Global forest loss hit a record in 2024 as fires raged
The planet lost a record amount of
forests
last year, largely because of
fires
that raged around the world, data shows.
Loss of pristine rainforests
alone reached 6.7 million hectares (16.5 million acres) in 2024, nearly twice as much as in 2023, researchers at the University of Maryland and the World Resources Institute said in an annual update of the state of the world's forests.
The world lost the equivalent of 18 soccer fields of forested land every minute, the researchers estimated.
For the first time since record-keeping began, fires, not agriculture, were the leading cause of rainforest loss, accounting for nearly half of all destruction. Those fires emitted 4.1 gigatons of planet-warming greenhouse gasses, which is more than four times the emissions from air travel in 2023, the researchers said.
READ MORE
Still, land clearing for agriculture, cattle farming and other causes rose by 14 per cent, the sharpest increase in almost a decade.
[
What do changing rainfall patterns mean for the world's nourishing grasslands?
Opens in new window
]
'If this trend continues, it could permanently transform critical natural areas and unleash large amounts of carbon, intensifying climate change and fuelling even more extreme fires,' Peter Potapov, the codirector of the Global Land Analysis and Discovery Lab at the University of Maryland, said in a statement.
Forests do a lot of work to store carbon dioxide, the leading greenhouse gas that is driving climate change. Globally, forests are thought to absorb from the atmosphere more than a quarter of the carbon emissions from human activities every year. Intact tropical forests are especially effective at storing carbon.
Brazil, which has the largest area of tropical forest, accounted for 42 per cent of all tropical primary forest loss in 2024, the data showed. Fires fuelled by the worst drought on record caused 66% of that loss, a more than sixfold increase from 2023. In neighbouring Bolivia, forest loss nearly tripled, as fires initially set to clear land for agriculture turned into huge wildfires because of the severe drought.
Congo and the Republic of Congo also saw their highest levels of forest loss on record, driven by unusually hot and dry conditions. Like the Amazon rainforest, the Congo Basin plays a crucial role in trapping the world's carbon.
Land clearing in Congo has been driven by poverty and a deep reliance on forests for food and energy, as well as ongoing conflict and instability, said Teodyl Nkuintchua of the World Resources Institute Africa.
Researchers at the University of Maryland's lab use satellite imagery to track changes in forest cover. The data is publicly available on the World Resources Institute's Global Forest Watch platform.
In 2021, more than 140 countries agreed to halt and reverse global forest loss by 2030. But of the 20 countries with the largest area of primary forests, 17 have higher losses today than when the agreement was signed, researchers said.
Some forests showed improvements over prior years. Primary forest loss in Indonesia fell by 11 per cent, reversing a steady increase between 2021 and 2023. Forest loss also declined 13 per cent in Malaysia. Researchers said efforts to restore the land, like thinning trees or prescribed burning, helped to curb wildfires, even amid widespread droughts.
Dominick Spracklen, a professor at the School of Earth and Environment at Leeds University who did not work on the report, said the data showed 'an incredibly worrying situation.'
Tropical forests used to be too wet to burn, he said. But as the climate warmed, and as forests degraded from human activity, they were becoming increasingly at risk of fire, he said.
'Last year showed how dangerous the situation has become,' Spracklen said. It also showed how, despite pockets of progress, governments have made little progress toward their pledges to fight deforestation.
The rich nations of the world, in particular, had not yet made good on promises to provide financial support for measures to support tropical forests, he said. 'The survival of everyone in the world depends on it.'
This article originally appeared in
The New York Times
.
2025 The New York Times Company
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
‘I lost everything': Swiss residents in shock after glacier debris buries village of Blatten
Swiss residents were struggling on Thursday to absorb the scale of devastation caused by a huge chunk of glacier that has buried most of their picturesque village, in what scientists suspect is a dramatic example of the impact of climate change on the Alps. A deluge of ice, mud and rock crashed down the mountain on Wednesday, engulfing some 90 per cent of the village of Blatten. Its 300 residents had already been evacuated earlier in May after part of the mountain behind the Birch Glacier began to crumble. However, rescue teams with search dogs were still scouring the area on Thursday for a missing 64-year-old man after an initial scan with thermal drones found nothing. As the Swiss army closely monitored the situation, some experts warned of the risks of flooding as vast mounds of debris almost two kilometres across were clogging the path of the River Lonza, causing a huge lake to swell amid the wreckage. READ MORE 'I don't want to talk just now, I lost everything yesterday. I hope you understand,' said one middle-aged woman from Blatten, declining to give her name as she sat alone in front of a church in the neighbouring village of Wiler. The scene on Thursday after the huge Birch Glacier collapsed the day before and destroyed the evacuated small village of Blatten in the Swiss Alps. Photograph: Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images Nearby, the road ran along the valley before ending abruptly at the mass of mud and debris now blanketing her own village. Just a few roofs poked up through the sea of sludge. A thin cloud of dust hung in the air over the Kleines Nesthorn Mountain where the rockslide occurred, while a helicopter buzzed overhead. Martin Henzen, another Blatten resident, said he was still trying to process what had occurred and did not want to speak for others in the village, saying only: 'Most are calm, but they're obviously affected.' They had been making preparations for some kind of natural disaster but 'not for this scenario', he added, referring to the scale of destruction. But the immediate dangers might not be over. 'The water from the River Lonza cannot flow down the valley because there is an enormous plug,' Raphael Mayoraz, a cantonal geologist, told Swiss national broadcaster SRF. 'The worst case scenario is possible flooding.' Up to one million cubic meters of water are accumulating daily as a result of the debris damming up the river, said Christian Huggel, a professor of environment and climate at the University of Zurich. Matthias Ebener, a spokesman for local authorities, said some residents of neighbouring villages had been relocated as a precaution. The incident has revived concern about the impact of rising temperatures on Alpine permafrost, which has long frozen gravel and boulders in place, creating new mountain hazards. For years, the Birch Glacier has been creeping down the mountainside, pressured by shifting debris near the summit. Matthias Huss, head of Glacier Monitoring in Switzerland, pointed to the likely influence of climate change in loosening the rock mass in the permafrost zone, which triggered this week's collapse. 'Unexpected things happen at places that we have not seen for hundreds of years, most probably due to climate change,' he said. − Reuters
Irish Times
5 days ago
- Irish Times
Global temperatures could break heat record in next five years
There is an 80 per cent chance that global temperatures will break at least one annual heat record in the next five years, raising the risk of extreme droughts, floods and forest fires, a new report by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) has shown. For the first time, the data also indicated a small likelihood that before 2030, the world could experience a year that is 2 degrees hotter than the preindustrial era, a possibility scientists described as 'shocking'. Coming after the hottest 10 years ever measured, the latest medium-term global climate update highlights the growing threat to human health, national economies and natural landscapes unless people stop burning oil, gas, coal and trees. The update, which synthesises short-term weather observations and long-term climate projections, said there was a 70 per cent chance that five-year average warming for 2025-2029 will be more than 1.5 degrees above preindustrial levels. READ MORE This would put the world perilously close to breaking the most ambitious target of the Paris Agreement, an international climate change treaty, though that goal is based on an average over 20 years. It also reported an 86 per cent likelihood that 1.5 degrees would be passed in at least one of the next five years, up from 40 per cent in the 2020 report. In 2024, the 1.5-degree threshold was breached on an annual basis for the first time – an outcome that was considered implausible in any of the five-year predictions before 2014. Last year was the hottest in the 175-year observational record. Underscoring how rapidly the world is warming, even 2 degrees is now appearing as a statistical possibility in the latest update, which is compiled by 220 ensemble members from models contributed by 15 different institutes, including the UK's Met Office, Barcelona Supercomputing Centre, the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, and Deutscher Wetterdienst. The likelihood of 2 degrees before 2030 is tiny – about 1 per cent – and would require a convergence of multiple warming factors, such as a strong El Niño and positive Arctic Oscillation, but it was previously considered impossible in a five-year time frame. 'It is shocking that 2C is plausible,' said Adam Scaife of the Met Office, which played a leading role in compiling the data. 'It has come out as only 1 per cent in the next five years but the probability will increase as the climate warms.' The impacts will not fall equally. Arctic winters are predicted to warm 3.5 times faster than the global average, partly because sea ice is melting, which means snow falls directly into the ocean rather than forming a layer on the surface to reflect the sun's heat back into space. The Amazon rainforest is predicted to suffer more droughts while south Asia, the Sahel and northern Europe, including the UK, will see more rain. The Met Office's Leon Hermanson, who led the production of the report, said 2025 is likely to be one of the three warmest years on record. Chris Hewitt, director of climate services at the WMO, described a 'worrying picture' for heatwaves and human health. However, he said it was still not too late to limit warming if fossil fuel emissions are cut. 'We must take climate action,' he said. '1.5C is not inevitable.' – Guardian
Irish Times
24-05-2025
- Irish Times
Sorry, kids. We blew your climate budget - but we really love our SUVs
With every breath you take today, some of the carbon dioxide you breathe in possibly was emitted to the atmosphere several centuries ago. True, an infinitesimally small contribution – but one that reminds us that some of the greenhouse gases we emit today will still be around, trapping the Earth's heat, cent far into the distant future. Some have shorter lifetimes. Methane, for example, which constitutes 30 per cent of Irish greenhouse gas emissions, produces its intense warming effect 80 times greater than CO2 over 20 years. But it doesn't stop there, as much of it then converts to CO2, which joins the long term store of that gas for centuries. Those who would have you believe that the warming effect of methane emissions disappear after a decade or so are simply wrong. It matters not to the atmosphere whether that methane has come from a dairy cow or a leaking gas pipeline. It all ends up in the atmospheric reservoir of greenhouse gases for future generations to cope with. So decisions made today regarding our emissions have very long-term consequences for those who come after us. It also confirms that there is no turning back the dial in terms of the warming effect of gases already emitted. No feasible removal technology exists at the scale and deployment level to get us out of our predicament over the next few decades. This means that there is only a certain amount of additional emissions that the world can add to the atmosphere before trigger points of warming and potential tipping points of climate dislocation are inevitable. [ You'd be genuinely mad to buy an SUV unless you need it - just look at latest climate and safety figures ] For a 50-50 chance of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels, the remaining global budget at the beginning of this year was estimated to be 235 billion tonnes of CO2. This will be used up in around six years at current rates of emission. The best we can do is buy time by radical cuts in emissions. READ MORE What is Ireland's fair share of this remaining budget? How should countries that have benefited from burning fossil fuels since the industrial revolution do in any allocation, compared with developing countries that have only recently started emitting significant amounts of greenhouse gases? Ireland has sought to address these issues in its climate legislation and its adherence to the Paris Agreement of 2015 by a system of legally binding five-yearly carbon budgets. The most recent update of these has been recommended to the Minister for the Environment by the Climate Change Advisory Council. These limit national emissions to 295, 200 and 160 million tonnes for each of the five year periods 2021-25, 2026-30 and 2031-35 respectively. Before taking these limits to the Oireachtas for approval, the Minister is seeking public submissions on them to be made before June 4th. It is an opportunity for citizens to express their views on this critical intergenerational issue. These new carbon budgets were required to be formulated in compliance with the Climate Action and Low Carbon Development (Amendment) Act 2021, which was passed overwhelmingly, and enthusiastically supported by the two major parties in government today. This Act also requires consistency with Article 2.2 of the Paris Agreement, which requires governments to implement their climate actions to 'reflect equity and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of different national circumstances.' This convoluted phrase essentially brings us back to the issue of fairness. What is fair for a rich country like Ireland to claim in terms of the remaining global carbon budget? Has this principle been observed in formulating the new round of carbon budgets? [ What do changing rainfall patterns mean for the world's nourishing grasslands? Opens in new window ] In its first report in 2021 advising the minister on the design of the original carbon budgets (2021-2030) the Climate Change Advisory Council produced a reasoned justification of how the budgets represented a fair and equitable contribution to meeting the needs of Paris 2.2. But in the latest iteration, this aspect is completely missing. Only a temperature criterion is offered regarding compliance with the Paris objective of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees, without any significant consideration of equity/fairness. This raises important legal issues as to the extent to which the required consistency with an international treaty is being observed. For a nation with a proud record of supporting less well-off countries in the Global South, ignoring a basic tenet of climate justice is unethical and selfish. It's rather like saying we will grab an unfair share of the remaining carbon budget and expect poorer countries to accommodate us by picking up the slack – the same countries that will also suffer more adverse climate consequences. The reality is that we in Ireland have already – or are close to having – exhausted our fair share of the dwindling global carbon budget. We are now entering carbon debt territory to the rest of the world. This is not an academic exercise – we are disproportionately contributing to the climate disasters of the present and future beyond our shores. This is not a comfortable situation to be in. What will you say to your children and grandchildren? 'Sorry, kids, we opted to plunder your legacy to sustain our comfortable lifestyles in the 2020s. We wanted to keep our SUVs, further intensify our agriculture, and continue subsidising fossil fuels to the extent of €4.7 billion annually. Our political leaders facilitated us at every stage as they prioritised holding on to power. Yes, we did know that blowing your legacy condemns everyone here in Ireland to future catastrophic flooding, heatwaves, droughts and storms. It's tough, but do the best you can.' John Sweeney is emeritus professor in the Irish Climate Analysis and Research Units (Icarus) at the department of geography at Maynooth University
