Anurag Basu's greatest miracle was discovering Kangana Ranaut, she rose like a phoenix, giving 'Gangster' the wings it needed to soar: Mahesh Bhatt
Nineteen years ago, gangster: a love story roared onto
indian cinema
screens, redefining love, betrayal, and heartbreak with a visceral force. directed by
anurag basu
and produced under the sharp, instinctive eye of
mahesh bhatt
, the film not only delivered memorable performances by
kangana ranaut
,
emraan hashmi
, and
shiney ahuja
, but also etched itself into the hearts of millions through its soulful music and haunting storytelling.
Today, Mahesh Bhatt revisits the extraordinary journey of
Gangster
, a film he regards not just as a project but as a living, breathing masterpiece — one that was touched by fate and blessed by what he calls the "Film God." In this candid conversation, Bhatt reveals the inspirations, the pivotal choices, and the divine accidents that birthed
Gangster
.
Why do you regard
Gangster
as your masterpiece?
Some films are made, and some are born from a spark the gods themselves strike. In the secretive corners of the entertainment world — from Hollywood's golden avenues to Bollywood's chaotic studios — there is a whispered belief in a force unseen: the Film God. A capricious deity who, with a flick of divine whim, either breathes life into a film or lets it wither.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Invest $200 in Amazon without buying stocks to earn a second salary
Marketsall
Sign Up
Undo
In Bollywood, we often say,
"Filmen achchhi ban jaati hai, banayi nahi jaati."
A film isn't made — it happens.
Gangster
was one such miracle.
Gangster: A Love Story
simply "happened"?
Exactly.
Gangster
happened. The film god smiled on it from the very first breath. Every frame seemed touched by destiny. Every note of music trembled with something predestined. It moved through us like a fever dream — alive, unstoppable. And when it hit the screens, it set the box office on fire, creating stars whose light still shines today.
You wrote
Gangster
. How did the idea come to you?
The idea didn't come gently — it rushed to my head like blood — violent, undeniable. It was a Sunday morning when it struck. I immediately called Anurag Basu and the entire team, unable to contain the firestorm burning inside me.A good story is like fire: touch it, and it scorches you.
Gangster
was that fire. It burned everyone who heard it, and they carried its passion into the film.
Why did you choose Anurag Basu to direct it?
Anurag Basu has an alchemical vision — a rare ability to take a raw spark and give it flesh, blood, and soul.
What would you call Anurag Basu's biggest miracle in
Gangster
?
His greatest miracle was discovering Kangana Ranaut — a wild, untamed force of nature. In her very first role, she rose like a phoenix, giving
Gangster
the wings it needed to soar.And then there was South Korea — such an unexpected, beautiful choice. Cherry blossoms falling like soft rain over broken hearts; a foreign land that felt both alien and achingly familiar. It became a silent, emotional backdrop for Pritam's music.
Speaking of music, what role did it play in
Gangster
?
Ah, the music! Pritam's soundtrack didn't just accompany the film — it
possessed
it.The album became the fifth best-selling in India for 2006. Millions carried its songs in their hearts."Ya Ali," with Zubeen Garg's haunting voice, crossed oceans and carried the ache of lost love to distant shores."Tu Hi Meri Shab Hai," "Bheegi Bheegi" — each song was like a spell woven tighter around the audience, making the film unforgettable.
Tell us about the performances of Kangana Ranaut, Emraan Hashmi, and Shiney Ahuja.
The performances were extraordinary. Emraan Hashmi transformed from a boy into a man before our eyes, sharpening his craft to staggering brilliance.Shiney Ahuja haunted the screen, speaking volumes even in his silences.And
Gulshan Grover
, long known for villainy, stunned everyone by revealing a bruised, fragile humanity beneath his tough exterior.
Your closing thoughts on
Gangster
?
Gangster
was not just a film. It was love, betrayal, violence, longing — a great, wounded heart beating on screen.It didn't end — it
ripped
its ending from the audience's soul, leaving them shattered and spellbound. Above all, it was Anurag Basu's triumph: his vision, his risk, his reckless surrender to the fire that
Gangster
was.Once in a lifetime, if you're lucky, you can look back and say
, Yes. That was a masterpiece. And we were part of it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Maharani Radhikaraje Gaekwad of Baroda takes a dig at Ishaan Khatter-Bhumi Pednekar's The Royals: ‘The Royal Ignore'
When Ishaan Khatter and Bhumi Pednekar's The Royals premiered on Netflix on May 9, it sparked varied reactions from viewers. While some appreciated the series' visual appeal, others criticised its storyline. Now, Maharani Radhikaraje Gaekwad of Baroda has publicly criticised the show for misrepresentation of modern-day royals. Taking to her Instagram, Radhikaraje penned a long note emphasizing that many royals are active contributors to India's cultural and social landscape. She expressed her disappointment in how the ladies of the royal family were presented on screen. Taking to her Instagram on Thursday, Radhikaraje Gaekwad shared a long note with the headline, 'The Royal Ignore.' She further wrote, 'One would imagine the royals of India, a community abundantly chronicled, photographed, biographed, and today well positioned in a range of arenas from politics, hospitality, to magazine covers, would have a better chance of surviving an on screen portrayal such as the one in The Royals. Alas, that was not be and such is our fate, since 1947.' Radhikaraje said stereotyping Rajas soaked in whiskey and profligacy and Ranis in chiffons and pearls, was a politically motivated propaganda that began post independence and unfortunately continues to define them, hinting at the portrayals of the royals in the Netflix series. A post shared by Radhikaraje Gaekwad (@radhikaraje) Defending her community, Radhikaraje Gaekwad went on to list several good things the royals did both pre- and post-independence. She wrote, 'In truth India's independence saw the dissolution of centuries old, internationally recognised Indian monarchy. Sardar Patel correctly referred it as a 'Bloodless Revolution'. 565 princely states controlling over 40 per cent of pre independence India handed over their homes, lands, and identities for the creation of a united, democratic country. Apart from a handful that resisted and disappointedly left.' Calling it an era of uncertainty for families that had lived for centuries with privileges, Radhikaraje wrote, 'They had for most parts administered their princely states, many the size of smaller European countries, and often more prosperous too with benevolence and acumen. And history is proof of this.' ALSO READ | The Traitors trailer: Karan Johar's reality show turns savage as Uorfi Javed, Raj Kundra, Apoorva Mukhija play dirty. Watch She added, 'Undoubtedly, there were a few bad royal apples and I make no excuse for them, yet while monarchs rose and fell in China and younger empires such as France, Russia, and Austria, India has the unique distinction of being one of the only countries where royals reigned for centuries without any known instances of revolt or assassination. And when time came, they relinquished their kingdoms with dignity.' Radhikaraje Gaekwad highlighted the time when Indian royals faced the abolition of allowance in return for giving up their sovereignty, going through a difficult time in 1971. Taking a dig at The Royals, Radhikaraje wrote, 'India has also seen some of their finest statesmen, diplomats, wildlife conservationists, bureaucrats, army officers, educationists, sportsmen, hoteliers and entrepreneurs emerge from royalty and today our places, forts and museums are perhaps the last few sentinels of India's undiluted, apolitical patronage and cultural history, all maintained in our personal capacity. Yet after all these decades, our own country continues to view us — all 565 families and a few thousand nobility, with an odd mixture of awe, ignorance, and distaste.' She added, 'The real Royals in the meanwhile have rolled up their sleeves and are running India's best known music festivals, museums, hotels, even constituencies and states — an impressive number being the ladies of the house — Gwalior, Jaipur, Bikaner, and Kotah to name a few. Ouch to purdah and patriarchy!' At last, taking a dig at Ishaan Khatter's character in the series, Radhikaraje wrote, 'The young royals too are returning to their roots armed with degrees from universities around the world. They proudly staddle the two worlds, speak their mother tongue, wear their turbans but work to make their heritage sustainable, relatable, accessible. For they know if not them, no one else can.' Radhikaraje Gaekwad's post drew widespread praise for the grace with which she expressed her opinion. Her note came after the makers announced a second season of the series, sparking debate online.
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Shabana Azmi and I sleep on streets': Javed Akhtar claps back at Pak actor Bushra Ansari's comment that no rents him a house in India
Weeks after Pakistani actress Bhushra Ansari's comment against Javed Akhtar, the veteran lyricist-writer has reacted to it. In a recent interview, Javed Akhtar gave a befitting reply to Bhushra's 'Inhe Mumbai mein koi ghar pe rent nahi deta' comment. He asked, 'Who are you to tell me when to talk and when to not?' In an interview with Lallantop, Javed Akhtar shared, 'There is this Pakistani actress, Bushra Ansari, she often talks about me. She once advised me to keep quiet. She said something like, 'Naseeruddin Shah stays quiet, you should too.' My question to her is: 'Who is she to tell me when to talk and when not to? Who gave you this right and why do you expect me to take your advise?'' He added, 'We internally might have several problems (referring to India), but if an outsider comes to comment, I am an Indian. Why do they forget that? I won't keep quiet.' When the interviewer said the the actress claimed that he doesn't even get a house on rent in Mumbai, Javed sarcastically replied, 'Yes right, Shabana and I have been sleeping on the streets lately. Kya yaar, ab kya bole?' He laughed as he said. In the same interview, Javed Akhtar recalled the incident that prompted her to take a dig at them for not getting a house on rent. He said, 'About 25 years ago, Shabana wanted to buy a flat for investment purpose. But the broker said that the owner will not sell his house to a Muslim. But, do you know why he refused? He refused it because his parents stayed in Sindh from where these Pakistanis shooed them away. Anyone with a wound that big and deep, will react the way the owner reacted. If that day, Shabana was refused a flat, it was not because she was a Muslim, but it was because the owner was displacing his revenge someplace else for what his parents went through. So who is she (Bushra Ansari) to take a dig at this, and ask me to keep quiet? They must look into their own doings before commenting.' On April 22, when the news of a terrorist group killing about 26 tourists in the Baisaran meadows of Pahalgam came in light, the entire nation went in shock. This sparked several reactions from Indians. Many actors, politicians and internet personalities went on to condemn this act and demanded justice. Similarly, veteran lyricist-writer gave a powerful speech at Gauravshaali Maharashtra Mahotsav. Speaking at the event, Javed Akhtar said, 'Yeh baat humein bhulni nahi chahiye, yeh mamooli baat nahi hai. (We shouldn't forget this).' Following his speech, Pakistani actress Bushra Ansari attacked him on social media and said, 'Humare writer so-called, unko toh bahana hi chahiye tha. Actually, unko toh makaan kiraaye pe nahi milta tha Bombay mein (Our so called writer is even refused a flat in Mumbai).' She added, 'Chaloji chup karjaaye aap. Naseeruddin Shah bhi toh hai, who chup baithe hai na? Aur bhi toh chup baithe hai na? Jiske dil mein jo hai who rakkha rahe. (Please stay quiet just like Naseeruddin Shah. Others are also quiet, you too be quiet please).'
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Arizona: Explosive report claims drama professor accused of forcing student to undress onstage, watch porn
Arizona: Explosive report claims drama professor accused of forcing student to undress onstage, watch porn. (Pic credit: MCC website) A shocking investigative report by the Arizona Republic has unveiled disturbing allegations against a drama professor at Mesa Community College, Mace Archer, 56, who is accused of coercing students to strip, flirting, and exposing them to pornography during class. School officials have launched an investigation into the claims, though students assert their complaints were ignored for months before the probe. According to the report, students in Archer's drama class maintained a shared file documenting two years of alleged "sexual depravity." This file reportedly contains over a dozen anonymous accusations. Among the most unsettling allegations are claims that Archer coached a student to "dive into" her personal experience of sexual assault for performance purposes and, in another alleged incident, straddled a student during a "demonstration." He is also accused of playing "orgy porn" videos for his students. Most disturbingly, Archer is alleged to have coerced three female students, some of whom were still teenagers, into taking off their clothes on stage. Under the guise of "vulnerability exercises" for midterms, students were reportedly forced to strip down to their underwear or go completely nude in front of Archer and their classmates. A student in Archer's class, told the Republic that the purpose of the midterm was for students to face their fears, not to end up nude. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo However, she and other female students claim Archer made it precisely about that. "On the first day, two women stripped down to their underwear. The person who got naked was on the second day," the student recounted. "We all knew what to expect." She described the scene of one student stripping silently, "She was just silent. She just took her clothes off. People were kind of shocked, but it was silent. No music, no talking, nothing." The student was one of approximately 16 students in a second-level acting class taught by Archer, which she said was intended to test the limits of students' fear. While school officials would not confirm to the Arizona Republic whether encouraging or watching students undress in an acting class constituted an explicit policy violation, the publication noted that school rules prohibit "any unwelcome conduct that a reasonable person would find so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it denies a person equal educational access." Administrators for Maricopa Community Colleges, the district overseeing Mesa Community College, declined interview requests from the Arizona Republic. Lindsey Wilson, a spokesperson for the district, said in a May 19 email, "Because this is an active personnel matter, we cannot provide specific details to protect the privacy of those involved." Wilson added, "Our colleges take any allegations of misconduct seriously and are committed to fostering a safe, respectful, and supportive environment for students, faculty, and staff," assuring that appropriate action would be taken based on the investigation's outcome. The Mesa Police Department confirmed it is not currently investigating the accusations.
