Marvell's (MRVL) AI Strategy Gains Analyst Support—But Can It Deliver?
Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRVL) is one of the . On June 18, TD Cowen reiterated a 'Buy' rating on the stock with a $70.00 price target following its Custom AI Silicon virtual event. Marvell took the opportunity to showcase its intellectual property portfolio at the event, highlighting the $94 billion market opportunity across the data center segment.
It also outlined its capabilities in custom artificial intelligence silicon solutions, noting how it's a dominant player in the semiconductor industry with projected 43% revenue growth for FY2026. While there are some concerns related to the competitive dynamics in the custom XPU (accelerated processing unit) space, analysts at TD Cowen remain optimistic about Marvell's prospects.
A close-up of a digital circuit board with chips illuminated by LED lights.
It further noted how Marvell's current stock price is a reflection of 'limited success' in the AI market. That said, there may be potential upside provided the company executes its strategy effectively. The firm remains optimistic about Marvell's potential to capitalize on AI opportunities.
Despite competitive pressures in the AI space, 'the rising tide' in AI technology adoption is set to benefit multiple industry players, including Marvell.
Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRVL) engages in the development and production of semiconductors, focusing heavily on data centers.
While we acknowledge the potential of MRVL as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.
READ NEXT: and
Disclosure: None.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
14 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bloomberg Daybreak Asia: Israel-Iran Ceasefire in Flux
President Donald Trump announced Israel and Iran had agreed to what he called a 'complete and total' ceasefire, easing fears that a conflict between the two adversaries might escalate. Trump, who made the surprise announcement on his Truth Social platform days after ordering airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, said the accord would begin around midnight US time and is aimed at a lasting end to the fighting. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a tweet afterward that while there is no ceasefire agreement, his country had no intention to keep responding to Israeli attacks after 4:00 a.m. Tehran time. We break down the headlines with Joe Mathieu, co-host of Bloomberg Radio and Television's Balance of Power. Oil slumped and stocks rallied after Trump announced the ceasefire, spurring optimism the worst of the Middle East conflict is over. Global benchmark Brent crude tumbled almost 5% in early Asian trading after the surprise comment. S&P 500 futures rose 0.5%, while key stock indexes advanced in Japan, Hong Kong and Australia. The news damped demand for haven assets with the dollar weakening against all its Group-of-10 peers and gold dropping. Bloomberg's Jill Disis speaks with our TV colleagues, Yvonne Man and David Ingles, in Hong Kong. Plus - we look at how all the day's news may play into the Federal Reserve's inflation outlook. We get market insights from Ross Mayfield, Investment Strategist at Baird.
Business Insider
15 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Rise on ‘Weak' Iran Retaliation, July Rate Cut Odds Jump
Both the S&P 500 (SPX) and the Nasdaq 100 (NDX) closed higher following Iran's missile strike on a U.S. military base in Qatar. The attack was Iran's response to U.S. strikes on three of its nuclear sites over the weekend. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Despite Iran's retaliation, the market remained strong while oil prices dropped. That's because the attack resulted in zero casualties and didn't disrupt any oil infrastructure or supply chain locations. In addition, Qatar was able to intercept all of the missiles and was informed by Iran of the strikes before they actually occurred. As a result, it appears that Iran's retaliation was more symbolic than aggressive, signaling that the country is closer to taking a seat at the negotiation table. President Trump called the move 'a very weak response.' 'The base that was targeted in the attack by the powerful Iranian forces was far from urban facilities and residential areas in Qatar,' said Iran's Supreme National Security Council. However, oil prices still remain elevated compared to the start of the war on June 13. 'To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!' said Trump in a Truth Social post this morning, encouraging domestic oil production. Meanwhile, Americans have expressed their discomfort with the war by dropping President Trump's approval rating to 41%, a term-low and down from 47% in January. The poll, conducted by Reuters and research firm Ipsos, showed that 84% of respondents were concerned about the war while 79% were worried that Americans could be attacked following the U.S. missile attack on Iran. In interest rate news, a second Fed member has voiced support for a July rate cut, sending the odds of a 25 basis points reduction to 22.7% compared to 14.5% yesterday on CME's FedWatch tool. Fed Governor Michelle Bowman said that she would support lowering rates as soon as July if inflation remains low. Last week, Fed Governor Christopher Waller said that the central bank is in a good position to cut rates as early as July. The S&P 500 finished with a 0.96% gain while the Nasdaq 100 returned 1.06%.
Politico
22 minutes ago
- Politico
Media Matters sues FTC over ‘retaliatory' investigation
A liberal media watchdog group has filed suit against the Federal Trade Commission, saying it was placed under investigation in retaliation for its reporting about extremist content on the social media site X. Media Matters said in the suit filed Monday in federal court in Washington that White House appointees in the FTC were seeking to punish the organization on behalf of Elon Musk, the billionaire owner of X who until recently had a prominent role in the Trump administration. The FTC notified Media Matters last month that it was investigating the organization over whether its reporting on X amounted to illegal collusion with advertisers. 'The Court should put an end to the latest effort by the Trump Administration and Elon Musk's government allies to punish, intimidate, and harass Media Matters for publishing reporting they do not like,' it said. In November 2023, Media Matters reported that ads were appearing next to pro-Nazi posts on X. Musk, the lawsuit said, 'promised a 'thermonuclear' lawsuit against Media Matters—and his supporters in government were quick to pile on.' Two subsequent investigations from attorneys general in Missouri and Texas, which Media Matters asserts were both also retaliatory, were later dismissed by federal judges on First Amendment grounds. Neither the White House nor the FTC responded immediately to requests for comment from POLITICO. Media Matters said the federal investigation is part of a broader politicization of the agency under the administration. 'The Trump Administration has opened investigations into former officials who were critical of the President,' the lawsuit said. 'And it has targeted swaths of civil society deemed to be disloyal: universities, cultural institutions, public radio, and other media outlets.' Trump in March fired the FTC's two Democratic members, Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, overturning decades of precedent. The agency now has three commissioners, all Republicans. Several key leaders at the agency have previously spoken out against both Media Matters and advertiser boycotts like the one that affected X, the lawsuit said. Those named in the complaint include FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson and commissioners Mark Meador and Melissa Ann Holyoak. The organization also wrote that the administration's investigation has cast a chill on its reporting, preventing staff from covering Musk's relationship with Trump and connections between right-wing media and the FTC. 'This is a significant free speech issue, and Media Matters will not back down from this fight,' Angelo Carusone, chair and president of the nonprofit, said in a statement. 'If the Trump administration is allowed to use this unlawful investigation to punish legitimate reporting on behalf of a political ally, then there is nothing to stop it from targeting anyone who stands up and exercises their rights.'
