
Parliament urged to pressure Pretoria to revive SADC Tribunal which died under Mugabe
The SADC Tribunal's powers were terminated in 2012 after it ruled that then Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe's seizure of white farms was illegal.
Parliament has been urged to pressure the government to resurrect the SADC Tribunal, which would restore the rights of regional citizens to hold their governments accountable to the law.
Lwazi Somya, senior researcher at the Southern African Liaison Office (Salo), an NGO advancing regional peace and democracy, made the appeal in a briefing to Parliament's international relations committee on Wednesday.
In 2012, leaders of Southern African Development Community (SADC) states, including then President Jacob Zuma, terminated the powers of the SADC Tribunal to adjudicate complaints brought by individuals against their governments. This was after the Tribunal had ruled that then Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe's seizure of white farms was illegal.
Somya noted that there had later been a resuscitation of the Tribunal, called the SADC Administrative Tribunal, but that did not go far enough as it can only adjudicate matters between states.
He noted that Parliament was premised on holding the state accountable and so should be pushing the SA government to help recreate the SADC Tribunal to enhance the voice of citizens in demanding that SADC states adhere to SADC treaties and protocols.
Agenda 2063
More widely, Somya said that Parliament should be pushing for mechanisms to put pressure on states to advance the African Union's Agenda 2063 and especially its development targets.
He noted that there were several regional treaties and protocols, but many had not been domesticated in national laws. He noted, for example, that the protocol on the free movement of people under the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA) had been ratified by only four of Africa's states.
Partly because of the failure to domesticate the prerequisites for intra-African trade, only 17% of the CEOs at the recent CEOs forum in Côte d'Ivoire expressed faith in the success of the AfCFTA.
Somya said South Africa had to think more collectively as it was not an island, and problems in other countries in the region – including bad governance – were, for example, driving immigration into this country.
Security challenges
He noted that the SADC region had historically been regarded as one of Africa's most stable, yet it currently faced multiple security challenges that threaten the relative stability and wellbeing of its people.
They include the Islamic State-affiliated insurgency in northern Mozambique, the M23 rebellion in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and undemocratic elections in other countries. SADC has sent military forces into both of those conflicts and then withdrawn them, with mixed results.
In Mozambique, Rwandan troops have played the bigger role in suppressing the jihadists, while the SADC Mission in DRC (SAMIDRC) has just begun withdrawing from DRC after several of its troops were killed in fierce fighting with the M23 in January.
Somya said that as the strongest state in the region, South Africa had a particular responsibility to lead SADC efforts to tackle such insurgencies and ensure proper, free and fair elections.
He said that South Africa had to cooperate more with other SADC countries to achieve that. He lamented, for instance, that only three SADC countries – SA, Tanzania and Malawi – had contributed troops to SAMIDRC.
SADC reform
Emma Powell, Democratic Alliance spokesperson on international relations, said the DA was developing a 'bold and principled' SADC reform policy to 'rescue SADC from its irrelevance'.
As part of the national coalition government, which she said required sufficient consensus on all decisions, including on foreign policy, the DA was also proposing the re-establishment of the SADC Tribunal with full authority to hear cases from individuals.
The DA was also proposing the creation of a regional SADC court for human and people's rights modelled on the African Court, with automatic referral mechanisms for gross human rights violations.
The DA's third proposal was to upgrade the current SADC Parliamentary Forum 'into a full regional parliament with legislative oversight, independent electoral monitoring power and direct citizen participation and engagement'.
The DA was also proposing that SADC agreements should be domesticated into South African law. She noted that SA had taken some steps to domesticate international law, such as that of the International Criminal Court (ICC). This was why Russian President Vladimir Putin has been unable to come to SA since being indicted by that court for abducting an estimated 20,000 Ukrainian children.
'I think that it's high time that South Africa once again assumes its position as a principled leader on the continent instead of an apologist for dictators,' Powell said, deploring what she called the ANC's diplomatic complicity in failing to condemn undemocratic practices by SADC states such as Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Tanzania.
'Liberation solidarity vs democratic principle'
She said in the ANC's foreign policy, 'liberation solidarity… trumped democratic principle', and this was empowering former freedom fighters running some of those countries to 'use the memory of struggle to capture the state, to loot and pillage the state, to persecute their opponents and to suffocate any dissent. And by shielding them, the ANC became a barrier to reform.'
MK party MP Colleen Makhubele wanted to know what SADC thought about the emigration to the US of white Afrikaners, which began this week, and who were offered refugee status because the Trump administration alleged that a genocide of whites was happening.
'Yet this organ of SADC is quiet…' If there really was a genocide, SADC should have been the first to say so. And if not, it 'should have been the first to raise its hand and defend South Africa…'
ANC MP Mogodu Moela commended SA's involvement in efforts to silence the guns in Mozambique. He blamed the DRC conflict on competition for natural resources, which could disrupt the whole continent if not addressed.
He said the ANC supported the withdrawal of SAMIDRC from DRC in favour of peace negotiations, which he said would bring peace to eastern DRC and allow humanitarian aid to again flow into the conflict zone. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Restructuring global health – WHO faces major challenges as foreign aid reductions take toll
While the immediate effects of the US cuts in health aid are being felt primarily by the Global South, the associated risks extend worldwide. Last week, global leaders gathered for the World Health Assembly in Geneva to address the reality that the global health landscape is being reshaped by dramatic shifts in funding, priorities, and leadership. Chief among these is the United States' decision to slash foreign aid and withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO). Despite spending only 0.24% of its gross national income on foreign aid, the United States has been the largest donor to global health programmes, providing one-third of the international assistance in global health. This is not just a US issue – other countries have also signalled reductions in foreign health aid, and Argentina also recently announced it will withdraw from the WHO. These dramatic shifts have forced the WHO to plan a reduction in staff by nearly 50%, triggering massive restructuring. Non-government organisations (NGOs) are laying off large numbers of staff worldwide. While other donors and philanthropies are stepping in, they cannot fill the void alone. Meanwhile, the shock to the system is already resulting in lives lost. According to the WHO, countries such as Haiti, Kenya, Lesotho, South Sudan, Burkina Faso and Nigeria may run out of HIV antiretroviral medications within months. The Africa CDC's director-general, Dr Jean Kaseya, warned in March that 'two to four million additional Africans are likely to die annually' as a result of the aid cuts. T The continent now faces a $12-billion shortfall in healthcare financing. Substantial impacts will be felt across the globe, from Afghanistan to Lao PDR, in many low- and middle-income countries. While the immediate effects of these cuts are being felt primarily by the Global South, the associated risks extend globally. When countries become overwhelmed by preventable infections, they will lose the ability to detect and contain pathogens with epidemic potential that could cross borders in days. The current situation carries serious implications for global security as well as health. A new era needs to begin with a roadmap for sustainable domestic funding by individual nations, a strategic view of the role of WHO, and a coordinated plan among major donors. Governments must take the lead in reshaping their health budgets to reflect urgent needs while navigating competing priorities. Donors, NGOs, and multilaterals can support this shift if they embrace flexible, trust-based funding models tailored to local strategies. African health financing The desire to create long-term sustainability is apparent in the Africa CDC's strategic plan to transform health financing, which focuses on domestic resource mobilisation, diversifying funding sources, optimising health fund management and using evidence-based data for efficient resource allocation. The plan calls for member countries to meet the Abuja Declaration target of spending at least 15% of national budgets on health and explores innovative ideas such as solidarity levies and mobilising Africa's $95-billion in annual diaspora remittances. Nigeria's Basic Health Care Provision Fund, which dedicates 1% of revenue (about $150-million annually) to primary care, is a promising example. Any effort to reform global health infrastructure must prioritise resilient, widely accessible primary healthcare. Since the Alma-Ata declaration of 1978, we've known that primary care is the foundation of 'Health for All'. Doing so will not only reduce the impact of chronic and endemic infectious diseases, but also serve to enable systems that quickly identify when infectious disease outbreaks of concern appear. As the WHO recalibrates, it must assess realistically the current situation and focus on its most important core functions for the future: setting global standards, responding to emergencies and coordinating transnational responses. Routine programme implementation should be handled by individual countries, NGOs, and the private sector. The WHO can no longer afford to take on the management of basic health functions within countries. Instead, it needs to focus on maintaining surge capacity to meet needs during health emergencies and facilitate cooperation in transboundary issues. The WHO needs to prioritise doing fewer things better. Now is also the time for new global coalitions, agreements and leadership among non-government actors. The Gates Foundation has reaffirmed its commitment to address emerging challenges. Philanthropies must align their efforts to successfully cooperate, identify priorities and gaps, reduce duplication and maximise impact. Meanwhile, the private sector has a vital role to play in connecting national health priorities to new markets, innovations and partnerships. Global health needs a multisector coalition of the willing right now that is felicitous, innovative, able to learn from past mistakes and adapt to meet the world's current needs and prevent future crises. The time for action is now – the consequences of inaction are too great, and the lives lost are both predictable and preventable. DM Mitchell Wolfe is Senior Associate at the Center for Strategic Studies, Washington, DC; Nahid Bhadelia is Associate Professor at the Boston University School of Medicine; and Wilmot James is Professor and Strategic Advisor to the Pandemic Center at Brown University's School of Public Health and a former Member of Parliament (South Africa).


Eyewitness News
6 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Zimbabwe to cull elephants and distribute meat to people
HARARE - Zimbabwe will cull dozens of elephants and distribute the meat for consumption to ease the ballooning population of the animals, its wildlife authority said Tuesday. The southern African country is home to the second-biggest elephant population in the world after Botswana. The cull at a vast private game reserve in the southeast would initially target 50 elephants, the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Authority (ZimParks) said in a statement. It did not say how many of the animals would be killed in total or over what period. An aerial survey in 2024 showed the reserve, the Save Valley Conservancy, had 2,550 elephants, more than triple its carrying capacity of 800, ZimParks said. At least 200 have been translocated to other parks over the past five years. "Elephant meat from the management exercise will be distributed to local communities while ivory will be state property that will be handed over to the ZimParks for safekeeping," it said. Zimbabwe is unable to sell its stockpile of tusks due to a global ban on ivory trading. Tuesday's announcement came a day after four people were arrested in the capital, Harare with more than 230 kilogrammes (500 pounds) of ivory for which they were allegedly seeking a buyer. In 2024, Zimbabwe culled 200 elephants as it faced an unprecedented drought that led to food shortages. It was the first major cull since 1988. The move to hunt the elephants for food has drawn sharp criticism, particularly as the animals are a major tourism draw.


Eyewitness News
7 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
WC High Court dimisses EFF's application to suspend fuel levy increase
CAPE TOWN - The fuel levy increase will come into effect at midnight after the Western Cape High Court dismissed the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF)'s application to suspend it. The EFF had approached the court to suspend the increase before it comes into effect on Wednesday, and also review the minister's decision in his budget speech last month. But Minister Enoch Godongwana defended the decision, arguing in court that it was not another tax but rather a regulatory charge that the minister is empowered to implement. The EFF argued in court that Godongwana encroached Parliament's powers when he announced the levy increase. ALSO READ: EFF argues Godongwana has no powers to increase fuel levy The party says the minister also failed to introduce a money bill as required when imposing a tax, and this needs to be processed by Parliament. It says the minister instead relied on Section 48 of the Customs and Excise Act, which deals with duties on goods and customs, not general taxation. Godongwana's legal counsel, Adv Kameel Premhid, told a full bench that the increase is not a tax but a regulation. "Regulatory charges bring in money, so they might raise revenue. But that doesn't make it a tax, and just because a tax also raises revenue, the two are not the same thing." Godongwana's court victory means that from Wednesday, motorists will pay an extra 16 cents per litre for petrol and 15 cents more per litre for diesel.