logo
CNN host laughs at Republican senator as he fact-checks him on Epstein ‘sweetheart' deal

CNN host laughs at Republican senator as he fact-checks him on Epstein ‘sweetheart' deal

Independent9 hours ago
CNN's Jake Tapper repeatedly fact-checked a Republican senator on air Sunday as the lawmaker insisted that Democrats and Barack Obama's administration were at fault for a 'sweetheart' deal that allowed Jeffrey Epstein to escape his 2008 conviction on child sex charges virtually unscathed.
Sen. Markwayne Mullin appeared on CNN's State of the Union and repeatedly claimed that a plea agreement to keep Epstein from being charged federally for child sex crimes was signed in 2009, under the Obama administration. But Epstein's plea agreement was drafted in 2007 and signed in 2008, when he pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor for sex, before Obama was even president.
'It was 2008,' Tapper corrected him, chuckling.
Tapper noted that the U.S. attorney who oversaw the non-prosecution agreement was Alex Acosta, who went on become Donald Trump's secretary of labor during his first administration.
'It all took place in 2008,' Tapper said.
Mullin then shot back, asking 'who was in office at the time?' — seemingly making the error of assuming that Obama was the president. Obama won the presidential election that year but was inaugurated in January 2009.
'In 2008, George W. Bush was the president,' Tapper said, as he was cut off by Mullin repeating his question. 'George W. Bush.'
Mullin went on to insist that because the case was 'sealed in 2009' that Democrats were somehow involved.
A clearly exasperated Tapper responded that 'the point is, the 'sweetheart deal', which was completed in 2008, was under the Bush administration.'
The plea agreement inked between Acosta and Epstein's attorney, Alan Dershowitz, was staggering in its leniency.
Epstein was allowed to leave the prison facility for hours at a time for 'work release' to the headquarters of a nebulous enterprise called the 'Florida Science Foundation' he founded shortly before beginning his sentence and shut down when it concluded.
Inside the prison, Epstein was allowed to maintain his own office, just as he'd done at Harvard University for years, while watching television and was watched by guards who wore suits and were partially on his payroll.
Mullin and other Republicans closely aligned with the president are treading a careful line on the issue of the Epstein investigation.
The Trump administration ignited a firestorm early in July when the Department of Justice and FBI announced that the agencies would not release any more documents related to the Epstein investigation despite having promised to do so. The agencies cited a refusal to release identifying information about victims and graphic sexual imagery involving children.
Most glaringly, the agencies also declared in that early July announcement that a so-called 'client list' of Epstein's alleged co-conspirators had not been found.
Having latched on to the issue long before Trump was elected to a second term, his MAGA base descended into chaos.
Many of the president's 2024 supporters called the reversal a betrayal by the administration, while some questioned whether Trump himself was involved in a cover-up to protect himself or other powerful men named as Epstein's accomplices in the files. Some Democrats latched on to the issue at the same time, joining calls for transparency.
Then, a pair of articles in The Wall Street Journal purported to outline Trump's own connections to the investigation.
The newspaper reported the contents of a message allegedly penned by Trump to Epstein as part of a 50th birthday celebration in 2003, including allusions to a 'secret.' Trump firmly denied authoring the note, and sued the newspaper and its reporters in response.
A second article from the WSJ days later reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Trump in May that he was mentioned in the Epstein investigation multiple times, thought it was not clear in what context
The White House called that story 'fake' and has repeatedly insinuated that Democrats including Joe Biden tampered with the Epstein files in response.
Being mentioned in the files does not mean wrongdoing, and hundreds of names are reportedly included.
Republicans on Capitol Hill are caught in the middle. Some are joining on to a bipartisan effort led by Thomas Massie — a Republican who clashed with the president over the GOP budget reconciliation package earlier this year — and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna to force the Justice Department to release the entirety of its document trove, with redactions for child sexual assault material and the names or identifying information of victims.
Others more aligned with leadership, including House Speaker Mike Johnson.
But Johnson and others have been careful not to label the Epstein story a distraction, to the White House's annoyance.
Johnson called the August recess early this past week, sending lawmakers home for the month to avoid a vote legislation from Massie and Khanna.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

French ministers say EU-US trade deal has merits but is also unbalanced
French ministers say EU-US trade deal has merits but is also unbalanced

Reuters

time29 minutes ago

  • Reuters

French ministers say EU-US trade deal has merits but is also unbalanced

PARIS, July 28 (Reuters) - French government ministers said a framework trade deal between the United States and European Union had some merits - such as exemptions for some key French business sectors such as spirits - but was nevertheless unbalanced. "The trade agreement negotiated by the European Commission with the United States will bring temporary stability to economic actors threatened by the escalation of American tariffs, but it is unbalanced," wrote French European Affairs Minister Benjamin Haddad on X. That view was echoed by France's industry minister Marc Ferracci, who said more talks - which could last weeks or months - would be needed before the deal could be formally concluded. Ferracci told RTL radio that more needed to be done in terms of rebalancing the EU's trade relations with the U.S. "This is not the end of the story," Ferracci told RTL.

Bondi called for release of Epstein files. What is she doing now?
Bondi called for release of Epstein files. What is she doing now?

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Bondi called for release of Epstein files. What is she doing now?

Now, Bondi, 59, finds herself at the heart of the debate over whether more information will be disclosed on the alleged sex trafficker. More: 'Terrific guy': The Trump-Epstein party boy friendship lasted a decade, ended badly Despite his death six years ago, Epstein's case continues to haunt the headlines because of rampant speculation about which rich and powerful people might have joined him in sexually abusing minors. Bondi has said there was no client list in Epstein's criminal file. But President Donald Trump's name reportedly appears in the documents, and he was a repeat passenger on Epstein's private jet when the two were friends in the 1990s. Trump has denied wrongdoing or visiting Epstein's private island, where much of the abuse allegedly occurred. "The fact is that the President kicked him out of his club for being a creep," said White House Communications Director Steven Cheung, referring to Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in South Florida. Meanwhile, Bondi served as Florida's state attorney general years after Palm Beach County authorities convicted Epstein on prostitution charges and released him in 2009 after 13 months in detention, which was mostly work release. Federal authorities chose not to prosecute Epstein at all, in what critics called the legal "deal of the century." After a Miami Herald investigation of his case, New York-based federal prosecutors charged Epstein in July of 2019 with sex trafficking minors. He died in jail a month after his arrest and long before any criminal trial could happen, in what the New York medical examiner ruled and the Justice Department confirmed was a suicide. Now Bondi has asked federal judges to release grand jury transcripts in the case. One has already turned her down and another asked for more documentation. And federal prosecutors and Bondi's No. 2, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, met July 24 and again on 25 with Ghislaine Maxwell, an Epstein associate serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for conspiracy to sexually abuse minors. Here are the highlights of Bondi's involvement in the case. Did Bondi investigate Epstein as Florida attorney general? After years of state-level investigation, Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to one count of soliciting prostitution and one count of soliciting prostitution from someone under age 18. During the inquiry, then-Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter disagreed with how Palm Beach state attorney Barry Krischer was handling the case and invited then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, an appointee from the George W. Bush administration, to investigate. But in what critics called the legal "deal of century," Epstein served 13 months on the two state charges under an agreement not to charge him federally. Bondi, a Republican, was elected statewide more than a year after Epstein was released and served as Florida's attorney general for two terms from 2011 to 2019. State attorneys such as Krischer are elected independently and don't report directly to the attorney general. Dave Aronberg, a Democrat who stepped down this year after a dozen years as Palm Beach state attorney, said the Epstein matter never went before Bondi. "Zero overlap," said Aronberg, who also served as Florida's state drug czar under Bondi. "It was long over by the time she got there." Robert Jarvis, a law professor at Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, said after state and federal prosecutors concluded their case there appeared to be nothing more for Bondi to pursue. "There was no reason to start a new investigation," Jarvis said, unless new evidence was brought to Bondi's office. Bondi said Epstein never should have been released Still, with accusations of more than 1,000 victims in the case, Republicans and conspiracy theorists have long argued for the release of additional information because of skepticism Epstein died by suicide and demands for a presumed client list that could lead to more prosecutions. Two days after Epstein died, Bondi told Sean Hannity on Fox News on Aug. 12, 2019, that he should have never been let out of custody. More: Disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, awaiting sex trafficking charges, dead of apparent suicide "Well, he should have never been released when he was in jail serving his jail time. Someone who is accused of sex crimes convicted should never be on work release," Bondi said. "So what do we have now? We have a dead, most likely pedophile, coward, and we have very brave victims who wants to face the person that did this to them." Bondi pledged to release information after becoming attorney general Shortly after her early February confirmation as Trump's second-term U.S. attorney general, Bondi again highlighted the case and began pledging to release files. Fox News host John Roberts asked Bondi on Feb. 21 whether she would release the list of Epstein's clients. "Will that really happen?" he asked. "It's sitting on my desk right now to review," Bondi replied. "That's been a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that." Then Bondi told Fox News host Jesse Watters on Feb. 26 more information would be released. "I think tomorrow, Jesse, breaking news right now, you're going to see some Epstein information being released by my office." She then added, "What you're going to see, hopefully tomorrow, is a lot of flight logs, a lot of names, a lot of information." The Justice Department released documents on Feb. 27 that had previously been leaked, but were never formally released. "The Department remains committed to transparency and intends to release the remaining documents upon review and redaction to protect the identities of Epstein's victims," a department statement said. The lack of revelations in the release disappointed lawmakers and others who expected bombshells from the release. "THIS IS NOT WHAT WE OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASKED FOR and a complete disappointment," Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Florida, wrote on social media Feb. 27. "GET US THE INFORMATION WE ASKED FOR!" Bondi made a point of noting in a Feb. 27 letter to FBI Director Kash Patel that she had requested "the full and complete files related to Jeffrey Epstein" but learned she received only a fraction of them. She initially received about 200 pages, "which consisted primarily of flight logs, Epstein's list of contacts, and a list of victims' names and phone numbers," she wrote. But the FBI field office in New York notified her that day there were thousands more pages of records, audio and video recordings, and other materials related to Epstein and his clients. "There will be no withholdings or limitations to my or your access," Bondi wrote Patel. "The Department of Justice will ensure that any public disclosure of these files will be done in a manner to protect the privacy of victims and in accordance with law, as I have done my entire career as a prosecutor." Appearing on Hannity's FOX News program, Bondi on March 3 said that an order she issued in February resulted in a "truckload" of Epstein files being delivered by the FBI. "Thousands of pages of documents. I have the FBI going through them," Bondi said. "We believe in transparency, and America has the right to know." Justice Department release on Epstein sparks criticism Against that backdrop, the Justice Department released a memo July 7 that said a "systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list'" and confirmed Epstein died by suicide in August 2019. "Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither" to combat child exploitation nor bring justice to victims, according to the memo. "No further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted." More: Family feud: Trump at odds with MAGA movement on multiple fronts The memo set off a firestorm of criticism from inside Trump's "Make America Great Again" movement and calls for the release of more information: Charlie Kirk, the head of Turning Point USA, listed 10 things he thinks should be done about the files and witnesses. Kirk later said he was done talking about Epstein and trusted his friends in the administration. Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colorado, said "no one is satisfied with what has been received of lack thereof," on "The Benny Show." Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, and Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, cosponsored a petition to force a House vote on releasing the files. The next day at a White House Cabinet meeting, Trump discouraged reporters from asking questions about Epstein. "Are people still talking about this guy, this creep? That is unbelievable," Trump said as he preferred to talk about legislative victories and recovery efforts for Texas flood damage. "It just seems like a desecration. But you go ahead." Two seats to Trump's right at the July 8 Cabinet meeting, Bondi then tried to clarify her remarks from the February interview with John Roberts that she was referring to the entire Epstein file, rather than a specific client list. "I was asked a question about the client list and my response was, 'It's sitting on my desk to be reviewed,' meaning the file, not the client list," she told reporters. Bondi also said jailhouse video from New York was missing a minute because of a nightly reset for the aged recording system. And she said any of Epstein's videos from the investigation would never "see the light of day" because they contain child pornography. "Also, to the tens of thousands of video, they turned out to be child porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein," Bondi said. "Child porn is what they were. Never going to be released. Never going to see the light of day." Lawmakers seek release of Epstein file The Trump administration denials raised suspicions there was something to hide. Democrats piled on with Republicans to demand more information. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-California, joined Massie on the proposed legislation that aims to force the Justice Department to release all its records related to Epstein. More: Is Trump in the Epstein files? Before Bondi's reported alert, here is where he appeared By mid-July, with the tempest rising, Trump directed Bondi to seek the release of grand jury testimony in the case. Bondi filed three requests July 18. It wasn't enough to help out House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, who suspended House floor action days before the scheduled August recess rather than face a vote on Massie's legislation. Johnson, a close Trump ally, said his decision for lawmakers' early dismissal was to "give the president space" to resolve questions about the investigation. He added that members of Congress were threading a fine needle trying to secure the release of information about Epstein while protecting his victims. Trump "wants maximum transparency but he's also very insistent that we do not subject people who have already been victims of unspeakable crimes to further public scrutiny," Johnson told reporters July 22. "It would be a very dangerous thing to put those people's names out or do a release of information in a way that is haphazard, where they could be easily unmasked." More: Republicans still have an Epstein dilemma. Now they have to face voters. "As things are revealed and, I hope will take place quickly, you will see that it is yet another Democrat CON JOB," Trump wrote on social media July 24. "Hopefully, the Grand Jury Files will put an end to this HOAX. Everyone should see what is there, but people who are innocent should not be hurt." Judges review requests to unseal Epstein file One big challenge for Bondi and the Trump administration as they push for more disclosures: Grand jury evidence traditionally remains confidential. U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg in West Palm Beach quickly refused to unseal the documents. The judge, an appointee of President Barack Obama, said the Bondi-led department's request to release grand jury documents from 2005 and 2007 did not meet any of the extraordinary exceptions under federal law that could make them public. Rosenberg said her "hands are tied." U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer in New York, another Obama appointee who presided over Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell's case, said there are exceptions to the secrecy rules but that Bondi hadn't invoked them. Engelmayer set a July 29 deadline for the government to explain why the disclosure is being sought, what specific information should be disclosed and whether grand jury witnesses are still alive. He also asked for a complete set of transcripts, a redacted version for potential release and a list of other evidence such as exhibits. Maxwell, an associate of Epstein who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for conspiring to sexually abuse minors, has until Aug. 5 to say whether she agrees to disclosure or opposes it. Victims face an Aug. 5 deadline to state their positions. "The Court intends to resolve this motion expeditiously," Engelmayer wrote. "However, the Court cannot rule on the motion without additional submissions." Federal prosecutors meet with Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche - who previously served as Trump's private lawyer defending him in a series of criminal cases - met July 24 and 25 with Maxwell to find out what more she can say about her dealings with Epstein. "If Ghislaine Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say," Blanche in a statement on social media on July 22 while planning the meeting. But Rep. Dan Goldman, D-New York, argued Blanche's effort was to protect Trump "by tacitly floating a pardon for Maxwell in return for information that politically benefits President Trump." "Maxwell's information is only as credible as any corroboration found in the Epstein files, including recordings, witness interviews, electronic communications, and photographs and videos," said Goldman, a former federal prosecutor who served as lead counsel in Trump's first House impeachment and battled against a presidential defense team that included Bondi. "Do not be fooled: this latest delay tactic is yet another effort to conceal the Epstein files." The same day as the Justice Department's announcement, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee agreed to subpoena Maxwell for questions from lawmakers. Three days later, as he readied to leave on a trip to Scotland, Trump responded to reporters that he hasn't considered pardoning Maxwell. Contributing: Nick Penzenstadler and Holly Baltz of The Palm Beach Post

Thanks to Epstein, MAGA is waking up to Trump's endless lies
Thanks to Epstein, MAGA is waking up to Trump's endless lies

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Thanks to Epstein, MAGA is waking up to Trump's endless lies

And then ... Trump and Co. tried to drop the Epstein matter. They said it was a nothingburger. Trump called it boring. Old news. He told his loyalists they were "weaklings" for not letting it go. MAGA is shocked to learn that President Donald Trump lies It was a twist that few in the Trump-loving universe saw coming. Put simply, he lied about releasing the files. And then, as we recently learned, he lied about whether his name appears in the files. His flailing attempts at distraction, his finger-pointing at others who were friends with Epstein and his decision to send a top Justice Department official (who happens to have previously been the president's personal defense attorney) to speak with Epstein's imprisoned sex-trafficking partner Ghislaine Maxwell have all made Trump seem desperate. Opinion: 'South Park' mocking naked Trump = NOT FUNNY. Fake Obama arrest video = FUNNY! And that has given the MAGA faithful a rare moment of clarity. Let me say this to them: Welcome back to reality. Your hero-president is a liar who lies about everything. Trump lies incessantly. His supporters might be starting to notice. He lied about the 2020 election being stolen. He lied about the crowd size at his first inauguration. He lied about the state of the economy under former President Joe Biden. He lied about crime rates. He has recently been lying about former President Barack Obama engaging in a coup or committing treason or whatever his latest evidence-less claim happens to be. He lied about migrants eating dogs. He has lied about U.S. cities being destroyed by immigrant gangs. He lies about his polling numbers, which lately are abysmal. Opinion: Insecure Trump knows he'll never measure up to Obama. And it kills him. He was asked not long ago whether Attorney General Pam Bondi had told him his name appears in the Epstein files. To that he said: "No, no." The Wall Street Journal reported July 23 that Bondi had told Trump his name appears "multiple times." So that's a banger of a lie? And based on the MAGA fury over the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files, it's one of the lies that broke through the "Everything Trump Says Is Gospel" barrier that has long protected his supporters from the painful truth of his habitual dishonesty. How can anything Trump says about the Epstein case be trusted? So my question to Trump supporters, seeing for the first time that the president plays fast and loose with the truth, is this: As the Epstein story continues to unfold, how can you trust anything Trump tells you? His deception already indicates he has something to hide, and having something to hide when it comes to Epstein is among the reddest of red flags. You believed Trump would bring down the vile elites who were part of a global conspiracy, but now you've gotten a glimpse at the possibility that the president is, at best, trying to protect powerful people or, at worst, trying to protect himself. Trump has made himself an inextricable part of the Epstein conspiracy One day, when the administration starts miraculously releasing the information it refuse to release right now, and if the name "Trump" is miraculously scrubbed from that information, and if we learn that Trump's former defense attorney and current Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has offered leniency or a pardon to Maxwell in exchange for testimony that miraculously exonerates Trump while targeting powerful Democrats, what will you think? Will you remember Trump lied to you? Will you remember how squirrelly he got as the Epstein story boiled? Will you remember his evasiveness and wild blame-casting? Or will you retreat to the safety of believing Trump to be a faultless purveyor of truth? Will you stick with the lies you swallowed before, and maybe gulp down a few more to dull the pain of facing the true nature of his character? MAGA has a choice with Epstein: Embrace the light or retreat to the shadows People like me have been saying for years that Trump can't be trusted. You've ignored such claims every step of the way, but now he hit a nerve, and it will require Herculean levels of denial to unsee the sidesteps and dissembling. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. If you care about the Epstein case - and whether it involves Democrats or Republicans or celebrities or whoever, we all should - you know as well as I do that Trump and this administration can't be trusted. That private jet has flown. Trump has woven himself into the conspiracy by behaving in a conspiratorial way. So you have a choice, MAGA: a harsh reality or the comfort of lies. I have no confidence you'll choose reality. But I at least hope the decision is tougher than usual. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store