Prince William's Absence At King Charles And Prince Harry's 'Peace Summit' Branded A 'Warning Shot'
However, royal experts believe Prince William's absence signals tension, with concerns he distrusts Harry and Meghan.
While King Charles is said to seek peace, partly influenced by his battle with cancer, doubts persist after the meeting's details leaked.
Prince William Keeps His Distance Amid King Charles And Prince Harry's 'Peace Summit'
Although Harry and King Charles seem to be heading toward reconciliation, royal experts believe there's one key figure who's unlikely to forgive or forget any time soon.
Royal analyst Ian Pelham Turner told Fox News Digital that Prince William's absence from the talks was no accident.
"The important issue is that Prince William and his representatives were not invited," Turner said.
He added, "I feel that this was a warning shot across William's bows that Charles is king – not him. … It may also be a stark warning that Charles will decide what happens during his reign, not William."
As reported by The Blast, Harry's chief of staff, Meredith Maines, traveled from California to London to meet with King Charles' top aide, Tobyn Andreae. Liam Maguire, head of U.K. communications for Harry and Meghan, also attended the confidential meeting.
The low-key meeting is said to have taken place at the Royal Over-Seas League — a private members' club just a short stroll from Clarence House, Charles' London residence.
Prince William's Distrust Of His Younger Brother Remains A Stumbling Block On The Road To Peace
Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams suggested to the publication that William was likely informed about the private meeting between Charles' and Harry's aides, but deliberately kept his own team out of it.
"The king is still battling cancer and is in his late 70s," Fitzwilliams said. "He wants a relationship with his grandchildren, whom he has hardly met. He is also temperamentally more accommodating than William. But [William] cannot trust the Sussexes. They must know it."
Fitzwilliams added, "The prospect of seeing the Sussexes at royal events would enrage the monarchy's loyal supporters. … Of course, reconciliation is desirable [for the king]. It would, however, come at a price."
King Charles Hopes For Healing With Prince Harry, But Experts Warn Prince William's Absence Could Widen Rift
British broadcaster Helena Chard echoed the sentiment, telling the news outlet that personal healing between Charles and Harry could be meaningful.
"From a positive private family stance, some personal healing between father and son would be good," Chard said. "King Charles will always love his son, and, in light of the king's ongoing cancer treatment, it could help tidy up the messy, fractured relationship.
She further noted that the monarch's health has likely prompted deeper reflection about his relationship with his son.
"King Charles is living with cancer, which makes his family situation very sad," Chard explained. "I'm sure he is thinking about his mortality and reevaluating his life. He would not want a family feud tarnishing his positive contributions and memory. I'm sure he will also want to clear up unresolved issues or surprises that could lead to further resentment and conflict between his two sons.'
However, Chard cautioned that without Prince William's involvement, achieving long-term peace may be difficult.
"Life is too short for battles," she continued. "However, without Prince William's inclusion in the rapprochement, I can't see a positive outcome. It could also cause a wedge between Charles and William, despite the king most certainly consulting with William."
Royal Expert Slams 'Peace Summit' Leak
British royal commentator Hilary Fordwich expressed skepticism over the so-called 'peace summit,' casting doubt on its sincerity.
"My instincts say that Harry is desperate," Fordwich claimed. "And King Charles loves his son and wants to have a restored relationship. However, this tentative step in any fragile peace process was marred by the leak of the meeting's details and photos."
Fordwich continued, "How on Earth was the media there?. … Both sides [have] expressed frustration regarding how such a leak jeopardizes the process, with now suspicions and distrust being resurrected.'
Prince William's Distrust Of The Sussexes Might Have Deepened After The Leak
Fordwich suggested William likely sees the leak as yet another reason to stay distant from Harry and Meghan.
"Prince William is likely viewing this leak as being true to form for the Sussexes," she said. "It further reinforces his stance that any reconciliation or indeed dialogue with the Sussexes will become public."
Royal expert Helena Chard echoed the concern, questioning how such a private meeting had become public knowledge so quickly.
"The trust line seems to have been overstepped yet again," Chard observed. "The story broke as the Prince and Princess of Wales received glowing media attention at Wimbledon."
She continued, "This was promptly overshadowed by the leaked reconciliation story. ...The PR machine is seemingly in full play. It wouldn't surprise me if everything was filmed and will soon be featured in a new Netflix show.'
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Entrepreneur
a minute ago
- Entrepreneur
Regulations Eased to Support Retail
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. High streets across the UK could soon see a revival in local culture and commerce, as ministers unveil a package of measures aimed at breathing life back into town centres long plagued by empty shopfronts and dwindling footfall. Under the proposals, a new National Licensing Policy Framework will sweep away what the government describes as "outdated" planning and licensing barriers, in a bid to support the growth of cafes, bars, music venues and outdoor dining. The reforms aim to simplify the process of opening hospitality venues, cutting red tape that small businesses have long cited as prohibitive. Ministers say the changes will allow for swifter conversions of vacant retail units into social spaces, while also offering stronger protections for established pubs, clubs and grassroots music venues - particularly those at risk of being silenced by noise complaints from newer developments. A key element of the plan is the introduction of the 'Agent of Change' principle into national planning policy, meaning developers will bear responsibility for mitigating noise when building near existing venues - a move welcomed by some in the nightlife industry as a long-overdue step. New "hospitality zones" will also be trialled, offering streamlined permissions for outdoor dining, community events and longer opening hours. Officials hope this will help restore a sense of place and vibrancy in town centres that have struggled to recover from the combined blows of online retail, austerity, and the pandemic. The government's pitch is that these reforms will not only reduce bureaucracy, but also foster economic regeneration and social connection. By standardising rules across the country, ministers claim the framework will remove the patchwork of local regulations that often discourage entrepreneurs from taking on high street premises. The initiative ties into the ongoing High Street Rental Auction Scheme, which gives local authorities the power to lease long-vacant commercial properties - a policy designed to tackle chronic underuse of central retail areas by creating space for independent businesses and community-led projects. This push forms part of a broader Small Business Plan, expected to be unveiled later this year, which the government says will provide a roadmap for unlocking the potential of the UK's 5.5m small and medium-sized enterprises. Collectively, they contribute nearly £3t to the economy and employ around 60% of the private sector workforce. While business groups have cautiously welcomed the move, some experts warn that regulatory reform alone may not be enough to revive town centres without parallel investment in transport, housing and public services - the wider ecosystem in which local economies thrive or falter. Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: "This Government has a plan to replace shuttered up shops with vibrant places to socialise turning them into thriving cafés or busy bars, which supports local jobs and gives people a place to get together and catch up over a beer or a coffee. "Red tape has stood in the way of people's business ideas for too long. Today we're slashing those barriers to giving small business owners the freedom to flourish. "From faster café openings to easier alfresco dining, our Plan for Change will put the buzz back into our town centres and money back into the pockets of local entrepreneurs, because when small businesses thrive, communities come alive."


Bloomberg
2 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump, Starmer to Discuss Trade Deal, Gaza Situation
US President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Stamer are meeting in Scotland on Monday in a bid to remove the remaining obstacles to their trade deal. Starmer will travel to the president's golf course in Scotland, Trump Turnberry, and the two leaders will then travel on together for a further private engagement in Aberdeen. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza will likely be discussed, with Starmer expected to press for a lasting ceasefire. Bloomberg's Lizzy Burden reports from Scotland. (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Europe hopes for 'no surprises' as US weighs force withdrawals
After keeping Donald Trump happy with a pledge to up defence spending at NATO's summit, Europe is now bracing for a key decision from the US president on the future of American forces on the continent. Washington is currently conducting a review of its military deployments worldwide -- set to be unveiled in coming months -- and the expectation is it will lead to drawdowns in Europe. That prospect is fraying the nerves of US allies, especially as fears swirl that Russia could look to attack a NATO country within the next few years if the war in Ukraine dies down. However, the alliance is basking in Trump's newfound goodwill following its June summit in The Hague, and his officials are making encouraging noises that Europe will not be left in the lurch. "We've agreed to no surprises and no gaps in the strategic framework of Europe," said Matthew Whitaker, US ambassador to NATO, adding he expected the review to come out in "late summer, early fall". "I have daily conversations with our allies about the process," he said. While successive US governments have mulled scaling back in Europe to focus more on China, Trump has insisted more forcefully than his predecessors that the continent should handle its own defence. "There's every reason to expect a withdrawal from Europe," said Marta Mucznik from the International Crisis Group. "The question is not whether it's going to happen, but how fast." When Trump returned to office in January many felt he was about to blow a hole in the seven-decade-old alliance. But the vibe in NATO circles is now far more upbeat than those desperate days. "There's a sanguine mood, a lot of guesswork, but the early signals are quite positive," one senior European diplomat told AFP, talking as others on condition of anonymity. "Certainly no panic or doom and gloom." - 'Inevitable' - The Pentagon says there are nearly 85,000 US military personnel in Europe -- a number that has fluctuated between 75,000 and 105,000 since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. "I think it is inevitable that they pull out some of their forces," a second European diplomat told AFP. "But I don't expect this to be like a dramatic overhaul. I think it's going to be gradual. I think it's going to be based on consultations." Trump's first target is likely to be the troops left over from a surge ordered by his predecessor Joe Biden after Moscow's tanks rolled into Ukraine. Officials say relocating the rump of that 20,000-strong deployment would not hurt NATO's deterrence too much -- but alarm bells would ring if Trump looked to cut too deep into personnel numbers or close key bases. The issue is not just troop numbers -- the US has capabilities such as air defences, long-range missiles and satellite surveillance that allies would struggle to replace in the short-term. "The kinds of defence investments by Europe that are being made coming out of The Hague summit may only be felt in real capability terms over many years," said Ian Lesser from the German Marshall Fund think tank. "So the question of timing really does matter." - 'Inopportune moment' - Washington's desire to pull back from Europe may be tempered by Trump now taking a tougher line with Russia -- and Moscow's reluctance to bow to his demands to end the Ukraine war. "It seems an inopportune moment to send signals of weakness and reductions in the American security presence in Europe," Lesser said. He also pointed to Trump's struggles during his first term to pull troops out of Germany -- the potential bill for relocating them along with political resistance in Washington scuppering the plan. While European diplomats are feeling more confident than before about the troop review, they admit nothing can be certain with the mercurial US president. Other issues such as Washington's trade negotiations with the EU could rock transatlantic ties in the meantime and upend the good vibes. "It seems positive for now," said a third European diplomat. "But what if we are all wrong and a force decrease will start in 2026. To be honest, there isn't much to go on at this stage." del/ec/jxb/tc