logo
RFK Jr. faces Senate grilling today

RFK Jr. faces Senate grilling today

Politico29-01-2025

Presented by The Pharmaceutical Reform Alliance
Driving The Day
ASKING MR. KENNEDY — Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will face his first vetting by lawmakers this morning when Senate Finance Committee members are sure to ask about his past comments on vaccines, federal health agency reform and abortion.
It marks the first public opportunity for senators to probe whether he can run the sprawling federal health department, responsible for 80,000 employees and 13 supporting agencies. Kennedy has already privately met with most of the committee.
Still, Kennedy's confirmation hearing for HHS secretary is expected to be uncomfortable for both parties, given the nominee's storied name, Democratic roots, history of spreading misinformation and troublesome headlines that include sexual assault allegations, affairs and potential mishandling of wildlife.
It also comes amid a flurry of campaigns and letters for and against Kennedy's nomination by doctors, patient advocacy groups, a former vice president's conservative group and his family members.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who hails from Kennedy's home state, has already sent the nominee a list of 175 questions and called his views on vaccine safety and public health 'dangerous.' Meanwhile, several public health leaders and experts told POLITICO's Joanne Kenen they want to hear Kennedy's views on treatment for people with substance use disorders, Medicaid work requirements, block grants and the so-called germ theory of disease.
Here are some lines of questioning we can expect today:
On vaccines: Kennedy, who recently stepped down from the board of the anti-vaccine activist group Children's Health Defense, has sown doubts about vaccines, repeated false claims that vaccines cause autism and suggested that the polio vaccine might have killed more people than polio itself. Financial disclosures made public last week also reveal that Kennedy could stand to gain from his lawsuit challenging Merck's Gardasil vaccine, which prevents nine strains of HPV.
Democrats will likely question and rebuke Kennedy on those views. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) told MSNBC recently he plans to come to the hearing with 'the receipts.'
It's also possible that some Republicans — including Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), a gastroenterologist who has previously said Kennedy was 'wrong' on vaccines — could jump in with their own questions. However, Republicans could instead seek to publicly affirm what Kennedy has been telling them: He isn't against vaccines but is 'pro-vaccine safety,' as Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) told reporters.
On abortion: Kennedy's past support for abortion rights — which a conservative group founded by former Vice President Mike Pence has cited in their condemnation of his nomination — could come up. Still, some pro-life Republicans, including Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), say they've had their concerns about Kennedy's prior abortion support assuaged after meeting with him.
On federal health reform: Kennedy's plans to overhaul health agencies — including his threat to fire officials at the FDA and the NIH who resist reform — are likely to be called into question. If Kennedy were to pursue even a fraction of the policy agenda he espoused as an activist, it would upend HHS and the public health system.
He also might be questioned on how he'd change the FDA's drug approval process, which he's criticized for rejecting unproven therapies, including ivermectin for Covid-19.
On his personal life: Sexual assault allegations — and admissions that he dumped a dead bear in Central Park and that the National Marine Fisheries Service was investigating him for cutting off a whale's head and driving it home three decades ago — could also come up.
WELCOME TO WEDNESDAY PULSE. Our team is covering Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s confirmation hearings today and tomorrow, including your host, FDA reporter Lauren Gardner, who's helping with Pulse today. Please send your tips, scoops and feedback to lgardner@politico.com or ccirruzzo@politico.com and follow along @Gardner_LM and @ChelseaCirruzzo.
AROUND THE AGENCIES
MEDICAID MESS — Medicaid funding that typically flows from the federal government to states was frozen Tuesday due to a nationwide payment processing system outage, POLITICO's Robert King and Kelly Hooper report.
Democratic lawmakers pinned the problem on President Donald Trump's orders freezing federal spending — including a late-Monday order pausing 'all federal financial assistance' save for Medicare and Social Security — while the administration reviews spending for any programs that defy the president's agenda.
Officials from several states — including Florida, Georgia, Illinois and Massachusetts — said they had unsuccessfully tried to access federal Medicaid payments.
The White House dismissed confusion around the order's scope, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt declining to directly say during a press briefing whether social service programs that serve people indirectly — such as Meals on Wheels and Medicaid — would be affected, POLITICO's Adam Cancryn and Myah Ward report.
In a follow-up memorandum Tuesday, the Office of Management and Budget clarified that Medicaid should not be affected.
'We have confirmed no payments have been affected — they are still being processed and sent,' Leavitt posted on X later Tuesday afternoon. 'We expect the portal will be back online shortly.'
Public Health
BIRD FLU FEARS — Public health experts and former government officials worry that President Donald Trump could face another pandemic — and wouldn't be as prepared to address it — as avian influenza continues to spread in the U.S., Lauren writes with her colleagues David Lim and Marcia Brown.
The virus killed the first person in the U.S. earlier this month and has infected 67 confirmed patients. While the disease isn't spreading among people, one mutation could change that.
Biden administration critics say it didn't take some steps they believe would help stem the spread, such as vaccinating farmworkers against bird flu.
Not so easy: But the president's options are limited, given economic and political considerations. Any effort to mitigate the chances of a viral mutation — like inducing farms to kill sick cattle as they already do with poultry — would be costly to another corner of the president's base. And a vaccination push would require buy-in from the farm community, whose workers are already wary of Trump's hard-line posture on immigration.
Another complicating factor is the vaccine-skeptical views held by Trump nominees who, if confirmed, would be responsible for steering an avian flu pandemic response: Robert F Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Dave Weldon, a former Florida congressman tapped to lead the CDC.
To be sure: If bird flu became a communicable disease among humans, Republicans could be well positioned to allay fears about a medical response like a vaccine given the Trump administration's stature in the agriculture industry, said Niki Carelli, executive director of the Coalition to Stop Flu and a lobbyist with The Daschle Group.
In Congress
THE KENNEDY PEANUT GALLERY — A smattering of big names and institutions weighed in Tuesday on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s HHS nomination, the splashiest of which was his cousin's scathing rebuke of his qualifications for the role.
Caroline Kennedy, in a letter first reported by The Washington Post and then read aloud by the former ambassador on X, called her cousin a 'predator' who 'is addicted to attention and power.' She accused him of victimizing parents with sick children and spreading vaccine misinformation despite immunizing his own children, Chelsea writes.
She also alleged that he pulled other family members into substance use.
Meanwhile, another Kennedy cousin — former Democratic Rep. Patrick Kennedy — supported Kennedy Jr.'s nomination in a letter to the editor in The Washington Post.
Patrick Kennedy wrote that his cousin was supportive of his journey toward sobriety.
'On addiction policy, I believe he is the leader we need to meet this moment,' he wrote.
Not to be outdone: Editorial boards at two publications owned by the Murdoch family — The Wall Street Journal and New York Post — denounced Kennedy Jr.'s nomination as HHS secretary, POLITICO's Amanda Friedman reports.
Names in the News
Rich Rieger has joined consulting firm Berkeley Research Group's health analytics practice as a managing director in Chicago, where he'll advise pharma and biotech companies. He's previously held positions at Baxter, Horizon Therapeutics and AbbVie.
WHAT WE'RE READING
President Donald Trump issued an executive order Tuesday ordering the federal government to stop paying for gender-affirming care for people under 19, POLITICO's Daniel Payne reports.
The Trump administration has moved to stop supplying drugs for HIV, malaria and tuberculosis to countries supported by the U.S. Agency for International Development as part of a wider funding freeze, Reuters reports, citing a memo and sources.
The FDA has approved Novo Nordisk's Ozempic to treat chronic kidney disease in people with type 2 diabetes, Bloomberg reports.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Biden press secretary is ready to tell Americans the truth? Give me a break.
Former Biden press secretary is ready to tell Americans the truth? Give me a break.

USA Today

time40 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Former Biden press secretary is ready to tell Americans the truth? Give me a break.

Former Biden press secretary is ready to tell Americans the truth? Give me a break. | Opinion The knives are now out inside the Democratic Party. And the party is bleeding, not only Americans' support and trust but also its last remaining drops of honesty and truth. Show Caption Hide Caption Karine Jean-Pierre talks exit from Democratic party in new book Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre talks about leaving the Democratic party in her upcoming book slated for release in October. The Democratic Party continues to self-destruct, and I am here for it. Former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has teased a tell-all memoir about former President Joe Biden and the administration she served for nearly three years. 'Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines' is stoking claims that Jean-Pierre is a grifter, profiting off her time in the administration by trashing the former president and the political party that gave her prominence. Knives are out among Democrats for one of their own who has now betrayed them. Like other books that have recently exposed details about Biden's poor health, Jean-Pierre's book raises questions about the White House cover-up that attempted to hide the president's mental and physical decline from voters. It also calls into question Jean-Pierre's honesty: Why did she wait until now, when she can profit from it, to tell the truth about the former commander in chief? Former White House colleagues turn on former Biden press secretary Democrats are now a minority party in America. The GOP controls the White House, the Senate and the U.S. House along with a majority of governor's offices and state legislatures. The Democratic Party has lost Americans' trust because of its leaders' penchant for gaslighting, not just about Biden's health but also on issues like immigration, border security and the economy. Jean-Pierre, who now claims to be an independent, certainly isn't helping her former colleagues rebuild that lost trust. Details from the book are still sketchy, but Jean-Pierre should provide readers with an inside look at what happened after Biden's disastrous debate with Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump a year ago this month. Jean-Pierre's coworkers have already reacted to the book with contempt. "Former colleagues expressed confusion at how Jean-Pierre seemingly intends to paint Biden as a victim while pinning her own decision to leave the party on his 'broken' White House," Politico reported, citing multiple former Biden administration officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. Opinion: Biden's cancer diagnosis raises the question: Was he ever in good enough health? Caitlin Legacki, a Democratic strategist who worked on the Commerce Department's communications team during Biden's presidency, took umbrage with Jean-Pierre's assertion that the Democratic Party betrayed Biden. 'Kamala Harris and the entire Biden/Harris campaign did hero's work to avoid losing 400 electoral votes and giving Republicans a supermajority in Congress, which is what would have happened if he stayed on the ticket,' Legacki told Politico. 'It's more productive to focus on that, and thank Biden for doing the responsible thing by stepping aside, than it is to pretend this was an unwarranted act of betrayal.' But party insiders continuing to squabble over whether a now former president was or was not betrayed by fellow Democrats entirely misses the larger point. Opinion: Guess who Americans want to run the economy? Hint − it's not Democrats. Far too many Democrats, Jean-Pierre included, worked hard to deceive Americans. Their willful lack of self-awareness about their gaslighting and dishonesty is why the party has shown no signs of recovering from the last disastrous election cycle. Karine Jean-Pierre's book about Biden isn't the first Jean-Pierre's book will be far from the first to address the deception at the heart of the Biden White House. On May 20, journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson released "Original Sin," which describes in detail Biden's cognitive decline and the mind-boggling efforts with which his inner circle and the Democratic Party tried to hide the truth from Americans. Opinion: Texas woman's death would have been prevented if Biden had secured the border Conservatives had long been suspicious about Biden's health, but journalists with White House access failed to ask tough questions then. Now that it's too late to make a real difference, those who were silent when it mattered most are more than ready to profit from belated exposés about the former president's failing health. The knives are now out inside the Democratic Party. And the party is bleeding, not only Americans' support and trust but also its last remaining drops of honesty and truth. Nicole Russell is an opinion columnist with USA TODAY. She lives in Texas with her four kids. Sign up for her newsletter, The Right Track, and get it delivered to your inbox.

US States Seek To Ban Chinese Citizens From Buying Land, Property
US States Seek To Ban Chinese Citizens From Buying Land, Property

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

US States Seek To Ban Chinese Citizens From Buying Land, Property

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Some U.S. states are attempting to ban Chinese citizens from buying land and property, amid souring diplomatic relations between the countries. By 2024, more than two thirds of states had enacted or considered laws limiting or barring foreign land ownership including states that specifically mention China by name, according to POLITICO. According to the non-profit membership organization the Committee of 100, in total 27 states have considered this kind of legislation. However, the group has not shared a list of those states. Newsweek has rounded up a non-exhaustive list of states that have been involved in this kind of legislation, based on publicly available information. Some states do not name China explicitly, but name foreign nations that would likely include China. A number of US stakes have advanced legislation to ban some land sales by foreign nationals and so-called "foreign adversaries." A number of US stakes have advanced legislation to ban some land sales by foreign nationals and so-called "foreign adversaries." Flourish Why It Matters There has been a wave of concern over Chinese land purchases in the United States, some of which have taken place close to military bases. This comes amid soaring tensions between the U.S. and China including trade clashes between the two giants and national security concerns. However, as of USDA data accurate to 2023, Chinese investors own land in the U.S. equivalent to roughly twice the size of the footprint of New York City. What To Know A number of states have considered legislation on the issue. In May, the Texas legislature passed a bill to ban people tied to the governments of China, North Korea, Russia and Iran from purchasing land in the state. In January, Republican senators in Arkansas introduced the Not One More Inch or Acre Act which would prohibit any Chinese citizen, entity or foreign person acting on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) from purchasing public or private real estate in the U.S. On Tuesday, Arizona's Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed a bill to prevent the People's Republic of China from buying a 30 percent stake or more in land near military bases and other strategic assets. Meanwhile, Florida passed a bill to prohibit citizens from China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, and Syria from owning agricultural land or property near military sites in 2023. Similar legislation has been passed in South Dakota, North Dakota, Indiana, Nebraska, Virginia, Utah, Iowa, West Virginia and Montana. Other states are considering legislation or bills regarding foreign nations' ability to purchase land including Ohio, Michigan and Georgia. What People Are Saying Speaking to Newsweek, Michael McFaul, who served as the U.S. ambassador to Russia from 2012 to 2014, said: "Not every Chinese citizen is an agent of the Communist Party of China. Many of China's most successful entrepreneurs, engineers, and academics—especially those living and working in the United States—loathe the Chinese Communist Party. U.S. government officials must develop more sophisticated policies for decreasing the influence of the Chinese Communist Party in the United States that do not treat all Chinese citizens as enemies of America." Cole Hefner, a Texas Republican state representative, said of Texas' bill: "Senate Bill 17 will counter this threat and make Texas a leader in state security. We cannot, we will not, allow oppressive regimes who actively seek to do harm to cease control and dictate their terms over our economy, our supply chains, our daily lives, our critical infrastructure for our food supply." Advocacy group Asian Texans for Justice opposed the Texas bill, saying it revives "a shameful chapter in American history—when Asian immigrants were banned from owning land." What Happens Next Texas' bill will now go to the state's governor, who has indicated he will support it. The success of other bills as well as whether other states will advance legislation pertaining to the issue remains to be seen.

Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses

timean hour ago

Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses

BATON ROUGE, La. -- As Louisiana Rep. Kimberly Landry Coates stood before her colleagues in the state's Legislature she warned that the bill she was presenting might 'seem strange' or even crazy. Some lawmakers laughed with disbelief and others listened intently, as Coates described situations that are often noted in discussions of 'chemtrails' — a decades-old conspiracy theory that posits the white lines left behind by aircraft in the sky are releasing chemicals for any number of reasons, some of them nefarious. As she urged lawmakers to ban the unsubstantiated practice, she told skeptics to 'start looking up' at the sky. 'I'm really worried about what is going on above us and what is happening, and we as Louisiana citizens did not give anyone the right to do this above us,' the Republican said. Louisiana is the latest state taking inspiration from a wide-ranging conspiratorial narrative, mixing it with facts, to create legislation. Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed a similar measure into law last year and one in Florida has passed both the House and the Senate. More than a dozen other states, from New York to Arizona, have introduced their own legislation. Such bills being crafted is indicative of how misinformation is moving beyond the online world and into public policy. Elevating unsubstantiated theories or outright falsehoods into the legislative arena not only erodes democratic processes, according to experts, it provides credibility where there is none and takes away resources from actual issues that need to be addressed. 'Every bill like this is kind of symbolic, or is introduced to appease a very vocal group, but it can still cause real harm by signaling that these conspiracies deserve this level of legal attention,' said Donnell Probst, interim executive director of the National Association for Media Literacy Education. Louisiana's bill, which is awaiting Republican Gov. Jeff Landry's signature, prohibits anyone from 'intentionally" injecting, releasing, applying or dispersing chemicals into the atmosphere with the purpose of affecting the 'temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.' It also requires the Department of Environmental Quality to collect reports from anyone who believes they have observed such activities. While some lawmakers have targeted real weather modification techniques that are not widespread or still in their infancy, others have pointed to dubious evidence to support legislation. Discussion about weather control and banning 'chemtrails' has been hoisted into the spotlight by high-profile political officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Recently, Marla Maples, the ex-wife of President Donald Trump, spoke in support of Florida's legislation. She said she was motivated to 'start digging' after seeing a rise in Alzheimer's. Asked jokingly by a Democratic state senator if she knew anyone in the federal government who could help on the issue, Maples smiled and said, 'I sure do.' Chemtrail conspiracy theories, which have been widely debunked and include a myriad of claims, are not new. The publication of a 1996 Air Force report on the possible future benefits of weather modification is often cited as an early driver of the narrative. Some say that evidence of the claims is happening right before the publics' eyes, alleging that the white streaks stretching behind aircrafts reveal chemicals being spread in the air, for everything from climate manipulation to mind control. Ken Leppert, an associate professor of atmospheric science at the University of Louisiana Monroe, said the streaks are actually primarily composed of water and that there is 'no malicious intent behind' the thin clouds. He says the streaks are formed as exhaust is emitted from aircrafts, when the humidity is high and air temperature is low, and that ship engines produce the same phenomenon. A fact sheet about contrails, published by multiple government agencies including NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency, explains that the streaks left behind by planes do not pose health risks to humans. However, the trails, which have been produced since the earliest days of jet aviation, do impact the cloudiness of Earth's atmosphere and can therefore affect atmospheric temperature and climate. Scientists have overwhelmingly agreed that data or evidence cited as proof of chemtrails 'could be explained through other factors, including well-understood physics and chemistry associated with aircraft contrails and atmospheric aerosols,' according to a 2016 survey published in the journal Environmental Research Letters. In the survey of 77 chemists and geochemists, 76 said they were not aware of evidence proving the existence of a secret large-scale atmospheric program. 'It's pure myth and conspiracy,' Leppert said. While many of the arguments lawmakers have used to support the chemtrails narrative are not based in fact, others misrepresent actual scientific endeavors, such as cloud seeding; a process by which an artificial material — usually silver iodide — is used to induce precipitation or to clear fog. 'It's maybe really weak control of the weather, but it's not like we're going to move this cloud here, move this hurricane here, or anything like that,' Leppert said. Parker Cardwell, an employee of a California-based cloud seeding company called Rainmaker, testified before lawmakers in Louisiana and asked that an amendment be made to the legislation to avoid impacts to the industry. The practice is an imprecise undertaking with mixed results that isn't widely used, especially in Louisiana, which has significant natural rainfall. According to Louisiana's Department of Agriculture and Forestry, a cloud seeding permit or license has never been issued in the state. While presenting Louisiana's bill last week, Coates said her research found charts and graphics from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on spraying the air with heavy metals to reflect sunlight back into space to cool the Earth. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022 directed the Office of Science and Technology Policy, with support from NOAA, to develop an initial governance framework and research plan related to solar radiation modification, or SRM. A resulting report, which Coates holds up in the House session, focuses on possible future actions and does not reflect decisions that had already been made. SRM 'refers to deliberate, large-scale actions intended to decrease global average surface temperatures by increasing the reflection of sunlight away from the Earth,' according to NOAA. It is a type of geoengineering. Research into the viability of many methods and potential unintended consequences is ongoing, but none have actually been deployed. In recent years, misinformation and conspiratorial narratives have become more common during the debates and committee testimonies that are a part of Louisiana's lawmaking process. And while legislators say Louisiana's new bill doesn't really have teeth, opponents say it still takes away time and focus from important work and more pressing topics. State Rep. Denise Marcelle, a Democrat who opposed Louisiana's bill, pointed to other issues ailing the state, which has some of the highest incarceration, poverty, crime, and maternal mortality rates. 'I just feel like we owe the people of Louisiana much more than to be talking about things that I don't see and that aren't real,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store