logo
Google Just Kicked In Hollywood's Trailer Door

Google Just Kicked In Hollywood's Trailer Door

Yahoo16 hours ago

What a difference a year makes…
Not long ago, AI's best attempt at video generation resulted in that cursed clip of Will Smith shoveling spaghetti into his mouth with his four-fingered hands.
But now the world has Google's Veo 3 at its fingertips – the tech titan's latest AI video generation tool. And the results we're seeing are nothing short of astonishing.
InvestorPlace - Stock Market News, Stock Advice & Trading Tips
This shiny new model can generate ultra-realistic, 1080p, synchronized audio-visual content based on a simple text prompt…
'A woman, classical violinist with intense focus, plays a complex, rapid passage from a Vivaldi concerto in an ornate, sunlit baroque hall during a rehearsal. Her bow dances across the strings with virtuosic speed and precision. Audio: Bright, virtuosic violin playing, resonant acoustics of the hall, distant footsteps of crew, conductor's occasional soft count-in (muffled), rustling sheet music.'
And within seconds, there she is, in video so realistic, you can even see individual hairs on her head highlighted by the sun.
She's almost tangible. The music is swelling. And no human lifted a single camera.
What we're witnessing with the launch of Google DeepMind's Veo 3 isn't some gimmicky tech demo or mere novelty for nerds on X. This seems more like the starting pistol for the next great creative-industrial upheaval – and if you're in the business of making or investing in content, it's time to get serious.
Yes, Veo 3 may be limited to eight seconds today. But that's not a wall; it's a runway. And if you've been paying any attention to the exponential trajectory of AI development, you know where this might go next.
Longer clips, then full scenes, entire episodes… and eventually, complete seasons. Perhaps one day, personalized stories crafted in real-time based on what you like to watch.
It's coming – .
This could be the beginning of the end of Hollywood as we know it…
And the start of a new era of AI stock dominance in the content world.
Obviously, this isn't the industry's first attempt at AI-generated video. Runway's Gen-2 was a cool prototype. OpenAI's Sora looked great in a lab. But Veo 3 is different.
It's the first model with:
4K visual quality
fully integrated audio
cinematic camera movement
deep prompt adherence
and, crucially, a launch partner with billions of users and a roadmap to global rollout
In our view, Google has aimed a shotgun full of GPU clusters directly at Hollywood's business model.
And Veo 3 is just the tip of the spear. Behind it are entire pipelines – Gemini-powered plot generators, scriptwriting agents, motion planners, and real-time editors.
Google is compressing the entire TV and film production supply chain into a single generative stack.
Do you know what happens when you take a years-long, $100-million content pipeline and squeeze it down into a GPU-powered prompt that costs pennies?
You break the game…
If you work in video production – or the hundreds of satellite roles orbiting it – AI just kicked in your trailer door with Veo 3.
Think about it. With this quantum leap in AI's video generation capabilities, actors could soon be replaced by photorealistic avatars and voice clones. No need for makeup artists; glam will be digitally rendered in post.
Goodbye, set designers; hello, infinite virtual stages.
Cinematographers? AI models now handle camera movement with humanlike precision.
Now, writers, you're still needed… but you'd better learn to prompt.
This might feel like sci-fi, but it's more so basic economics.
Studios are always hunting for ways to reduce cost and time. And AI doesn't sleep, unionize, forget lines, or demand a four-figure payday.
That's why we expect that over the next five to 10 years, AI will eat the technical backend of filmmaking the way Amazon ate retail – and with the same ruthless cost-efficiency.
The same kinds of players always win when the tech curve steepens: Those who ride the exponential wave instead of trying to fight it.
Take Netflix (NFLX) – Blockbuster killer; once DVD-dealer, now data king in entertainment.
It knows what you watch, when you watch it, what you love, and what you hate. Imagine what an AI script engine could do with all that data.
You're a fan of fictional period romance stories? Netflix's AI could create 10 different versions of the next Bridgerton, testing which hooks you harder – then instantly generate the winner in full.
Or how about Alphabet (GOOGL)?
It runs YouTube and Veo 3 – the delivery pipelines and creative infrastructure. Combine Veo with Gemini and YouTube Studio, and you've got a vertically integrated AI content machine with billions of monetizable eyeballs.
And then there's Meta (META).
It's got LLaMA, Emu, and a raging addiction to immersive content. Just picture Veo-level video generation tailored to your social graph, optimized for infinite scroll, and seamlessly injected into Instagram, Threads, and the Metaverse. Engagement meets hallucination.
And the rest of Hollywood? Well…
Legacy studios, crew-heavy productions, anyone betting their future on union-only sets and hundred-million-dollar shoots… it seems you are on notice. The economics just changed – permanently.
When it comes to AI-native studios that can churn out hyper-targeted content at 1/100th the cost and 100x the speed, there's no competition. And it's not likely that audiences will resist.
Pundits said the same thing about CGI, YouTube, reality TV, TikTok. People don't care how it's made. They care how it feels. And if AI gives them a hit of dopamine, they'll hit 'Next Episode' without a second thought.
This latest AI breakthrough feels a lot like the early 2000s, when Amazon used the internet to undercut brick-and-mortar retail. Lower costs, faster delivery, wider selection. Incumbents laughed… until they went bankrupt.
Remember Sears, JCPenney, K-Mart?
Same script, different industry.
AI is the internet. Veo 3 is Amazon.com. Netflix is Jeff Bezos, sitting atop its throne with a popcorn bucket in hand.
And once one company starts passing cost savings to consumers with cheaper subscriptions, faster content cycles, and more personalization, others have to follow. That's how you get a full-blown economic reset.
Currently, Veo 3 is available to select creators via waitlist — but given Google's track record with rapid deployment, widespread rollout to YouTube creators and enterprise partners could come quickly.
Here's what we think could be next:
Custom AI-generated series and movies tailored to individual users
Interactive stories where the plot evolves based on viewer engagement
Fan-generated shows that rival studio hits
Ad-supported, AI-produced content that costs nothing to stream
Veo 3's launch proved that the AI Content Economy is just around the corner. We are years – not decades – away from this becoming a widespread reality.
So, if you're an investor, go long AI.
This breakthrough tech is eating the whole global economy. Hollywood is just one entree in a seven-course meal.
Buy the platforms, AI chipmakers, infrastructure enablers, and appliers – Alphabet, Meta, Nvidia (NVDA) – and yes, Netflix. These are the architects of the new media world.
Learn to prompt like a boss; curate, direct, and remix. AI is the orchestra, but someone still has to conduct.
And if you're in denial, you might want to check the mirror – and ask Blockbuster how things shook out after ignoring the curve.
AI's industrialization of content creation isn't a theory anymore: it's a living, accelerating disruption. Veo 3 marks the moment when generating Hollywood-quality video no longer requires Hollywood-scale budgets.
And we're just at the starting gate.
Just as streaming upended cable and smartphones reshaped the internet, generative video is about to redefine content itself – who created it, how fast it's made, and who profits. The big studios? Maybe. But more likely, it'll be the AI-native platforms, the chipmakers, and the investors who saw it coming.
And yet, Veo 3 is just one front in a much broader AI revolution. While the world watches digital actors take center stage…
Another trillion-dollar transformation is forming in the wings.
Humanoid robots – what we're calling ''
According to Morgan Stanley (MS), this market could be worth as much as $30 trillion in the coming decades. That's bigger than today's global e-commerce and cloud computing markets combined.
Why? Because humanoid robots won't just generate videos or write code. They'll do the jobs. Real, physical tasks in factories, on farms; in homes, hospitals, and warehouses. Every job the global economy depends on could be automated, accelerated, and made profitable at scale.
And it's all happening faster than most expect.
.
The post Google Just Kicked In Hollywood’s Trailer Door appeared first on InvestorPlace.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Google AI Overviews strike again following the fatal Air India crash
Google AI Overviews strike again following the fatal Air India crash

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Google AI Overviews strike again following the fatal Air India crash

If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. Google said at I/O 2025 that AI Overviews are quite popular with users, but I've always found them to be the worst kind of AI product. Google is forcing AI results on as many Google Search queries as it can just because it can. It's not because users want AI Overviews in search. The separate AI Mode is generative AI in Google Search done the right way. It's a separate tab or an intentional choice from the user to enhance their Search experience with a Gemini-powered chat. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 The reason I don't like the idea of AI Overviews being forced on users aggressively is their well-known problems with accuracy. We've learned the hard way that AI Overviews hallucinate badly. The glue-on-pizza incident won't be forgotten anytime soon. While Google has improved AI Overviews, the AI-powered Search results still make mistakes. The latest one concerns the fatal Air India crash from earlier this week. Some people who rushed to Google Search to find out what happened saw an AI Overview claiming that an Airbus operated by Air India crashed on Thursday, soon after takeoff. Some AI Overviews even mentioned the type of plane, an Airbus A330-243. In reality, it was a Boeing 787. I've said more than once that Google should abandon AI Overviews. The glue-on-pizza hallucinations were one thing. They were funny. Most people probably realized the AI made a mistake. But this week's hallucination is different. It spreads incorrect information about a tragic event, and that can have serious consequences. The last thing we want from genAI products is to be misled by fake news. AI Overviews do exactly that when they hallucinate. It doesn't matter if these issues are rare. One mistake like the one involving the Air India crash is enough to cause harm. Google is showing It was an Airbus aircraft that crushed today in India. how is this being allowed? byu/Economy_Shallot_9166 inartificial This isn't just about Google's reputation. Airbus could be directly impacted. Imagine investors or travelers making decisions based on that search result. Sure, they could seek out real news sources. But not everyone will bother to verify the snippet at the top of the page. Google's disclaimer that 'AI responses may include mistakes' isn't enough. Not everyone notices, or even reads, that fine print. At least Google corrected this hallucination and gave Ars Technica the following statement: As with all Search features, we rigorously make improvements and use examples like this to update our systems. This response is no longer showing. We maintain a high quality bar with all Search features, and the accuracy rate for AI Overviews is on par with other features like Featured Snippets. I'll also point out that not all AI Overviews may have listed Airbus as the crashed plane. Results can vary depending on what you ask and how you phrase it. Some users might have gotten the correct answer on the first try. We don't know how many times the Airbus detail appeared by mistake. AI Overviews might make similar mistakes on topics beyond tragic news events. We have no way of knowing how often they hallucinate, no matter what Google says about accuracy. If you've been following AI developments over the past few years, you probably have a sense of why these hallucinations happen. The AI doesn't think like a human. It might combine details from reports that mention both Airbus and Boeing, then get the facts mixed up. And it's not just AI Overviews. We've seen other genAI tools hallucinate too. Research has even shown that the most advanced ChatGPT models hallucinate more than earlier ones. That's why I always argue with ChatGPT when it fails to give me sources for its claims. But here's the big difference. You can't opt out of AI Overviews. Google has pushed this AI search experience on everyone without first ensuring the AI doesn't hallucinate. AI Mode, by contrast, is a much better use of AI in Search. It can genuinely improve the experience. I'll also add that instead of talking about AI Overviews and their hallucinations, I could be praising a different AI initiative from Google. DeepMind is using AI to predict hurricane forecasts, which could be incredibly helpful. But here we are, focusing on AI Overviews and their errors, because misleading users with AI is a serious problem. Hallucination remains an AI safety issue that nobody has solved yet. Don't Miss: Today's deals: Nintendo Switch games, $5 smart plugs, $150 Vizio soundbar, $100 Beats Pill speaker, more More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the

I don't like my reminders app — so I made my own using Claude 4
I don't like my reminders app — so I made my own using Claude 4

Tom's Guide

time44 minutes ago

  • Tom's Guide

I don't like my reminders app — so I made my own using Claude 4

If I don't write something down, it will be gone from my brain forever. I am the kind of person who needs every date, name, and random bit of trivia noted down, or it will vanish into the abyss. This has resulted in me trying just about every reminder or notes app under the sun. And it's been a pretty hit-and-miss experience. While I've been able to make things work with these off-the-shelf apps, it's still not the exact thing I want. So, when I saw how advanced Anthropic's Claude has become for coding, I thought I'd try something that would have seemed impossible just a year ago: creating my own app entirely via a chatbot. Making an app with an AI chatbot normally requires some knowledge of prompting. It's not quite as simple as saying 'make me this app'. Instead, you need to give some clear instructions and be prepared for some back and forth. Claude makes this step slightly easier, offering a pre-designed prompt to best get the model working. I used this prompt, with an edit to make it better fit what I was looking for: Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Claude instantly jumped into coding, but also asked me two questions: 1: How do you want to distinguish between brain dumps and important notes 2: What's most important in a reminder? Due dates, reminders, or more advanced features With these two questions answered, Claude jumped into action. After just a minute or two of generating, Claude returned a completed app. It had a search function and three categories to add notes: Brain dump, important notes, and reminders. While it had everything I asked for, I decided I wanted these in separate tabs. After asking for the change, it took Claude a few more minutes to do this and my app was completed. I could search for specific notes and had my three categories, capable of adding as many notes as I needed to each. Each note has the date of creation and with the reminders section, I could choose the exact time a reminder was set for. With the app finished, I could then publish it. This gives it a public URL and allows you to come back to it at any time. I can bookmark it, and access it via browser from any of my devices. I've tried "vibe coding", the concept of coding via an AI chatbot, with all the big names now: ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini and Claude. Claude is, by a long way, the best experience of this. It was so easy getting this app up and running. I was able to decide exactly what I wanted from it and didn't need any coding experience to do it. While there is still a long way to go, and this is just a URL I can use to get to this reminders app, it shows the impressive jump forward AI is taking when it comes to coding. I'm already trying to decide what my next app should be.

Google's plan to buy security firm Wiz gets antitrust review
Google's plan to buy security firm Wiz gets antitrust review

Los Angeles Times

time2 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Google's plan to buy security firm Wiz gets antitrust review

Justice Department antitrust enforcers are reviewing whether Google's planned $32 billion acquisition of cybersecurity company Wiz Inc. would illegally limit competition in the marketplace, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Officials in the department's antitrust division, who are probing the deal, have been examining the contours of the Alphabet Inc. unit's plan following its announcement in March, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing a confidential matter. Such inquiries include discussions with the merging companies as well as competitors and customers. The review, which is in its early stages, could last months more. It will ultimately determine whether US officials let the deal proceed. Although full-scale antitrust merger reviews are relatively rare compared to the number of deals announced each year, there are signs that the firms were bracing for scrutiny. Google agreed to pay Wiz a breakup fee of about $3.2 billion, or about 10% of the deal value, if it doesn't close, Bloomberg previously reported. Spokespeople for Google and the DOJ declined to comment on the review. A spokesperson for Wiz didn't respond to a request for comment. Meanwhile, Google has been facing intense antitrust scrutiny from Washington. In the past year, the search engine firm was found by federal judges to have illegal monopolies in online search and some advertising technology markets. Following those two rulings, it is facing a potential breakup of large parts of its business, including its Chrome web browser and some advertising tools used to place display ads around the web. Wiz, which provides cloud security, wouldn't be Google's first purchase of a large cybersecurity firm. In 2022, it bought Mandiant for $5.4 billion. Both deals are meant to bulk up the company's cloud computing business, which has historically lagged its peers, including Microsoft Corp. The DOJ also reviewed the Mandiant deal, but never challenged the transaction. Mandiant and Wiz provide complimentary services, with the former specializing in threat intelligence and cyber breaches. Wiz offers similar capabilities but its tools also work to identify and block threats across organizations' often-complex cloud environments. Wiz also works with competing services from Inc., Oracle Corp. and Microsoft. When announcing the deal, Google said the Wiz acquisition was a way to beef up its cloud security offerings and provide customers with new ways to keep their systems secure in a new era of AI. The companies said Wiz's products will continue to work on major cloud platforms, including competing services. Sisco writes for Bloomberg.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store