Prince William's Absence At King Charles And Prince Harry's 'Peace Summit' Branded A 'Warning Shot'
However, royal experts believe Prince William's absence signals tension, with concerns he distrusts Harry and Meghan.
While King Charles is said to seek peace, partly influenced by his battle with cancer, doubts persist after the meeting's details leaked.
Prince William Keeps His Distance Amid King Charles And Prince Harry's 'Peace Summit'
Although Harry and King Charles seem to be heading toward reconciliation, royal experts believe there's one key figure who's unlikely to forgive or forget any time soon.
Royal analyst Ian Pelham Turner told Fox News Digital that Prince William's absence from the talks was no accident.
"The important issue is that Prince William and his representatives were not invited," Turner said.
He added, "I feel that this was a warning shot across William's bows that Charles is king – not him. … It may also be a stark warning that Charles will decide what happens during his reign, not William."
As reported by The Blast, Harry's chief of staff, Meredith Maines, traveled from California to London to meet with King Charles' top aide, Tobyn Andreae. Liam Maguire, head of U.K. communications for Harry and Meghan, also attended the confidential meeting.
The low-key meeting is said to have taken place at the Royal Over-Seas League — a private members' club just a short stroll from Clarence House, Charles' London residence.
Prince William's Distrust Of His Younger Brother Remains A Stumbling Block On The Road To Peace
Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams suggested to the publication that William was likely informed about the private meeting between Charles' and Harry's aides, but deliberately kept his own team out of it.
"The king is still battling cancer and is in his late 70s," Fitzwilliams said. "He wants a relationship with his grandchildren, whom he has hardly met. He is also temperamentally more accommodating than William. But [William] cannot trust the Sussexes. They must know it."
Fitzwilliams added, "The prospect of seeing the Sussexes at royal events would enrage the monarchy's loyal supporters. … Of course, reconciliation is desirable [for the king]. It would, however, come at a price."
King Charles Hopes For Healing With Prince Harry, But Experts Warn Prince William's Absence Could Widen Rift
British broadcaster Helena Chard echoed the sentiment, telling the news outlet that personal healing between Charles and Harry could be meaningful.
"From a positive private family stance, some personal healing between father and son would be good," Chard said. "King Charles will always love his son, and, in light of the king's ongoing cancer treatment, it could help tidy up the messy, fractured relationship.
She further noted that the monarch's health has likely prompted deeper reflection about his relationship with his son.
"King Charles is living with cancer, which makes his family situation very sad," Chard explained. "I'm sure he is thinking about his mortality and reevaluating his life. He would not want a family feud tarnishing his positive contributions and memory. I'm sure he will also want to clear up unresolved issues or surprises that could lead to further resentment and conflict between his two sons.'
However, Chard cautioned that without Prince William's involvement, achieving long-term peace may be difficult.
"Life is too short for battles," she continued. "However, without Prince William's inclusion in the rapprochement, I can't see a positive outcome. It could also cause a wedge between Charles and William, despite the king most certainly consulting with William."
Royal Expert Slams 'Peace Summit' Leak
British royal commentator Hilary Fordwich expressed skepticism over the so-called 'peace summit,' casting doubt on its sincerity.
"My instincts say that Harry is desperate," Fordwich claimed. "And King Charles loves his son and wants to have a restored relationship. However, this tentative step in any fragile peace process was marred by the leak of the meeting's details and photos."
Fordwich continued, "How on Earth was the media there?. … Both sides [have] expressed frustration regarding how such a leak jeopardizes the process, with now suspicions and distrust being resurrected.'
Prince William's Distrust Of The Sussexes Might Have Deepened After The Leak
Fordwich suggested William likely sees the leak as yet another reason to stay distant from Harry and Meghan.
"Prince William is likely viewing this leak as being true to form for the Sussexes," she said. "It further reinforces his stance that any reconciliation or indeed dialogue with the Sussexes will become public."
Royal expert Helena Chard echoed the concern, questioning how such a private meeting had become public knowledge so quickly.
"The trust line seems to have been overstepped yet again," Chard observed. "The story broke as the Prince and Princess of Wales received glowing media attention at Wimbledon."
She continued, "This was promptly overshadowed by the leaked reconciliation story. ...The PR machine is seemingly in full play. It wouldn't surprise me if everything was filmed and will soon be featured in a new Netflix show.'
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump heads to Scotland for golf resort visits, Keir Starmer meeting
Protesters are ramping up for multiple demonstrations. The UK prime minister is planning a visit. Golf is likely on the agenda. President Donald Trump is heading back to Scotland, a place that holds special significance for him, from July 25-29. Scotland is the birthplace of Trump's mother and a place where he owns two golf resorts, one of which is poised to open a new golf course. Yet he hasn't always had a warm reception there, clashing with residents over his resort plans and facing protests over his politics. While more protests are in the works, Trump should get a friendly greeting from British Prime Minister Keir Starmer as the two meet to talk trade ahead of a formal state visit to the United Kingdom in September. The Scottish trip is a prelude to that pomp-filled state visit, where Trump will meet with British royalty. Here's what to know about the trip. Refining trade deal The United Kingdom was the first country to reach a trade agreement with the Trump administration after the president paused his reciprocal tariffs in April. Trump is ramping up his tariff push again, and more countries are agreeing to trade pacts ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline for new levies to take effect. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president and Starmer will work to 'refine' their trade agreement during the Scotland trip. The UK is America's ninth largest trading partner. Trump's UK trade deal kept a 10% universal tariff on the country while lowering tariffs on automobiles and steel. The UK pledged to open its markets for U.S. agricultural products such as beef and ethanol. Protests planned While Trump meets with Starmer, protesters will gather around Scotland to blast the president. The UK-based Stop Trump Coalition is organizing demonstrations in Aberdeen, Edinburgh and Dumfries, according to its website. The group organized large protests when Trump visited the UK during his first administration and relaunched after his re-election. Stop Trump Coalition said it is working to 'To defeat the politics of Trumpism, and to promote an alternative, democratic vision of the world based on peace, social justice and international cooperation.' Windsor Castle up next Trump will be back in the United Kingdom from Sept. 17-19 for a more elaborate visit that includes meeting with King Charles III at Windsor Castle. Trump is an admirer of the British royalty. He met Queen Elizabeth II, who died in 2022, twice during his first term as president, visiting Windsor Castle in 2018 and dining with the queen at Buckingham Palace during a 2019 state visit. Trump's September trip will be his second state visit to Britain, a first for a U.S. president. 'He is honored and looking forward to meeting with his majesty the king,' Leavitt said, calling the trip "truly unprecedented." Trump met with King Charles' heir to the throne, Prince William, in December in France during the reopening of Notre-Dame Cathedral. Trump has called the U.S. relationship with the UK 'the highest level of special.' Scotland, in particular, has personal significance for the president. Trump's Scottish resorts and controversy Scotland is closely associated with the game of golf and its history, and Trump is an avid golfer with an extensive portfolio of golf properties. The president is visiting his Scottish golf resorts, Trump Turnberry on the west coast and Trump International Scotland in Aberdeen on the east coast. The Aberdeen property has been a headache for Trump for years. He faced opposition to his development plans for the property and waged an unsuccessful legal battle to block a wind turbine farm off the coast. But the president can now celebrate the development of a second golf course at Trump International Scotland. The second course will open on Aug. 13, according to the resort's website. Trump has pushed to have the Turnberry property host the Open Championship, one of the four major golf tournaments, but organizers say it presents logistical issues. A pro-Palestinian group recently vandalized the property that has previously been the site of four British Open events. Beyond his resorts, Trump is connected to Scotland through family lineage. His mother was born Mary Anne MacLeod in Tong, a village on the Isle of Lewis in the Hebrides islands. She immigrated to New York in the 1930s. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump's Scotland trip: Protests, trade talks and a new golf course
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
China Fails to Capitalize on Europe's Grievances Over US Tariffs
I'm Chris Anstey, an economics editor in Boston. Today we're looking at Europe-China ties. Send us feedback and tips to ecodaily@ And if you aren't yet signed up to receive this newsletter, you can do so here. Fifty years after the European Economic Community (now the European Union) established diplomatic ties with mainland China, relations with Beijing are at an ' inflection point.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
16-year-olds to be given vote at next election in landmark change
The voting age is to be lowered to 16 in time for the next election, the government has announced in a move that would allow around 1.5 million more teenagers to cast a ballot. The change will bring UK-wide elections in line with Scotland and Wales by the time the country next goes to the polls, due by the summer of 2029 at the latest. The 'seismic' development, which is part of a raft of measures set to be introduced through a new Elections Bill, is the biggest change to the electorate since 1969 when the voting age was lowered from 21 to 18. Keir Starmer encouraged 16 and 17 year olds to use their vote at next election. No 10 said the PM would 'absolutely encourage them to be as engaged as they can be in the future of their country'. Deputy prime minister Angela Rayner said: 'For too long public trust in our democracy has been damaged and faith in our institutions has been allowed to decline. 'We are taking action to break down barriers to participation that will ensure more people have the opportunity to engage in UK democracy… and delivering on our manifesto commitment to give 16-year-olds the right to vote.' Sixteen-year-olds already work, pay taxes and serve in the military, ministers point out. Rushanara Ali, the minister for democracy, said the move would take 'a generational step forward in restoring public trust and boosting engagement in UK democracy'. But politicians from other parties have accused Starmer of trying to 'rig future elections' with the change. The PM insisted last year the issue was one of fairness. He said: 'If you can work, if you can pay tax, if you can serve in your armed forces, then you ought to be able to vote.' Across the world there are only a handful of countries where the voting age is less than 18. In 2024 only Nicaragua, Scotland (for devolved Scottish Parliament and council elections), the Isle of Man, Guernsey, Ethiopia, Ecuador, Cuba, Brazil, and Austria had votes at 16. Last year the then Tory MP Andrea Jenkyns, who has since lost her seat and defected to Nigel Farage's Reform party, put a video out on X (formerly Twitter) claiming that Starmer wants to 'rig future elections'. But Chris Annous, from pollsters More in Common, said expanding the right to vote to 16 and 17 year olds 'will have little impact on election results - outside of hyper marginal seats'. A new poll has also found nearly half of 16 and 17-year-olds don't think they should be allowed to vote. The survey of 500 16 and 17-year-olds by Merlin Strategy for ITV News found that 49 per cent didn't think the voting age should be lowered to 16, while 51 per cent said it should. The plans will also see UK-issued bank cards as an accepted form of ID at the polling stations. A more automated voter registration system will also make it easier for people to register to vote, the government said. New changes will also close loopholes that would allow foreign donors via 'shell companies' to influence UK political parties. It follows reports earlier this year that Elon Musk was preparing to give $100m (£80m) to Nigel Farage's Reform UK party, in what would have been by far the largest donation in British electoral history. The changes will also allow the Electoral Commission to take action and enforce heavier fines of up to £500,000 on those who breach political finance rules, and enable tougher sentences for those who abuse election campaigners. The reforms come as the official watchdog the Electoral Commission reported that spending at last summer's general election hit a record high of £94.5 million, including £69.3 million spent by political parties. Labour outspent its rivals, shelling out £30 million during the campaign, more than twice the amount it spent five years earlier, while the Conservatives spent £23.9 million and the Liberal Democrats £5.6 million. Reform spent £5.5 million, the Greens £1.7 million and the SNP £799,000. Harry Quilter-Pinner, executive director of the IPPR think tank, said the changes were "the biggest reform to our electoral system since 1969", when the voting age was lowered to 18. He said: "Barely half of people voted in last year's general election. Our democracy is in crisis, and we risk reaching a tipping point where politics loses its legitimacy. The government has clearly heard these alarm bells." No 10 'absolutely rejected' claims that the reform was being brought in to shore up the government's vote.
