What are the 5 warning signs of a stroke?
FAST is an acronym to help identify a stroke before being able to make it to a doctor or hospital. It stands for face, arms, speech and time, alluding to common stroke symptoms.
Stroke is the fifth leading cause of death for Americans and a leading cause of long-term disability. Each year, approximately 795,000 people in the United States have a stroke, 610,000 of which are first-time strokes.
It occurs when a blood vessel that carries oxygen and nutrients to the brain is either blocked by a clot or ruptures, causing parts of the brain to become damaged or die.
Onset symptoms, which are sudden, may include:
Numbness or weakness in the face, arm or leg, especially on one side of the body
Confusion, trouble speaking or difficulty understanding speech
Trouble seeing in one or both eyes
Difficulty walking, dizziness, loss of balance or lack of coordination.
How to prevent a stroke
The CDC recommends the following 'test,' with the help of someone nearby if possible, to identify a stroke and urges patients to seek medical attention.
Face: Smile to test if your face droops on one side.
Arms: Raise both arms to see if one arm is drifting downward.
Speech: Repeat a simple phrase to determine if speech is slurred.
Timing: Stroke treatments work best within three hours of the first symptoms, so call 911 immediately if you have any of these signs.
NewsNation's Jordan Perkins contributed to this report.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
18 minutes ago
- Axios
ACA insurers plan biggest rate hikes in eight years
Health plans on the Affordable Care Act marketplaces are requesting their biggest premium hikes since 2018, in some cases over 30%, according to a new analysis from KFF. The big picture: The growing cost of care combined with the anticipated expiration of enhanced ACA premium subsidies and tariffs are driving the increase, according to insurers' preliminary filings with state regulators for 2026. By the numbers: ACA premiums are on track to rise by a median 15% next year, based on 105 filings submitted across 19 states and D.C. that KFF examined. Thirty-two insurers anticipate a 10% to 15% increase in premiums. Another 24 insurers expect increases of 15% to 20%. No insurer proposed decreasing premiums. Five said they would hike premiums no more than 5%, while eight insurers seek an increase of 30% or more. State regulators and insurers will finalize rates by late summer. Republicans' new tax-and-spending law, as well as new regulations from the Trump administration, could alter the plans' premium calculations, KFF says. Between the lines: Marketplace enrollees who qualify for ACA premium subsidies typically won't feel the effects of annual premium increases, KFF notes. But if Congress doesn't extend enhanced subsidies for people making more than 400% of the federal poverty level, middle-income ACA enrollees could feel an average surge of 75% in monthly coverage costs from this year to next. Zoom out: Many Americans with employer-sponsored insurance will also see higher health care costs next year.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Health insurance costs are about to spike again: What to expect in 2026.
Consumers who buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act marketplace will likely face double-digit rate hikes next year. Insurers plan a median premium increase of 15% for 2026 plans, which would be the largest ACA insurance price hike since 2018, according to a Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker analysis published July 18. And many working-age consumers who get their health insurance through the workplace won't be spared, either. Benefits consultant Mercer said more than half of big employers expect to shift a larger share of insurance costs to employees and their families next year by raising deductibles, copays or out-of-pocket requirements. KFF said the ACA insurers cited factors such as medical cost inflation, the expiration of tax credits instituted during former President Joe Biden's administration that made plans cheaper, and tariffs on prescription drugs and medical device imports. Still unknown is how President Donald Trump's and Congressional Republicans' tax cut and spending law might impact next year's ACA health insurance rates, experts said. Trump's tax cut law has "created a lot of uncertainty," said Matt McGough, a policy analyst for KFF's program on the ACA. "Insurers weren't sure how to handle it." Millions of nondisabled adults are projected to lose Medicaid coverage due to the law's work-or-volunteer requirement, but the law also will impact some who buy ACA plans. Trump's law and a federal rule will end a special sign-up period for people who earned less than 150% of the federal poverty level − a group that had significant enrollment gains in recent years. The enrollment perk allowed low-income Americans to sign up for coverage year-round, making it easier for families to sign up, McGough said. The law also ends automatic ACA enrollment renewals for consumers, who will be required to update income and other information annually. Trump administration officials have said the Biden administration's enrollment policies for Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act allowed fraud and abuse. In a July 17 news release, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said it discovered 2.8 million Americans were potentially enrolled in Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance Program plans in multiple states, or they were simultaneously enrolled in Medicaid/CHIP plans and subsidized ACA plans. The agency said it initiated steps to ensure people weren't simultaneously enrolled in multiple, taxpayer-subsidized insurance plans. In a statement, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. said the Trump administration "will no longer tolerate waste, fraud, and abuse at the expense of our most vulnerable citizens." Higher health costs, end of COVID-era tax credits Higher health care spending is the top factor driving health insurance premiums higher - accounting for roughly half of the expected insurance price hikes, McGough said. Another significant factor is Biden's COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits, which made ACA plans cheaper for consumers and drove record high enrollment, will expire at the end of the year. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated about 5 million could lose health insurance after the tax credits expire. KFF said the expiring tax credits will increase ACA consumers' out-of-pocket premium payments more than 75% on average. Healthier enrollees will likely choose to drop their coverage, leaving insurance plans with groups of sicker patients who require more health care, McGough said. KFF's review of 105 ACA insurers in 19 states and Washington D.C. found most are seeking rate hikes of 10% to 20% for coverage next year. Another 28 insurers will seek rate hikes of 28% or more. State and federal insurance regulators must sign off on proposed rate hikes before they are finalized this fall. Most working-age Americans get health insurance through their or a spouse's employer. These large employers will be more willing to pass along a larger share of health insurance costs to workers and their families next year, a July 16 report from benefits consultant Mercer found. Mercer said 51% of large employers say they are likely or very likely to shifts cost to workers through higher deductibles or out-of-pocket maximums. A year ago, 45% of employers were willing to make their workers absorb a higher share of the health bill. Employers health benefits costs are expected to rise 6% in 2025 and could rise even faster in 2026. To curb those cost increases, employers are adjusting insurance plan options for workers and their families, said Beth Umland, Mercer's director of research for health and benefits. Earlier this decade, employers were reluctant to shift significant health costs to workers due to the tight labor market. But with health costs rising faster than inflation, more companies are willing to do so, Umland said. Companies also are increasingly offering plans that encourage workers to get care from narrower networks of doctors and hospitals who have negotiated discounts with the insurance plan, Umland said.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
GOP Budget Threatens Rural Hospitals Across Several States
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. After President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" brought in some of the biggest healthcare spending cuts in American history, there has been growing concern about how many rural hospitals, both those already at risk of closure and others, will shut as a result of the financial burden shifted to states and what that will mean for local communities. The major budget bill cuts around $1 trillion from health care spending over the next decade, with the Medicaid program taking the biggest hit. Nearly half of all rural hospitals across the country were already struggling financially before these new cuts were brought in. A Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson told Newsweek: "As mentioned in Dr. Oz's X post, 'The OBBB spends an additional $200 billion more on Medicaid moving forward than is spent this year. The only thing it eliminates is waste, fraud, and abuse.' "HHS remains committed to ensuring that Americans, especially those in rural and underserved communities, can access the care they need, when they need it," the spokesperson added. How Will the Bill Impact Hospitals? As the bill will see the federal match rate reduced for states that expanded Medicaid, as well as broader cuts, those states will be placed in a more difficult financial position— potentially slimming down services or allowing hospitals to close down. While some hospitals may merge with larger hospital systems to "weather the storm," many will look to "cut specific services and departments to save costs," Michael Shepherd, a professor of health management and policy at the University of Michigan, told Newsweek. Shepherd said that for rural hospitals, labor, delivery, and obstetrics are often cut first due to lower birth rates in rural areas, while mental health services and intensive care units could also be stripped back. "Most of the hospitals that will close in the coming years will be hospitals that are already struggling financially," he said. But, the implications on Medicaid threaten to "spread these closures nationwide once again," Shepherd said. "We may observe even higher rates of closures in the coming year." The wide-reaching effect of this could spark "intense focus on opportunities to both pursue greater efficiency and to increase different revenue sources," Elizabeth Merwin, executive director of the Center for Rural Health and Nursing at the University of Texas at Arlington, told Newsweek. It may also increase the percentage of uninsured individuals, which is "a risk for both hospitals and communities," requiring a development of "strategies to generate revenues and opportunities to support this population," she added. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty Where Could Hospitals Be At Risk Of Closure? The hospitals most at risk are in states that already had "the highest percentages of rural hospitals that are open but financially struggling," Shepherd said. These states include Texas, South Carolina, Louisiana, and Kansas. Additionally, rural hospitals in states that are likely to experience the largest reductions in rural Medicaid coverage may struggle, such as Kentucky, North Carolina, Virginia, Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and West Virginia, he added. Rural hospitals that serve a large number of older adults, such as those in Northern New England, also "have an increased risk due to aging populations, higher per-capita reliance on Medicaid, and limited alternative healthcare options," Karen Fortuna, a professor of community and family medicine at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, told Newsweek. While Arkansas has not experienced the degree of hospital closures seen in surrounding states, the "fabric of our rural healthcare system is fraying because of increased personnel and supply costs, stagnant reimbursement, lower patient volume due to out-migration and shifts to outpatient care, and antiquated facilities," Arkansas Center for Health Improvement Interim CEO Craig Wilson told Newsweek. "Even minimal healthcare coverage loss in rural areas would push hospitals into critical territory financially," he added. Ultimately, "there is a risk to all hospitals, even those with better financial situations," Merwin said. What Does This Mean For Communities? The closure of more rural hospitals across the country will have a wide-ranging impact on local communities. Communities would lose a point of access to multiple services, "which is not limited to inpatient hospitalizations, since rural hospitals are often the hub for outpatient services, emergency medical services, and even home health," Keith Mueller, a professor of health management and policy at the University of Iowa, told Newsweek. Closures would also result in the loss of jobs, he added, which provide benefits such as health insurance. "Any time an access point for acute care is lost, a community runs the risk of poorer health outcomes due to longer travel times for emergencies and other critical care," Wilson said. Some studies have shown that mortality risk is higher following closures, much of which is due to the increased travel distances required to receive medical attention, Shepherd said. "If you have a stroke or a heart attack, having an additional 45-minute commute can be the difference between survival and death," he added. Other studies have revealed that the loss of hospitals has negative consequences on birth outcomes as well, Shepherd said. The "likely decline" in access to physical and mental health care for vulnerable groups will see more patients "delaying care and accessing care at high-cost facilities such as emergency rooms," which can "drive up the cost of healthcare and lead to worse patient outcomes," Fortuna said. What Options Do States Have? States have a number of options to navigate the difficult path ahead. There is also some help offered in Trump's budget bill, as $50 billion has been allocated over five years to all states for a variety of purposes, including payments to rural facilities. However, these options are not without their complexities. "States can attempt to raise more money within the state to bolster their Medicaid programs," Shepherd said. However, doing so requires raising taxes in "a political environment where that has become difficult to do." He added that some states may consider rescinding Medicaid expansion "to save resources for those below the poverty line or cutting the number of services provided by their state's Medicaid program." But, Shepherd said that "will not help hospital finances and will likely lead to increased 'uncompensated care' costs for the hospitals." "More emphasis needs to be placed on identifying cost-effective care to ensure funds available are optimally used to meet the communities' needs," Merwin said. She said that cost-effectiveness studies offer decision makers "needed information to understand cost in relation to outcomes that can benefit patients and communities." There may also be a push for "telehealth expansion," Fortuna said, meaning patients would have access to digital care if hospital buildings have to close. "The integration of artificial intelligence into health systems may be necessary to optimize scarce resources," she added. Ultimately, "to survive, rural health streams will need to innovate." Some states are already beginning to act in light of the bill's passage. Some are "trying to maximize their federal matching dollars from Medicaid while they still can, bolstering state grant programs for rural health care workforce and facilities, and boosting Medicaid reimbursement rates," Carrie Henning-Smith, co-director of the Rural Health Research Center at the University of Minnesota, told Newsweek. Regardless, though, "states face funding and policy limitations on what they can do to shore up their rural health care infrastructure," she said. "Without federal support and federal solutions, population health outcomes for the entire country may suffer." While states have difficult financial decisions to make, Wilson said, "local communities will also need to engage in some difficult conversations about the extent to which they want to financially support their hospital to keep care local."
