logo
MoneySupermarket firm raises dividend as insurance boosts revenues

MoneySupermarket firm raises dividend as insurance boosts revenues

Independent17-02-2025
The parent firm of MoneySupermarket has said it will hand out higher shareholder dividends and launch a share buyback after revealing a jump in profits.
Shares in Mony Group lifted higher in early trading on Monday as a result.
The London-listed firm told shareholders that it reported recorded revenues in 2024, as it benefited from growth in its insurance arm.
We are proud to have helped customers save a record £2.9 billion - the more customers save, the more the group grows
Peter Duffy, Mony chief executive
Group revenues increased by 2% to £439.2 million for the year, compared with 2023.
Insurance revenues grew by 7% to £235.6 million in the year, driven by a strong first half of 2024.
This helped to offset weaker sales in its money, home services and travel comparison businesses over the year.
It added that its breadth of business areas is set to help the company continue recent momentum 'despite headwinds in the car insurance switching market'.
Mony revealed that its pre-tax profits grew by 11% to £80.2 million as it offset increases to its operating costs.
The company said it will pay out a shareholder dividend of 12.5p per share, up 3%, as it also confirmed plans to hand up to £30 million to shareholders through a buyback.
Peter Duffy, chief executive of Mony, said: 'We are proud to have helped customers save a record £2.9 billion – the more customers save, the more the group grows.
'We've done this by delivering strong performance both operationally and financially in 2024 as we continue to execute on our strategy.
'This includes encouraging customers to join our member-based propositions like the SuperSaveClub which, in turn, reduces our reliance on increasingly expensive pay-per-click (PPC) marketing.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rubbish collections delayed as binmen go on holiday
Rubbish collections delayed as binmen go on holiday

Telegraph

time7 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Rubbish collections delayed as binmen go on holiday

Rubbish collections are being delayed in London because of a staff shortage fuelled by binmen going on holiday. Ealing council has declared a driver shortage and admitted it could start paying the remaining workers more to fill the gap. The Labour-run authority said that although some staff were off sick, it expected the disruption to continue until September once holidays had finished. On Sunday night, the Government warned the council that taxpayers 'rightly expect and rely on' regular waste collections and that it must continue to provide the 'vital' service. Council tax bills went up across the borough in April, with charges increasing from £1,948 to £2,041 for the average Band D home. Those living in Band H homes, meanwhile, are now paying more than £4,000 in council tax. The disruption comes as residents of Birmingham wait for a resolution to a dispute between the binmen's union and the council which has seen rubbish piling up for six months. Ealing council said bin collection services were being deployed later than usual in a statement first issued to the Chiswick Calendar, a local news website. It added that any bins not collected on schedule would be prioritised the following day. A council spokesman said: 'We are sorry about the delays that are occurring to bin collections due to driver shortage and the impact it is having on residents. 'This is because a number of staff are currently off sick and, in addition, as it is the summer holiday period many staff are on leave, which we anticipate lasting until September when the holidays have finished.' The council said it was 'actively recruiting more staff' and that it employed a number of HGV drivers, who were 'highly sought after' by businesses that could offer them more money. 'This is an ongoing issue and we are reviewing salaries and other incentives for staff,' it added. Susan Hall, leader of the London Assembly Conservatives, said bins going uncollected across the capital was 'absolutely outrageous'. Ms Hall told The Telegraph: 'When you're paid to do a job, damn well do it and the people in charge of them, they need to be talked to as well. 'When you're running a company or a business, you have to make sure you've got a certain amount of staff in order to deliver the service you're providing. 'Just because these people work for a council, they assume they can do what they like. It's not good enough.' A spokesman for the Ealing Conservatives said: 'Ealing Council should have foreseen driver shortages over the summer. 'We are monitoring the situation carefully, as it's critical that waste is promptly collected over the hot period.' Earlier in the summer, residents in Croydon complained that their borough was filled with the 'persistent smell of decay' after waste management company Veolia failed to empty bins. Veolia was given a £21.5m eight-year contract by the local authority in April but there have been complaints of bins going uncollected for as long as seven weeks. The company apologised for having to re-route all kerbside collections, which it insisted would lead to 'more efficient' service in the long run but at the expense of short-term operations. Rowena Davies, the Labour mayoral candidate in Croydon, said the service being provided was 'so shockingly disappointing'. In Birmingham, rubbish continues to pile up as the dispute between the Unite trade union and the council in England's second city runs into a sixth month. Talks between Unite and the Labour-run council are deadlocked, with the local authority having paid £8m in agency costs to keep a skeleton bin service running. A Government spokesman said: 'Taxpayers rightly expect and rely on regular waste collections, and the government expects councils to continue providing this vital service to residents. 'Local communities deserve good public services which is why we've already made over £69 billion available this year to boost council finances, alongside more than £1bn for councils to improve recycling services. 'We will go further to reform the outdated funding system ensuring councils are funded fairly.'

Kellogg's brings new cereal to the UK that shoppers say is just like discontinued favourite
Kellogg's brings new cereal to the UK that shoppers say is just like discontinued favourite

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Kellogg's brings new cereal to the UK that shoppers say is just like discontinued favourite

KELLOGG's has brought a new cereal to the UK that shoppers have said is just like a discontinued favourite. Shoppers have spotted packs of Kellogg's Smacks on shelves at Morrisons for £2.50. 1 The sweetened puff wheat cereal is already popular in the US but it's now made it across the pond. It's described as a classic crunchy breakfast cereal with a honey-sweet taste. But shoppers have also pointed out that it looks very similar to a popular discontinued cereal. A picture of the new cereal was shared on the Facebook group Snack Reviews and hundreds of people were commenting on it. Lots of commenters said how similar the new product looked to Sugar Puffs, which were discontinued in 2014. "Basically sugar puffs then lol," one person said. Another wrote: "Definitely sugar puffs!!" A third added: "They'll always be sugar puffs to me. They're puffed wheat and sugar." Sugar Puffs, which were made by Quaker Oats, were rebranded as Honey Monster Puffs with a new reformulated recipe. The new recipe had less sugar and more honey than the original Sugar Puffs. Rice Krispies brings back 'most requested' flavor for first time in 20 years – but fans will notice a big switch It came as the Government aimed to crack down on sugar content in foods marketed at children. Sugar Puffs had been around for 60 years before they were rebranded. Discontinued items that have made a comeback Brands have started a trend of bringing back popular discontinued items recently. One that got shoppers buzzing was the comeback of White Malteasers, which had been off shelves for 11 years. Customers can now buy a 30g pack for £1.05, 74g pack for £2.50 or a larger 126g sharing bag for £2.95. Meanwhile snack fans have spotted another chocolatey treat on supermarket shelves that's similar to a discontinued Cadbury product. The new Cadbury Dairy Milk Balls are said to resemble Cadbury Tasters, which first launched in 1996. Plus, the nostalgic alcopop Bacardi Breezer has also made a return to stores after being axed in 2015. The fruity alcopops were once a rite of passage for teenagers having their first alcoholic drinks or going clubbing for the first time. Why are products axed or recipes changed? ANALYSIS by chief consumer reporter James Flanders. Food and drinks makers have been known to tweak their recipes or axe items altogether. They often say that this is down to the changing tastes of customers. There are several reasons why this could be done. For example, government regulation, like the "sugar tax," forces firms to change their recipes. Some manufacturers might choose to tweak ingredients to cut costs. They may opt for a cheaper alternative, especially when costs are rising to keep prices stable. For example, Tango Cherry disappeared from shelves in 2018. It has recently returned after six years away but as a sugar-free version. Fanta removed sweetener from its sugar-free alternative earlier this year. Suntory tweaked the flavour of its flagship Lucozade Original and Orange energy drinks. While the amount of sugar in every bottle remains unchanged, the supplier swapped out the sweetener aspartame for sucralose.

Construction should be a career that you can build a life on
Construction should be a career that you can build a life on

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Construction should be a career that you can build a life on

Re your editorial (The Guardian view on construction workers: the country needs more of them, fast, 13 August), as a bricklayer with decades of experience, I see the skills shortage in the construction industry as the result of years of neglect. The problem is not only attracting new people, but keeping them in the trade once they see the reality of working conditions. Most site bricklayers are self-employed subcontractors. We don't get pensions, holiday pay, or sick pay. If you're ill or injured, you simply don't earn. That insecurity pushes many skilled people out of construction entirely. On top of that, wages have barely moved in years – in fact, the rates many bricklayers receive today are lower than four years ago. Large housebuilders often pay good rates to main contractors, but by the time it filters down to the bricklayer, they can end up with far less. If the UK is serious about meeting its housing targets, we need more than training schemes. We need to make construction a job you can build a life on – fair pay directly to the tradespeople, proper benefits, and conditions that match the skill and physical demands of the work. Until that changes, we'll keep losing good people faster than we can train them, no matter how much money is thrown at OrdPeterlee, County Durham Large construction firms routinely depend on multiple levels of subcontracting, involving an ecosystem of small and medium-sized enterprises that source labour through a myriad of different routes. Those who do the work are often unsure of their own employment status. People working alongside each other frequently have very different terms and conditions, or indeed, no written terms and conditions at all. Career paths do exist, but only in sheltered pockets. The fractured nature of the employment model brings obvious advantages to 'employers' in terms of low overheads. But training is invariably seen as someone else's problem. Many small firms would much prefer to invest in direct employment and apprenticeships, but such investment isn't feasible given the competitive dynamics of the marketplace. This is the end point of the industry's 40-year quest for modernisation. Simple solutions are few and far between. But the first step for policymakers is to recognise the highly fissured nature of the construction employment GreenProfessor of construction management, University of Reading There are plenty of decent tradespeople out there and, of course, some not so good. Yes, we need to bring in more for the future, and I've no problem with them having formal qualifications. But that doesn't make a tradesperson. I got my City & Guilds in carpentry in 1997. As I understand it, once my Construction Skills Certificate Scheme card runs out, it won't be renewed unless I make a significant spend to get an NVQ. I've been in the trade for over 30 years, and I've diverged my skill base significantly past carpentry alone, all learned on the job. Currently, I have no problem getting work, as I'm fairly adept at most building trades. A rush to have only the formally qualified working on site will be counterproductive. As a self-employed tradesperson, if my work isn't to standard, I cannot work. I'm 51, still fit. If Labour is going to achieve its goals, people like me are StringerKing's Lynn, Norfolk Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store