‘I lost everything': Swiss residents in shock after glacier debris buries village of Blatten
Swiss residents were struggling on Thursday to absorb the scale of devastation caused by a huge chunk of glacier that has buried most of their picturesque village, in what scientists suspect is a dramatic example of the impact of climate change on the Alps.
A deluge of ice, mud and rock crashed down the mountain on Wednesday, engulfing some 90 per cent of the village of Blatten. Its 300 residents had already been evacuated earlier in May after part of the mountain behind the Birch Glacier began to crumble.
However, rescue teams with search dogs were still scouring the area on Thursday for a missing 64-year-old man after an initial scan with thermal drones found nothing.
As the Swiss army closely monitored the situation, some experts warned of the risks of flooding as vast mounds of debris almost two kilometres across were clogging the path of the River Lonza, causing a huge lake to swell amid the wreckage.
READ MORE
'I don't want to talk just now, I lost everything yesterday. I hope you understand,' said one middle-aged woman from Blatten, declining to give her name as she sat alone in front of a church in the neighbouring village of Wiler.
The scene on Thursday after the huge Birch Glacier collapsed the day before and destroyed the evacuated small village of Blatten in the Swiss Alps. Photograph: Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images
Nearby, the road ran along the valley before ending abruptly at the mass of mud and debris now blanketing her own village. Just a few roofs poked up through the sea of sludge.
A thin cloud of dust hung in the air over the Kleines Nesthorn Mountain where the rockslide occurred, while a helicopter buzzed overhead.
Martin Henzen, another Blatten resident, said he was still trying to process what had occurred and did not want to speak for others in the village, saying only: 'Most are calm, but they're obviously affected.'
They had been making preparations for some kind of natural disaster but 'not for this scenario', he added, referring to the scale of destruction.
But the immediate dangers might not be over.
'The water from the River Lonza cannot flow down the valley because there is an enormous plug,' Raphael Mayoraz, a cantonal geologist, told Swiss national broadcaster SRF. 'The worst case scenario is possible flooding.'
Up to one million cubic meters of water are accumulating daily as a result of the debris damming up the river, said Christian Huggel, a professor of environment and climate at the University of Zurich.
Matthias Ebener, a spokesman for local authorities, said some residents of neighbouring villages had been relocated as a precaution.
The incident has revived concern about the impact of rising temperatures on Alpine permafrost, which has long frozen gravel and boulders in place, creating new mountain hazards.
For years, the Birch Glacier has been creeping down the mountainside, pressured by shifting debris near the summit.
Matthias Huss, head of Glacier Monitoring in Switzerland, pointed to the likely influence of climate change in loosening the rock mass in the permafrost zone, which triggered this week's collapse.
'Unexpected things happen at places that we have not seen for hundreds of years, most probably due to climate change,' he said. − Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Scientists accuse Ireland and New Zealand of using ‘accounting trick' to justify livestock emissions
Leading climate scientists have accused politicians in New Zealand and Ireland of using an 'accounting trick' to back their sheep and cattle industries, warning their support for methane-emitting livestock could undermine global efforts to fight climate change . In an open letter shared with the Financial Times, 26 climate scientists from around the world warned that New Zealand's proposed new methane targets risk setting a dangerous precedent. Scientists have separately raised concerns about Ireland's approach. Governments with large livestock sectors, including those of Ireland and New Zealand, are increasingly using a new method for calculating methane's effect on climate change, which estimates its contribution to warming based on how emissions are changing relative to a baseline. This differs from the long-established approach, which compares the total warming impact of a given mass of methane to the same mass of CO₂ over a 100-year period. READ MORE Proponents argue the newer method, known as global warming potential star (GWP*), better reflects methane's shortlived nature in the atmosphere compared to the long-lasting effects of CO₂. But scientists warn that some governments are misapplying it to justify 'no additional warming' targets, which allow emissions to remain flat rather than decline — potentially enabling high levels of methane emissions and climate damage to continue. 'It's like saying 'I'm pouring 100 barrels of pollution into this river, and it's killing life. If I then go and pour just 90 barrels, then I should get credited for that',' said Paul Behrens, global professor of environmental change at Oxford university and a signatory of the letter. Drew Shindell, professor of climate science at Duke University and another signatory, said assessing future emissions purely in terms of the difference from current levels can amount to an 'accounting trick' when misused. That 'lets you off the hook, and 'grandfathers in' any emissions that are already going on', he said. New Zealand and Ireland are among the world's highest per capita agricultural methane emitters, largely due to their export-focused meat and dairy industries. In New Zealand, agriculture accounts for nearly half of total greenhouse gas emissions, primarily from livestock. Ireland's agriculture sector is its largest emitter, with dairy cows producing significantly more methane per animal than beef cattle. The scientists' letter argues the approach preferred by Dublin and Wellington could set a precedent, allowing other countries to justify minimal reductions in methane emissions and jeopardising commitments under the 2015 Paris Agreement as well as the Global Methane Pledge, which was launched in 2021. Paul Price, a climate change researcher at Dublin City University, said Ireland needs sharp near-term cuts in agricultural methane to have any chance of limiting warming to 1.5°C, as called for under the Paris Agreement. Instead, he said, the country is expanding production — 'exactly the opposite' of what's needed. While herd sizes have declined elsewhere in Europe, the number of dairy cows in Ireland has increased over the past 15 years, according to the country's state agricultural research agency. New Zealand is expected to formalise new methane targets later this year, following a government-commissioned review suggesting reductions of 14 to 24 per cent by 2050 would suffice under the 'no additional warming' goal. This is lower than the 35-47 per cent cuts recommended by the country's Climate Change Commission. The governments of Ireland and New Zealand did not respond to requests for comment. Myles Allen, professor of geosystem science at Oxford university's physics department and one of the scientists behind GWP*, said governments — not scientists — must decide whether farmers should undo past warming from herd growth. He supported separate targets for methane and CO₂, calling the older approach 'a dodgy speedometer' that overstated the warming impact of constant methane emissions and was slow to reflect the impact of changes. But scientists behind the letter said that the weaker methane target could act as a tool to justify richer and higher-emitting countries failing to lead the way in cutting emissions. 'If you're a rich farmer that happens to have a lot of cows, then you can keep those cows forever,' said Shindell. This approach 'penalises anybody who's not already a big player in agriculture', including 'poor farmers in Africa that are trying to feed a growing population'. —Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Forget hope. Be a hopeful pessimist instead
Pope Francis was a nice fella, but was he wrong about hope? Diagnosing the problems of the modern world, he argued that what we need more than anything today is belief in a better future. Yet many of the worst actors globally are infused with overconfidence, or excessive optimism. Hope itself appears to have become an impediment to tackling urgent challenges. Action on climate change is weakened by a general hope technology will come to the rescue. European defence against Russia is undermined by a hazy belief Vladimir Putin will metamorphose into a peacemaker. Dealing with Ireland's housing crisis is crippled by a faith in the same old policies. I've lost track of the number of people who said in the wake of Donald Trump's election as US president 'ah, sure, he mightn't be so bad'. And then there's the irrational exuberance surrounding artificial intelligence , with governments now tending to see the glass as half full regarding this potentially cataclysmic technology. Not for nothing is the biography of OpenAI boss Sam Altman called The Optimist. Philosophers have long discussed the paradoxical nature of hope. READ MORE 'Only one thing is more stupid than absolute pessimism and that is absolute optimism,' said Albert Camus. His thinking on the matter was informed by a conundrum that also troubled Pope Francis: Why are people so indifferent to the suffering of others? Francis described indifference as 'the opposite of love', and believed it was a much more common evil in human affairs than hate. Camus, who was active in the French resistance against the Nazis, was also deeply troubled by political apathy and saw it as essentially anti-love. Modern man 'fornicated and read the papers', Camus wrote in a damning assessment of our unmotivated condition. Francis saw hope as the answer to indifference. 'It is often said that 'so long as there is life, there is hope', but the truth, if anything, is the opposite: it is hope that keeps life going, protects it, takes care of it, helps it to grow,' he wrote. Camus was more ambivalent about optimism, and argued pessimism could be a more powerful force against inertia, what he called 'man's strongest temptation'. He was particularly wary of ideological hope in 'some great idea' – be it religious or secular – that deflected us from reality. 'We find in his [Camus's] pessimism a clearsightedness that cuts through all the subterfuges and evasions available in his time to the beating core of his activism: that we must do what must be done, for reasons of justice and solidarity – because we owe it to our fellow human beings to prevent their suffering as best we can ... Camus proposes a fierce philosophy of action that is as bold as it is stark, stripped from any confidence of victory,' philosopher Mara Van der Lugt writes in a new book, Hopeful Pessimism. [ Don't dismiss Peig Sayers. Her stoic folk wisdom has plenty to offer today Opens in new window ] Camus's wariness of hope seems well founded when considering the utopian thinking of today's tech moguls. Elon Musk , the world's richest man, dreams of occupying Mars and re-engineering democracy. And to achieve this goal, we need less – not more – concern for the suffering of our fellow human beings. 'The fundamental weakness of western civilisation is empathy. The empathy exploit. They're exploiting a bug in western civilisation, which is the empathy response,' the multi-billionaire whined on the Joe Rogan podcast earlier this year. For utopians like Musk, human solidarity interferes with grand visions. So what is the right approach to hope? One way of resolving the conundrum is by definitions. Hope can be defined as either positive thinking or constructive thinking. One is more passive than the other. Optimism can be defined as a belief in a positive outcome. It has a faith element, and potentially carries higher risks and rewards. Studies show optimists live longer but are also more likely to take risks. 'The evidence suggests that optimism is widespread, stubborn and costly,' the psychologist Daniel Kahneman said. He had in mind particularly the optimism around public projects, and how spending estimates on infrastructure were always pitched towards the most hopeful end of the spectrum. Hello National Children's Hospital . Then there is utopianism, which can be defined as an ideological attachment to progress or some idealised future. [ Could there be good reason to believe in life after death? Opens in new window ] So defined, it's always good to have some hope. Treat optimism with caution and be very wary of utopianism. Van der Lugt resolves the matter in a different way, saying we should strive to become 'hopeful pessimists'. This aims to take the best of what optimism and pessimism both have to offer. It has the advantage of drawing us away from self-centred hope, and towards the responsibilities we have to our fellow human beings and the wider world. 'If anything, the pessimists have taught me this: with eyes full of that darkness there can still be this strange shattering openness, like a door cracked open, for the good to make its entry into life. Since all things are uncertain, so too is the future, and so there is always the possibility of change for better as there is for worse,' writes Van der Lugt. An exclusive focus on hope can lead us towards passivity and indifference. Better that we are hopeful pessimists who, as Van der Lugt puts it, 'strive for change without certainties, without expecting anything from our efforts other than the knowledge that we have done what we are called upon to do as moral agents in a time of change'.
Irish Times
5 days ago
- Irish Times
‘I lost everything': Swiss residents in shock after glacier debris buries village of Blatten
Swiss residents were struggling on Thursday to absorb the scale of devastation caused by a huge chunk of glacier that has buried most of their picturesque village, in what scientists suspect is a dramatic example of the impact of climate change on the Alps. A deluge of ice, mud and rock crashed down the mountain on Wednesday, engulfing some 90 per cent of the village of Blatten. Its 300 residents had already been evacuated earlier in May after part of the mountain behind the Birch Glacier began to crumble. However, rescue teams with search dogs were still scouring the area on Thursday for a missing 64-year-old man after an initial scan with thermal drones found nothing. As the Swiss army closely monitored the situation, some experts warned of the risks of flooding as vast mounds of debris almost two kilometres across were clogging the path of the River Lonza, causing a huge lake to swell amid the wreckage. READ MORE 'I don't want to talk just now, I lost everything yesterday. I hope you understand,' said one middle-aged woman from Blatten, declining to give her name as she sat alone in front of a church in the neighbouring village of Wiler. The scene on Thursday after the huge Birch Glacier collapsed the day before and destroyed the evacuated small village of Blatten in the Swiss Alps. Photograph: Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images Nearby, the road ran along the valley before ending abruptly at the mass of mud and debris now blanketing her own village. Just a few roofs poked up through the sea of sludge. A thin cloud of dust hung in the air over the Kleines Nesthorn Mountain where the rockslide occurred, while a helicopter buzzed overhead. Martin Henzen, another Blatten resident, said he was still trying to process what had occurred and did not want to speak for others in the village, saying only: 'Most are calm, but they're obviously affected.' They had been making preparations for some kind of natural disaster but 'not for this scenario', he added, referring to the scale of destruction. But the immediate dangers might not be over. 'The water from the River Lonza cannot flow down the valley because there is an enormous plug,' Raphael Mayoraz, a cantonal geologist, told Swiss national broadcaster SRF. 'The worst case scenario is possible flooding.' Up to one million cubic meters of water are accumulating daily as a result of the debris damming up the river, said Christian Huggel, a professor of environment and climate at the University of Zurich. Matthias Ebener, a spokesman for local authorities, said some residents of neighbouring villages had been relocated as a precaution. The incident has revived concern about the impact of rising temperatures on Alpine permafrost, which has long frozen gravel and boulders in place, creating new mountain hazards. For years, the Birch Glacier has been creeping down the mountainside, pressured by shifting debris near the summit. Matthias Huss, head of Glacier Monitoring in Switzerland, pointed to the likely influence of climate change in loosening the rock mass in the permafrost zone, which triggered this week's collapse. 'Unexpected things happen at places that we have not seen for hundreds of years, most probably due to climate change,' he said. − Reuters
