Lawyers for US man executed by firing squad say bullets mostly missed heart
A man who was put to death last month in South Carolina's second firing squad execution was conscious and likely suffered in extreme pain for as long as a minute after the bullets, meant to quickly stop his heart, struck him lower than expected, according to a pathologist hired by his lawyers.
Advertisement
The lawyers called it a botched execution because they think either the volunteer prison employees who all had live ammunition missed or the target was not placed properly.
An autopsy photo of Mikal Mahdi's torso showed only two distinct wounds at the April 11 execution, according to the pathologist's report, which was filed Thursday with a letter to the state Supreme Court.
Mahdi chose to be executed by firing squad over lethal injection or electrocution in the killing of an off-duty police officer in 2004.
Mikal Mahdi. File photo: South Carolina Department of Corrections via AP
All three guns fired simultaneously and prison officials believe all three bullets hit Mahdi with two of them entering his body at the same spot and following the same path, Corrections Department spokeswoman Chrysti Shane said Thursday. That has happened before when the firing squad team practices its job to fire at the inmate from 4.6 metres (15 feet) away.
Advertisement
A pathologist hired by lawyers for condemned inmates said there was not enough independent evidence from the autopsy – where only one photo of the body was taken and Mahdi's clothes were not examined – to make that conclusion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US Supreme Court sides with woman who says she was demoted because she is straight
The US Supreme Court made it easier on Thursday for people from majority backgrounds such as white or straight individuals to pursue claims alleging workplace 'reverse' discrimination, reviving an Ohio woman's lawsuit claiming she was illegally denied a promotion and demoted because she is heterosexual. Advertisement The justices, in a 9-0 ruling written by liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, threw out a lower court's decision rejecting a civil rights lawsuit by the plaintiff, Marlean Ames, against her employer, Ohio's Department of Youth Services. Ames said she had a gay supervisor when she was passed over for a promotion in favour of a gay woman and demoted, with a pay cut, in favour of a gay man. The dispute centred on how plaintiffs like Ames must try to prove a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on race, religion, national origin and sex – including sexual orientation. Ames challenged a requirement used by some US courts that plaintiffs from majority groups must provide more evidence than minority plaintiffs to make an initial – or 'prima facie' – claim of discrimination under a 1973 Supreme Court ruling that governs the multi-step process employed to resolve such cases. Advertisement These courts include the Cincinnati-based 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled against Ames. They require majority-group plaintiffs to show 'background circumstances' indicating that a defendant accused of workplace bias is 'that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority'.
South China Morning Post
12 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump signs US travel ban targeting 12 nations while limiting entry for 7 others
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation banning individuals from 12 countries from entering the US, reinstating one of the most controversial measures from his first term following an attack in Colorado that targeted an event supporting Israeli hostages. The travel ban announced on Wednesday covers Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The measure also partially limits entry of people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Trump earlier in the week blamed the immigration policies of former President Joe Biden for the presence of the suspect in the Colorado attack. The suspect was an Egyptian who overstayed his visa and wouldn't have been affected by the ban. Witnesses say they saw the suspect use a makeshift flame-thrower and throw an incendiary device in the attack. 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas,' Trump said in a video posted on social media Wednesday. 'We don't want them.' The ban will not apply to those who already have visas, lawful permanent residents of the US or teams travelling for the World Cup or Olympics. Those with special visas to escape persecution in Iran or for assisting the US military effort in Afghanistan are also exempt. In his first term, Trump barred travellers from Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen. Hong Kong students are 'hesitant' to study in the US because of Trump's policies The addition of Afghanistan in this order comes after the Trump administration suspended the US refugee programme and froze federal funding for assistance programmes, including those that provided travel for Afghans who had already been approved to resettle in the US. The move is part of a broader immigration plan to reduce undocumented migration, increase deportations and finish the US-Mexico border wall that Trump started during his first term. In his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump promised to strengthen US borders, focusing on voter worries about crime and rising numbers of migrants. The travel ban is likely to face legal challenges, just as its first-term predecessor did and with many of Trump's other immigration actions during his current White House stint already being litigated in the courts. Trump has vowed to carry out an agenda that offers to test the powers of his office on immigration policy. The first-term travel ban marked a signature moment in Trump's tenure. Trump, in 2017, within days of taking office, issued an order which barred people from seven countries with largely Muslim populations from entering the US for 90 days. The US' broader immigration plan includes finishing the US-Mexico border wall that Trump started during his first term. Photo: AP The move sparked chaos and confusion at airports, protests across the globe and a flood of lawsuits seeking to halt the order, which critics assailed as a 'Muslim ban'. Trump defended the move as necessary for national security and, after judges struck down the initial version. He moved to issue revised orders that altered the list of countries targeted and offered more specifics about the scope of the restrictions in a bid to survive further legal scrutiny. The subsequent changes to the policy eventually led to the US Supreme Court in 2018 upholding the travel ban, with the justices rejecting claims that it targeted Muslims and giving Trump a major legal victory that bolstered a president's broad controls over the nation's borders. Biden – in one of his first acts in office in 2021 – signed his own order ending Trump's travel ban. Trump during the 2024 campaign, though, had vowed to reinstate it and expand the measure to cover refugees from Gaza if elected, and his move delivers on a key plank of his agenda.
South China Morning Post
12 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US president Trump suspends new Chinese and other foreign student visas at Harvard
The administration of United States president Donald Trump has formally barred Harvard University from enrolling international students. The administration has said the institution failed to address national security risks on campus. In a proclamation on Wednesday night, Trump said he would immediately block the Ivy League school from enrolling new international students or exchange visitors. He has also ordered the State Department to review whether the visas of current foreign students should be revoked. The sweeping action came as the Trump administration continued to accuse Harvard of maintaining links with foreign countries, particularly China, which it said posed a national security threat to the United States. 'Hesitant' Hongkongers worry Trump has shattered dreams of studying in US 'The Federal Bureau of Investigation has long warned that foreign adversaries [opponents] and competitors take advantage of easy access to American higher education to, among other things, steal technical information and products, exploit expensive research and development to advance their own ambitions and spread false information for political or other reasons,' the document said. 'Our adversaries, including the People's Republic of China, try to take advantage of American higher education by exploiting the student visa programme for improper purposes and using visiting students to collect information at elite universities in the United States.' The proclamation takes effect immediately and will remain in place for at least six months, according to the White House. The move – along with the State Department's announcement last week that it would 'aggressively' revoke Chinese students' visas – is expected to further deepen tensions between the US and China, whose trade negotiations remain stalled. US president Donald Trump has ramped up his administration's crackdown on higher education. Photo: AFP This is not the first time Chinese students enrolled in advanced science and engineering programmes have been accused of posing a national security threat. Washington has long-standing concerns that Chinese students may be involved in espionage activities to strengthen Beijing's military capabilities. Harvard currently hosts more than 10,000 international students, making up roughly 30 per cent of its student body, including about 2,000 from China. In a statement, Harvard said that Trump's order 'is yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights'. 'Harvard will continue to protect its international students,' it said. More than 1,000 international students in the US have had their visas or legal status revoked The stand-off with Harvard is also part of Trump's broader campaign against elite academic institutions, which began straight after his inauguration in January. Alongside Harvard, other Ivy League institutions like Columbia and Princeton have been under scrutiny for allegedly fostering antisemitism in the wake of widespread pro-Palestinian demonstrations over Gaza. They are now facing substantial federal funding cuts. The showdown with Harvard escalated when the Department of Homeland Security ordered the university to submit detailed records of its international student population – a request the university refused. In response, the department announced in late May that it intended to revoke Harvard's authorisation to enrol international students. Harvard filed a lawsuit challenging the decision, calling the administration's actions politically motivated and damaging to academic freedom. Last week, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order, blocking the revocation from taking effect.
