Michelle Obama frets young women are not allowed the unearned confidence young men have
During Wednesday's episode of her "IMO" podcast, which she co-hosts with her brother Craig Robinson, Obama spoke to "Seinfeld" and "Veep" star Julia Louis-Dreyfus about how she wishes younger women had the unbridled confidence that young men in their 30s have — arguing that when women finally start feeling good about themselves, they're older and less visible to society.
"We're always hedging, you know, because in the back of our minds, we weren't raised with the certainty of maleness that, you know – kind of the confidence that young men in their 30s have, which they haven't earned. They just have it," she told the actress.
"You know, we don't start feeling that and owning that until our 50s and 60s, at a time when we start to be treated as invisible in society," Obama added.
Michelle Obama Says She 'Grew Up Grateful,' But Kids Today Are Less So
The topic came up with Louis-Dreyfus mentioning how she has become friends with 87-year-old actress Jane Fonda in recent years and has marveled at her "extraordinary" life that isn't in the spotlight as much anymore.
Read On The Fox News App
"And I was so struck by the breadth of her life, the profundity – she's done so many different things. And it got me thinking about, wow, there's so many women out there that are older – I mean, at the time she was 85, I believe – that are older that have had these extraordinary lives, and we're not hearing from them."
Obama suggested this was a societal issue, replying, "We've talked about this a lot, how women, as we age, we get pushed out of the picture."
"Yeah, it's incredible," the "Seinfeld" actress replied.
Obama Isn't Coming To Rescue Democrats In Desperate Need Of Leadership: Ny Times Columnist
Obama went on to say, now that she's older, she finally feels sure of herself and confident in her wisdom — a mindset she said she couldn't experience when she was younger.
"Now that I'm 60… this is really the first time in my life where I feel completely me, and I can absolutely embrace my wisdom," she said. "I mean, because I think we, as women, we spend most of our lives saying, 'Well, maybe I don't know what I'm talking about.' We qualify everything,"
"We apologize," Louis-Dreyfus interjected.
"We apologize. We don't want to put our opinions on the table because maybe we're wrong," Obama continued.
Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture
Since the start of her podcast with Robinson, Obama has remained largely apolitical, choosing to focus more on lifestyle topics and questions about family and personal relationships.
In a May episode with pop star Beyoncé Knowles' mom, Tina Knowles, Obama urged parents to resist the urge to be friends with their kids as they're growing up.
"And so many people are trying to be their kids' friends, and they think that that makes you closer," Obama said. "But let me tell you, I was not my children's friend. I love them deeply. There was respect. And, you know, for those of you trying to be friends with your kids, our kids love us just as much as adults. In fact, the relationship, I think, is even closer because now they've earned my friendship. Now we can be friends. Now, maybe you know something."
In a late June episode with social psychologist and author Jonathan Haidt, Obama stressed the need for parents to limit their kids' time on smartphones and social media.
"The bottom line is that we've got to get tougher. We've got to get more resilient for our kids. Because I know time and time again that a lot of parents do what's easy for them, you know, and not necessarily what's best for the kid," she continued.Original article source: Michelle Obama frets young women are not allowed the unearned confidence young men have
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
36 minutes ago
- USA Today
Noem defends policies amid reports FEMA didn't answer thousands of flood survivor calls
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Sunday defended the administration's response to the disastrous July 4 floods in Texas, as its management of the Federal Emergency Management Agency receives scrutiny. During her appearance on NBC's 'Meet the Press with Kristen Welker' on July 13, Noem denied reporting from The New York Times that found the agency struggled to answer calls from survivors because call center contracts had not been extended. The outlet reported on July 11 that nearly two-thirds of calls to its disaster assistance hotline went unanswered two days after the flooding, as search and rescue efforts continued. Answer rates dipped to 35.8% on July 6 and 15.9% on July 7, according to the report. Live updates: 'Code Red': Texas recovery effort halted amid new flash flood fears. 'No employees were off of work,' Noem said when asked directly about the reporting. 'Every one of them was answering calls, so false reporting, fake news, and it's discouraging. It's discouraging that during this time, when we have such a loss of life and so many people's lives have turned upside down, that people are playing politics with this because the response time was immediate.' The NYT reported that the lack of responsiveness was due to the agency firing hundreds of contractors at call centers. At the same time, contracts were not renewed to maintain staffing levels needed to address the crisis due to a new policy instituted by Noem. The mandate requires that the DHS Secretary must personally approve expenses exceeding $100,000, and she did not renew the contracts until July 10, five days after they expired and six days after the deadly flooding on July 4. Welker asked Noem to respond to the reports that on July 7, only 15.9% of calls made to the hotline were answered. 'These contracts were in place, and those people were in those call centers, and they were picking up the phone and answering these calls from these individuals,' Noem said. 'So, that report needs to be validified.' Map of damage: See how the Texas floods unfolded and why Camp Mystic was in a hazardous location The death toll has risen to 129 on Saturday, including more than three dozen children. At least 27 campers and counselors from Camp Mystic, an all-girls Christian camp, are among the victims. Efforts continue for more than nine days to recover the remains of those missing, with officials saying there are more than 160 people unaccounted for across the state. With immediate search and rescue now shifting to finding and identifying those who have perished, attention is shifting to various local, state and federal officials and governments, as questions mount over disaster response and warning systems. More: 'Unhinged': Democrats are furious Sen. Alex Padilla was hauled out of Noem briefing USA TODAY reported on July 7 that the state's Division of Emergency Management denied requests from the hardest-hit region of Kerr County for a $1 million grant to improve its flood warning system. In the days following, CNN reported that new cost control rules on contracts enforced by Noem slowed FEMA's response in Texas, with DHS disputing the report. On Friday, as President Donald Trump surveyed the extensive damage in Texas, a group of Democratic lawmakers sent letters seeking 'answers' from FEMA, the Department of Commerce Inspector General and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which oversees the weather service. 'The tragic loss of life underscores the urgent need to understand what contributed to this disaster and how we can better prepare for future disasters,' their letter to NOAA reads. 'Rigorous oversight is needed not only to provide answers to grieving communities in Central Texas, but also to save lives in future extreme weather events.' Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Noem defends conditions at ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detention facility
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended the conditions at the 'Alligator Alcatraz' facility in Florida after Democrats made claims of 'inhumane' treatment of the detained migrants. In an interview on NBC News's 'Meet the Press,' moderator Kristen Welker asked Noem about claims from Democrats that, in the facility, more than 30 people are 'stuffed into a jail cell' and that the detainees 'get their drinking water and they brush their teeth from the same place where they go to the bathroom.' 'Our detention centers at the federal level are held to a higher standard than most local or state centers and even federal prisons. The standards are extremely high,' Noem responded, noting the facility is 'state run.' Noem also pushed back on the term 'jail cells,' calling them, instead, 'secure facilities' that are 'held to the highest levels of what the federal government requires for detention facilities.' Noem suggested that there is a double standard in the way Democrats react to facilities under the Trump administration compared to past Democratic administrations. 'I wish they would have said that back during the Biden administration and back when Democrats were in the White House and they were piling people on top of each other on cement floors and literally didn't have two feet to move,' Noem said about claims that the migrants are in 'cages' in the facility. 'They never did that, and that's why this politics has to end.' Noem said she would take cameras in the facility to 'show people what these facilities look like.' 'Because if you compare them to what happened under the Biden administration and under the Obama administration, these centers are at the highest levels,' she continued. 'And they're even higher than what our federal prison standards are or state or local often are.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Beautiful' or 'Ugly,' Trump's big bill shapes the battle for House control in 2026 midterms
WASHINGTON (AP) — Debate over President Donald Trump's sweeping budget-and-policy package is over on Capitol Hill. Now the argument goes national. From the Central Valley of California to Midwestern battlegrounds and suburban districts of the northeast, the new law already is shaping the 2026 midterm battle for control of the House of Representatives. The outcome will set the tone for Trump's final two years in the Oval Office. Democrats need a net gain of three House seats to break the GOP's chokehold on Washington and reestablish a power center to counter Donald Trump. There's added pressure to flip the House given that midterm Senate contests are concentrated in Republican-leaning states, making it harder for Democrats to reclaim that chamber. As Republicans see it, they've now delivered broad tax cuts, an unprecedented investment in immigration enforcement and new restraints on social safety net programs. Democrats see a law that rolls back health insurance access and raises costs for middle-class Americans while cutting taxes mostly for the rich, curtailing green energy initiatives and restricting some workers' organizing rights. 'It represents the broken promise they made to the American people,' said Rep. Suzan DelBene, a Washington Democrat who chairs the party's House campaign arm. 'We're going to continue to hold Republicans accountable for this vote.' Parties gear up for a fight Whether voters see it that way will be determined on a district-by-district level, but the battle will be more intense in some places than others. Among the 435 House districts, only 69 contests were decided by less than 10 percentage points in the 2024 general election. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has so far identified 26 Democratic-held seats it must defend vigorously, along with 35 GOP-held seats it believes could be ripe to flip. Republicans' campaign arm, the National Republican Congressional Committee, has so far listed 18 GOP incumbents as priorities, plus two districts opened by retirements. There are a historically low number of so-called crossover districts: Only 13 Democrats represent districts Trump carried in 2024, while just three Republicans serve districts Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris carried. Both committees are busy recruiting challengers and open-seat candidates and more retirements could come, so the competitive map will evolve. Still, there are clusters of districts guaranteed to influence the national result. California, despite its clear lean to Democrats statewide, has at least nine House districts expected to be up for grabs: three in the Central Valley and six in southern California. Six are held by Democrats, three by the GOP. Pennsylvania features four districts that have been among the closest national House races for several consecutive cycles. They include a suburban Philadelphia seat represented by Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, one of just two House Republicans to vote against Trump's bill and one of the three GOP lawmakers from a district Harris won. Fitzpatrick cited the Medicaid cuts. Vice President JD Vance plans on Wednesday to be in Republican Rep. Rob Bresnahan's northwest Pennsylvania district to tout the GOP package. Bresnahan's seat is a top Democratic target. Iowa and Wisconsin, meanwhile, feature four contiguous GOP-held districts in farm-heavy regions where voters could be swayed by fallout from Trump's tariffs. Democrats fight to define the GOP Beyond bumper-sticker labels – Trump's preferred 'Big Beautiful Bill' versus Democrats' 'Big Ugly Bill' retort – the 900-page law is, in fact, an array of policies with varying impact. Democrats hammer Medicaid and food assistance cuts, some timed to take full effect only after the 2026 midterms, along with Republicans' refusal to extend tax credits to some people who obtained health insurance through the Affordable Care Act. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law; 3 million more would not qualify for food stamps, also known as SNAP benefits. 'Folks will die here in Louisiana and in other parts of the country,' House Minority Leader Jeffries warned last week during a town hall in Republican Speaker Mike Johnson's home state of Louisiana. Jeffries singled out vulnerable Republicans like California Rep. David Valadao, who represents a heavily agricultural Central Valley district where more than half the population is eligible for the joint state-federal insurance program. California allows immigrants with legal status and those who are undocumented to qualify for Medicaid, so not all Medicaid recipients are voters. But the program helps finance the overall health care system, including nursing homes and hospitals. Republicans highlight the law's tightened work requirements for Medicaid enrollees. They argue it's a popular provision that will strengthen the program. 'I voted for this bill because it does preserve the Medicaid program for its intended recipients — children, pregnant women, the disabled, and elderly,' Valadao said. 'I know how important the program is for my constituents.' Republicans hope voter s see lower taxes The law includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. It makes permanent existing rates and brackets approved during Trump's first term. Republicans and their allies have hammered vulnerable Democrats for 'raising costs' on American households by opposing the bill. GOP campaign aides point to the popularity of individual provisions: boosting the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 (some families at lower income levels would not get the full credit), new deductions on tip and overtime income and auto loans; and a new deduction for older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. 'Everyone will have more take home pay. They'll have more jobs and opportunity,' Johnson said in a Fox News Sunday interview. 'The economy will be doing better and we'll be able to point to that as the obvious result of what we did.' Democrats note that the biggest beneficiaries of Trump's tax code are wealthy Americans and corporations. Pairing that with safety net cuts, Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz concluded, 'The cruelty is the point.' Immigration, meanwhile, was Trump's strongest issue in 2024. NRCC aides say that will continue with the new law's investments in immigration enforcement. Democrats believe the Trump administration has overplayed its hand with its push for mass deportation. Playing the Trump card The president is a titanic variable. Democrats point to 2018, when they notched a 40-seat net gain in House seats to take control away from the GOP. This year, Democrats have enjoyed a double-digit swing in special elections around the country when compared to 2024 presidential results. Similar trends emerged in 2017 after Trump's 2016 victory. Democrats say that reflects voter discontent with Trump once he's actually in charge. Republicans answer that Trump's job approval remains higher at this point than in 2017. But the GOP's effort is further complicated by ongoing realignments: Since Trump's emergence, Democrats have gained affluent white voters -– like those in suburban swing districts -– while Trump has drawn more working-class voters across racial and ethnic groups. But Republicans face a stiffer challenge of replicating Trump's coalition in a midterm election without him on the ballot. Democrats, meanwhile, must corral voters who are not a threat to vote for Republicans but could stay home. Jeffries said he's determined not to let that happen: 'We're going to do everything we can until we end this national nightmare.' __ Editor's note: An earlier version of this story said that there are 34 Republican-held seats Democrats are targeting as of now. This story updates that number to 35. __ Cooper reported from Phoenix. Brook reported from New Orleans. Associated Press reporters Michael Blood in Los Angeles and Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, contributed.
