logo
RFK Jr. faces Senate grilling today

RFK Jr. faces Senate grilling today

Politico29-01-2025

Presented by The Pharmaceutical Reform Alliance
Driving The Day
ASKING MR. KENNEDY — Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will face his first vetting by lawmakers this morning when Senate Finance Committee members are sure to ask about his past comments on vaccines, federal health agency reform and abortion.
It marks the first public opportunity for senators to probe whether he can run the sprawling federal health department, responsible for 80,000 employees and 13 supporting agencies. Kennedy has already privately met with most of the committee.
Still, Kennedy's confirmation hearing for HHS secretary is expected to be uncomfortable for both parties, given the nominee's storied name, Democratic roots, history of spreading misinformation and troublesome headlines that include sexual assault allegations, affairs and potential mishandling of wildlife.
It also comes amid a flurry of campaigns and letters for and against Kennedy's nomination by doctors, patient advocacy groups, a former vice president's conservative group and his family members.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who hails from Kennedy's home state, has already sent the nominee a list of 175 questions and called his views on vaccine safety and public health 'dangerous.' Meanwhile, several public health leaders and experts told POLITICO's Joanne Kenen they want to hear Kennedy's views on treatment for people with substance use disorders, Medicaid work requirements, block grants and the so-called germ theory of disease.
Here are some lines of questioning we can expect today:
On vaccines: Kennedy, who recently stepped down from the board of the anti-vaccine activist group Children's Health Defense, has sown doubts about vaccines, repeated false claims that vaccines cause autism and suggested that the polio vaccine might have killed more people than polio itself. Financial disclosures made public last week also reveal that Kennedy could stand to gain from his lawsuit challenging Merck's Gardasil vaccine, which prevents nine strains of HPV.
Democrats will likely question and rebuke Kennedy on those views. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) told MSNBC recently he plans to come to the hearing with 'the receipts.'
It's also possible that some Republicans — including Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), a gastroenterologist who has previously said Kennedy was 'wrong' on vaccines — could jump in with their own questions. However, Republicans could instead seek to publicly affirm what Kennedy has been telling them: He isn't against vaccines but is 'pro-vaccine safety,' as Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) told reporters.
On abortion: Kennedy's past support for abortion rights — which a conservative group founded by former Vice President Mike Pence has cited in their condemnation of his nomination — could come up. Still, some pro-life Republicans, including Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), say they've had their concerns about Kennedy's prior abortion support assuaged after meeting with him.
On federal health reform: Kennedy's plans to overhaul health agencies — including his threat to fire officials at the FDA and the NIH who resist reform — are likely to be called into question. If Kennedy were to pursue even a fraction of the policy agenda he espoused as an activist, it would upend HHS and the public health system.
He also might be questioned on how he'd change the FDA's drug approval process, which he's criticized for rejecting unproven therapies, including ivermectin for Covid-19.
On his personal life: Sexual assault allegations — and admissions that he dumped a dead bear in Central Park and that the National Marine Fisheries Service was investigating him for cutting off a whale's head and driving it home three decades ago — could also come up.
WELCOME TO WEDNESDAY PULSE. Our team is covering Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s confirmation hearings today and tomorrow, including your host, FDA reporter Lauren Gardner, who's helping with Pulse today. Please send your tips, scoops and feedback to lgardner@politico.com or ccirruzzo@politico.com and follow along @Gardner_LM and @ChelseaCirruzzo.
AROUND THE AGENCIES
MEDICAID MESS — Medicaid funding that typically flows from the federal government to states was frozen Tuesday due to a nationwide payment processing system outage, POLITICO's Robert King and Kelly Hooper report.
Democratic lawmakers pinned the problem on President Donald Trump's orders freezing federal spending — including a late-Monday order pausing 'all federal financial assistance' save for Medicare and Social Security — while the administration reviews spending for any programs that defy the president's agenda.
Officials from several states — including Florida, Georgia, Illinois and Massachusetts — said they had unsuccessfully tried to access federal Medicaid payments.
The White House dismissed confusion around the order's scope, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt declining to directly say during a press briefing whether social service programs that serve people indirectly — such as Meals on Wheels and Medicaid — would be affected, POLITICO's Adam Cancryn and Myah Ward report.
In a follow-up memorandum Tuesday, the Office of Management and Budget clarified that Medicaid should not be affected.
'We have confirmed no payments have been affected — they are still being processed and sent,' Leavitt posted on X later Tuesday afternoon. 'We expect the portal will be back online shortly.'
Public Health
BIRD FLU FEARS — Public health experts and former government officials worry that President Donald Trump could face another pandemic — and wouldn't be as prepared to address it — as avian influenza continues to spread in the U.S., Lauren writes with her colleagues David Lim and Marcia Brown.
The virus killed the first person in the U.S. earlier this month and has infected 67 confirmed patients. While the disease isn't spreading among people, one mutation could change that.
Biden administration critics say it didn't take some steps they believe would help stem the spread, such as vaccinating farmworkers against bird flu.
Not so easy: But the president's options are limited, given economic and political considerations. Any effort to mitigate the chances of a viral mutation — like inducing farms to kill sick cattle as they already do with poultry — would be costly to another corner of the president's base. And a vaccination push would require buy-in from the farm community, whose workers are already wary of Trump's hard-line posture on immigration.
Another complicating factor is the vaccine-skeptical views held by Trump nominees who, if confirmed, would be responsible for steering an avian flu pandemic response: Robert F Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Dave Weldon, a former Florida congressman tapped to lead the CDC.
To be sure: If bird flu became a communicable disease among humans, Republicans could be well positioned to allay fears about a medical response like a vaccine given the Trump administration's stature in the agriculture industry, said Niki Carelli, executive director of the Coalition to Stop Flu and a lobbyist with The Daschle Group.
In Congress
THE KENNEDY PEANUT GALLERY — A smattering of big names and institutions weighed in Tuesday on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s HHS nomination, the splashiest of which was his cousin's scathing rebuke of his qualifications for the role.
Caroline Kennedy, in a letter first reported by The Washington Post and then read aloud by the former ambassador on X, called her cousin a 'predator' who 'is addicted to attention and power.' She accused him of victimizing parents with sick children and spreading vaccine misinformation despite immunizing his own children, Chelsea writes.
She also alleged that he pulled other family members into substance use.
Meanwhile, another Kennedy cousin — former Democratic Rep. Patrick Kennedy — supported Kennedy Jr.'s nomination in a letter to the editor in The Washington Post.
Patrick Kennedy wrote that his cousin was supportive of his journey toward sobriety.
'On addiction policy, I believe he is the leader we need to meet this moment,' he wrote.
Not to be outdone: Editorial boards at two publications owned by the Murdoch family — The Wall Street Journal and New York Post — denounced Kennedy Jr.'s nomination as HHS secretary, POLITICO's Amanda Friedman reports.
Names in the News
Rich Rieger has joined consulting firm Berkeley Research Group's health analytics practice as a managing director in Chicago, where he'll advise pharma and biotech companies. He's previously held positions at Baxter, Horizon Therapeutics and AbbVie.
WHAT WE'RE READING
President Donald Trump issued an executive order Tuesday ordering the federal government to stop paying for gender-affirming care for people under 19, POLITICO's Daniel Payne reports.
The Trump administration has moved to stop supplying drugs for HIV, malaria and tuberculosis to countries supported by the U.S. Agency for International Development as part of a wider funding freeze, Reuters reports, citing a memo and sources.
The FDA has approved Novo Nordisk's Ozempic to treat chronic kidney disease in people with type 2 diabetes, Bloomberg reports.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In the battle of Trump v Newsom, the president is winning the public
In the battle of Trump v Newsom, the president is winning the public

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

In the battle of Trump v Newsom, the president is winning the public

In the on-going Battle of Los Angeles, California governor Gavin Newsom may have the law on his side – but his adversary president Donald Trump has the most powerful imagery. The conflict began in Los Angeles on Friday, when mobs of protestors attacked agents of the US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), who were trying to serve warrants on specific illegal immigrants at a Home Depot and also at a clothing store. On Saturday, during a protest in front of a nearby Department of Homeland Security (DHS) office, members of the crowd lit fires and threw rocks at federal officers, who defended themselves with tear gas and non-lethal ammunition. Later that day, president Trump authorised the deployment of 2000 members of the National Guard to protect the federal ICE agents; since then 700 American Marines have been added to the federal force. Governor Newsom and other leaders of the Democratic-dominated California have claimed that Trump's actions were not needed because local and state authorities had the situation under control. And yet on Sunday, following three days of violence and arrests, the Los Angeles Police Department declared downtown Los Angeles an 'unlawful assembly' area. And on Monday the state of California sued the Trump administration, claiming that Trump 'illegally acted to federalise the National Guard,' in the words of Newsom. Typically a governor requests a president to federalise and mobilise the National Guard to deal with riots or natural disasters. For example, consider the Los Angeles riots of 1992. It was sparked by the acquittal of four white police officers who beat a black motorist named Rodney King and it led to more than fifty deaths and a billion dollars of damage; in response a Republican California governor Pete Wilson asked a Republican president George HW Bush to federalise the National Guard. Not since 1965, when president Lyndon B. Johnson sent the National Guard to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators, has a president sent troops without a governor's request. While California officials might be able to make a legal case against the Trump administration, the state and the Democratic party risk losing in the court of public opinion. Viral photographs show masked rioters waving Mexican flags in front of burning cars and debris, supporting the Trump White House's inflammatory claims about an immigrant invasion. In a shrewd public relations move, the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has released mug shots under the heading: 'ICE Captures Worst of the Worst Illegal Alien Criminals in Los Angeles Including Murderers, Sex Offenders, and Other Violent Criminals.' The rogues' gallery contains illegal immigrants from a number of countries including Vietnam, the Philippines, and Mexico, charged with offenses including attempted rape, assault with a deadly weapon, grand theft larceny, distribution of heroin and cocaine, wilful cruelty to a child and other serious crimes. Democrats recently succeeded in reversing the allegedly unlawful deportation to El Salvador of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal immigrant from El Salvador who was granted the right to remain in the US by a federal immigration judge. But on his return he was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of being an MS-13 gang member who has smuggled thousands of illegal immigrants, drugs, and firearms in the US. Democratic strategists might ask whether someone like Abrego Garcia should be the face of the Democratic party. At least, unlike some of the rioters cavorting in front of burning wreckage in LA, he does not wear a mask. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment: Only MAGA can protest
After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment: Only MAGA can protest

USA Today

time32 minutes ago

  • USA Today

After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment: Only MAGA can protest

After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment: Only MAGA can protest | Opinion Rule No. 1: No protesting unless it's something Trump wants you to protest. Show Caption Hide Caption Australian journalist shot with a rubber bullet in Los Angeles Australian journalist from 9News, Lauren Tomasi, was shot with a rubber bullet while reporting from the protests in Los Angeles. President Donald Trump and his band of faux-macho nogoodniks keep poking the city of Los Angeles, hoping it will squeal and create the kind of violent theater that gives right-wing media its life force. First they sent in the National Guard to address predominantly peaceful anti-ICE protests, but the sprawling city failed to adequately burn. Now they're sending in U.S. Marines to get the job done. It's an intentional, dangerous and wholly unnecessary provocation. And based on how Trump and other Republicans have reacted to the ongoing protests, we should all be clear on the administration's new rules for protesting in America. Rule No. 1: No protesting unless it's something Trump wants you to protest For those who engage in liberal activities like reading and 'seeing things with your own eyes and believing they're real,' it might seem odd that the man who praised Jan. 6 insurrectionists as "great patriots" and then pardoned them all has the gall to call LA protesters 'insurrectionists.' Technically, there's nothing about the California protests that would make them an insurrection, while everything about the 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, an effort to overturn a free-and-fair election, made it an actual insurrection. But that kind of fact-based thinking is now illegal, and protesters in Los Angeles and elsewhere need to understand that the First Amendment only applies to things Trump and Republicans want to hear. As border czar Tom Homan said on June 9 about the LA protesters: 'I said many times, you can protest. You get your First Amendment rights. But when you cross that line, you put hands on an ICE officer, or you destroy property or ICE says you impede law enforcement … that's a crime. And the Trump administration is not going to tolerate it.' Opinion: Trump lied about LA protests to deploy the National Guard. He wants violence. Correct. Unless you're a pro-Trump protester. In which case, breaking into a federal building, beating the snot out of police officers and destroying property is patriotic and easily pardonable. Rule No. 2: Protesters can only use American flags Video of California protesters waving flags from Mexico and other countries really upset a number of Republicans who have apparently never been in Boston on St. Patrick's Day. Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma said: 'This is an American city, and to be able to have an American city where we have people literally flying Mexican flags and saying 'you cannot arrest us' cannot be allowed.' If those protesters were waving a good old-fashioned American flag, it would be an entirely different story. But in Trump's America, flag choice matters. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called out 'left-wing radicals carrying foreign flags.' Vice President JD Vance declared on social media: 'Insurrectionists carrying foreign flags are attacking immigration enforcement officers.' MIND THE FLAGS, PEOPLE! The rule seems pretty clear. Your First Amendment right only allows you to carry an American flag, unless you are a Trump supporter during an actual insurrection, in which case you can carry a Confederate flag, replace an American flag with a Trump flag or use an American flag on a pole to beat a police officer. Opinion: Three ways the Trump-Musk feud revealed the GOP's twisted hypocrisy Rule No. 3: No spitting on or disrespecting law enforcement officers In response to some LA protesters allegedly spitting on authorities, Trump declared on social media June 9: ' 'If they spit, we will hit.' This is a statement from the President of the United States concerning the catastrophic Gavin Newscum inspired Riots going on in Los Angeles. The Insurrectionists have a tendency to spit in the face of the National Guardsmen/women, and others. These Patriots are told to accept this, it's just the way life runs. But not in the Trump Administration. IF THEY SPIT, WE WILL HIT, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before. Such disrespect will not be tolerated!' Some might respond to this by saying, 'But the Jan. 6 insurrectionists whom you pardoned en masse did a lot more than just spit. They brutally attacked police officers, physically injuring more than 140 of them.' To which Trump would probably say: 'Shut up. Your First Amendment rights are hereby revoked!' Or he might say what he actually said when he pardoned hundreds of Jan. 6 rioters after he was inaugurated Jan. 20: 'These are people who actually love our country, so we thought a pardon would be appropriate.' To clarify, the people who Trump thinks love this country, demonstrated by them loving him, are allowed to express that love by defacing a federal building they broke into and viciously assaulting police officers. People who Trump thinks don't love the country, demonstrated by them exercising their First Amendment right to protest things he doesn't want them to protest, will be beaten up for spitting. Follow Trump's protesting rules, or he'll call in the troops It's clear as mud, folks. Americans across the country should feel free to get out and protest, as long as it's for the right reasons and done in a way that aligns completely with the beliefs of Republicans and the Trump administration. Anything outside of that and they'll call in the National Guard. And the Marines. And, I guess, the flag police? Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at

Readers sound off on the Trump/Musk rift, anti-ICE protests and Diddy's abuse
Readers sound off on the Trump/Musk rift, anti-ICE protests and Diddy's abuse

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Readers sound off on the Trump/Musk rift, anti-ICE protests and Diddy's abuse

Dartmouth, Mass.: Being the richest man in the world does not appear sufficiently ego-gratifying for Elon Musk. Observing his recent involvement with the Trump administration, with his destructive actions leading the DOGE crusade to disrupt or destroy American governance, one wonders what his motivation is. Is it financial gain, media attention or a quest for power? Or is it a grand plan conceived by a man with a deep psychological disorder? Musk's recent severe criticism of President Trump's legislative agenda is perhaps the first salvo in his plan to save America from the conflagration he ignited and helped enlarge. Is the grand scheme to now be the white knight who comes to the rescue and douses the flames, thereby becoming the hero who saved America? The legislative and judicial branches of government have either enabled, been enriched by or ignored the destruction occurring to American democracy. Musk can now assume the role of hero by utilizing his enormous resources to defeat Trump's agenda by threatening to 'out-primary' any Republican legislators who continue to support the president. Trump has certainly provided a roadmap by imposing or threatening tariffs, or defunding and then dowsing the flames with a change of course, thus appearing as though he's coming to the rescue of America. Musk has far more personal resources and grasp of political strategy than Trump, and may have greater aspirations as he interjects himself into the politics of Brazil, Germany and the United States. Betty Ussach Glendale: From the ancient text 'The Art of War' by Sun Tzu, it is said, 'All war is based on deception.' The same applies to the accusations of division now viewed as front-page news regarding Trump versus Musk. Such antics create a storyline that hurts people. Also stated in the book: 'There's no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare.' Our country is experiencing a period of adjustment whereby deception has been made to separate us. The lesson from the book stipulates, 'There are times when you have to forgive your enemies and love them as your own.' Hatred never ends if people embrace only what makes them comfortable. Jonathan Kiddrane Brooklyn: Let me get this straight. TACO man sits on his hands when his criminal cultists storm the Capitol, but he unleashes the National Guard on peaceful protesters? When is this madness going to end? Don't tell me America is not in the midst of a constitutional crisis. June Lowe Staatsburg, N.Y.: Trump deploys the National Guard for individuals who are protesting in Los Angeles. Rioters attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6 and the National Guard was not deployed, then the rioters were pardoned. What's wrong with this picture? I really hope no one tries to explain this to me, because it's obvious that this so-called president has no idea how to run this joke of a country that the United States has become. Glenn Marowitz Manhattan: Joe Biden thought he needed woke approval to be reelected. Woke devotees created sanctuary cities and no immigrants could be deported. That and no bail for repeat criminals was the end for Biden and the Dems. They would not allow the bad apples to be vetted and deported. Trump had a royal straight flush in this game of hold 'em. An inexperienced Vice President Kamala Harris only added to the pot. Trump got elected and decided to deport everyone. All those righteous people are now thrown in with the criminals. These uprisings in California are just the beginning. We will soon see violent terrorist operations carried out secretly. People like AOC and City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams are responsible. Fascist Trump is smiling and licking his lips as if he just had a jelly donut. There are no strong Dems to counteract him. We are in big trouble. Michael Malewich Avon-by-the-Sea, N.J.: There were a few letters in yesterday's edition questioning why ICE agents cover their faces. Simple answer: Same reason the protesters do — to avoid discovery. Protesters want to evade arrest and prosecution. ICE agents want to protect their families and selves from retaliation. The liberal justice system would most likely free the criminals while ICE agents face physical retaliation. Robert Stiloski Bronx: Where is the outcry from the left demanding that protesters remove their masks? More importantly, where is their condemnation of the violence and destruction taking place? Those who take part in destructive mobs should be held accountable and required to pay for any damages caused. Even a simple act of assault or resistance against a federal officer can carry up to a year in jail. Enforcing the law consistently is essential to stopping this wave of violence. Al D'Angelo Smithtown, L.I.: Voicer Katherine Raymond agrees with democratic-socialist ideas such as taxing the rich but, like almost all liberals, 'the rich' are anyone making more than her. She shows her hand by questioning how anyone can think a household income of $1 million qualifies as rich. Is she kidding or is this a misprint? Andrew Ross Bronx: As a 48-year Belmont/Little Italy resident, community advocate and 37-year NYC Board of Education/Department of Education educator and parent, it has become abundantly clear that neither Rafael Moure-Punnett, the rest of Bronx Community Board 6, The Belmont BID or, as of yet, any of our local politicians have shown a genuine or active interest in the safety and wellbeing of the children, teenagers or families in our neighborhood in regard to the completely unchecked speeding that has been going on for more than a decade one block from our local elementary, middle and high schools. Despite the Department of Transportation claiming to have done a study in this area, one of their representatives would not provide the time or date they did so, yet insisted that their conclusion had been there was no need for a traffic light on the corner of this highly dangerous intersection. Jeff Vargon Peekskill, N.Y.: To Voicer John Weiss: Wrong you are! On page 24 in Friday's Daily News, there was an article on the 81st anniversary of that momentous day ('WWII vets are still toast of Normandy even 81 years later,' June 6)! I guess it appeared in my paper and no one else's. Steven Bevacqua Pleasantville, N.Y.: To Voicer Nick Smith: My letter wasn't saying that criticism of Israel is always antisemitic, it was more about why Israel is the only country heavily criticized for fighting terrorism. Every year, when Yom Haatzmaut, which is known as Israeli Independence Day, and the Salute to Israel Parade come up, I always hear a bunch of anti-Israel fanatics calling it Nakba Day as an insult. Had the Arabs just accepted the UN Partition Plan back in 1947 rather than attack the Jews that day, there wouldn't be such issues now. As for me living where I do, it was because my father had a major job transfer when I was an infant that brought my family here. If you really believe in giving land back to indigenous groups, then give your property to the Native American tribe that originally lived there. Tal Barzilai Staten Island: So far, everything I have read or seen about Sean 'Diddy' Combs shows that he is rich, controlling and a bully. No matter what, people's lives have been ruined. I hope he can't buy his way out of this. Thomas Bell Bronx: To Voicer Stephanie Revander: You do not disagree with what I said, but how I said it. I could have made my point and saved four words by leaving out 'run-of-the-mill.' In retrospect, I should have stated that while some rapists can be reformed, that does not include those who brutally beat and/or choke their victims unconscious. They should serve life. Richard Warren

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store