Demonising Algeria With the Scarecrow of 'Iran's Strategic Ally'
These interpretations have even reached the point of placing Algeria in the position of siding with Tehran, considering it a strategic ally. This is promoted by the French, Zionist, and Moroccan media. These media outlets have published a series of articles, such as the French newspaper Le Point and the Zionist Jerusalem Post. France 24 has also opened platforms on what has been described as Algeria's public 'support' for Iran.
These articles and analyses are not based on factual data or real information. Quite the contrary, they all rely on a superficial, untrue reading of Algeria's positions on the Iranian-Zionist conflict. Algeria's position on the US strikes on Iran was no more strident than the statements issued by the foreign ministries of many Arab countries. Algerian foreign ministry statements emphasise the need to respect international law, rather than glorifying Iranian strikes.
In the same context, Algeria's position is consistent with the principles of international law, particularly regarding the so-called 'preventive war,' which is internationally prohibited and rejected by the United Nations. Algeria's actions are merely a call to uphold international law and the need to apply the same principle regarding the non-subjection of Israeli nuclear facilities to international oversight, unlike Tehran, which cooperates closely with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), before its recent suspension.
Therefore, this classification campaign is not based on any political, economic, or even security data. Rather, it falls within a media scheme woven by Zionist-Makhzen intelligence agencies, aimed at 'demonising Algeria.' This is just as the same forces and mouthpieces sought to spread the slander claiming that 'Algerian soldiers' were among those killed in the Zionist bombing of Iran. This scenario is completely similar to the disgraceful story produced by Moroccan intelligence agencies—with Zionist planning—regarding the dispatch of Algerians to fight in Syria alongside Bashar al-Assad's forces. This was followed by the same mouthpieces releasing a new story about the presence of Algerians alongside the M23 movement in the Congo. This is essentially the same propaganda, misinformation and lobbying used in a project targeting Algeria.
The publisher of the story about the presence of 'Algerian soldiers' in Iran simply ignores the fact that Algeria and Iran have no military agreements or treaties, neither with training nor with military exercises, nor the exchange of official visits between military leaders. Thus, Iran is the only country with which Algeria has formal relations, and with which Algeria has not concluded any military agreements.
Politically, Algeria's international positions differ from Iran's on some issues, as do the relations that bind Algeria to many countries. This is based on the principle of taking into account each country's interests. This is not limited to a specific country. For example, Iran, to clarify this point, has never officially declared its support for Western Sahara in its struggle for independence. Iran has adopted an ambiguous position on this issue in official diplomatic forums, particularly within the United Nations' decolonisation commissions.
Understanding Algerian-Iranian relations requires examining the reality of the bilateral partnership in all areas. In the economic field, Algeria has not concluded any agreements with Iran, nor has the joint commission held any meetings to discuss economic cooperation between the two countries. Trade exchanges are nonexistent.
In light of this, observers believe that Algerian-Iranian relations do not rise to the level of an ally and that Algeria's positions on events in the region are in line with its positions, principles, and doctrine in foreign policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
El Chorouk
2 days ago
- El Chorouk
Paris Seeks Alternative Diplomatic Ways With Algeria
The French authorities have resorted to alternative diplomacy to preserve their remaining interests in Algeria, which have suffered unprecedented damage since the outbreak of the crisis between the two countries following France's shift in position on the Sahara issue, resulting in a decline in diplomatic representation to the level of chargé d'affaires. This refers to parliamentary activity, which is considered complementary and sometimes transforms, as in the current situation between Algeria and Paris, into an alternative diplomacy, given the severing of official ties. This was embodied by the visit of the French Senator Akli Mellouli and National Assembly MP, Sabrina Sebaihi, to Algeria. Akli Mellouli serves as Vice-Chair of the Foreign Affairs and Armed Forces Committee in the upper house of the French Parliament and Vice-Chair of the Algerian-French Friendship Group. MP Sabrina Sebaihi is a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee in the lower house of the French Parliament and Vice-Chair of the Algerian-French Friendship Group. The two parliamentarians were received by Michel Bisac, President of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry at the French Embassy in Algeria. In a post on his LinkedIn account on Wednesday, July 23, 2025, the CCIF President welcomed his guests and spoke of a 'useful and constructive exchange with member business leaders on prospects for developing and strengthening economic relations between the two countries.' Both Akli Mellouli and Sabrina Sebaihi are considered moderate political voices in France. They advocate for respecting Algeria and maintaining stable relations with it, to preserve bridges of communication and safeguard the intertwined social ties between the two shores of the Mediterranean. The visit of the French elected officials comes at a time of great complexity in relations between Algeria and Paris, which have been ongoing for exactly a year, following weeks of renewed political and media controversy between the two countries. The latest was the escalating measures announced by the French Foreign Ministry regarding diplomatic portfolios, a measure to which Algeria responded with another measure based on the principle of reciprocity established in diplomatic norms. This is not the first time French politicians have resorted to this approach in an attempt to de-escalate tensions with Algeria and preserve, as much as possible, Paris's economic and cultural interests in Algeria. However, these attempts have so far failed miserably, due to the depth of the crisis that has shaken relations between the two capitals. More than two weeks ago, Sébastien Delogu, MP representing the La France Insoumise party, visited Algeria. His political stance, which called on the far right to avoid harming bilateral relations to preserve Paris' interests, led to a racist campaign by those political circles. Upon his return to Paris, he denounced the campaign in a post on X. MP Sébastien Delogu wrote: 'In line with the unprecedented attacks launched by the right and the far right to create conflict in French-Algerian relations, I was immediately attacked, to exploit my visit (to Algeria), ridiculing me, and distorting my presence there.' He emphasized that 'the shared memory between us and the Algerian people must prompt us to envision a future based on the principles of respect, equality, and brotherhood between our peoples.' The French parliamentarians' visit to Algeria is not expected to help calm the escalating tensions between the two countries. This is because the decision-making power in the French state is no longer controlled by the Elysée Palace, as it is supposed to be, but by unconstitutional forces surrounding it. This is what Bruno Retailleau, Interior Minister in François Bayrou's government, is keen to implement. As is known, he has caused a new diplomatic crisis, about which the Quai d'Orsay Palace said that it was not consulted, in a caricatured scene that sums up the situation that a country like France has reached.
El Chorouk
3 days ago
- El Chorouk
The Moroccan Regime Is At War To Target Algeria's Memory.
The Moroccan regime, with meticulous planning from the Royal Palace, is waging a war on Algerian memory, enlisting pseudo-historians to try and undermine one of the symbolic pillars of the revolution. This targeting also extended to a prominent French historical figure, Benjamin Stora, simply because this historian did not align with the expansionist theses of the Moroccan regime and its fifth column arms. This campaign is planned from within the Palace, and the tool is 'Al-360' newspaper, owned by Mounir Madjidi, the private secretary of Moroccan King Mohammed VI. It has consistently provided a platform for a French individual who claims to be a historian, named Bernard Lugan, who writes nothing but attacks on Algeria's history or casts doubt on its borders, precisely in line with the expansionist thesis of the Alawi regime, which knows no path to the honor of resistance and defending the nation's movement. The latest chapter of what the 'spokesperson' newspaper for the Palace wrote, penned by this alleged historian on Tuesday, July 29, 2025, was an attempt to target a pivotal historical moment in the history of the Liberation Revolution, namely the Soummam Congress. Its author, a mercenary Frenchman, tried to sow discord among the revolution's men, the makers of independence, accusing them of liquidating each other. These are illusions that French colonialism tried to exploit during the glorious Liberation Revolution to detonate it from within, but it failed. The Alawi Palace, through its article titled: 'The Soummam Congress… or what another Algeria could have been,' tried to give the impression that the imprisonment of the Franco-Algerian writer, Boualem Sansal, was due to the latter daring to repeat words that even the French themselves did not say, regarding the borders, and by accusing the men of the Liberation Revolution of being terrorists, as Sansal once said with utter impudence and baseness. What is striking is that the Alawi Palace's targeting, through its media arm, even extended to a globally recognized academic figure, particularly in France, the historian Benjamin Stora. Mounir Majidi, the private secretary of Moroccan King Mohammed VI, as its de facto editor-in-chief, did not hesitate to describe Stora as a 'charlatan in the service of Algeria.' The newspaper dedicated a lengthy article to the French historian, Benjamin Stora, describing him with the most heinous terms and using phrases inspired by the theocratic spirit of the Moroccan regime, evoked from the darkness of the Middle Ages: 'Benjamin Stora dreamed of being the hero of the great Franco-Algerian reconciliation, but he became its gravedigger.' And because Stora exposed many of the theses promoted by the Moroccan regime through some of its pawns, including the Franco-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal, he became a target for the Alawi Palace, which now acts as if it is more French than the French. In the view of the 'media spokesperson' for the Alawi Palace, Benjamin Stora 'finds himself rejected by France, which is tired of his Algerian patriotism and his lack of sympathy in the Sansal case.' However, the reason for the Moroccan regime's focused targeting of historian Benjamin Stora and its attempt to tarnish his image is no longer hidden from any observer. The historian, who is highly regarded in academic, media, and political circles in France, directly refuted the border thesis promoted by the Alawi regime on French public television. This brought him the wrath of the Alawi kingdom and its allies from Zionist and far-right circles in France. It is worth noting here the devastating response launched by Stora from a French television studio, refuting what Boualem Sansal had repeated, when he said that Tlemcen, which Sansal considers part of Morocco, gave birth to the father of the national movement in Algeria, Messali Hadj, and Mascara, which Sansal also attributed to the western neighbor, gave birth to the founder of the modern Algerian state, Emir Abdelkader El Djezairi. These statements shook the foundations of French propaganda as it tried to portray Sansal as a victim of freedom of expression, only to reveal that he is merely a mouthpiece in a fifth column, working for a regime devoid of honor and knowing no path to the values of sovereignty.
El Chorouk
4 days ago
- El Chorouk
The Moroccan Regime In A Frantic Bid To Circumvent European Justice
The Moroccan regime is making frantic efforts to convince the member states of the European Union to circumvent the decision of the European Court of Justice issued on October 4, 2024, in anticipation of the end of the deadline set by the European Court, which is one year, coinciding with October 4, 2025. The final and conclusive decision of the European Court of Justice gave the member states of the Union one year to enable the concerned companies to manage their affairs before the definitive cessation of work on three trade agreements related to agriculture and fisheries between the Moroccan regime and the European Union. After one year, Europeans are prohibited from importing any agricultural or fishery product originating from the occupied Western Sahara, provided that its source is Morocco, based on the European Court's decision which considers Western Sahara a territory not covered by Moroccan sovereignty. In this regard, Moroccan media reports spoke of strenuous efforts being made by the foreign minister of the Alawi regime, through which he is playing his last possible cards to dissuade the European side from the decision to cease work on the agriculture and fisheries agreements between Rabat and Brussels. It quoted a statement by Bourita saying that 'the problem' exists at the European level and not at the Moroccan regime's level, and that Rabat will not agree to any trade partnership that does not include the territories of the occupied Western Sahara. Bourita called on the European Union to 'establish partnership with Morocco and defend it against blackmail and legal and economic harassment,' indicating that the ball is now in Brussels' court. He stated that the Kingdom 'is watching how the European Union will deal with these provocations, through the measures and policies it will take to deal with this reality.' According to Rabat's foreign minister, as stated on the Moroccan website 'Al-Sahifa', Rabat expects the European side to 'establish partnership with Morocco and defend it against blackmail and legal harassment,' indicating that the Moroccan regime does not recognize the sovereign decision of the European Court of Justice, which ruled in a final and unappealable decision that the Kingdom of Morocco has no sovereignty over the Sahrawi territories. Commenting on the desperate Moroccan maneuvers, diplomat Mostafa Zaghlash, in communication with 'Al-Shorouk', believes that the Moroccan regime is trying to exert pressure through political leverage to circumvent the decision of justice, which is a well-known behavior, indicating that Rabat does not differentiate between political and judicial, despite its awareness that the two authorities are governed by an unalterable constitutional principle. Mostafa Zaghlash says: 'The European Commission represents the executive branch of the European Union (governments), while the European Court of Justice is an independent judicial entity not subject to political influence on its decisions, as evidenced by the court's decision issued about a year ago, contrary to the orientations of a number of European governments, which called for maintaining the fisheries and agriculture agreements.' He added: 'The decision originates from a judicial body and the problem originates from an executive body. However, the judiciary does not view the cases it handles with the same approach that governments advocate. There are considerations that strengthen the judiciary's position, such as the United Nations considering the Sahrawi territory as a territory under the authority of a colonial power with duties, including protecting the resources of this territory, which should be enjoyed by the people who inhabit it.' Therefore, the party that may be involved in violating the decision of justice will be subject to legal accountability, says diplomat Mostafa Zaghlash, whether it is an executive political body or a company that benefited from the agreement. He gave an example of the accountability faced by the Hungarian government, following the human rights violations in that country due to the mistreatment of migrants, because there is a law in the Union that emphasizes the protection of human rights. The most dangerous weapon that can be used against the party that violates the decision of European justice is the weapon of financial aid from which the Moroccan regime benefits, because the European Union spends billions of euros in the form of funding for some sectors of economic activity in Morocco, says the diplomat, at a time when Rabat is in dire need of it. The weapon of justice also remains activatable at any moment, whether by the Sahrawi government or by European associations and organizations active in the field of human rights, against any government or company that may try to violate the decision of justice, which makes the mission of the Moroccan regime's foreign minister merely desperate attempts to circumvent a reality imposed by unalterable decisions.
