting a lawsuit from leading medical groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Physicians. At the end of March, the highly respected top vaccine regulator at the Food and Drug Administration was forced out, and wrote in his resignation letter: 'It has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies.' Food inspections? Hand washing? What's next to come under RFK Jr.'s ax? Whether through Trump's magical branding skills or Republican malpractice or both, Kennedy was able to take on enough of a veneer of credibility to become health secretary. But he is still the same raw-milk-guzzling, roadkill-eating, vaccine-alarmist dipstick he was for all those years when his gibberish was nothing more than a punchline for jokes about conspiracy-addled loons. And he is now doing things that are making us fundamentally less safe, whether by sowing doubt about vaccines, derailing medical research or curbing food safety inspections. Kennedy's policies are almost certainly going to kill people A year ago, if you asked me and many other sane people to come up with the most irresponsible public figure to put in charge of America's health, we would have said RFK Jr. And here we are, staring down radical changes inspired not by science but by suspicion and opportunistic hearsay. The ineptitude and absurdity of the Trump administration can be almost laughable at times. But I'm convinced people will die because of Kennedy's policies, weirdo worldviews and actions. And I'm not laughing a bit. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at
