
‘Staggering moral cowardice'—Congress slams Modi govt's abstention from UNGA ceasefire resolution on Gaza
Vadra went a step further, stating that Israel's attack on Iran Friday was a violation of its sovereignty and a complete contravention of all international norms.
The Congress top brass, including party president Mallikarjun Kharge, general secretary Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and general secretary (organisation) K.C. Venugopal, launched a coordinated attack on the government, stating that the decision to abstain reflected a 'foreign policy in shambles'.
New Delhi: The Congress Saturday termed India's abstention from a United Nations General Assembly resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza an act of 'staggering moral cowardice', and asked if the BJP-led government at the Centre had abandoned late former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee's 'principled stand' on Palestine.
On 12 June, India was among the 19 countries that abstained on the vote, while 149 nations of the 193-member UN General Assembly endorsed the resolution 'Protection of civilians and upholding legal and humanitarian obligations'.
According to a PTI report from New York, India's Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish said New Delhi's vote was in continuation with its previous abstentions and 'the belief that there is no other way to resolve conflicts but through dialogue and diplomacy. A joint effort should be directed towards bringing the two sides closer'.
The resolution demanded that Israel, the 'occupying power', immediately end the blockade, open all border crossings and ensure that aid reaches the Palestinian civilian population throughout the Gaza Strip immediately and at scale, in line with its obligations under international law and humanitarian principles.
This is the fourth time since October 2023 that New Delhi abstained from a UNGA resolution on Palestine. Israel's ongoing military assault on Gaza began after a Hamas attack on Israeli territory on 7 October, 2023.
On X, Kharge asked if India had moved away from its consistent stand advocating for a ceasefire, peace and dialogue in the Middle East and West Asia.
'It is now increasingly evident that our Foreign Policy is in shambles. Perhaps, PM Modi must now take a call on his EAM's repeated blunders and set some accountability. 149 countries voted for a UNGA resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza. India was only one of the 19 countries that abstained. We virtually stand isolated by this step,' he wrote.
It is now increasingly evident that our Foreign Policy is in shambles. Perhaps, PM Modi must now take a call on his EAM's repeated blunders and set some accountability.
149 countries voted for a UNGA resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza. India was only one of the 19 countries…
— Mallikarjun Kharge (@kharge) June 14, 2025
On X, Venugopal said that while India always stood for peace, justice and human dignity, today it 'stands alone as the only country in South Asia, BRICS, and SCO to abstain on a UNGA resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza'. BRICS and Shanghai Cooperation Organisation are multilateral bodies with India as a member.
'60,000 killed. Most of them women and children. Thousands starving. International aid blocked. A humanitarian catastrophe is unfolding. Has India abandoned its principled stand against war, against genocide, and for justice? MEA must explain: what changed in the last six months that led India from supporting a ceasefire to abstaining? We know this government has little regard for Nehruji's legacy, but why abandon even Vajpayeeji's principled stance on Palestine?' Venugopal posted.
India has always stood for peace, justice, and human dignity. But today, India stands alone as the only country in South Asia, BRICS, and SCO to abstain on a UNGA resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza.
60,000 killed. Most of them women and children. Thousands starving.…
— K C Venugopal (@kcvenugopalmp) June 14, 2025
He was referring to the fact that successive governments at the Centre, including the ones led by Vajpayee as PM, have upheld India's long-standing support for the Palestinian cause.
Further, on 11 December, 2024, India had voted in favour of a UNGA resolution that demanded an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza and reiterated the demand for immediate and unconditional release of all hostages.
Congress media and publicity department chairperson Pawan Khera also criticised India's abstention on the UNGA vote, saying it was a 'craven U-turn from India's December 2024 vote in favour of a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, proving that the Modi government remembers nothing, stands for nothing, and chases only photo-ops even if they involve blood-soaked handshakes'.
'India's June 12, 2025, UN abstention on the Gaza ceasefire comes as an act of staggering moral cowardice – a shameful betrayal of our anti-colonial legacy and the values of our own freedom struggle…Global leadership cannot be built on silence and sycophancy. If we want our voice to matter on the global stage, we must first show the courage to speak when it matters most,' Khera wrote on X.
India was the first non-Arab state to recognise the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) in 1974 as 'the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people'. India formally recognised Palestinian statehood in 1988.
'As Israel sets West Asia ablaze – bombing Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and now Iran – Modi's complicity has abandoned India's conscience,' Khera added, referring to Tel Aviv's attack on Iran Friday in an apparent bid to cripple its nuclear sites.
India's June 12, 2025, UN abstention on the Gaza ceasefire comes as an act of staggering moral cowardice – a shameful betrayal of our anti-colonial legacy and the values of our own freedom struggle.
India once stood tall for Palestine – becoming the first non-Arab state to…
— Pawan Khera 🇮🇳 (@Pawankhera) June 14, 2025
Vadra, who has been highly critical of Israel's assault on Gaza, said there was no justification for India's stand at the UNGA. She stated that it was a 'tragic reversal' of India's anti-colonial legacy.
'It is shameful and disappointing that our government has chosen to abstain on the UN motion for the protection of civilians and upholding legal and humanitarian obligations in Gaza. 60,000 people, mostly women and children have been killed already, an entire population is being confined and starved to death, and we are refusing to take a stand.
'This is a tragic reversal of our anti-colonial legacy. In fact, not only are we standing silent as Mr Netanyahu annihilates an entire nation, we are cheering on as his government attacks Iran and assassinates its leadership in flagrant violation of its sovereignty and complete contravention of all international norms,' Vadra posted on X.
(Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui)
Also Read: Why are Indians indifferent to Palestinians' plight? No, it's not about Jews vs Muslims

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Another former minister returns to SAD: Maluka calls it his ‘ghar vapsi'
Bathinda: A two-time former minister in the SAD-BJP govt, Sikandar Singh Maluka, has rejoined the Shiromani Akali Dal . Maluka had earlier joined the Akali Dal Sudhar Lehar, which had formed by dissidents displeased with party president Sukhbir Singh Badal. After rejoining the party, Maluka said he would campaign for the party candidate in the Ludhiana West byelection. Maluka's daughter-in-law, Parampal Kaur Sidhu, contested the 2024 parliamentary elections from Bathinda as a BJP nominee against SAD's Harsimrat Kaur Badal. Maluka, who was elected the MLA from Rampura Phul in 1997 and 2012, was displeased when his request to be fielded from Maur seat for the 2022 assembly polls was not accepted. Speaking to TOI on Saturday, Maluka said, "I have done ghar vapsi (returned home), and now whatever duty the party assigns, I will discharge it with full devotion, including campaigning for the party candidate in Ludhiana West." Maluka was elevated to the minister's rank in the Parkash Singh Badal govt in 1997, despite being a first-time MLA. He was again made a minister in 2012 in the Badal cabinet. Many leaders, including the now-deceased Sukhdev Singh Dhindsa, his son Parminder Singh Dhindsa, Prem Singh Chandumajra, Bibi Jagir Kaur, and Surjit Singh Rakhra, had formed Sudhar Lehar after parting ways with SAD. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Sukhbir, while announcing Maluka's rejoining in a post on X on Saturday, said it gave him "immense pleasure" to welcome the "veteran Akali leader" back to SAD. "Maluka Sahab has significantly contributed to strengthening the party under the leadership of Parkash Singh Badal. His return will further strengthen the party, and he will immediately join the party's campaign in Ludhiana West. With the support of the people of Punjab, Akali Dal is growing stronger with each passing day. I urge all Punjabis to come together to strengthen Punjab's only regional party for the peace and development of the state," he said. Earlier, in an indication of SAD regaining some of its lost ground, former ministers Sohan Singh Thandal and Anil Joshi rejoined the party in recent days. Four-time MLA Thandal, who joined BJP after resigning from SAD in Nov 2024, was nominated by the BJP to unsuccessfully contest the byelection from the Chabbewal assembly segment immediately upon his switching sides. Joshi quit BJP and joined SAD after he voiced support for the farmers' protest in 2021. He left SAD in Nov 2024, but joined back recently. Akali Dal also welcomed Preeti Malhotra, the women's wing head of the Punjab unit of the Aam Aadmi Party, earlier this week. Malhotra was expelled by AAP after she revolted against the party and raised issues about the dominance of Delhi-based leaders in the party's Punjab unit. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .


New Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
World of wars and bonfire of G7 vanities
A week is indeed a long time in geopolitics. On Tuesday, the world markets celebrated headlines about a trade deal between China and the US. On Friday, world markets plummeted following Israeli strikes on Iran. Real wars tend to make trade wars look insignificant. This week, the G7, the group of advanced economies, is observing the 50th anniversary of its origin in picturesque Kananaskis in Alberta, at the foothills of the Canadian Rockies. The theme, as always, is lofty: international peace and security, global economic stability and growth, digital transition and global challenges. The ground realities mock at the ballyhooed heft of advanced economies to sustain predictability and stability. Global trade is upended, thanks to Donald J Trump's America First tariff policies. Sure, there is a ceasefire on tariffs, a détente with China and talks about talks with other countries. Peace is in pieces. Trump's promise of peace in 24 hours is consigned to the bunker by Russian President Vladimir Putin. The ceasefire-for-hostages deal in Gaza is comatose. Newly 'liberated' Syria is haunted by sectarian killings despite a relief on sanctions—US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned the country is weeks away from an epic civil war. On Wednesday, after US declared the 'end of bombing', the Houthis warned of attacks. This week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu upped the ante as he authorised Israeli forces to attack Iran. With it, Trump's agenda in West Asia—and a possible Nobel honour—was washed off. In a sequence of complex manoeuvres, Israeli forces targeted the leadership of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, nuclear scientists, military units and nuclear facilities. The sequence is instructive. The audacious attacks were executed just before officials from Iran and the US were to meet in Oman over a new nuclear deal. The US president authorised the talks for the new deal and gave a deadline of 60 days; the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and six countries including the US took 20 months.


India Today
43 minutes ago
- India Today
Israeli military attack hits Yemen, reportedly targeting senior Houthi leader
Israeli forces recently carried out a targeted strike in Yemen, in an apparent assassination attempt against a senior figure in the Iran-backed Houthi movement, according to Israeli media. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have not officially confirmed the operation, and both Israeli and Houthi officials have so far refrained from making public statements on the Houthis, who control large parts of northern Yemen, have been engaged in a campaign of maritime attacks in the Red Sea since November 2023, claiming solidarity with Palestinians amid the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. The group is believed to have launched over 100 assaults on commercial vessels traversing one of the world's key shipping TENSIONS BETWEEN ISRAEL AND IRANThe reported strike in Yemen comes as Israel and Iran exchanged fresh hostilities late Saturday, escalating fears of a broader regional conflict. The Israeli military expanded its campaign against Iran with a surprise strike targeting the South Pars gas field, the world's largest, prompting a fierce response from Tehran. Iran launched missiles and drones toward Israel, according to Iranian state media, while the IDF confirmed it had intercepted multiple incoming projectiles and was continuing operations against military targets in Tehran. Missile strikes lit up the night skies over Jerusalem and Haifa, where a direct hit on a residential building killed a woman in her 20s and injured at least 13 canceled a scheduled round of nuclear talks with the United States in Oman. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said the discussions were impossible amid what he called "barbarous" Israeli Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned that Iran had "seen nothing yet" and hinted at further action. Meanwhile, the White House said President Donald Trump had cautioned Iran against further escalation, offering a diplomatic off-ramp in exchange for a significant rollback of its nuclear program.